Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Anomalous diffusion in QCD matter

Paul Caucal1,* and Yacine Mehtar-Tani1,2,†

  • 1Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
  • 2RIKEN BNL Research Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA

  • *pcaucal@bnl.gov
  • †mehtartani@bnl.gov

Phys. Rev. D 106, L051501 – Published 12 September, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.L051501

Abstract

We study the effects of quantum corrections on transverse momentum broadening of a fast parton passing through dense QCD matter. We show that, at leading logarithmic accuracy the broadening distribution tends at late times or equivalently for large system sizes L to a universal distribution that only depends on a single scaling variable kT2/Qs2 where the typical transverse momentum scale increases with time as ln Qs2≃(1+2β)ln L−32(1+β)ln ln L up to nonuniversal terms, with an anomalous dimension β∼αs. This property is analogous to geometric scaling of gluon distributions in the saturation regime and traveling-wave solutions to reaction-diffusion processes. We note that since β>0 the process is super-diffusive, which is also reflected at large transverse momentum where the scaling distribution exhibits a heavy tail kT−4+2β akin to Lévy random walks.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (62)

  1. J.-P. Blaizot and Y. Mehtar-Tani, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24, 1530012 (2015).
  2. G.-Y. Qin and X.-N. Wang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24, 1530014 (2015).
  3. L. N. Lipatov, Phys. Rep. 286, 131 (1997).
  4. F. Gelis, E. Iancu, J. Jalilian-Marian, and R. Venugopalan, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60, 463 (2010).
  5. J. L. Albacete and C. Marquet, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 76, 1 (2014).
  6. R. Baier, Y. L. Dokshitzer, A. H. Mueller, S. Peigne, and D. Schiff, Nucl. Phys. B484, 265 (1997).
  7. B. G. Zakharov, JETP Lett. 63, 952 (1996).
  8. R. Baier, Y. L. Dokshitzer, A. H. Mueller, S. Peigne, and D. Schiff, Nucl. Phys. B483, 291 (1997).
  9. B. G. Zakharov, JETP Lett. 65, 615 (1997).
  10. T. Liou, A. H. Mueller, and B. Wu, Nucl. Phys. A916, 102 (2013).
  11. J.-P. Blaizot, F. Dominguez, E. Iancu, and Y. Mehtar-Tani, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2014) 075.
  12. J.-P. Blaizot and Y. Mehtar-Tani, Nucl. Phys. A929, 202 (2014).
  13. E. Iancu, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2014) 095.
  14. E. Iancu, P. Taels, and B. Wu, Phys. Lett. B 786, 288 (2018).
  15. G. Dee and J. Langer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 383 (1983).
  16. W. Van Saarloos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2571 (1987).
  17. S. Munier and R. B. Peschanski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 232001 (2003).
  18. U. Ebert and W. van Saarloos, Physica (Amsterdam) 146D, 199 (2000).
  19. W. Van Saarloos, Phys. Rep. 386, 29222 (2003).
  20. G. M. Viswanathan, V. Afanasyev, S. V. Buldyrev, E. Murphy, P. Prince, and H. E. Stanley, Nature (London) 381, 413 (1996).
  21. A. M. Edwards, R. A. Phillips, N. W. Watkins, M. P. Freeman, E. J. Murphy, V. Afanasyev, S. V. Buldyrev, M. G. da Luz, E. P. Raposo, H. E. Stanley et al., Nature (London) 449, 1044 (2007).
  22. G. Zumofen and J. Klafter, Chem. Phys. Lett. 219, 303 (1994).
  23. H. Katori, S. Schlipf, and H. Walther, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2221 (1997).
  24. M. F. Shlesinger, G. M. Zaslavsky, and J. Klafter, Nature (London) 363, 31 (1993).
  25. M. F. Shlesinger, G. M. Zaslavsky, and U. Frisch, Lévy Flights and Related Topics in Physics (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1995), Vol. 450, 10.1007/3-540-59222-9.
  26. P. Bak, C. Tang, and K. Wiesenfeld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 381 (1987).
  27. P. Bak, C. Tang, and K. Wiesenfeld, Phys. Rev. A 38, 364 (1988).
  28. Y. V. Kovchegov and E. Levin, Quantum Chromodynamics at High Energy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2012), Vol. 33.
  29. F. D’Eramo, H. Liu, and K. Rajagopal, Phys. Rev. D 84, 065015 (2011).
  30. We use bold type for two dimensional transverse vectors and note aT=|a⊥|.

  31. μ2 can be obtained from the hard thermal loop value of the collision rate [32]. They read respectively q^0=αsNcmD2T and μ=mDe−1+γE/2 [33], with T the plasma temperature, mD the Debye mass. In our numerical results, we fix q^0 to 0.1  GeV3 and τ0=eμ2/q^0 to 0.11 fm.

  32. P. Aurenche, F. Gelis, and H. Zaraket, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2002) 043.
  33. J. a. Barata, Y. Mehtar-Tani, A. Soto-Ontoso, and K. Tywoniuk, Phys. Rev. D 104, 054047 (2021).
  34. H. Kowalski and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. D 68, 114005 (2003).
  35. T. Lappi, Phys. Lett. B 703, 325 (2011).
  36. G. Moliere, Z. Naturforsch. 3A, 78 (1948).
  37. H. A. Bethe, Phys. Rev. 89, 1256 (1953).
  38. J.-P. Blaizot and F. Dominguez, Phys. Rev. D 99, 054005 (2019).
  39. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.L051501 for more details about the numerical resolution of Eqs. (3) and (4) (the evolution equation is solved after discretization using the Euler method), the calculation of the sub-asymptotic corrections away from the wave front and the calculation of the large kT tail of the TMB distribution.
  40. E. Iancu and D. N. Triantafyllopoulos, Phys. Rev. D 90, 074002 (2014).
  41. A. H. Mueller, B. Wu, B.-W. Xiao, and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 95, 034007 (2017).
  42. A. M. Stasto, K. J. Golec-Biernat, and J. Kwiecinski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 596 (2001).
  43. E. Iancu, K. Itakura, and L. McLerran, Nucl. Phys. A708, 327 (2002).
  44. J. Kwiecinski and A. M. Stasto, Phys. Rev. D 66, 014013 (2002).
  45. I. Balitsky, Nucl. Phys. B463, 99 (1996).
  46. Y. V. Kovchegov, Phys. Rev. D 60, 034008 (1999).
  47. E. Brunet and B. Derrida, Phys. Rev. E 56, 2597 (1997).
  48. S. Munier and R. B. Peschanski, Phys. Rev. D 69, 034008 (2004).
  49. S. Munier and R. B. Peschanski, Phys. Rev. D 70, 077503 (2004).
  50. R. A. Fisher, Ann. Eugen. 7, 355 (1937).
  51. A. N. Kolmogorov, Bull. Univ. Moskow, Ser. Internat., Sec. A 1, 1 (1937).
  52. G must decay faster than a power law and be positive 2000.

  53. L. D. McLerran and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. D 49, 2233 (1994).
  54. L. D. McLerran and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. D 49, 3352 (1994).
  55. F. D’Eramo, M. Lekaveckas, H. Liu, and K. Rajagopal, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 031.
  56. F. D’Eramo, K. Rajagopal, and Y. Yin, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 172.
  57. R. Hilfer, Threefold introduction to fractional derivatives, in Anomalous Transport (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd), Chap. 2, pp. 17–73.
  58. M. Kwaśnicki, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 20, 7 (2017).
  59. A. A. Dubkov, B. Spagnolo, and V. V. Uchaikin, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 18, 2649 (2008).
  60. The unknown pre-factor is determined by a fit to the numerical result at large L.

  61. J. Klafter, A. Blumen, and M. F. Shlesinger, Phys. Rev. A 35, 3081 (1987).
  62. R. Metzler, E. Barkai, and J. Klafter, Europhys. Lett. 46, 431 (1999).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation