Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Reconstructing confined particles with complex singularities

Yui Hayashi1,* and Kei-Ichi Kondo1,2,†

  • 1Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan
  • 2Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan

  • *yhayashi@chiba-u.jp
  • †kondok@faculty.chiba-u.jp

Phys. Rev. D 103, L111504 – Published 14 June, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.L111504

Abstract

Complex singularities have been suggested in propagators of confined particles, e.g., the Landau-gauge gluon propagator. We rigorously reconstruct Minkowski propagators from Euclidean propagators with complex singularities. As a result, the analytically continued Wightman function is holomorphic in the tube, and the Lorentz symmetry and locality are kept intact, whereas the reconstructed Wightman function violates the temperedness and the positivity condition. Moreover, we argue that complex singularities correspond to confined zero-norm states in an indefinite metric state space.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (48)

  1. R. Alkofer and L. von Smekal, Phys. Rep. 353, 281 (2001).
  2. M. Q. Huber, Phys. Rep. 879, 1 (2020).
  3. A. Maas, Phys. Rep. 524, 203 (2013).
  4. R. Alkofer, W. Detmold, C. S. Fischer, and P. Maris, Phys. Rev. D 70, 014014 (2004).
  5. S. Strauss, C. S. Fischer, and C. Kellermann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 252001 (2012).
  6. M. Haas, L. Fister, and J. M. Pawlowski, Phys. Rev. D 90, 091501(R) (2014).
  7. F. Siringo, Nucl. Phys. B907, 572 (2016).
  8. F. Siringo, Phys. Rev. D 94, 114036 (2016).
  9. D. Dudal, O. Oliveira, and P. J. Silva, Phys. Rev. D 89, 014010 (2014).
  10. P. Lowdon, Phys. Rev. D 96, 065013 (2017).
  11. P. Lowdon, Nucl. Phys. B935, 242 (2018).
  12. P. Lowdon, Phys. Lett. B 786, 399 (2018).
  13. A. K. Cyrol, J. M. Pawlowski, A. Rothkopf, and N. Wink, SciPost Phys. 5, 065 (2018).
  14. Y. Hayashi and K.-I. Kondo, Phys. Rev. D 99, 074001 (2019).
  15. D. Dudal, O. Oliveira, M. Roelfs, and P. Silva, Nucl. Phys. B952, 114912 (2020).
  16. K.-I. Kondo, M. Watanabe, Y. Hayashi, R. Matsudo, and Y. Suda, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 84 (2020).
  17. D. Binosi and R.-A. Tripolt, Phys. Lett. B 801, 135171 (2020).
  18. S. W. Li, P. Lowdon, O. Oliveira, and P. J. Silva, Phys. Lett. B 803, 135329 (2020).
  19. Y. Hayashi and K.-I. Kondo, Phys. Rev. D 101, 074044 (2020).
  20. C. S. Fischer and M. Q. Huber, Phys. Rev. D 102, 094005 (2020).
  21. A. F. Falcão, O. Oliveira, and P. J. Silva, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114518 (2020).
  22. H. Umezawa and S. Kamefuchi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 6, 543 (1951); G. Källén, Helv. Phys. Acta. 25, 417 (1952); H. Lehmann, Nuovo Cimento 11, 342 (1954).
  23. V. N. Gribov, Nucl. Phys. B139, 1 (1978).
  24. D. Zwanziger, Nucl. Phys. B323, 513 (1989).
  25. M. Stingl, Phys. Rev. D 34, 3863 (1986); 36, 651(E) (1987).
  26. U. Habel, R. Konning, H. G. Reusch, M. Stingl, and S. Wigard, Z. Phys. A 336, 423 (1990); 336, 435 (1990).
  27. M. Stingl, Z. Phys. A 353, 423 (1996).
  28. D. Dudal, J. A. Gracey, S. P. Sorella, N. Vandersickel, and H. Verschelde, Phys. Rev. D 78, 065047 (2008).
  29. M. Tissier and N. Wschebor, Phys. Rev. D 82, 101701(R) (2010).
  30. M. Tissier and N. Wschebor, Phys. Rev. D 84, 045018 (2011).
  31. M. Peláez, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, Phys. Rev. D 90, 065031 (2014).
  32. P. Maris and H. A. Holties, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 07, 5369 (1992).
  33. P. Maris, Phys. Rev. D 50, 4189 (1994).
  34. P. Maris, Phys. Rev. D 52, 6087 (1995).
  35. K. Osterwalder and R. Schrader, Commun. Math. Phys. 31, 83 (1973).
  36. K. Osterwalder and R. Schrader, Commun. Math. Phys. 42, 281 (1975).
  37. R. F. Streater and A. S. Wightman, PCT, Spin and Statistics, and All That (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2000).
  38. Y. Hayashi and K.-I. Kondo, arXiv:2105.07487.
  39. Without this condition, the discontinuity would be, in general, a hyperfunction, which is inconvenient for some necessary limiting operations. Therefore, we assume that the discontinuity can be represented as a tempered distribution on [−∞,0], namely, D(−σ2−iε)−D(−σ2+iε)→ε→+0DiscD(−σ2)∈𝒮′([0,∞]), where 𝒮′([0,∞]) is the dual space of 𝒮([0,∞])≔{f(λ)=g(−(1+λ)−1); g is a C∞ function on [−1,0]}. For details, see (Sec. A.3. in [40]). Note that a tempered distribution with positive support can be extended to a tempered distribution on [0,∞].

  40. N. Bogolubov, A. Logunov, A. Oksak, and I. Todorov, General Principles of Quantum Field Theory (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1990).
  41. The assumptions (1) boundedness of complex singularities in |k2| and (2) holomorphy of D(k2) in a neighborhood of the real axis except for the timelike singularities are required to justify this statement.

  42. N. Nakanishi, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 51, 1 (1972).
  43. Even in a finite dimensional vector space, the completeness of eigenstates of a hermitian operator does not always hold. Instead, by the Jordan decomposition, “generalized eigenstates” defined by a sequence {|E0⟩,|E1⟩,…,|En−1⟩}: (H−E)|E0⟩=E|E1⟩, (H−E)|E1⟩=E|E2⟩,…, (H−E)|En−1⟩=0 spans the vector space. Nevertheless, allowing generalized eigenstates does not change the conclusion.

  44. N. Nakanishi, Phys. Rev. D 5, 1968 (1972).
  45. T. D. Lee and G. C. Wick, Nucl. Phys. B9, 209 (1969); Phys. Rev. D 2, 1033 (1970).
  46. T. Kugo and I. Ojima, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 66, 1 (1979).
  47. N. Alkofer and R. Alkofer, Phys. Lett. B 702, 158 (2011).
  48. L. Schwartz, Théorie des Distributions (Hermann, Paris, 1966).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation