Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Novel 3D supersymmetric massive Yang-Mills theory

Nihat Sadik Deger1,* and Jan Rosseel2,†

  • 1Department of Mathematics, Bogazici University, Bebek, 34342 Istanbul, Turkey
  • 2Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, A-1090 Vienna, Austria

  • *sadik.deger@boun.edu.tr
  • †jan.rosseel@univie.ac.at

Phys. Rev. D 104, L081701 – Published 1 October, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L081701

Abstract

We construct three-dimensional, N=1 off-shell supersymmetric massive Yang-Mills (YM) theory whose YM equation is “third-way” consistent. This means that the field equations of this model do not come from variation of a local action without additional fields, yet the gauge-covariant divergence of the YM equation still vanishes on shell. To achieve this, we modify the massive Majorana spinor equation so that its supersymmetry variation gives a modified YM equation whose bosonic part coincides with the third-way consistent pure massive YM model.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (19)

  1. E. Bergshoeff, O. Hohm, W. Merbis, A. J. Routh, and P. K. Townsend, Classical Quant. Grav. 31, 145008 (2014).
  2. E. Bergshoeff, W. Merbis, A. J. Routh, and P. K. Townsend, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, 1544015 (2015).
  3. M. Özkan, Y. Pang, and P. K. Townsend, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 035.
  4. H. R. Afshar and N. S. Deger, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2019) 145.
  5. A. S. Arvanitakis, A. Sevrin, and P. K. Townsend, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 181603 (2015).
  6. M. Broccoli, N. S. Deger, and S. Theisen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 091603 (2021).
  7. S. Deser, R. Jackiw, and S. Templeton, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 140, 372 (1982); 185, 406(E) (1988).
  8. S. Deser, R. Jackiw, and S. Templeton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 975 (1982).
  9. E. A. Bergshoeff, O. Hohm, and P. K. Townsend, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 201301 (2009).
  10. J. F. Schonfeld, Nucl. Phys. B185, 157 (1981).
  11. C. Aragone, Phys. Lett. 131B, 69 (1983).
  12. B. M. Zupnik and D. G. Pak, Sov. Phys. J. 31, 962 (1988).
  13. Our Clifford algebra and spinor conventions are as follows. The charge conjugation matrix C obeys γμT=−CγμC−1, CT=−C. The following properties for bilinears involving Majorana spinors then hold: χ¯ε=ε¯χ, χ¯γμε=−ε¯γμχ. The Fierz identity reads: χε¯=−12ε¯χ1−12ε¯γμχγμ. Some useful γ-matrix relations are γνγμγν=−γμ, γμν=εμνργρ, γμ=−12εμνργνρ, γμνρ=εμνρ1.

  14. R. Andringa, E. A. Bergshoeff, M. de Roo, O. Hohm, E. Sezgin, and P. K. Townsend, Classical Quant. Grav. 27, 025010 (2010).
  15. S. Mukhi, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2011) 083.
  16. B. E. W. Nilsson, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 107.
  17. We are grateful to Paul Townsend for making this suggestion.

  18. J. Bagger, N. Lambert, S. Mukhi, and C. Papageorgakis, Phys. Rep. 527, 1 (2013).
  19. D. Chernyavsky, N. S. Deger, and D. Sorokin, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 556 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation