Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Pion fragmentation functions at high energy colliders

Ignacio Borsa* and Rodolfo Sassot†

Daniel de Florian‡

Marco Stratmann§

  • Departamento de Física and IFIBA, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, Pabellón 1 (1428) Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • International Center for Advanced Studies (ICAS) and IFICI, UNSAM, Campus Miguelete, 25 de Mayo y Francia (1650) Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany

  • *iborsa@df.uba.ar
  • †sassot@df.uba.ar
  • ‡deflo@unsam.edu.ar
  • §marco.stratmann@uni-tuebingen.de

Phys. Rev. D 105, L031502 – Published 9 February, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.L031502

Abstract

We revisit the description of pion production in proton-proton collisions in the light of the very precise data taken at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) over the past decade. First attempts to include LHC results in next-to-leading order global QCD analyses of parton-to-pion fragmentation functions insinuated some conflict between data sets at different center-of-mass system energies. We show that the data can be well described within their uncertainties by a consistent set of pion fragmentation functions once the theoretical scale dependence is taken into account in the global QCD analysis.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (41)

  1. R. D. Field and R. P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. D 15, 2590 (1977).
  2. J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. F. Sterman, Adv. Ser. Dir. High Energy Phys. 5, 1 (1989).
  3. J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, Nucl. Phys. B194, 445 (1982).
  4. D. de Florian, R. Sassot, and M. Stratmann, Phys. Rev. D 75, 114010 (2007).
  5. N. Sato, J. J. Ethier, W. Melnitchouk, M. Hirai, S. Kumano, and A. Accardi, Phys. Rev. D 94, 114004 (2016).
  6. V. Bertone et al. (NNPDF Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 516 (2017).
  7. R. A. Khalek, V. Bertone, and E. R. Nocera, Phys. Rev. D 104, 034007 (2021).
  8. D. de Florian, R. Sassot, M. Epele, R. J. Hernández-Pinto, and M. Stratmann, Phys. Rev. D 91, 014035 (2015).
  9. M. Leitgab et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 062002 (2013).
  10. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 88, 032011 (2013).
  11. C. Adolph et al. (COMPASS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 764, 1 (2017).
  12. B. Abelev et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 717, 162 (2012).
  13. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 339 (2017).
  14. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 263 (2018).
  15. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 256 (2021).
  16. J. Adams et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 637, 161 (2006).
  17. B. I. Abelev et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 80, 111108 (2009).
  18. G. Agakishiev et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 072302 (2012).
  19. L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 89, 012001 (2014).
  20. A. Adare et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 76, 051106 (2007).
  21. A. Adare et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 93, 011501 (2016).
  22. M. Abele, D. de Florian, and W. Vogelsang, Phys. Rev. D 104, 094046 (2021).
  23. D. de Florian and W. Vogelsang, Phys. Rev. D 71, 114004 (2005).
  24. M. Epele, C. A. Garcia Canal, and R. Sassot, Phys. Rev. D 94, 034037 (2016).
  25. M. Epele, C. García Canal, and R. Sassot, Phys. Lett. B 790, 102 (2019).
  26. M. Bonvini, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 989 (2020).
  27. C. Duhr, A. Huss, A. Mazeliauskas, and R. Szafron, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 122.
  28. D. d’Enterria, K. J. Eskola, I. Helenius, and H. Paukkunen, Nucl. Phys. B883, 615 (2014).
  29. D. De Florian, G. A. Lucero, R. Sassot, M. Stratmann, and W. Vogelsang, Phys. Rev. D 100, 114027 (2019).
  30. I. Borsa, G. Lucero, R. Sassot, E. C. Aschenauer, and A. S. Nunes, Phys. Rev. D 102, 094018 (2020).
  31. S. Bailey, T. Cridge, L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin, and R. S. Thorne, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 341 (2021).
  32. L. N. Epele, H. Fanchiotti, C. A. Garcia Canal, and R. Sassot, Phys. Lett. B 275, 155 (1992).
  33. A. Airapetian et al. (HERMES Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 87, 074029 (2013).
  34. Further results and the set of replicas of our FFs are available upon request from the authors.
  35. H. Aihara et al. (TPC/TWO GAMMA Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 184, 299 (1987); Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1263 (1988); X.-Q. Lu, Ph.D. thesis, Johns Hopkins University, UMI-87-07273, 1987.
  36. W. Braunschweig et al. (TASSO Collaboration), Z. Phys. C 42, 189 (1989).
  37. K. Abe et al. (SLD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 59, 052001 (1999).
  38. D. Buskulic et al. (ALEPH Collaboration), Z. Phys. C 66, 355 (1995).
  39. P. Abreu et al. (DELPHI Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 5, 585 (1998).
  40. R. Akers et al. (OPAL Collaboration), Z. Phys. C 63, 181 (1994).
  41. I. Arsene et al. (BRAHMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 252001 (2007).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation