Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Continuum approach to real time dynamics of (1+1)D gauge field theory: Out of horizon correlations of the Schwinger model

Ivan Kukuljan*

  • Max-Planck-Institute of Quantum Optics, Hans-Kopfermann-Straße 1, DE-85748 Garching, Germany and Munich Center for Quantum Science and Technology, Schellingstraße 4, DE-80799 München, Germany

  • *ivan.kukuljan@mpq.mpg.de

Phys. Rev. D 104, L021702 – Published 13 July, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L021702

Abstract

We develop a truncated Hamiltonian method to study nonequilibrium real time dynamics in the Schwinger model—the quantum electrodynamics in D=1+1. This is a purely continuum method that captures reliably the invariance under local and global gauge transformations and does not require a discretization of space-time. We use it to study a phenomenon that is expected not to be tractable using lattice methods: we show that the (1+1)D quantum electrodynamics admits the dynamical horizon violation effect which was recently discovered in the case of the sine-Gordon model. Following a quench of the model, oscillatory long-range correlations develop, manifestly violating the horizon bound. We find that the oscillation frequencies of the out-of-horizon correlations correspond to twice the masses of the mesons of the model suggesting that the effect is mediated through correlated meson pairs. We also report on the cluster violation in the massive version of the model, previously known in the massless Schwinger model. The results presented here reveal a novel nonequilibrium phenomenon in (1+1)D quantum electrodynamics and make a first step towards establishing that the horizon violation effect is present in gauge field theory.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (156)

  1. A. Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2011).
  2. J. Berges, AIP Conf. Proc. 739, 3 (2004).
  3. J. Berges, S. Borsányi, and C. Wetterich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 142002 (2004).
  4. E. A. Calzetta and B.-L. B. Hu, Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2008).
  5. S. Grozdanov and J. Polonyi, Phys. Rev. D 92, 065009 (2015).
  6. S. c. v. Grozdanov and J. Polonyi, Phys. Rev. D 91, 105031 (2015).
  7. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, J. Stat. Mech. (2016) 064003.
  8. D. Bernard and B. Doyon, J. Stat. Mech. (2016) 064005.
  9. P. Glorioso and H. Liu, Proc. Sci., TASI2017 (2018) 008.
  10. D. Husmann, S. Uchino, S. Krinner, M. Lebrat, T. Giamarchi, T. Esslinger, and J.-P. Brantut, Science 350, 1498 (2015).
  11. R. Vasseur and J. E. Moore, J. Stat. Mech. (2016) 064010.
  12. M. Medenjak, C. Karrasch, and T. Prosen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 080602 (2017).
  13. Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2008) 065.
  14. A. Kitaev, Proceedings of the Fundamental Physics Prize Symposium (2014), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQ9qN8j7EZI.
  15. J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 106.
  16. J. Polchinski and V. Rosenhaus, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2016) 001.
  17. V. Jahnke, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2019, 9632708 (2019).
  18. T. Langen, R. Geiger, and J. Schmiedmayer, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 201 (2015).
  19. I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008).
  20. H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner et al., Nature (London) 551, 579 (2017).
  21. I. Madan, J. Buh, V. V. Baranov, V. V. Kabanov, A. Mrzel, and D. Mihailovic, Sci. Adv. 4, eaao0043 (2018).
  22. A. LeClair and G. Mussardo, Nucl. Phys. B552, 624 (1999).
  23. F. H. L. Essler and M. Fagotti, J. Stat. Mech. (2016) 064002.
  24. J.-S. Caux, J. Stat. Mech. (2016) 064006.
  25. J. Maldacena, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113 (1999).
  26. O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz, Phys. Rep. 323, 183 (2000).
  27. J. Casalderrey-Solana, H. Liu, D. Mateos, K. Rajagopal, and U. A. Wiedemann, Gauge/String Duality, Hot QCD and Heavy Ion Collisions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2014).
  28. J. Zaanen, Y. Liu, Y.-W. Sun, and K. Schalm, Holographic Duality in Condensed Matter Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2015).
  29. H. Liu and J. Sonner, arXiv:1810.02367.
  30. S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
  31. U. Schollwöck, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 326, 96 (2011), January 2011 Special Issue.
  32. J. I. Cirac and F. Verstraete, J. Phys. A 42, 504004 (2009).
  33. R. Orús, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 349, 117 (2014).
  34. J. C. Bridgeman and C. T. Chubb, J. Phys. A 50, 223001 (2017).
  35. J. Bender, P. Emonts, E. Zohar, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 043145 (2020).
  36. P. Emonts, M. C. Bañuls, I. Cirac, and E. Zohar, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074501 (2020).
  37. V. P. Yurov and A. B. Zomolodchikov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 05, 3221 (1990).
  38. A. J. A. James, R. M. Konik, P. Lecheminant, N. J. Robinson, and A. M. Tsvelik, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 046002 (2018).
  39. V. Yurov and A. Zomolodchikov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 06, 4557 (1991).
  40. M. Lässig, G. Mussardo, and J. L. Cardy, Nucl. Phys. B348, 591 (1991).
  41. G. Feverati, F. Ravanini, and G. Takács, Phys. Lett. B 430, 264 (1998).
  42. Z. Bajnok, L. Palla, and G. Takács, Nucl. Phys. B614, 405 (2001).
  43. Z. Bajnok, L. Palla, and G. Takács, Nucl. Phys. B622, 565 (2002).
  44. M. Hogervorst, S. Rychkov, and B. C. van Rees, Phys. Rev. D 91, 025005 (2015).
  45. S. Rychkov and L. G. Vitale, Phys. Rev. D 91, 085011 (2015).
  46. J. Elias-Miró, S. Rychkov, and L. G. Vitale, Phys. Rev. D 96, 065024 (2017).
  47. J. Elias-Miró and E. Hardy, Phys. Rev. D 102, 065001 (2020).
  48. G. P. Brandino, R. M. Konik, and G. Mussardo, J. Stat. Mech. (2010) P07013.
  49. M. Srdinšek, T. Prosen, and S. Sotiriadis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 121602 (2021).
  50. I. Kukuljan, S. Sotiriadis, and G. Takács, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 110402 (2018).
  51. I. Kukuljan, S. Sotiriadis, and G. Takács, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 224.
  52. T. Rakovszky, M. Mestyán, M. Collura, M. Kormos, and G. Takács, Nucl. Phys. B911, 805 (2016).
  53. K. Hódsági, M. Kormos, and G. Takács, SciPost Phys. 5, 27 (2018).
  54. D. X. Horváth, I. Lovas, M. Kormos, G. Takács, and G. Zaránd, Phys. Rev. A 100, 013613 (2019).
  55. R. Konik, T. Pálmai, G. Takács, and A. Tsvelik, Nucl. Phys. B899, 547 (2015).
  56. P. Azaria, R. M. Konik, P. Lecheminant, T. Pálmai, G. Takács, and A. M. Tsvelik, Phys. Rev. D 94, 045003 (2016).
  57. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 136801 (2006).
  58. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P06008.
  59. F. Iglói and H. Rieger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3233 (2000).
  60. E. H. Lieb and D. W. Robinson, Commun. Math. Phys. 28, 251 (1972).
  61. J. Cardy, J. Stat. Mech. (2016) 023103.
  62. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, J. Stat. Mech. (2005) P04010.
  63. G. D. Chiara, S. Montangero, P. Calabrese, and R. Fazio, J. Stat. Mech. (2006) P03001.
  64. C. K. Burrell and T. J. Osborne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 167201 (2007).
  65. M. Fagotti and P. Calabrese, Phys. Rev. A 78, 010306 (2008).
  66. A. M. Läuchli and C. Kollath, J. Stat. Mech. (2008) P05018.
  67. V. Eisler and I. Peschel, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 17, 410 (2008).
  68. S. R. Manmana, S. Wessel, R. M. Noack, and A. Muramatsu, Phys. Rev. B 79, 155104 (2009).
  69. P. Calabrese, F. H. L. Essler, and M. Fagotti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 227203 (2011).
  70. F. Iglói, Z. Szatmári, and Y.-C. Lin, Phys. Rev. B 85, 094417 (2012).
  71. P. Calabrese, F. H. L. Essler, and M. Fagotti, J. Stat. Mech. (2012) P07016.
  72. P. Calabrese, F. H. L. Essler, and M. Fagotti, J. Stat. Mech. (2012) P07022.
  73. M. Ganahl, E. Rabel, F. H. L. Essler, and H. G. Evertz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 077206 (2012).
  74. F. H. L. Essler, S. Evangelisti, and M. Fagotti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 247206 (2012).
  75. J. H. Bardarson, F. Pollmann, and J. E. Moore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 017202 (2012).
  76. H. Kim and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 127205 (2013).
  77. P. Hauke and L. Tagliacozzo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 207202 (2013).
  78. J. Schachenmayer, B. P. Lanyon, C. F. Roos, and A. J. Daley, Phys. Rev. X 3, 031015 (2013).
  79. P. Richerme, Z.-X. Gong, A. Lee, C. Senko, J. Smith, M. Foss-Feig, S. Michalakis, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Nature (London) 511, 198 (2014).
  80. G. Carleo, F. Becca, L. Sanchez-Palencia, S. Sorella, and M. Fabrizio, Phys. Rev. A 89, 031602 (2014).
  81. M. G. Nezhadhaghighi and M. A. Rajabpour, Phys. Rev. B 90, 205438 (2014).
  82. L. Bonnes, F. H. L. Essler, and A. M. Läuchli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 187203 (2014).
  83. M. Collura, M. Kormos, and P. Calabrese, J. Stat. Mech. (2014) P01009.
  84. K. V. Krutitsky, P. Navez, F. Queisser, and R. Schützhold, Eur. Phys. J. Quantum Technol. 1, 12 (2014).
  85. L. Bucciantini, M. Kormos, and P. Calabrese, J. Phys. A 47, 175002 (2014).
  86. M. Kormos, L. Bucciantini, and P. Calabrese, Europhys. Lett. 107, 40002 (2014).
  87. R. Vosk and E. Altman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 217204 (2014).
  88. M. A. Rajabpour and S. Sotiriadis, Phys. Rev. B 91, 045131 (2015).
  89. A. S. Buyskikh, M. Fagotti, J. Schachenmayer, F. Essler, and A. J. Daley, Phys. Rev. A 93, 053620 (2016).
  90. E. Altman and R. Vosk, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 383 (2015).
  91. M. Fagotti and M. Collura, arXiv:1507.02678.
  92. B. Bertini and M. Fagotti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 130402 (2016).
  93. O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, B. Doyon, and T. Yoshimura, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041065 (2016).
  94. B. Bertini, M. Collura, J. De Nardis, and M. Fagotti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 207201 (2016).
  95. Y. Zhao, F. Andraschko, and J. Sirker, Phys. Rev. B 93, 205146 (2016).
  96. I. Pitsios, L. Banchi, A. S. Rab, M. Bentivegna, D. Caprara, A. Crespi, N. Spagnolo, S. Bose, P. Mataloni, R. Osellame et al., Nat. Commun. 8, 1569 (2017).
  97. M. Kormos, M. Collura, G. Takács, and P. Calabrese, Nat. Phys. 13, 246 (2017).
  98. M. Cheneau, P. Barmettler, D. Poletti, M. Endres, P. Schauß, T. Fukuhara, C. Gross, I. Bloch, C. Kollath, and S. Kuhr, Nature (London) 481, 484 (2012).
  99. P. Jurcevic, B. P. Lanyon, P. Hauke, C. Hempel, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Nature (London) 511, 202 (2014).
  100. T. Langen, R. Geiger, M. Kuhnert, B. Rauer, and J. Schmiedmayer, Nat. Phys. 9, 640 (2013).
  101. T. Prosen, Phys. Rev. E 89, 012142 (2014).
  102. S. Bravyi, M. B. Hastings, and F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 050401 (2006).
  103. H. Araki, Commun. Math. Phys. 14, 120 (1969).
  104. M. Kliesch, C. Gogolin, M. J. Kastoryano, A. Riera, and J. Eisert, Phys. Rev. X 4, 031019 (2014).
  105. J. Kogut and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 11, 395 (1975).
  106. B. Buyens, J. Haegeman, F. Verstraete, and K. V. Acoleyen, Proc. Sci., LATTICE2015 (2016) 280 [arXiv:1511.04288].
  107. B. Buyens, J. Haegeman, F. Hebenstreit, F. Verstraete, and K. Van Acoleyen, Phys. Rev. D 96, 114501 (2017).
  108. F. Hebenstreit, J. Berges, and D. Gelfand, Phys. Rev. D 87, 105006 (2013).
  109. D. Spitz and J. Berges, Phys. Rev. D 99, 036020 (2019).
  110. S. Notarnicola, M. Collura, and S. Montangero, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 013288 (2020).
  111. T. Chanda, J. Zakrzewski, M. Lewenstein, and L. Tagliacozzo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 180602 (2020).
  112. G. Magnifico, M. Dalmonte, P. Facchi, S. Pascazio, F. V. Pepe, and E. Ercolessi, Quantum 4, 281 (2020).
  113. S. Coleman, R. Jackiw, and L. Susskind, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 93, 267 (1975).
  114. S. Coleman, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 101, 239 (1976).
  115. J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 128, 2425 (1962).
  116. T. Banks, L. Susskind, and J. Kogut, Phys. Rev. D 13, 1043 (1976).
  117. D. Crewther and C. Hamer, Nucl. Phys. B170, 353 (1980).
  118. C. Hamer, J. Kogut, D. Crewther, and M. Mazzolini, Nucl. Phys. B208, 413 (1982).
  119. C. Adam, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 259, 1 (1997).
  120. C. Gutsfeld, H. Kastrup, and K. Stergios, Nucl. Phys. B560, 431 (1999).
  121. C. Gattringer, I. Hip, and C. Lang, Phys. Lett. B 466, 287 (1999).
  122. P. Sriganesh, C. J. Hamer, and R. J. Bursill, Phys. Rev. D 62, 034508 (2000).
  123. L. Giusti, C. Hoelbling, and C. Rebbi, Phys. Rev. D 64, 054501 (2001).
  124. T. Byrnes, P. Sriganesh, R. Bursill, and C. Hamer, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 109, 202 (2002).
  125. N. Christian, K. Jansen, K. Nagai, and B. Pollakowski, Nucl. Phys. B739, 60 (2006).
  126. K. Cichy, A. Kujawa-Cichy, and M. Szyniszewski, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1666 (2013).
  127. M. C. Bañuls, K. Cichy, J. I. Cirac, and K. Jansen, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 158.
  128. B. Buyens, Ph.D. thesis, Ghent University, 2016, https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8094608/file/8094617.pdf.
  129. N. Nakanishi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 59, 607 (1978).
  130. Y. Nakawaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 64, 1828 (1980).
  131. D. J. Gross, I. R. Klebanov, A. V. Matytsin, and A. V. Smilga, Nucl. Phys. B461, 109 (1996).
  132. Y. Hosotani, R. Rodriguez, J. Hetrick, and S. Iso, arXiv:hep-th/9606129.
  133. F. Cooper, J. Haegeman, and G. C. Nayak, arXiv:hep-th/0612292.
  134. Y.-Z. Chu and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. D 81, 085020 (2010).
  135. N. Klco, E. F. Dumitrescu, A. J. McCaskey, T. D. Morris, R. C. Pooser, M. Sanz, E. Solano, P. Lougovski, and M. J. Savage, Phys. Rev. A 98, 032331 (2018).
  136. T. V. Zache, N. Mueller, J. T. Schneider, F. Jendrzejewski, J. Berges, and P. Hauke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 050403 (2019).
  137. G. Gold, D. A. McGady, S. P. Patil, and V. Vardanyan, arXiv:2012.15824.
  138. J. Lowenstein and J. Swieca, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 68, 172 (1971).
  139. R. Ferrari and V. Montalbano, Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965–1970) 107, 1383 (1994).
  140. E. Abdalla, M. C. B. Abdalla, and K. D. Rothe, Non-Perturbative Methods in 2 Dimensional Quantum Field Theory, 2nd ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001).
  141. P. Lowdon, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 57, 102302 (2016),
  142. P. Lowdon, Phys. Rev. D 96, 065013 (2017).
  143. P. Lowdon, Nucl. Phys. B935, 242 (2018).
  144. P. Lowdon, Proc. Sci., 336, 050 (2019).
  145. S. Iso and H. Murayama, Prog. Theor. Phys. 84, 142 (1990).
  146. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L021702 for details.
  147. I. Kukuljan, S. Sotiriadis, and G. Takács, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 224.
  148. T. Schweigler, V. Kasper, S. Erne, I. Mazets, B. Rauer, F. Cataldini, T. Langen, T. Gasenzer, J. Berges, and J. Schmiedmayer, Nature (London) 545, 323 (2017).
  149. S. Weinberg, Cosmology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008), https://global.oup.com/academic/product/cosmology-9780198526827?cc=de&lang=en&.
  150. D. Boyanovsky, H. de Vega, and D. Schwarz, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 56, 441 (2006).
  151. M. Gleiser, Contemp. Phys. 39, 239 (1998).
  152. M. B. Hindmarsh, M. Lüben, J. Lumma, and M. Pauly, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 24, 1 (2021).
  153. J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 151302 (2002).
  154. P. Jaikumar and A. Mazumdar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 191301 (2003).
  155. V. Alba and M. Fagotti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 010601 (2017).
  156. C. Destri and H. De Vega, Nucl. Phys. B290, 363 (1987).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation