Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Variational method in relativistic quantum field theory without cutoff

Antoine Tilloy*

  • Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik, Hans-Kopfermann-Straße 1, 85748 Garching, Germany and Munich Center for Quantum Science and Technology (MCQST), Schellingstraße 4, D-80799 München, Germany

  • *antoine.tilloy@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 104, L091904 – Published 11 November, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L091904

Abstract

The variational method is a powerful approach to solve many-body quantum problems nonperturbatively. However, in the context of relativistic quantum field theory, it needs to meet three seemingly incompatible requirements outlined by Feynman: extensivity, computability, and lack of UV sensitivity. In practice, variational methods break one of the three, which translates into the need to have an IR or UV cutoff. In this letter, I introduce a relativistic modification of continuous matrix product states that satisfies the three requirements jointly in 1+1 dimensions. I apply it to the self-interacting scalar field, without UV cutoff and directly in the thermodynamic limit. Numerical evidence suggests the error decreases faster than any power law in the number of parameters, while the cost remains only polynomial.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Article Text

References (33)

  1. M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995).
  2. M. Creutz, L. Jacobs, and C. Rebbi, Phys. Rep. 95, 201 (1983).
  3. S. Aoki et al. (FLAG Working Group), Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2890 (2014).
  4. R. P. Feynman, Difficulties in applying the variational principle to quantum field theories, in Variational Calculations in Quantum Field Theory (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 1987), pp. 28–40.
  5. S. Rychkov and L. G. Vitale, Phys. Rev. D 91, 085011 (2015).
  6. J. Elias-Miró, M. Montull, and M. Riembau, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2016) 144.
  7. M. Hogervorst, S. Rychkov, and B. C. van Rees, Phys. Rev. D 91, 025005 (2015).
  8. J. Elias-Miró, S. Rychkov, and L. G. Vitale, Phys. Rev. D 96, 065024 (2017).
  9. J. Elias-Miró, S. Rychkov, and L. G. Vitale, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 213.
  10. J. Elias-Miró and E. Hardy, Phys. Rev. D 102, 065001 (2020).
  11. F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, arXiv:cond-mat/0407066.
  12. I. Cirac, D. Perez-Garcia, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete, arXiv:2011.12127.
  13. M. Fannes, B. Nachtergaele, and R. F. Werner, Commun. Math. Phys. 144, 443 (1992).
  14. F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 190405 (2010).
  15. J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, H. Verschelde, and F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 251601 (2010).
  16. V. Stojevic, J. Haegeman, I. P. McCulloch, L. Tagliacozzo, and F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. B 91, 035120 (2015).
  17. A. Tilloy, companion paper, Phys. Rev. D 104, 096007 (2021).
  18. J. Glimm and A. Jaffe, Fields without cutoffs, in Quantum Physics: A Functional Integral Point of View (Springer, New York, New York, NY, 1987), pp. 249–254.
  19. R. Fernández, J. Fröhlich, and A. D. Sokal, Continuum limits, in Random Walks, Critical Phenomena, and Triviality in Quantum Field Theory (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992), pp. 367–403.
  20. S. Bronzin, B. De Palma, and M. Guagnelli, Phys. Rev. D 99, 034508 (2019).
  21. D. Kadoh, Y. Kuramashi, Y. Nakamura, R. Sakai, S. Takeda, and Y. Yoshimura, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2019) 184.
  22. C. Delcamp and A. Tilloy, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033278 (2020).
  23. A. Milsted, J. Haegeman, and T. J. Osborne, Phys. Rev. D 88, 085030 (2013).
  24. B. Vanhecke, J. Haegeman, K. Van Acoleyen, L. Vanderstraeten, and F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 250604 (2019).
  25. M. Serone, G. Spada, and G. Villadoro, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 148.
  26. J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, and F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. B 88, 085118 (2013).
  27. J. Rincón, M. Ganahl, and G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. B 92, 115107 (2015).
  28. L. Vanderstraeten, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 7 (2019).
  29. F. Pollmann, S. Mukerjee, A. M. Turner, and J. E. Moore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 255701 (2009).
  30. Y. Huang, arXiv:1505.00772.
  31. A. Tilloy and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021040 (2019).
  32. T. D. Karanikolaou, P. Emonts, and A. Tilloy, Phys. Rev. Research 3, 023059 (2021).
  33. J. Glimm, Commun. Math. Phys. 10, 1 (1968).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation