- Letter
- Open Access
Measurement of reactor antineutrino flux and spectrum at RENO
Phys. Rev. D 104, L111301 – Published 9 December, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L111301
Abstract
The RENO experiment reports measured flux and energy spectrum of reactor electron antineutrinos from the six reactors at Hanbit Nuclear Power Plant. The measurements use 966 094 candidate events with a background fraction of 2.39% (5.13%), acquired in the near (far) detector, from August 2011 to March 2020. The inverse beta decay (IBD) yield is measured as , corresponding to of the prediction by the Huber and Mueller (HM) model. A reactor spectrum is obtained by unfolding a measured IBD prompt spectrum. The obtained neutrino spectrum shows a clear excess around 6 MeV relative to the HM prediction. The obtained reactor spectrum will be useful for understanding unknown neutrino properties and reactor models. The observed discrepancies suggest the next round of precision measurements and modification of the current reactor models.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (33)
- P. Huber, Phys. Rev. C 84, 024617 (2011).
- T. A. Mueller, D. Lhuillier, M. Fallot, A. Letourneau, S. Cormon, M. Fechner, L. Giot, T. Lasserre, J. Martino, G. Mention, A. Porta, and F. Yermia, Phys. Rev. C 83, 054615 (2011).
- G. Mention, M. Fechner, T. Lasserre, T. Mueller, D. Lhuillier, M. Cribier, and A. Letourneau, Phys. Rev. D 83, 073006 (2011).
- F. An et al. (Daya Bay Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 251801 (2017).
- G. Bak et al. (RENO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 232501 (2019).
- A. C. Hayes, J. L. Friar, G. T. Garvey, G. Jungman, and G. Jonkmans, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 202501 (2014).
- S.-H. Seo (RENO Collaboration), AIP Conf. Proc. 1666, 080002 (2015).
- G. Bak et al. (RENO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 201801 (2018).
- F. P. An et al. (Daya Bay Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061801 (2016); 118, 099902(E) (2017).
- H. de Kerret et al. (Double Chooz Collaboration), Nat. Phys. 16, 558 (2020).
- Y. Ko et al. (NEOS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 121802 (2017).
- V. Zacek, G. Zacek, P. Vogel, and J. Vuilleumier, arXiv:1807.01810.
- M. Andriamirado et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 103, 032001 (2021).
- H. A. Molina et al. (STEREO Collaboration), J. Phys. G 48, 075107 (2021).
- X. Ma, W. Zhong, L. Wang, Y. Chen, and J. Cao, Phys. Rev. C 88, 014605 (2013).
- S. H. Seo et al. (RENO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 98, 012002 (2018).
- F. P. An et al. (Daya Bay Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C 41, 013002 (2017).
- D. Adey et al. (Daya Bay Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 100, 052004 (2019).
- G. Boireau et al. (NUCIFER Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 93, 112006 (2016).
- P. Vogel and J. F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. D 60, 053003 (1999).
- P. A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
- G. D’Agostini, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 362, 487 (1995).
- A. Hcker and V. Kartvelishvili, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 372, 469 (1996).
- T. Adye, in Proceedings, PHYSTAT 2011 Workshop on Statistical Issues Related to Discovery Claims in Search Experiments and Unfolding, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011 (CERN, Geneva, 2011), pp. 313–318.
- C. L. Lawson and R. J. Hanson, Solving Least Squares Problems, Classics in Applied Mathematics Vol. 15 (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 1995), pp. xii+337, revised reprint of the 1974 original.
- D. L. Danielson, A. C. Hayes, and G. T. Garvey, Phys. Rev. D 99, 036001 (2019).
- D. V. Forero, R. Hawkins, and P. Huber, arXiv:1710.07378.
- F. An et al. (JUNO Collaboration), J. Phys. G 43, 030401 (2016).
- A. A. Sonzogni, M. Nino, and E. A. McCutchan, Phys. Rev. C 98, 014323 (2018).
- M. Estienne et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 022502 (2019).
- Z. Atif et al., arXiv:2011.00896.
- F. P. An et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 241801 (2021).
- See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L111301 for RENO 2021 Supplementary Data Release.