Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Probing the Lμ−Lτ gauge boson at the MUonE experiment

Kento Asai1,*, Koichi Hamaguchi2,3,†, Natsumi Nagata2,‡, Shih-Yen Tseng2,§, and Juntaro Wada2,∥

  • 1Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Saitama University, Sakura-ku, Saitama 338–8570, Japan
  • 2Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113–0033, Japan
  • 3Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (Kavli IPMU), University of Tokyo, Kashiwa 277–8583, Japan

  • *asai@krishna.th.phy.saitama-u.ac.jp
  • †hama@hep-th.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
  • ‡natsumi@hep-th.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
  • §shihyen@hep-th.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
  • ∥wada@hep-th.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. D 106, L051702 – Published 27 September, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.L051702

Abstract

We discuss the prospects of probing the Lμ−Lτ gauge boson at the MUonE experiment. The Lμ−Lτ gauge boson Z′ with a mass of ≲200  MeV, which can explain the discrepancy between the measured value of the muon g−2 and the value calculated in the Standard Model, can be produced at the MUonE experiment through the process μe→μeZ′. The Z′ in the final state decays into a pair of neutrinos, and therefore we cannot observe the decay of Z′ directly. It is, however, still possible to probe this signature by searching for events with a large scattering angle of muon and a less energetic final-state electron. The background events coming from the elastic scattering μe→μe as well as radiative process μe→μeγ can be removed by the kinematical cuts on the muon scattering angle and the electron energy, in addition to a photon veto. The background events from the electroweak process μe→μeνν¯ are negligible. With our selection criteria, the number of signal events μe→μeZ′ is found to be as large as ∼103, assuming an integrated luminosity of 15  fb−1, in the parameter region motivated by the muon g−2 discrepancy. It is, therefore, quite feasible to probe the Lμ−Lτ gauge boson at the MUonE experiment—without introducing additional devices—and we strongly recommend recording the events relevant to this Z′ production process.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (93)

  1. Muon g-2 Collaboration, Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 141801 (2021).
  2. Muon g-2 Collaboration, Final report of the muon E821 anomalous magnetic moment measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73, 072003 (2006).
  3. T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model, Phys. Rep. 887, 1 (2020).
  4. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu, and Z. Zhang, Reevaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the Standard Model predictions of the muon g−2 and α(mZ2) using newest hadronic cross-section data, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 827 (2017).
  5. A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura, and T. Teubner, Muon g−2 and α(MZ2): A new data-based analysis, Phys. Rev. D 97, 114025 (2018).
  6. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, and P. Stoffer, Two-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 006.
  7. M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, and B. Kubis, Three-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2019) 137.
  8. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu, and Z. Zhang, A new evaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment and to α(mZ2), Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 241 (2020); 80, 410(E) (2020).
  9. A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura, and T. Teubner, The g−2 of charged leptons, α(MZ2) and the hyperfine splitting of muonium, Phys. Rev. D 101, 014029 (2020).
  10. A. Kurz, T. Liu, P. Marquard, and M. Steinhauser, Hadronic contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment to next-to-next-to-leading order, Phys. Lett. B 734, 144 (2014).
  11. S. Borsanyi et al., Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD, Nature (London) 593, 51 (2021).
  12. G. Abbiendi, C. M. Carloni Calame, U. Marconi, C. Matteuzzi, G. Montagna, O. Nicrosini, M. Passera, F. Piccinini, R. Tenchini, L. Trentadue, and G. Venanzoni, Measuring the leading hadronic contribution to the muon g-2 via μe scattering, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 139 (2017).
  13. G. Abbiendi et al., Letter of intent: The MUonE project (2019), https://cds.cern.ch/record/2677471.
  14. C. M. Carloni Calame, M. Passera, L. Trentadue, and G. Venanzoni, A new approach to evaluate the leading hadronic corrections to the muon g−2, Phys. Lett. B 746, 325 (2015).
  15. MUonE Collaboration, Status of the MUonE experiment, Proc. Sci. ICHEP2020 (2021) 223 [arXiv:2012.07016].
  16. G. Venanzoni, Status of MUonE and RadioMonteCarLow (+Strong2020) activities, https://agenda.hepl.phys.nagoya-u.ac.jp/indico/getFile.py/access?contribId=16&sessionId=4&resId=0&xcmaterialId=slides&confId=1691. Muon g-2 theory initiative workshop in memoriam Simon Eidelman, 2021.
  17. R. Foot, New physics from electric charge quantization?, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 06, 527 (1991).
  18. X. G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew, and R. R. Volkas, New Z-prime phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 43, R22 (1991).
  19. X.-G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew, and R. R. Volkas, Simplest Z-prime model, Phys. Rev. D 44, 2118 (1991).
  20. R. Foot, X. G. He, H. Lew, and R. R. Volkas, Model for a light Z-prime boson, Phys. Rev. D 50, 4571 (1994).
  21. K. Asai, K. Hamaguchi, and N. Nagata, Predictions for the neutrino parameters in the minimal gauged U(1)Lμ−Lτ model, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 763 (2017).
  22. K. Asai, K. Hamaguchi, N. Nagata, S.-Y. Tseng, and K. Tsumura, Minimal gauged U(1)Lα−Lβ models driven into a corner, Phys. Rev. D 99, 055029 (2019).
  23. K. Asai, Predictions for the neutrino parameters in the minimal model extended by linear combination of U(1)Le−Lμ, U(1)Lμ−Lτ and U(1)B−L gauge symmetries, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 76 (2020).
  24. K. Asai, K. Hamaguchi, N. Nagata, and S.-Y. Tseng, Leptogenesis in the minimal gauged U(1)Lμ−Lτ model and the sign of the cosmological baryon asymmetry, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2020) 013.
  25. G. C. Branco, W. Grimus, and L. Lavoura, The seesaw mechanism in the presence of a conserved lepton number, Nucl. Phys. B312, 492 (1989).
  26. S. Choubey and W. Rodejohann, A Flavor symmetry for quasi-degenerate neutrinos: L(mu)—L(tau), Eur. Phys. J. C 40, 259 (2005).
  27. T. Araki, J. Heeck, and J. Kubo, Vanishing minors in the neutrino mass matrix from Abelian gauge symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2012) 083.
  28. J. Heeck Ph. D. thesis, Heidelberg University, 2014.
  29. A. Crivellin, G. D’Ambrosio, and J. Heeck, Addressing the LHC flavor anomalies with horizontal gauge symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 91, 075006 (2015).
  30. R. Plestid, Consequences of an Abelian Z′ for neutrino oscillations and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 93, 035011 (2016).
  31. S. Baek, N. G. Deshpande, X. G. He, and P. Ko, Muon anomalous g-2 and gauged L(muon)—L(tau) models, Phys. Rev. D 64, 055006 (2001).
  32. E. Ma, D. P. Roy, and S. Roy, Gauged L(mu)—L(tau) with large muon anomalous magnetic moment and the bimaximal mixing of neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 525, 101 (2002).
  33. J. Heeck and W. Rodejohann, Gauged Lμ−Lτ symmetry at the electroweak scale, Phys. Rev. D 84, 075007 (2011).
  34. K. Harigaya, T. Igari, M. M. Nojiri, M. Takeuchi, and K. Tobe, Muon g-2 and LHC phenomenology in the Lμ−Lτ gauge symmetric model, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2014) 105.
  35. W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, M. Pospelov, and I. Yavin, Neutrino Trident Production: A Powerful Probe of New Physics with Neutrino Beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 091801 (2014).
  36. T. Araki, F. Kaneko, Y. Konishi, T. Ota, J. Sato, and T. Shimomura, Cosmic neutrino spectrum and the muon anomalous magnetic moment in the gauged Lμ−Lτ model, Phys. Rev. D 91, 037301 (2015).
  37. A. Kamada and H.-B. Yu, Coherent propagation of PeV neutrinos and the dip in the neutrino spectrum at IceCube, Phys. Rev. D 92, 113004 (2015).
  38. T. Araki, F. Kaneko, T. Ota, J. Sato, and T. Shimomura, MeV scale leptonic force for cosmic neutrino spectrum and muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. D 93, 013014 (2016).
  39. S. Baek, Dark matter and muon (g−2) in local U(1)Lμ−Lτ-extended Ma Model, Phys. Lett. B 756, 1 (2016).
  40. K. Fuyuto, W.-S. Hou, and M. Kohda, Z’ -induced FCNC decays of top, beauty, and strange quarks, Phys. Rev. D 93, 054021 (2016).
  41. S. Patra, S. Rao, N. Sahoo, and N. Sahu, Gauged U(1)Lμ−Lτ model in light of muon g−2 anomaly, neutrino mass and dark matter phenomenology, Nucl. Phys. B917, 317 (2017).
  42. A. Biswas, S. Choubey, and S. Khan, Neutrino mass, dark matter and anomalous magnetic moment of muon in a U(1)Lμ−Lτ model, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2016) 147.
  43. M. Ibe, W. Nakano, and M. Suzuki, Constraints on Lμ−Lτ gauge interactions from rare kaon decay, Phys. Rev. D 95, 055022 (2017).
  44. A. Biswas, S. Choubey, and S. Khan, FIMP and muon (g−2) in a U(1)Lμ−Lτ model, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2017) 123.
  45. Y. Kaneta and T. Shimomura, On the possibility of a search for the Lμ−Lτ gauge boson at Belle-II and neutrino beam experiments, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2017, 053B04 (2017).
  46. T. Araki, S. Hoshino, T. Ota, J. Sato, and T. Shimomura, Detecting the Lμ−Lτ gauge boson at Belle II, Phys. Rev. D 95, 055006 (2017).
  47. C.-H. Chen and T. Nomura, Lμ−Lτ gauge-boson production from lepton flavor violating τ decays at Belle II, Phys. Rev. D 96, 095023 (2017).
  48. S. N. Gninenko and N. V. Krasnikov, Probing the muon gμ—2 anomaly, Lμ−Lτ gauge boson and dark matter in dark photon experiments, Phys. Lett. B 783, 24 (2018).
  49. T. Nomura and T. Shimomura, Searching for scalar boson decaying into light Z′ boson at collider experiments in U(1)Lμ−Lτ model, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 594 (2019).
  50. M. Bauer, P. Foldenauer, and J. Jaeckel, Hunting all the hidden photons, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 094.
  51. A. Kamada, K. Kaneta, K. Yanagi, and H.-B. Yu, Self-interacting dark matter and muon g−2 in a gauged U(1)Lμ−Lτ model, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2018) 117.
  52. H. Banerjee, P. Byakti, and S. Roy, Supersymmetric gauged U(1)Lμ−Lτ model for neutrinos and the muon (g−2) anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 98, 075022 (2018).
  53. A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, and P. Schmidt-Wellenburg, Combined explanations of (g−2)μ,e and implications for a large muon EDM, Phys. Rev. D 98, 113002 (2018).
  54. P. Foldenauer, Light dark matter in a gauged U(1)Lμ−Lτ model, Phys. Rev. D 99, 035007 (2019).
  55. H. Banerjee and S. Roy, Signatures of supersymmetry and Lμ−Lτ gauge bosons at Belle-II, Phys. Rev. D 99, 035035 (2019).
  56. M. Escudero, D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic, and M. Pierre, Cosmology with a very light Lμ−Lτ gauge boson, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 071.
  57. W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, J. Martín-Albo, A. Sousa, and M. Wallbank, Neutrino tridents at DUNE, Phys. Rev. D 100, 115029 (2019).
  58. G. Krnjaic, G. Marques-Tavares, D. Redigolo, and K. Tobioka, Probing Muonphilic Force Carriers and Dark Matter at Kaon Factories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 041802 (2020).
  59. P. Ballett, M. Hostert, S. Pascoli, Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, Z. Tabrizi, and R. Zukanovich Funchal, Z′s in neutrino scattering at DUNE, Phys. Rev. D 100, 055012 (2019).
  60. A. Biswas and A. Shaw, Reconciling dark matter, RK(*) anomalies and (g−2)μ in an Lμ−Lτ scenario, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2019) 165.
  61. D. W. P. d. Amaral, D. G. Cerdeno, P. Foldenauer, and E. Reid, Solar neutrino probes of the muon anomalous magnetic moment in the gauged U(1)Lμ−Lτ, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2020) 155.
  62. D. Borah, S. Mahapatra, D. Nanda, and N. Sahu, Inelastic fermion dark matter origin of XENON1T excess with muon (g−2) and light neutrino mass, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135933 (2020).
  63. T. Shimomura and Y. Uesaka, Kinematical distributions of coherent neutrino trident production in gauged Lμ−Lτ model, Phys. Rev. D 103, 035022 (2021).
  64. K. Asai, S. Okawa, and K. Tsumura, Search for U(1)Lμ−Lτ charged dark matter with neutrino telescope, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 047.
  65. H. Banerjee, B. Dutta, and S. Roy, Supersymmetric gauged U(1)Lμ−Lτ model for electron and muon (g−2) anomaly, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 211.
  66. Y. Zhang, Z. Yu, Q. Yang, M. Song, G. Li, and R. Ding, Probing the Lμ−Lτ gauge boson at electron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 103, 015008 (2021).
  67. G.-y. Huang, F. S. Queiroz, and W. Rodejohann, Gauged Lμ−Lτ at a muon collider, Phys. Rev. D 103, 095005 (2021).
  68. T. Araki, K. Asai, K. Honda, R. Kasuya, J. Sato, T. Shimomura, and M. J. S. Yang, Resolving the Hubble tension in a U(1)Lμ−Lτ model with Majoron, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 103 (2021).
  69. H. Banerjee, B. Dutta, and S. Roy, Probing Lμ−Lτ models with CEνNS: A new look at the combined COHERENT CsI and Ar data, Phys. Rev. D 104, 015015 (2021).
  70. D. W. P. Amaral, D. G. Cerdeño, A. Cheek, and P. Foldenauer, Distinguishing U(1)Lμ−Lτ from U(1)Lμ as a solution for (g−2)μ with neutrinos, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 861 (2021).
  71. L. Zu, X. Pan, L. Feng, Q. Yuan, and Y.-Z. Fan, Constraining U(1)Lμ−Lτ charged dark matter model for muon g−2 anomaly with AMS-02 electron and positron data, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2022) 028.
  72. D. Borah, M. Dutta, S. Mahapatra, and N. Sahu, Muon (g−2) and XENON1T excess with boosted dark matter in Lμ−Lτ model, Phys. Lett. B 820, 136577 (2021).
  73. S. Zhou, Neutrino masses, leptonic flavor mixing and muon (g−2) in the seesaw model with the U(1)Lμ−Lτ gauge symmetry, Chin. Phys. C 46, 011001 (2022).
  74. J. A. Carpio, K. Murase, I. M. Shoemaker, and Z. Tabrizi, High-energy cosmic neutrinos as a probe of the vector mediator scenario in light of the muon g−2 anomaly and Hubble tension, arXiv:2104.15136.
  75. X. Qi, A. Yang, W. Liu, and H. Sun, Scalar dark matter and Muon g−2 in a U(1)Lμ−Lτ model, Chin. Phys. C 46, 083102 (2022).
  76. D. Borah, A. Dasgupta, and D. Mahanta, TeV scale resonant leptogenesis with Lμ−Lτ gauge symmetry in the light of muon (g−2), Phys. Rev. D 104, 075006 (2021).
  77. A. Greljo, Y. Soreq, P. Stangl, A. E. Thomsen, and J. Zupan, Muonic force behind flavor anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2022) 151.
  78. I. Holst, D. Hooper, and G. Krnjaic, The Simplest and Most Predictive Model of Muon g−2 and Thermal Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 141802 (2022).
  79. M. Drees and W. Zhao, U(1)Lμ−Lτ for light dark matter, gμ−2, the 511 keV excess and the Hubble tension, Phys. Lett. B 827, 136948 (2022).
  80. T. Hapitas, D. Tuckler, and Y. Zhang, General kinetic mixing in gauged U(1)Lμ−Lτ model for muon g−2 and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 105, 016014 (2022).
  81. D. Borah, M. Dutta, S. Mahapatra, and N. Sahu, Lepton anomalous magnetic moment with singlet-doublet fermion dark matter in scotogenic U(1)Lμ−Lτ model, Phys. Rev. D 105, 015029 (2022).
  82. U. Schubert and C. Williams, Interplay between SM precision, BSM physics, and the measurements of α had in αhad in μ−e scattering, Phys. Rev. D 100, 035030 (2019).
  83. P. S. B. Dev, W. Rodejohann, X.-J. Xu, and Y. Zhang, MUonE sensitivity to new physics explanations of the muon anomalous magnetic moment, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 053.
  84. A. Masiero, P. Paradisi, and M. Passera, New physics at the MUonE experiment at CERN, Phys. Rev. D 102, 075013 (2020).
  85. N. D. Christensen and C. Duhr, FeynRules—Feynman rules made easy, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 1614 (2009).
  86. A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0—A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2250 (2014).
  87. J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H.-S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.
  88. BABAR Collaboration, Search for a muonic dark force at BABAR, Phys. Rev. D 94, 011102 (2016).
  89. T. Czank et al., Search for Z′→μ+μ− in the Lμ−Lτ gauge-symmetric model at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 106, 012003 (2022).
  90. G. Bellini et al., Precision Measurement of the 7Be Solar Neutrino Interaction Rate in Borexino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 141302 (2011).
  91. CHARM-II Collaboration, First observation of neutrino trident production, Phys. Lett. B 245, 271 (1990).
  92. CCFR Collaboration, Neutrino Tridents and W Z Interference, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3117 (1991).
  93. H. Sieber, D. Banerjee, P. Crivelli, E. Depero, S. N. Gninenko, D.  V. Kirpichnikov, M.  M. Kirsanov, V. Poliakov, and L. Molina Bueno, Prospects in the search for a new light Z’ boson with the NA64μ experiment at the CERN SPS, Phys. Rev. D 105, 052006 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation