- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Direct detection of light dark matter from evaporating primordial black holes

Roberta Calabrese1,2, Marco Chianese1,2,*, Damiano F. G. Fiorillo1,2, and Ninetta Saviano2,3

  • 1Dipartimento di Fisica “Ettore Pancini”, Università degli studi di Napoli “Federico II”, Complesso Universitario Monte S. Angelo, I-80126 Napoli, Italy
  • 2INFN—Sezione di Napoli, Complesso Universitario Monte S. Angelo, I-80126 Napoli, Italy
  • 3Scuola Superiore Meridionale, Università degli studi di Napoli “Federico II”, Largo San Marcellino 10, 80138 Napoli, Italy

  • *chianese@na.infn.it
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 105, L021302 – Published 5 January, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.L021302

Abstract

The direct detection of sub-GeV dark matter interacting with nucleons is hampered by the low recoil energies induced by scatterings in the detectors. This experimental difficulty is avoided in the scenario of boosted dark matter where a component of dark matter particles is endowed with large kinetic energies. In this paper, we point out that the current evaporation of primordial black holes with a mass from 1014 to 1016  g is a source of boosted light dark matter with energies of tens to hundreds of MeV. Focusing on the XENON1T experiment, we show that these relativistic dark matter particles could give rise to a signal orders of magnitude larger than the present upper bounds. Therefore, we are able to significantly constrain the combined parameter space of primordial black holes and sub-GeV dark matter. In the presence of primordial black holes with masses of 1015  g and abundances compatible with present bounds, the limits on a dark matter-nucleon cross section are improved by four orders of magnitude.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (95)

  1. G. Bertone and M. P. T. Tait, A new era in the search for dark matter, Nature (London) 562, 51 (2018).
  2. F. Kahlhoefer, Review of LHC dark matter searches, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32, 1730006 (2017).
  3. C. Pérez de los Heros, Status, challenges and directions in indirect dark matter searches, Symmetry 12, 1648 (2020).
  4. G. Angloher, C. Bucci, P. Christ, C. Cozzini, F. von Feilitzsch, D. Hauff, S. Henry, Th. Jagemann, J. Jochum, H. Kraus et al., Limits on wimp dark matter using scintillating CaWO4 cryogenic detectors with active background suppression, Astropart. Phys. 23, 325 (2005).
  5. E. Aprile, M. Alfonsi, K. Arisaka, F. Arneodo, C. Balan, L. Baudis, B. Bauermeister, A. Behrens, P. Beltrame, K. Bokeloh et al. (XENON100 Collaboration), Dark Matter Results from 225 Live Days of XENON100 Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 181301 (2012).
  6. P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide Collaboration), First results from the DarkSide-50 dark matter experiment at Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Phys. Lett. B 743, 456 (2015).
  7. G. Angloher et al., The COSINUS project—perspectives of a NaI scintillating calorimeter for dark matter search, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 441 (2016).
  8. J. Aalbers et al. (DARWIN Collaboration), DARWIN: Towards the ultimate dark matter detector, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2016) 017.
  9. R. Agnese et al. (SuperCDMS Collaboration), Projected sensitivity of the SuperCDMS SNOLAB experiment, Phys. Rev. D 95, 082002 (2017).
  10. C. E. Aalseth et al. (DarkSide-20k Collaboration), DarkSide-20k: A 20 tonne two-phase LAr TPC for direct dark matter detection at LNGS, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133, 131 (2018).
  11. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111302 (2018).
  12. D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX-ZEPLIN Collaboration), Projected WIMP sensitivity of the LUX-ZEPLIN dark matter experiment, Phys. Rev. D 101, 052002 (2020).
  13. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Light Dark Matter Search with Ionization Signals in XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 251801 (2019).
  14. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Search for Light Dark Matter Interactions Enhanced by the Migdal Effect or Bremsstrahlung in XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 241803 (2019).
  15. G. Angloher et al. (CRESST Collaboration), Results on MeV-scale dark matter from a gram-scale cryogenic calorimeter operated above ground, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 637 (2017).
  16. A. H. Abdelhameed et al. (CRESST Collaboration), First results from the CRESST-III low-mass dark matter program, Phys. Rev. D 100, 102002 (2019).
  17. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Projected WIMP sensitivity of the XENONnT dark matter experiment, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2020) 031.
  18. G. Adhikari et al. (COSINE-100 Collaboration), Strong constraints from COSINE-100 on the DAMA dark matter results using the same sodium iodide target, Sci. Adv. 7, abk2699 (2021).
  19. Y. Meng et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Dark Matter Search Results from the PandaX-4T Commissioning Run, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 261802 (2022).
  20. R. Essig, J. Mardon, and T. Volansky, Direct detection of sub-GeV dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 85, 076007 (2012).
  21. R. Essig, A. Manalaysay, J. Mardon, P. Sorensen, and T. Volansky, First Direct Detection Limits on sub-GeV Dark Matter from XENON10, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 021301 (2012).
  22. R. Essig, T. Volansky, and T.-T. Yu, New constraints and prospects for sub-GeV dark matter scattering off electrons in xenon, Phys. Rev. D 96, 043017 (2017).
  23. M. Crisler, R. Essig, J. Estrada, G. Fernandez, J. Tiffenberg, M. Sofo haro, T. Volansky, and T.-T. Yu (SENSEI Collaboration), SENSEI: First Direct-Detection Constraints on sub-GeV Dark Matter from a Surface Run, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 061803 (2018).
  24. P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide Collaboration), Constraints on Sub-GeV Dark-Matter–Electron Scattering from the DarkSide-50 Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111303 (2018).
  25. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (DAMIC Collaboration), Constraints on Light Dark Matter Particles Interacting with Electrons from DAMIC at SNOLAB, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 181802 (2019).
  26. E. Andersson, A. Bökmark, R. Catena, T. Emken, H. Klein Moberg, and E. Åstrand, Projected sensitivity to sub-GeV dark matter of next-generation semiconductor detectors, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2020) 036.
  27. M. Schumann, Direct detection of WIMP dark matter: Concepts and status, J. Phys. G 46, 103003 (2019).
  28. A. Boyarsky, O. Ruchayskiy, and D. Iakubovskyi, A lower bound on the mass of dark matter particles, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2009) 005.
  29. C. Di Paolo, F. Nesti, and F. L. Villante, Phase space mass bound for fermionic dark matter from dwarf spheroidal galaxies, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 475, 5385 (2018).
  30. S. Tremaine and J. E. Gunn, Dynamical Role of Light Neutral Leptons in Cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 407 (1979).
  31. T. Cohen, M. Lisanti, and H. Keong Lou, Semivisible Jets: Dark Matter Undercover at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 171804 (2015).
  32. N. Daci, Isabelle De Bruyn, S. Lowette, M. H. G. Tytgat, and B. Zaldivar, Simplified SIMPs and the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2015) 108.
  33. Y. Ali-Haïmoud, J. Chluba, and M. Kamionkowski, Constraints on Dark Matter Interactions with Standard Model Particles from Cosmic Microwave Background Spectral Distortions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 071304 (2015).
  34. M. Baryakhtar, J. Bramante, S. Weishi Li, T. Linden, and N. Raj, Dark Kinetic Heating of Neutron Stars and An Infrared Window On WIMPs, SIMPs, and Pure Higgsinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 131801 (2017).
  35. K. Bondarenko, A. Boyarsky, T. Bringmann, M. Hufnagel, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, and A. Sokolenko, Direct detection and complementary constraints for sub-GeV dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 118.
  36. A. Coogan, L. Morrison, and S. Profumo, Precision gamma-ray constraints for sub-GeV dark matter models, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2021) 044.
  37. V. Gluscevic and K. K. Boddy, Constraints on Scattering of keV–TeV Dark Matter with Protons in the Early Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 081301 (2018).
  38. W. L. Xu, C. Dvorkin, and A. Chael, Probing sub-GeV dark matter-baryon scattering with cosmological observables, Phys. Rev. D 97, 103530 (2018).
  39. T. R. Slatyer and C.-L. Wu, Early-universe constraints on dark matter-baryon scattering and their implications for a global 21 cm signal, Phys. Rev. D 98, 023013 (2018).
  40. E. O. Nadler, V. Gluscevic, K. K. Boddy, and R. H. Wechsler, Constraints on dark matter microphysics from the Milky Way satellite population, Astrophys. J. Lett. 878, L32 (2019); 897, L46(E) (2020).
  41. K. Agashe, Y. Cui, L. Necib, and J. Thaler, (In)direct detection of boosted dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2014) 062.
  42. G. F. Giudice, D. Kim, J.-C. Park, and S. Shin, Inelastic boosted dark matter at direct detection experiments, Phys. Lett. B 780, 543 (2018).
  43. B. Fornal, P. Sandick, J. Shu, M. Su, and Y. Zhao, Boosted Dark Matter Interpretation of the XENON1T Excess, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 161804 (2020).
  44. C. V. Cappiello, K. C. Y. Ng, and J. F. Beacom, Reverse direct detection: Cosmic ray scattering with light dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 99, 063004 (2019).
  45. T. Bringmann and M. Pospelov, Novel Direct Detection Constraints on Light Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 171801 (2019).
  46. Y. Ema, F. Sala, and R. Sato, Light Dark Matter at Neutrino Experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 181802 (2019).
  47. C. Cappiello and J. F. Beacom, Strong new limits on light dark matter from neutrino experiments, Phys. Rev. D 100, 103011 (2019).
  48. Y. Ema, F. Sala, and R. Sato, Neutrino experiments probe hadrophilic light dark matter, SciPost Phys. 10, 072 (2021).
  49. M. Andriamirado et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration), Limits on sub-GeV dark matter from the PROSPECT reactor antineutrino experiment, Phys. Rev. D 104, 012009 (2021).
  50. Y. B. Zel’dovich and I. D. Novikov, The hypothesis of cores retarded during expansion and the hot cosmological model, Sov. Astron. AJ (Engl. Transl.) 10, 602 (1967).
  51. E. R. Harrison, Fluctuations at the threshold of classical cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 1, 2726 (1970).
  52. S. W. Hawking, Black hole explosions?, Nature (London) 248, 30 (1974).
  53. S. W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975).
  54. I. B. Zeldovich, Charge asymmetry of the universe as a consequence of evaporation of black holes and of the asymmetry of the weak interaction, ZhETF Pisma Red. 24, 29 (1976).
  55. B. J. Carr, Some cosmological consequences of primordial black-hole evaporations, Astrophys. J. 206, 8 (1976).
  56. D. N. Page, Particle emission rates from a black hole: Massless particles from an uncharged, nonrotating hole, Phys. Rev. D 13, 198 (1976).
  57. D. N. Page, Particle emission rates from a black hole. 3. Charged leptons from a nonrotating hole, Phys. Rev. D 16, 2402 (1977).
  58. J. H. MacGibbon and B. R. Webber, Quark- and gluon-jet emission from primordial black holes: The instantaneous spectra, Phys. Rev. D 41, 3052 (1990).
  59. M. Boudaud and M. Cirelli, Voyager 1 e± Further Constrain Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 041104 (2019).
  60. R. Laha, Primordial Black Holes as a Dark Matter Candidate are Severely Constrained by the Galactic Center 511 keV γ-Ray Line, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 251101 (2019).
  61. G. Ballesteros, J. Coronado-Blázquez, and D. Gaggero, X-ray and gamma-ray limits on the primordial black hole abundance from Hawking radiation, Phys. Lett. B 808, 135624 (2020).
  62. B. Dasgupta, R. Laha, and A. Ray, Neutrino and Positron Constraints on Spinning Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 101101 (2020).
  63. A. Coogan, L. Morrison, and S. Profumo, Direct Detection of Hawking Radiation from Asteroid-Mass Primordial Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 171101 (2021).
  64. R. Calabrese, D. F. G. Fiorillo, G. Miele, S. Morisi, and A. Palazzo, Primordial black hole dark matter evaporating on the neutrino floor, arXiv:2106.02492.
  65. V. De Romeri, P. Martínez-Miravé, and M. Tórtola, Signatures of primordial black hole dark matter at DUNE and THEIA, arXiv:2106.05013.
  66. M. J. Baker and A. Thamm, Probing the particle spectrum of nature with evaporating black holes, arXiv:2105.10506.
  67. B. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda, and J. Yokoyama, Constraints on primordial black holes, arXiv:2002.12778.
  68. L. Morrison, S. Profumo, and Y. Yu, Melanopogenesis: Dark matter of (almost) any mass and baryonic matter from the evaporation of primordial black holes weighing a ton (or less), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2019) 005.
  69. I. Baldes, Q. Decant, D. C. Hooper, and L. Lopez-Honorez, Non-cold dark matter from primordial black hole evaporation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2020) 045.
  70. N. Bernal and Ó. Zapata, Self-interacting dark matter from primordial black holes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2021) 007.
  71. N. Bernal and Ó. Zapata, Gravitational dark matter production: Primordial black holes and UV freeze-in, Phys. Lett. B 815, 136129 (2021).
  72. N. Bernal and Ó. Zapata, Dark matter in the time of primordial black holes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2021) 015.
  73. J. Auffinger, I. Masina, and G. Orlando, Bounds on warm dark matter from Schwarzschild primordial black holes, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 261 (2021).
  74. P. Gondolo, P. Sandick, and B. Shams Es Haghi, Effects of primordial black holes on dark matter models, Phys. Rev. D 102, 095018 (2020).
  75. I. Masina, Dark matter and dark radiation from evaporating Kerr primordial black holes, arXiv:2103.13825.
  76. A. Cheek, L. Heurtier, Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, and J. Turner, Primordial black hole evaporation and dark matter production: I. Solely hawking radiation, arXiv:2107.00013 [Phys. Rev. D (to be published)].
  77. A. Cheek, L. Heurtier, Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, and J. Turner, Primordial black hole evaporation and dark matter production: II. Interplay with the freeze-in/out mechanism, arXiv:2107.00016 [Phys. Rev. D (to be published)].
  78. A. Arbey and J. Auffinger, BlackHawk: A public code for calculating the Hawking evaporation spectra of any black hole distribution, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 693 (2019).
  79. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
  80. J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, A universal density profile from hierarchical clustering, Astrophys. J. 490, 493 (1997).
  81. G. D. Starkman, A. Gould, R. Esmailzadeh, and S. Dimopoulos, Opening the window on strongly interacting dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 41, 3594 (1990).
  82. G. D. Mack, J. F. Beacom, and G. Bertone, Towards closing the window on strongly interacting dark matter: Far-reaching constraints from earth’s heat flow, Phys. Rev. D 76, 043523 (2007).
  83. B. J. Kavanagh, R. Catena, and C. Kouvaris, Signatures of earth-scattering in the direct detection of dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2017) 012.
  84. T. Emken and C. Kouvaris, How blind are underground and surface detectors to strongly interacting dark matter?, Phys. Rev. D 97, 115047 (2018).
  85. P. Capuano, G. De Luca, F. Di Sena, P. Gasparini, and R. Scarpa, The density of the rock covering Gran Sasso laboratories in central Apennines, Italy by underground gravity measurements, J. Appl. Geophys. 39, 25 (1998).
  86. R. H. Helm, Inelastic and elastic scattering of 187-Mev electrons from selected even-even nuclei, Phys. Rev. 104, 1466 (1956).
  87. J. D. Lewin and P. F. Smith, Review of mathematics, numerical factors, and corrections for dark matter experiments based on elastic nuclear recoil, Astropart. Phys. 6, 87 (1996).
  88. G. Tesic (VERITAS Collaboration), Searching for primordial black holes with the VERITAS gamma-ray experiment, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 375, 052024 (2012).
  89. J.-F. Glicenstein, A. Barnacka, M. Vivier, and T. Herr (H.E.S.S. Collaboration), Limits on primordial black hole evaporation with the H.E.S.S. array of Cherenkov telescopes, in Proceedings of the 33rd International Cosmic Ray Conference (2013), 1307.4898.
  90. A. A. Abdo et al., Milagro limits and HAWC sensitivity for the rate-density of evaporating primordial black holes, Astropart. Phys. 64, 4 (2015).
  91. S. Archambault (VERITAS Collaboration), Search for primordial black hole evaporation with VERITAS, Proc. Sci. ICRC2017 (2018) 691 [arXiv:1709.00307].
  92. M. Ackermann et al. (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), Search for gamma-ray emission from local primordial black holes with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Astrophys. J. 857, 49 (2018).
  93. A. Albert et al. (HAWC Collaboration), Constraining the local burst rate density of primordial black holes with HAWC, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2020) 026.
  94. P. Dave and I. Taboada (IceCube Collaboration), Neutrinos from primordial black hole evaporation, Proc. Sci. ICRC2019 (2021) 863 [arXiv:1908.05403].
  95. R. López-Coto, M. Doro, A. de Angelis, M. Mariotti, and J. P. Harding, Prospects for the observation of primordial black hole evaporation with the southern wide field of view gamma-ray observatory, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2021) 040.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 105, L021302– Published 5 January, 2022
  • Received 16 August 2021
  • Revised 9 October 2021
  • Accepted 8 December 2021
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation