Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

n/s−q^/T3 relation at next-to-leading order in QCD

Berndt Müller

  • Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA

Phys. Rev. D 104, L071501 – Published 7 October, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L071501

Abstract

The relation between the specific shear viscosity η/s and the dimensionless jet quenching parameter q^/T3 in perturbative QCD is explored at next-to-leading order in the coupling constant. It is shown that the relation changes little, although both transport coefficients independently are subject to large modifications at the next-to-leading order level. This finding confirms that the relationship is robust.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (23)

  1. W. Busza, K. Rajagopal, and W. van der Schee, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68, 339 (2018).
  2. J. E. Bernhard, J. S. Moreland, and S. A. Bass, Nat. Phys. 15, 1113 (2019).
  3. D. Everett, W. Ke, J.-F. Paquet, G. Vujanovic, S. A. Bass, L. Du et al. (JETSCAPE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 103, 054904 (2021).
  4. K. M. Burke, A. Buzzatti, N. Chang, C. Gale, M. Gyulassy, U. Heinz et al. (JET Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 90, 014909 (2014).
  5. S. Cao, Y. Chen, J. Coleman, J. Mulligan, P. M. Jacobs, R. A. Soltz et al. (JETSCAPE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 104, 024905 (2021).
  6. A. Majumder, B. Müller, and X. N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 192301 (2007).
  7. S. Caron-Huot, Phys. Rev. D 79, 065039 (2009).
  8. J. Ghiglieri, G. D. Moore, and D. Teaney, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2016) 095.
  9. J. Ghiglieri, G. D. Moore, and D. Teaney, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 179.
  10. E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Nucl. Phys. B337, 569 (1990).
  11. E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Phys. Rev. D 45, R1827 (1992).
  12. J. P. Blaizot and E. Iancu, Phys. Rep. 359, 355 (2002).
  13. R. Baier, Y. L. Dokshitzer, A. H. Mueller, S. Peigné, and D. Schiff, Nucl. Phys. B483, 291 (1997).
  14. P. B. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2003) 030.
  15. P. Danielewicz and M. Gyulassy, Phys. Rev. D 31, 53 (1985).
  16. The author thanks the referee for pointing this out.

  17. P. B. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2000) 001.
  18. A. K. Rebhan, Phys. Rev. D 48, R3967 (1993).
  19. P. B. Arnold and L. G. Yaffe, Phys. Rev. D 52, 7208 (1995).
  20. E. Braaten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2164 (1995).
  21. E. Braaten and A. Nieto, Phys. Rev. D 53, 3421 (1996).
  22. M. Laine and Y. Schröder, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2005) 067.
  23. P. B. Arnold and W. Xiao, Phys. Rev. D 78, 125008 (2008).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation