Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Light-nuclei gluons from dijet production in proton-oxygen collisions

Petja Paakkinen*

  • Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, E-15782 Galicia-Spain, University of Jyväskylä, Department of Physics, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland and Helsinki Institute of Physics, P.O. Box 64, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland

  • *petja.k.m.paakkinen@jyu.fi

Phys. Rev. D 105, L031504 – Published 17 February, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.L031504

Abstract

The prospects of measuring a single-differential dijet cross section during the proposed short proton-oxygen data taking at LHC Run 3 are studied using next-to-leading-order perturbative QCD predictions. With reasonable experimental cuts and luminosity estimates, such a measurement is found to be feasible, and a few inverse nanobarns of integrated luminosity is estimated to be enough to yield new constraints on parton distribution functions (PDFs) of light nuclei. In the absence of a dedicated proton-proton reference, a mixed-energy nuclear modification ratio is proposed for canceling free-proton PDF uncertainties to obtain a direct access to the nuclear modifications of the parton distributions in oxygen.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (39)

  1. R. D. Ball et al. (NNPDF Collaboration), Parton distributions from high-precision collider data, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 663 (2017).
  2. T. J. Hou, J. Gao, T. J. Hobbs, K. Xie, S. Dulat, M. Guzzi, J. Huston, P. Nadolsky, J. Pumplin, C. Schmidt, I. Sitiwaldi, D. Stump, and C. P. Yuan, New CTEQ global analysis of quantum chromodynamics with high-precision data from the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014013 (2021).
  3. S. Bailey, T. Cridge, L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin, and R. S. Thorne, Parton distributions from LHC, HERA, Tevatron and fixed target data: MSHT20 PDFs, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 341 (2021).
  4. K. J. Eskola, P. Paakkinen, H. Paukkunen, and C. A. Salgado, EPPS16: Nuclear parton distributions with LHC data, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 163 (2017).
  5. R. Abdul Khalek, J. J. Ethier, J. Rojo, and G. van Weelden, nNNPDF2.0: Quark flavor separation in nuclei from LHC data, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 183.
  6. A. Kusina et al., Impact of LHC vector boson production in heavy ion collisions on strange PDFs, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 968 (2020).
  7. P. Duwentäster, L. A. Husová, T. Ježo, M. Klasen, K. Kovařík, A. Kusina, K. F. Muzakka, F. I. Olness, I. Schienbein, and J. Y. Yu, Impact of inclusive hadron production data on nuclear gluon PDFs, Phys. Rev. D 104, 094005 (2021).
  8. I. Helenius, M. Walt, and W. Vogelsang, TUJU21: NNLO nuclear parton distribution functions with electroweak-boson production data from the LHC, arXiv:2112.11904.
  9. K. J. Eskola, P. Paakkinen, H. Paukkunen, and C. A. Salgado, EPPS21: A global QCD analysis of nuclear PDFs, arXiv:2112.12462.
  10. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Study of prompt D0 meson production in pPb collisions at sNN=5  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 090,
  11. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Constraining Gluon Distributions in Nuclei Using Dijets in Proton-Proton and Proton-Lead Collisions at sNN=5.02  TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 062002 (2018).
  12. A. Kusina, J.-P. Lansberg, I. Schienbein, and H.-S. Shao, Gluon Shadowing in Heavy-Flavor Production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 052004 (2018).
  13. K. J. Eskola, P. Paakkinen, and H. Paukkunen, Non-quadratic improved Hessian PDF reweighting and application to CMS dijet measurements at 5.02 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 511 (2019).
  14. K. J. Eskola, I. Helenius, P. Paakkinen, and H. Paukkunen, A QCD analysis of LHCb D-meson data in p+Pb collisions, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 037.
  15. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), First Measurement of Charm Production in its Fixed-Target Configuration at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 132002 (2019).
  16. N. Armesto, Nuclear shadowing, J. Phys. G 32, R367 (2006).
  17. A. Morreale and F. Salazar, Mining for gluon saturation at colliders, Universe 7, 312 (2021).
  18. U. A. Acharya et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Systematic study of nuclear effects in p+Al, p+Au, d+Au, and He3+Au collisions at sNN=200  GeV using π0 production, arXiv:2111.05756.
  19. Z. Citron et al., Report from Working Group 5: Future physics opportunities for high-density QCD at the LHC with heavy-ion and proton beams, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7, 1159 (2019).
  20. J. Brewer, A. Mazeliauskas, and W. van der Schee, Opportunities of OO and pO collisions at the LHC, arXiv:2103.01939.
  21. R. Bruce, LHC machine scenario for a short oxygen run (2021), https://cds.cern.ch/record/2751162.
  22. A. Accardi et al., Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier: Understanding the glue that binds us all, Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 268 (2016).
  23. R. Abdul Khalek et al., Science requirements and detector concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report, arXiv:2103.05419.
  24. E. C. Aschenauer, S. Fazio, M. A. C. Lamont, H. Paukkunen, and P. Zurita, Nuclear structure functions at a future electron-ion collider, Phys. Rev. D 96, 114005 (2017).
  25. M. Jebramcik and J. Jowett, Prospects for future asymmetric collisions in the LHC, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1350, 012003 (2019).
  26. R. Abdul Khalek, J. J. Ethier, and J. Rojo (NNPDF Collaboration), Nuclear parton distributions from lepton-nucleus scattering and the impact of an electron-ion collider, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 471 (2019).
  27. H. Paukkunen, Nuclear PDFs today, Proc. Sci., HardProbes2018 (2018) 014 [arXiv:1811.01976].
  28. I. Helenius, J. Lajoie, J. D. Osborn, P. Paakkinen, and H. Paukkunen, Nuclear gluons at RHIC in a multiobservable approach, Phys. Rev. D 100, 014004 (2019).
  29. A. Huss, A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, R. Paatelainen, W. van der Schee, and U. A. Wiedemann, Discovering Partonic Rescattering in Light Nucleus Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 192301 (2021).
  30. B. G. Zakharov, Jet quenching from heavy to light ion collisions, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 087.
  31. J. Brewer, A. Huss, A. Mazeliauskas, and W. van der Schee, Ratios of jet and hadron spectra at LHC energies: Measuring high-pT suppression without a pp reference, arXiv:2108.13434.
  32. K. J. Eskola, H. Paukkunen, and C. A. Salgado, A perturbative QCD study of dijets in p+Pb collisions at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2013) 213.
  33. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, The anti-kt jet clustering algorithm, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2008) 063.
  34. Z. Nagy, Next-to-leading order calculation of three jet observables in hadron hadron collision, Phys. Rev. D 68, 094002 (2003).
  35. CMS Collaboration, Dijet pseudorapidity in pp and pPb collisions at sNN=5.02  TeV with the CMS detector, Report No. CMS-PAS-HIN-16-003, 2016.
  36. M. Dasgupta, L. Magnea, and G. P. Salam, Non-perturbative QCD effects in jets at hadron colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2008) 055.
  37. M. Dasgupta, F. Dreyer, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, Small-radius jets to all orders in QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2015) 039; Inclusive jet spectrum for small-radius jets, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2016) 057.
  38. S. Dulat, T.-J. Hou, J. Gao, M. Guzzi, J. Huston, P. Nadolsky, J. Pumplin, C. Schmidt, D. Stump, and C. P. Yuan, New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 93, 033006 (2016).
  39. J. Albrecht et al., The muon puzzle in cosmic-ray induced air showers and its connection to the Large Hadron Collider, arXiv:2105.06148.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation