Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Muon and electron g−2 and proton and cesium weak charges implications on dark Zd models

M. Cadeddu1,*, N. Cargioli2,1,†, F. Dordei1,‡, C. Giunti3,§, and E. Picciau2,1,∥

  • 1Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Cagliari, Complesso Universitario di Monserrato—S.P. per Sestu Km 0.700, 09042 Monserrato (Cagliari), Italy
  • 2Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Complesso Universitario di Monserrato—S.P. per Sestu Km 0.700, 09042 Monserrato (Cagliari), Italy
  • 3Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Torino, Via P. Giuria 1, I–10125 Torino, Italy

  • *matteo.cadeddu@ca.infn.it
  • †nicola.cargioli@ca.infn.it
  • ‡francesca.dordei@cern.ch
  • §carlo.giunti@to.infn.it
  • ∥emmanuele.picciau@ca.infn.it

Phys. Rev. D 104, L011701 – Published 16 July, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L011701

Abstract

Theories beyond the standard model involving a sub-GeV-scale vector Zd mediator have been largely studied as a possible explanation of the experimental values of the muon and electron anomalous magnetic moments. Motivated by the recent determination of the anomalous muon magnetic moment performed at Fermilab, we derive the constraints on such a model obtained from the magnetic moment determinations and the measurements of the proton and cesium weak charge, QW, performed at low-energy transfer. In order to do so, we revisit the determination of the cesium QW from the atomic parity violation experiment, which depends critically on the value of the average neutron rms radius of Cs133, by determining the latter from a practically model-independent extrapolation from the recent average neutron rms radius of Pb208 performed by the PREX-2 Collaboration. From a combined fit of all the aforementioned experimental results, we obtain rather precise limits on the mass and the kinetic mixing parameter of the Zd boson, namely mZd=47−16+61  MeV and ϵ=2.3−0.4+1.1×10−3, when marginalizing over the Z−Zd mass mixing parameter δ.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (114)

  1. G. W. Bennett, B. Bousquet, H. N. Brown, G. Bunce, R. M. Carey, P. Cushman, G. T. Danby, P. T. Debevec, M. Deile, H. Deng et al., Phys. Rev. D 73, 072003 (2006).
  2. B. Abi et al. (Muon g−2 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 141801 (2021).
  3. T. Aoyama et al., Phys. Rep. 887, 1 (2020).
  4. T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita, and M. Nio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 111808 (2012).
  5. T. Aoyama, T. Kinoshita, and M. Nio, Atoms 7, 28 (2019).
  6. A. Czarnecki, W. J. Marciano, and A. Vainshtein, Phys. Rev. D 67, 073006 (2003); 73, 119901(E) (2006).
  7. C. Gnendiger, D. Stöckinger, and H. Stöckinger-Kim, Phys. Rev. D 88, 053005 (2013).
  8. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu, and Z. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 827 (2017).
  9. A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura, and T. Teubner, Phys. Rev. D 97, 114025 (2018).
  10. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, and P. Stoffer, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 006.
  11. M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, and B. Kubis, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2019) 137.
  12. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu, and Z. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 241 (2020); 80, 410(E) (2020).
  13. A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura, and T. Teubner, Phys. Rev. D 101, 014029 (2020).
  14. K. Melnikov and A. Vainshtein, Phys. Rev. D 70, 113006 (2004).
  15. P. Masjuan and P. Sánchez-Puertas, Phys. Rev. D 95, 054026 (2017).
  16. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, M. Procura, and P. Stoffer, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2017) 161.
  17. M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, B. Kubis, S. Leupold, and S. P. Schneider, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 141.
  18. A. Gérardin, H. B. Meyer, and A. Nyffeler, Phys. Rev. D 100, 034520 (2019).
  19. J. Bijnens, N. Hermansson-Truedsson, and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, Phys. Lett. B 798, 134994 (2019).
  20. G. Colangelo, F. Hagelstein, M. Hoferichter, L. Laub, and P. Stoffer, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 101.
  21. V. Pauk and M. Vanderhaeghen, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3008 (2014).
  22. I. Danilkin and M. Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Rev. D 95, 014019 (2017).
  23. F. Jegerlehner, Springer Tracts Mod. Phys. 274, 1 (2017).
  24. M. Knecht, S. Narison, A. Rabemananjara, and D. Rabetiarivony, Phys. Lett. B 787, 111 (2018).
  25. G. Eichmann, C. S. Fischer, and R. Williams, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054015 (2020).
  26. P. Roig and P. Sánchez-Puertas, Phys. Rev. D 101, 074019 (2020).
  27. A. Kurz, T. Liu, P. Marquard, and M. Steinhauser, Phys. Lett. B 734, 144 (2014).
  28. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, A. Nyffeler, M. Passera, and P. Stoffer, Phys. Lett. B 735, 90 (2014).
  29. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays, arXiv:2103.11769.
  30. D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell, and G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 120801 (2008).
  31. D. Hanneke, S. F. Hoogerheide, and G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. A 83, 052122 (2011).
  32. R. H. Parker, C. Yu, W. Zhong, B. Estey, and H. Müller, Science 360, 191 (2018).
  33. L. Morel, Z. Yao, P. Cladé, and S. Guellati-Khélifa, Nature (London) 588, 61 (2020).
  34. P. Fayet, Phys. Rev. D 75, 115017 (2007).
  35. H. Davoudiasl and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. D 98, 075011 (2018).
  36. M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, E. Picciau, and Y. Y. Zhang, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 116.
  37. C. Bœhm and P. Fayet, Nucl. Phys. B683, 219 (2004).
  38. G. F. Giudice, P. Paradisi, and M. Passera, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2012) 113.
  39. A. Bodas, R. Coy, and S. J. D. King, Solving the electron and muon g−2 anomalies in Z′ models, arXiv:2102.07781.
  40. H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee, and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. D 85, 115019 (2012).
  41. H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee, and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. D 86, 095009 (2012).
  42. H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee, I. Lewis, and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. D 88, 015022 (2013).
  43. G. Arcadi, M. Lindner, J. Martins, and F. S. Queiroz, Nucl. Phys. B959, 115158 (2020).
  44. H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee, and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. D 92, 055005 (2015).
  45. P. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
  46. J. Erler and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Phys. Rev. D 72, 073003 (2005).
  47. J. Erler and R. Ferro-Hernández, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 196.
  48. H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee, and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 031802 (2012).
  49. H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee, and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. D 89, 095006 (2014).
  50. C. Bouchiat and C. Piketty, Phys. Lett. 128B, 73 (1983).
  51. C. Bouchiat and P. Fayet, Phys. Lett. B 608, 87 (2005).
  52. H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee, and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 031802 (2012).
  53. D. Androić et al. (Qweak Collaboration), Nature (London) 557, 207 (2018).
  54. J. Erler and S. Su, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 71, 119 (2013).
  55. C. S. Wood, S. C. Bennett, D. Cho, B. P. Masterson, J. L. Roberts, C. E. Tanner, and C. E. Wieman, Science 275, 1759 (1997).
  56. J. Guena, M. Lintz, and M. A. Bouchiat, Phys. Rev. A 71, 042108 (2005).
  57. S. Pollock and M. Welliver, Phys. Lett. B 464, 177 (1999).
  58. S. J. Pollock, E. N. Fortson, and L. Wilets, Phys. Rev. C 46, 2587 (1992).
  59. C. J. Horowitz, S. J. Pollock, P. A. Souder, and R. Michaels, Phys. Rev. C 63, 025501 (2001).
  60. V. A. Dzuba, J. C. Berengut, V. V. Flambaum, and B. Roberts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 203003 (2012).
  61. A. Derevianko, Phys. Rev. A 65, 012106 (2001).
  62. A. Trzcińska, J. Jastrzębski, P. Lubiński, F. J. Hartmann, R. Schmidt, T. von Egidy, and B. Kłos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 082501 (2001).
  63. W. Johnson and G. Soff, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 33, 405 (1985).
  64. M. Thiel, C. Sfienti, J. Piekarewicz, C. J. Horowitz, and M. Vanderhaeghen, J. Phys. G 46, 093003 (2019).
  65. C. J. Horowitz et al., Phys. Rev. C 85, 032501 (2012).
  66. D. Adhikari et al. (PREX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 172502 (2021).
  67. S. Abrahamyan, Z. Ahmed, H. Albataineh, K. Aniol, D. S. Armstrong, W. Armstrong, T. Averett, B. Babineau, A. Barbieri, V. Bellini et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 112502 (2012).
  68. B. Reed, Presentation on behalf of the PREX-II Collaboration at the Magnificent CEvNS 2020 workshop (2020).
  69. J. Dobaczewski, H. Flocard, and J. Treiner, Nucl. Phys. A422, 103 (1984).
  70. J. Bartel, P. Quentin, M. Brack, C. Guet, and H. B. Hakansson, Nucl. Phys. A386, 79 (1982).
  71. M. Kortelainen, J. McDonnell, W. Nazarewicz, P. G. Reinhard, J. Sarich, N. Schunck, M. V. Stoitsov, and S. M. Wild, Phys. Rev. C 85, 024304 (2012).
  72. M. Kortelainen, T. Lesinski, J. More, W. Nazarewicz, J. Sarich, N. Schunck, M. V. Stoitsov, and S. Wild, Phys. Rev. C 82, 024313 (2010).
  73. E. Chabanat, P. Bonche, P. Haensel, J. Meyer, and R. Schaeffer, Nucl. Phys. A635, 231 (1998).
  74. P. G. Reinhard and H. Flocard, Nucl. Phys. A584, 467 (1995).
  75. J. A. Hernandez, Weak nuclear form factor: Nuclear structure & coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, Master’s thesis, Florida State U., Tallahassee (main), 2019.
  76. J. Yang, J. A. Hernandez, and J. Piekarewicz, Phys. Rev. C 100, 054301 (2019).
  77. W.-C. Chen and J. Piekarewicz, Phys. Rev. C 90, 044305 (2014).
  78. W.-C. Chen and J. Piekarewicz, Phys. Lett. B 748, 284 (2015).
  79. M. M. Sharma, M. A. Nagarajan, and P. Ring, Phys. Lett. B 312, 377 (1993).
  80. M. Bender, K. Rutz, P. G. Reinhard, J. A. Maruhn, and W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C 60, 034304 (1999).
  81. G. A. Lalazissis, J. Konig, and P. Ring, Phys. Rev. C 55, 540 (1997).
  82. P. G. Reinhard, M. Rufa, J. Maruhn, W. Greiner, and J. Friedrich, Z. Phys. A 323, 13 (1986).
  83. T. Niksic, D. Vretenar, and P. Ring, Phys. Rev. C 78, 034318 (2008).
  84. T. Niksic, D. Vretenar, P. Finelli, and P. Ring, Phys. Rev. C 66, 024306 (2002).
  85. H. Zheng, Z. Zhang, and L.-W. Chen, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2014) 011.
  86. T. Sil, M. Centelles, X. Vinas, and J. Piekarewicz, Phys. Rev. C 71, 045502 (2005).
  87. J. Piekarewicz, B. K. Agrawal, G. Colò, W. Nazarewicz, N. Paar, P.-G. Reinhard, X. Roca-Maza, and D. Vretenar, Phys. Rev. C 85, 041302 (2012).
  88. T.-G. Yue, L.-W. Chen, Z. Zhang, and Y. Zhou, Constraints on the Symmetry Energy from PREX-II in the Multimessenger Era, arXiv:2102.05267.
  89. M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, E. Picciau, C. A. Ternes, and Y. Y. Zhang, New insights into nuclear physics and weak mixing angle using electroweak probes, arXiv:2102.06153.
  90. G. Fricke, C. Bernhardt, K. Heilig, L. A. Schaller, L. Schellenberg, E. B. Shera, and C. W. de Jager, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 60, 177 (1995).
  91. I. Angeli and K. P. Marinova, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 99, 69 (2013).
  92. M. Cadeddu and F. Dordei, Phys. Rev. D 99, 033010 (2019).
  93. M. Cadeddu, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Y. Li, E. Picciau, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 102, 015030 (2020).
  94. M. Hoferichter, J. Menéndez, and A. Schwenk, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074018 (2020).
  95. A. V. Viatkina, D. Antypas, M. G. Kozlov, D. Budker, and V. V. Flambaum, Phys. Rev. C 100, 034318 (2019).
  96. M. Cadeddu, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, and Y. Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 101, 033004 (2020).
  97. R. Essig, J. Mardon, M. Papucci, T. Volansky, and Y.-M. Zhong, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 167.
  98. E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, Phys. Rev. D 88, 114015 (2013).
  99. M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, and M. B. Voloshin, Phys. Lett. B 662, 53 (2008).
  100. A. V. Artamonov et al. (BNL-E949 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 79, 092004 (2009).
  101. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L011701 for more information.
  102. D. Becker et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 54, 208 (2018).
  103. P. S. B. Dev, W. Rodejohann, X.-J. Xu, and Y. Zhang, Searching for Z′ bosons at the P2 experiment, arXiv:2103.09067.
  104. J. Benesch et al. (MOLLER Collaboration), The MOLLER Experiment: An ultra-precise measurement of the weak mixing angle using Moller scattering, arXiv:1411.4088.
  105. A. de Gouvea, P. A. N. Machado, Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, and Z. Tabrizi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 051803 (2020).
  106. M. Cadeddu, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, K. Kouzakov, E. Picciau, and A. Studenikin, Phys. Rev. D 100, 073014 (2019).
  107. G. Fernandez-Moroni, P. A. N. Machado, I. Martinez-Soler, Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, D. Rodrigues, and S. Rosauro-Alcaraz, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 186.
  108. B. Cañas, E. Garcés, O. Miranda, and A. Parada, Phys. Lett. B 784, 159 (2018).
  109. M. S. Safronova, D. Budker, D. DeMille, D. F. J. Kimball, A. Derevianko, and C. W. Clark, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 025008 (2018).
  110. B. Roberts, V. Dzuba, and V. Flambaum, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 65, 63 (2015).
  111. M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018).
  112. P. L. Anthony et al. (SLAC E158 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 081601 (2005).
  113. D. Wang et al. (PVDIS Collaboration), Nature (London) 506, 67 (2014).
  114. G. P. Zeller et al. (NuTeV Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 091802 (2002).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation