Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Diagnosing collisions in the interior of a wormhole

Felix M. Haehl and Ying Zhao

  • School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study 1 Einstein Drive, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA

Phys. Rev. D 104, L021901 – Published 28 July, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L021901

Abstract

Two distant black holes can be connected in the interior through a wormhole. Such a wormhole has been interpreted as an entangled state shared between two exterior regions. If Alice and Bob send signals into each of the black holes, then they can meet in the interior. In this paper, we interpret this meeting in terms of the quantum circuit that prepares the entangled state: Alice and Bob sending signals creates growing perturbations in the circuit, whose overlap represents their meeting inside the wormhole. We argue that such overlap in the circuit is quantified by a particular six-point correlation function. Therefore, exterior observers in possession of the entangled qubits can use this correlation function to diagnose the collision in the interior without having to jump in themselves.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (30)

  1. J. M. Maldacena, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113 (1999); Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
  2. J. M. Maldacena, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2003) 021.
  3. J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Fortschr. Phys. 61, 781 (2013).
  4. D. Marolf and A. C. Wall, Classical Quantum Gravity 30, 025001 (2013).
  5. T. Hartman and J. Maldacena, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 014.
  6. L. Susskind, Fortschr. Phys. 64, 49 (2016).
  7. Y. Zhao, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 144.
  8. D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 90, 126007 (2014).
  9. The minus sign appears here because the left boundary time is in the opposite direction with the Schwarschild time.

  10. Note that we do not mean Alice and Bob themselves travel backward in time. They merely need to reverse the Hamiltonian acting on the qubits in their lab. This is not only possible but also practical in quantum laboratories [11].

  11. B. Swingle, G. Bentsen, M. Schleier-Smith, and P. Hayden, Phys. Rev. A 94, 040302 (2016).
  12. J. B. Kogut and L. Susskind, Phys. Rep. 8, 75 (1973).
  13. M. Karliner, I. R. Klebanov, and L. Susskind, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 03, 1981 (1988).
  14. L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6606 (1994).
  15. D. A. Roberts, D. Stanford, and A. Streicher, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2018) 122.
  16. X.-L. Qi and A. Streicher, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2019) 012.
  17. L. Susskind, arXiv:1708.03040.
  18. L. Susskind, arXiv:1802.01198.
  19. L. Susskind and Y. Zhao, arXiv:1408.2823.
  20. F. M. Haehl and Y. Zhao, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 056.
  21. F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, P. Narayan, and M. Rangamani, SciPost Phys. 6, 001 (2019).
  22. F. M. Haehl and M. Rozali, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 121601 (2018).
  23. J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 12C104 (2016).
  24. S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2015) 132.
  25. J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, Fortschr. Phys. 65, 1700034 (2017).
  26. A. Kitaev, A Simple Model of Quantum Holography, http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev/, http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev2/, in Proceedings at KITP, April 7, 2015 and May 27, 2015.
  27. J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Phys. Rev. D 94, 106002 (2016).
  28. A. Goel, H. T. Lam, G. J. Turiaci, and H. Verlinde, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 156.
  29. The precise form of the reparametrization t(u) on contour 4 is not important, as it consists of just a single SL(2,R) transformation, under which the Schwarzian action is invariant.

  30. The collision happens near the horizon of the unperturbed black hole, which has a much smaller radius than the new black hole formed in the postcollision region. In other words, the singularity bends downward in the Penrose diagram.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation