- Letter
- Open Access
Search for sterile neutrino oscillations using RENO and NEOS data
Phys. Rev. D 105, L111101 – Published 8 June, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.L111101
Abstract
We present a nearly reactor model independent search for sterile neutrino oscillation using 2 509 days of RENO near detector data and 180 days of NEOS data. The reactor related systematic uncertainties are significantly suppressed as both detectors are located at the same reactor complex of Hanbit Nuclear Power Plant. The search is performed by electron antineutrino () disappearance between six reactors and two detectors with flux-weighted baselines of 419 m (RENO) and 24 m (NEOS). A spectral comparison of the NEOS prompt-energy spectrum with a no-oscillation prediction from the RENO measurement can explore reactor oscillations to sterile neutrino. Based on the comparison, we obtain a 95% C.L. excluded region of . We also obtain a 68% C.L. allowed region with the best fit of and having a p-value of 8.2%. Comparisons of obtained reactor antineutrino spectra at reactor sources are made among RENO, NEOS, and Daya Bay to find a possible spectral variation.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (30)
- J. Ahn et al. (RENO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 191802 (2012).
- F. An et al. (Daya Bay Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 171803 (2012).
- Y. Abe et al. (Double Chooz Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 131801 (2012).
- C. Athanassopoulos et al. (LSND Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3082 (1996).
- A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 161801 (2013).
- W. Hampel et al. (GALLEX Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 447, 127 (1999).
- J. Abdurashitov et al. (SAGE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 60, 055801 (1999).
- J. Choi et al. (RENO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 191801 (2020).
- P. Adamson et al. (, Daya Bay Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 071801 (2020).
- Y. Ko et al. (NEOS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 121802 (2017).
- F. P. An et al. (Daya Bay Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C 41, 013002 (2017).
- P. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
- S. H. Seo et al. (RENO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 98, 012002 (2018).
- J. K. Ahn et al. (RENO Collaboration), arXiv:1003.1391.
- S. G. Yoon et al. (RENO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 104, L111301 (2021).
- G. D’Agostini, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 362, 487 (1995).
- C. L. Lawson and R. J. Hanson, Solving Least Squares Problems, Classics in Applied Mathematics (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 1995), Vol. 15, pp. xii+337, revised reprint of the 1974 original.
- P. Huber, Phys. Rev. C 84, 024617 (2011).
- T. A. Mueller, D. Lhuillier, M. Fallot, A. Letourneau, S. Cormon, M. Fechner, L. Giot, T. Lasserre, J. Martino, G. Mention, A. Porta, and F. Yermia, Phys. Rev. C 83, 054615 (2011).
- S. S. Wilks, Ann. Math. Stat. 9, 60 (1938).
- P. Coloma, P. Huber, and T. Schwetz, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 2 (2021).
- C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, C. A. Ternes, and Y. Y. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 816, 136214 (2021).
- L. Lyons, arXiv:1404.7395.
- G. Mention, M. Fechner, T. Lasserre, T. Mueller, D. Lhuillier, M. Cribier, and A. Letourneau, Phys. Rev. D 83, 073006 (2011).
- G. J. Feldman and R. D. Cousins, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3873 (1998).
- K. Abazajian et al., arXiv:1204.5379.
- H. Almazán et al. (STEREO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 102, 052002 (2020).
- J. Ashenfelter et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 251802 (2018).
- F. P. An et al. (Daya Bay Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C 45, 073001 (2021).
- See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.L111101 for details.