Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Maxwell-scalar device based on the electric dipole

D. Bazeia1, M. A. Marques2,1, and R. Menezes3,1

  • 1Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, 58051-970 João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil
  • 2Departamento de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, 58051-900 João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil
  • 3Departamento de Ciências Exatas, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, 58297-000 Rio Tinto, Paraíba, Brazil

Phys. Rev. D 104, L121703 – Published 16 December, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L121703

Abstract

In this work, we study the electric field of a dipole immersed in a medium with permittivity controlled by a real scalar field which is nonminimally coupled to the Maxwell field. We model the system with an interesting function, which allows the presence of exact solutions, describing the possibility of the permittivity to encapsulate the charges at very high values, giving rise to an effect that is not present in the standard situation. The results are of direct interest to applications for emission and absorption of radiation, and may motivate new studies concerning binary stars and black holes in gravity scenarios of current interest.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (43)

  1. R. Friedberg and T. D. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1096 (1977); 18, 2623 (1978).
  2. T. D. Lee and Y. Pang, Phys. Rep. 221, 251 (1992).
  3. A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, C. B. Thorn, and V. F. Weisskopf, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3471 (1974).
  4. A. Elardeen, M. S. Chanorritz, S. D. Drell, M. Weinstein, and T.-M. Yan, Phys. Rev. D 11, 1094 (1975).
  5. J. Lee and S. Nam, Phys. Lett. B 261, 437 (1991).
  6. D. Bazeia, Phys. Rev. D 46, 1879 (1992).
  7. W. G. Fuertes and J. M. Guilarte, Eur. Phys. J. C 9, 535 (1999).
  8. A. Donos and J. P. Gauntlett, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2014) 007.
  9. E. Mefford and G. T. Horowitz, Phys. Rev. D 90, 084042 (2014).
  10. R. Rougemont, J. Noronha, and J. Noronha-Hostler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 202301 (2015).
  11. R. Critelli, R. Rougemont, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D 99, 066004 (2019).
  12. C. Adam, K. Oles, and A. Wereszczynski, Phys. Lett. B 807, 135560 (2020).
  13. C. Adam, C. Naya, J. Sanchez-Guillen, and A. Wereszczynski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 232501 (2013).
  14. L. A. Ferreira and Ya. Shnir, Phys. Lett. B 772, 621 (2017).
  15. S. B. Gudnason, Phys. Rev. D 102, 116013 (2020).
  16. D. Bazeia, M. A. Marques, and R. Menezes, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 94 (2021).
  17. D. Bazeia, M. A. Marques, and R. Menezes, Phys. Lett. B 780, 485 (2018).
  18. D. Bazeia, M. A. Marques, and D. Melnikov, Phys. Lett. B 785, 454 (2018).
  19. D. Bazeia, M. A. Liao, M. A. Marques, and R. Menezes, Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033053 (2019).
  20. R. Casana, A. C. Santos, and M. L. Dias, Phys. Rev. D 102, 085002 (2020).
  21. D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 131103 (2018).
  22. H. O. Silva, J. Sakstein, L. Gualtieri, T. P. Sotiriou, and E. Berti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 131104 (2018).
  23. C. A. R. Herdeiro, E. Radu, N. Sanchis-Gual, and J. A. Font, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 101102 (2018).
  24. A. Dima, E. Barausse, N. Franchini, and T. P. Sotiriou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 231101 (2020).
  25. S. Hod, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 408 (2020).
  26. C. A. R. Herdeiro, T. Ikeda, M. Minamitsuji, T. Nakamura, and E. Radu, Phys. Rev. D 103, 044019 (2021).
  27. J. R. Morris, Phys. Rev. D 104, 016013 (2021).
  28. E. Berti, L. G. Collodel, B. Kleihaus, and J. Kunz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 011104 (2021).
  29. C. A. R. Herdeiro, E. Radu, H. O. Silva, T. P. Sotiriou, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 011103 (2021).
  30. D. Bazeia, arXiv:hep-th/0507188.
  31. E. B. Bogomol’nyi, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 24, 449 (1976).
  32. R. Hobart, Proc. Phys. Soc. 82, 201 (1963).
  33. G. H. Derrick, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 5, 1252 (1964).
  34. D. Bazeia, J. Menezes, and R. Menezes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 241601 (2003).
  35. M. Hoffmann, F. P. G. Fengler, M. Herzig, T. Mittmann, B. Max, U. Schroeder, R. Negrea, P. Lucian, S. Slesazeck, and T. Mikolajick, Nature (London) 565, 464 (2019).
  36. W. Kobayashi and I. Terasaki, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 032902 (2005).
  37. J. Jumpatam, N. Chanlek, and P. Thongbai, Appl. Surf. Sci. 476, 623 (2019).
  38. O. Auciello, G. Lee, C. Wu, Y. Chen, J. J. Alcantar-Peña, I. Mejia, and E. de Obaldía, MRS Bull. 45, 231 (2020).
  39. J. -Y. Kim, J. Lee, W. H. Lee, I. N. Kholmanov, J. W. Suk, T. Y. Kim, Y. Hao, H. Chou, D. Akinwande, and R. S. Ruoff, ACS Nano 8, 269 (2014).
  40. L. Shi, R. Yang, S. Lu, K. Jia, C. Xiao, T. Lu, T. Wang, W. Wei, H. Tan, and S. Ding, NPG Asia Mater. 10, 821 (2018).
  41. H. O. Silva, H. Witek, M. Elley, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 031101 (2021).
  42. W. E. East and J. L. Ripley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 101102 (2021).
  43. A. Saha and S. Gupta, J. Appl. Phys. 129, 080901 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation