Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

CP asymmetries and higher-order unitarity relations

Tomáš Blažek* and Peter Maták†

  • Department of Theoretical Physics, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina, 84248 Bratislava, Slovak Republic

  • *tomas.blazek@fmph.uniba.sk
  • †peter.matak@fmph.uniba.sk

Phys. Rev. D 103, L091302 – Published 26 May, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.L091302

Abstract

The main focus of this paper is to introduce a new method to control perturbative calculations of CP asymmetric reaction rates in Boltzmann equation. CP asymmetries in particle reactions are traditionally calculated in terms of complex couplings, Feynman integrals, and Cutkosky rules. We use an expansion of the S-matrix unitarity condition instead, obtaining a general expression for the asymmetries without reference to the imaginary part of the loops. Asymmetry cancelations implied by CPT and unitarity are manifested in a diagrammatic way and easy to track at any order of perturbation theory. We demonstrate the power of this general framework within the right-handed neutrino and top-quark scattering asymmetries in seesaw type-I leptogenesis.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (32)

  1. L. Kvasz, Inštrumentálny Realizmus, 2nd ed. (Pavel Mervart Publishing House, Plzen, the Czech Republic, 2015).
  2. E. W. Kolb and S. Wolfram, Nucl. Phys. B172, 224 (1980).
  3. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 850 (1979).
  4. M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 174, 45 (1986).
  5. L. Bento and Z. Berezhiani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 231304 (2001).
  6. M. Yoshimura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 281 (1978).
  7. A. Falkowski, J. T. Ruderman, and T. Volansky, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2011) 106.
  8. E. Nardi, J. Racker, and E. Roulet, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2007) 090.
  9. D. E. Kaplan, M. A. Luty, and K. M. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D 79, 115016 (2009).
  10. A. Sakharov, Sov. Phys. Usp. 34, 392 (1991).
  11. A. Hook, Phys. Rev. D 84, 055003 (2011).
  12. I. Baldes, N. F. Bell, K. Petraki, and R. R. Volkas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 181601 (2014).
  13. J. Racker, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 042.
  14. E. Roulet, L. Covi, and F. Vissani, Phys. Lett. B 424, 101 (1998).
  15. W. Buchmuller and M. Plumacher, Phys. Lett. B 431, 354 (1998).
  16. M. Flanz and E. A. Paschos, Phys. Rev. D 58, 113009 (1998).
  17. J. M. Frere, F. S. Ling, M. H. G. Tytgat, and V. Van Elewyck, Phys. Rev. D 60, 016005 (1999).
  18. D. V. Nanopoulos and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 20, 2484 (1979).
  19. T. Blažek and P. Maták, arXiv:2104.06395.
  20. Alternatively, we may define the product of amplitudes as (2π)4δ(4)(pf−pi)iMfm|…|iMni=iTfm|…|iTni. Then, the expressions rewritten in terms of M’s will be free of the infinite volume.

  21. J. Bernstein, Kinetic Theory in the Expanding Universe (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1988).
  22. A. Pilaftsis and T. E. Underwood, Nucl. Phys. B692, 303 (2004).
  23. A. Abada, S. Davidson, F.-X. Josse-Michaux, M. Losada, and A. Riotto, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2006) 004.
  24. E. Nardi, Y. Nir, E. Roulet, and J. Racker, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2006) 164.
  25. D. A. Sierra, E. Nardi, and L. A. Munoz, Phys. Rev. D 80, 016007 (2009).
  26. A. Abada, S. Davidson, A. Ibarra, F. X. Josse-Michaux, M. Losada, and A. Riotto, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2006) 010.
  27. The vacuum diagrams that we started from may remind us of thermal field theory with two-particle irreducible effective action. Here, however, the (reducible) bubble diagrams are only used to ensure we generate all forward scattering diagrams without forgetting anything. The connection of the present work to the field theory at finite temperature is investigated in a separate study.

  28. F. J. Botella, M. Nebot, and O. Vives, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2006) 106.
  29. A. Pilaftsis and T. E. J. Underwood, Phys. Rev. D 72, 113001 (2005).
  30. For example, the scattering of lϕa within the model considered in Ref. [31] leads to diagrams of this type.

  31. B. Kayser and G. Segre, Phys. Lett. B 704, 570 (2011).
  32. C. Frye, H. Hannesdottir, N. Paul, M. D. Schwartz, and K. Yan, Phys. Rev. D 99, 056015 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation