Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Statistics of limit root bundles relevant for exact matter spectra of F-theory MSSMs

Martin Bies1,2, Mirjam Cvetič2,1,3, and Muyang Liu2

  • 1Department of Mathematics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396, USA
  • 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396, USA
  • 3Center for Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia

Phys. Rev. D 104, L061903 – Published 15 September, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L061903

Abstract

In the largest, currently known, class of one quadrillion globally consistent F-theory Standard Models with gauge coupling unification and no chiral exotics, the vectorlike spectra are counted by cohomologies of root bundles. In this work, we apply a previously proposed method to identify toric base threefolds, which are promising to establish F-theory Standard Models with exactly three quark doublets and no vectorlike exotics in this representation. The base spaces in question are obtained from triangulations of 708 polytopes. By studying root bundles on the quark-doublet curve C(3,2)1/6 and employing well-known results about desingularizations of toric K3 surfaces, we derive a triangulation independent lower bound NˇP(3) for the number NP(3) of root bundles on C(3,2)1/6 with exactly three sections. The ratio NˇP(3)/NP, where NP is the total number of roots on C(3,2)1/6, is largest for base spaces associated with triangulations of the eighth three-dimensional polytope Δ8∘ in the Kreuzer-Skarke list. For each of these O(1015) threefolds, we expect that many root bundles on C(3,2)1/6 are induced from F-theory gauge potentials and that at least every 3000th root on C(3,2)1/6 has exactly three global sections and thus no exotic vectorlike quark-doublet modes.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (51)

  1. P. Candelas, G. T. Horowitz, A. Strominger, and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B258, 46 (1985).
  2. B. R. Greene, K. H. Kirklin, P. J. Miron, and G. G. Ross, Phys. Lett. B 180, 69 (1986).
  3. V. Braun, Y.-H. He, B. A. Ovrut, and T. Pantev, Phys. Lett. B 618, 252 (2005).
  4. V. Bouchard and R. Donagi, Phys. Lett. B 633, 783 (2006).
  5. V. Bouchard, M. Cvetič, and R. Donagi, Nucl. Phys. B745, 62 (2006).
  6. L. B. Anderson, J. Gray, Y.-H. He, and A. Lukas, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2010) 054.
  7. L. B. Anderson, J. Gray, A. Lukas, and E. Palti, Phys. Rev. D 84, 106005 (2011).
  8. L. B. Anderson, J. Gray, A. Lukas, and E. Palti, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2012) 113.
  9. M. Berkooz, M. R. Douglas, and R. G. Leigh, Nucl. Phys. B480, 265 (1996).
  10. G. Aldazabal, S. Franco, L. E. Ibanez, R. Rabadan, and A. M. Uranga, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 42, 3103 (2001).
  11. G. Aldazabal, S. Franco, L. E. Ibanez, R. Rabadan, and A. M. Uranga, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2001) 047.
  12. L. E. Ibanez, F. Marchesano, and R. Rabadan, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2001) 002.
  13. R. Blumenhagen, B. Kors, D. Lüst, and T. Ott, Nucl. Phys. B616, 3 (2001).
  14. M. Cvetič, G. Shiu, and A. M. Uranga, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 201801 (2001).
  15. M. Cvetič, G. Shiu, and A. M. Uranga, Nucl. Phys. B615, 3 (2001).
  16. R. Blumenhagen, M. Cvetič, P. Langacker, and G. Shiu, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 55, 71 (2005).
  17. T. L. Gomez, S. Lukic, and I. Sols, Commun. Math. Phys. 276, 1 (2007).
  18. V. Bouchard and R. Donagi, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2008) 060.
  19. C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B469, 403 (1996).
  20. D. R. Morrison and C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B473, 74 (1996).
  21. D. R. Morrison and C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B476, 437 (1996).
  22. T. W. Grimm and H. Hayashi, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2012) 027.
  23. S. Krause, C. Mayrhofer, and T. Weigand, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2012) 119.
  24. V. Braun, T. W. Grimm, and J. Keitel, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2013) 069.
  25. M. Cvetič, A. Grassi, D. Klevers, and H. Piragua, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 010.
  26. M. Cvetič, D. Klevers, D. K. M. Peña, P.-K. Oehlmann, and J. Reuter, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2015) 087.
  27. L. Lin, C. Mayrhofer, O. Till, and T. Weigand, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2016) 098.
  28. L. Lin and T. Weigand, Nucl. Phys. B913, 209 (2016).
  29. S. Krause, C. Mayrhofer, and T. Weigand, Nucl. Phys. B858, 1 (2012).
  30. M. Cvetič, L. Lin, M. Liu, and P.-K. Oehlmann, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2018) 089.
  31. M. Cvetič, J. Halverson, L. Lin, M. Liu, and J. Tian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 101601 (2019).
  32. M. Bies, C. Mayrhofer, C. Pehle, and T. Weigand, arXiv:1402.5144.
  33. M. Bies, C. Mayrhofer, and T. Weigand, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2017) 081.
  34. M. Bies, Cohomologies of coherent sheaves and massless spectra in F-theory, Ph.D. thesis, Heidelberg U. (2018-02).
  35. M. Bies, M. Cvetič, R. Donagi, L. Lin, M. Liu, and F. Ruehle, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 196.
  36. M. Bies, M. Cvetič, R. Donagi, L. Lin, M. Liu, and F. Ruehle, Database, https://github.com/Learning-line-bundle-cohomology, 2020.
  37. The ToricVarieties_project authors, The ToricVarieties_project, https://github.com/homalg-project/ToricVarieties_project, 2019–2021.
  38. A. Brill and M. Nöther , Math. Ann. 7, 269 (1874).
  39. D. Eisenbud, M. Green, and J. Harris, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 33, 295 (1996).
  40. T. Watari, Phys. Lett. B 762, 145 (2016).
  41. M. Bies, M. Cvetič, R. Donagi, M. Liu, and M. Ong, arXiv:2102.10115.
  42. C. Lucia, C. Cinzia, and C. Maurizio, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 359, 3733 (2007).
  43. M. Kreuzer and H. Skarke, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 853 (1998).
  44. V. V. Batyrev, J. Alg. Geom. 3, 493 (1994).
  45. E. Perevalov and H. Skarke, Nucl. Phys. B505, 679 (1997).
  46. D. A. Cox and S. Katz, Mirror Symmetry and Algebraic Geometry, Mathematical surveys and monographs (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1999).
  47. F. Rohsiepe, arXiv:hep-th/0409290.
  48. A. P. Braun, C. Long, L. McAllister, M. Stillman, and B. Sung, arXiv:1712.04946.
  49. J. Halverson and J. Tian, Phys. Rev. D 95, 026005 (2017).
  50. D. Cox, J. Little, and H. Schenck, Toric Varieties, Graduate studies in mathematics (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2011).
  51. M. Kreuzer, Ukr. J. Phys. 55, 613 (2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation