Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Geometric optics in the presence of axionlike particles in curved spacetime

Dominik J. Schwarz1, Jishnu Goswami1, and Aritra Basu1,2

  • 1Fakultät für Physik, Universität Bielefeld, Postfach 100131, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany
  • 2Thüringer Landessternwarte, Sternwarte 5, 07778 Tautenburg, Germany

Phys. Rev. D 103, L081306 – Published 27 April, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.L081306

Abstract

We present a concise derivation of geometric optics in the presence of axionic fields in a curved spacetime. Whenever light can be described via geometric optics (the eikonal approximation), the only difference to the situation without axionic field is the phenomenon of achromatic birefringence. Consequently, redshift of light and distance estimates based on propagating light rays, as well as shear and magnification due to gravitational lensing are not affected by the interaction of light with an axionic field.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (27)

  1. J. Ipser and P. Sikivie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 925 (1983).
  2. F. W. Stecker and Q. Shafi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 928 (1983).
  3. J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Lett. 120B, 127 (1983).
  4. L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, Phys. Lett. 120B, 133 (1983).
  5. M. Dine and W. Fischler, Phys. Lett. 120B, 137 (1983).
  6. P. Sikivie and Q. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 111301 (2009).
  7. J. E. Kim and G. Carosi, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 557 (2010); 91, 049902(E) (2019).
  8. G. Sigl and P. Trivedi, arXiv:1811.07873.
  9. T. Fujita, R. Tazaki, and K. Toma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 191101 (2019).
  10. M. M. Ivanov, Y. Y. Kovalev, M. L. Lister, A. G. Panin, A. B. Pushkarev, T. Savolainen, and S. V. Troitsky, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2019) 059.
  11. S. Chigusa, T. Moroi, and K. Nakayama, Phys. Lett. B 803, 135288 (2020).
  12. Y. Chen, J. Shu, X. Xue, Q. Yuan, and Y. Zhao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 061102 (2020).
  13. A. Basu, J. Goswami, D. J. Schwarz, and Y. Urakawa, arXiv:2007.01440.
  14. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Klassische Feldtheorie, Lehrbuch der Theoretischen Physik, Band 2 (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1987).
  15. I. I. Tkachev, Phys. Lett. B 191, 41 (1987).
  16. A. Caputo, M. Regis, M. Taoso, and S. J. Witte, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2019) 027.
  17. A. Arza and P. Sikivie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 131804 (2019).
  18. D. G. Levkov, A. G. Panin, and I. I. Tkachev, Phys. Rev. D 102, 023501 (2020).
  19. D. Harari and P. Sikivie, Phys. Lett. B 289, 67 (1992).
  20. D. Blas, A. Caputo, M. M. Ivanov, and L. Sberna, Phys. Dark Universe 27, 100428 (2020).
  21. M. A. Fedderke, P. W. Graham, and S. Rajendran, Phys. Rev. D 100, 015040 (2019).
  22. I. M. H. Etherington, Philos. Mag. 15, 761 (1933).
  23. R. Sachs, Proc. R. Soc. Ser. A 264, 309 (1961).
  24. Note that for ω∼m, the last term in Eq. (8) would actually be of order k2; therefore, our approximation does not capture the resonant case. For flat spacetimes, a similar ansatz has been worked out in Ref. [18].

  25. J. I. McDonald and L. B. Ventura, Phys. Rev. D 101, 123503 (2020).
  26. C. L. Carilli and G. B. Taylor, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 40, 319 (2002).
  27. T. Akahori and D. Ryu, Astrophys. J. 723, 476 (2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation