Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Hydrogen atom in a fuzzy spherical cavity

M. Hrmo1, S. Kováčik1,2,*, P. Rusnák1, and J. Tekel1

  • 1Department of Theoretical Physics, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynská dolina, 842 48, Bratislava, Slovakia
  • 2Department of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic

  • *Contact author: samuel.kovacik@fmph.uniba.sk

Phys. Rev. D 113, 106026 – Published 22 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/9ycw-jkws

Abstract

The fuzzy onion model formed by connecting a set of concentric fuzzy spheres of increasing radius is motivated by studies of quantum space but can also be used to study standard physics. The main feature of the model is that functions in three-dimensional space—like scalar fields or wave functions—are expressed in terms of Hermitian matrices of a certain structure. Relevant equations are then matrix equations, and some problems, such as searching for the energy spectrum for fixed quantum numbers (l,m), can be expressed as an eigenvalue problem. We show how this simple approach can reproduce the results of other studies analyzing the hydrogen atom in a spherical cavity. We also test the effect of the short-distance quantum structure of the space on these solutions—not looking for the phenomenological consequences, as the scale of quantum space is many orders below the order of the Bohr radius, but to understand the effect of quantum space in general. We observe a set of solutions without a classical counterpart which have been suggested also in a former theoretical study.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (52)

  1. S. Doplicher, K. Fredenhagen, and J. E. Roberts, The quantum structure of spacetime at the Planck scale and quantum fields, Commun. Math. Phys. 172, 187 (1995).
  2. A. H. Chamseddine and A. Connes, The spectral action principle, Commun. Math. Phys. 186, 731 (1997).
  3. J. Ambjorn, J. Jurkiewicz, and R. Loll, Emergence of a 4-D world from causal quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 131301 (2004).
  4. R. J. Szabo, Quantum field theory on noncommutative spaces, Phys. Rep. 378, 207 (2003).
  5. H. Steinacker, Non-commutative geometry and matrix models, Proc. Sci. QGQGS2011 (2011) 004 [arXiv:1109.5521].
  6. N. Seiberg and E. Witten, String theory and noncommutative geometry, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (1999) 032.
  7. D. Berenstein, E. Dzienkowski, and R. Lashof-Regas, Spinning the fuzzy sphere, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2015) 134.
  8. H. C. Steinacker and J. Tekel, String modes, propagators and loops on fuzzy spaces, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2022) 136.
  9. S. Hossenfelder, Minimal length scale scenarios for quantum gravity, Living Rev. Relativity 16, 2 (2013).
  10. P. Nicolini, Quantum gravity and the zero point length, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 54, 106 (2022).
  11. G. Amelino-Camelia, J. R. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos, D. V. Nanopoulos, and S. Sarkar, Tests of quantum gravity from observations of gamma-ray bursts, Nature (London) 393, 763 (1998).
  12. G. Amelino-Camelia, Quantum-spacetime phenomenology, Living Rev. Relativity 16, 5 (2013).
  13. P. Schupp and S. Solodukhin, Exact black hole solutions in noncommutative gravity, arXiv:0906.2724.
  14. E. Burns, D. Svinkin, E. Fenimore, D. A. Kann, J. F. A. Fernandez, D. Frederiks, R. Hamburg, S. Lesage, Y. Temiraev, A. Tsvetkova et al., GRB 221009A: The BOAT, Astrophys. J. Lett. 946, L31 (2023).
  15. J. Hoppe, Ph.D. thesis, MIT, 1982.
  16. J. Madore, The fuzzy sphere, Classical Quantum Gravity 9, 69 (1992).
  17. S. Kováćik and J. Tekel, Fuzzy onionlike space as a matrix model, Phys. Rev. D 109, 105004 (2024).
  18. A. B. Hammou, M. Lagraa, and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Coherent state induced star product on R**3(lambda) and the fuzzy sphere, Phys. Rev. D 66, 025025 (2002).
  19. V. Gáliková, S. Kováčik, and P. Prešnajder, Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector in quantum mechanics in noncommutative space, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 54, 122106 (2013).
  20. V. Gáliková, S. Kováčik, and P. Prešnajder, Quantum mechanics in noncommutative space, Acta Phys. Slovaca 65, 153 (2015).
  21. V. G. Kupriyanov, A hydrogen atom on curved noncommutative space, J. Phys. A 46, 245303 (2013).
  22. A. Géré, T. Jurić, and J. C. Wallet, Noncommutative gauge theories on Rλ3: Perturbatively finite models, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2015) 045.
  23. T. Jurić, T. Poulain, and J. C. Wallet, Closed star product on noncommutative R3 and scalar field dynamics, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2016) 146.
  24. P. Vitale, M. Adamo, R. Dekhil, and D. Fernández-Silvestre, Introduction to noncommutative field and gauge theory, Proc. Sci. QG-MMSchools (2024) 007 [arXiv:2309.17369].
  25. P. Vitale and J. C. Wallet, Noncommutative field theories on Rλ3: Toward UV/IR mixing freedom, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2013) 115.
  26. F. G. Scholtz, B. Chakraborty, J. Govaerts, and S. Vaidya, Spectrum of the non-commutative spherical well, J. Phys. A 40, 14581 (2007).
  27. D. Sinha, B. Chakraborty, and F. G. Scholtz, Non-commutative quantum mechanics in three dimensions and rotational symmetry, J. Phys. A 45, 105308 (2012).
  28. N. Chandra, H. W. Groenewald, J. N. Kriel, F. G. Scholtz, and S. Vaidya, Spectrum of the three dimensional fuzzy well, J. Phys. A 47, 445203 (2014).
  29. J. Tekel, Phase structure of fuzzy field theories and multitrace matrix models, Acta Phys. Slovaca 65, 369 (2015).
  30. J. N. Kriel, H. W. Groenewald, and F. G. Scholtz, Scattering in a three-dimensional fuzzy space, Phys. Rev. D 95, 025003 (2017).
  31. G. Fiore and F. Pisacane, Fuzzy circle and new fuzzy sphere through confining potentials and energy cutoffs, J. Geom. Phys. 132, 0393 (2018).
  32. Gaetano Fiore, Fuzzy hyperspheres via confining potentials and energy cutoffs, J. Phys. A 56, 204002 (2023).
  33. M. Saitou, K. Bamba, and A. Sugamoto, Hydrodynamics on non-commutative space: A step toward hydrodynamics of granular materials, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2014, 103B03 (2014).
  34. N. Aquino, G. Campoy, and H. E. Montgomery Jr., Highly accurate solutions for the confined hydrogen atom, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 107 (2007) 1548.
  35. R. Reyes-García, S. A. Cruz, and R. Cabrera-Trujillo, Heisenberg’s uncertainty relations for a hydrogen atom confined by an impenetrable spherical cavity, Phys. Rev. A 110, 022814 (2024).
  36. A. V. Scherbinin, V. I. Pupyshev, and A. Y. Ermilov, One-electron atom in a spherical cavity as a model for the electronic structure of the internal atoms in clusters, Physics of Clusters (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998), p. 273.
  37. M. H. Al-Hashimi, A. M. Shalaby, and U. J. Wiese, Fate of accidental symmetries of the relativistic hydrogen atom in a spherical cavity, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 362, 621 (2015).
  38. R. Reyes-García, S. A. Cruz, and R. Cabrera-Trujillo, On the wavefunction cutoff factors of atomic hydrogen confined by an impenetrable spherical cavity, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 124, e27441 (2024).
  39. M. H. Al-Hashimi and U. J. Wiese, Self-adjoint extensions for confined electrons: From a particle in a spherical cavity to the hydrogen atom in a sphere and on a cone, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 327, 2742 (2012).
  40. I. B. Kamel, Quantum study of hydrogen stored under high pressure in a spherical cavity, in 8th International Conference on Modeling, Identification and Control (IEEE, Algiers (Algeria), 2016), 592.
  41. S. Goldman and C. Joslin, Spectroscopic properties of an isotropically compressed hydrogen atom, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 6021 (1992).
  42. N. Aquino, The hydrogen and helium atoms confined in spherical boxes, Adv. Quantum Chem. 57, 123 (2009).
  43. C. Laughlin, B. L. Burrows, and M. Cohen, A hydrogen-like atom confined within an impenetrable spherical box, J. Phys. B 35, 701 (2002).
  44. H. White, J. Vera, P. Bailey, P. March, and T. Lawrence, Dynamics of the vacuum and Casimir analogs to the hydrogen atom, J. Mod. Phys. 6, 1308 (2015).
  45. J. Ping and H. Zong, Hydrogen in a cavity, arXiv:1902.05355.
  46. S. Chaudhuri, The problem of a hydrogen atom in a cavity: Oscillator representation solution versus analytic solution, Open Phys. 19, 61 (2021).
  47. E. W. Fischer and P. Saalfrank, Cavity-catalyzed hydrogen transfer dynamics in an entangled molecular ensemble under vibrational strong coupling, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 11771 (2023).
  48. P. Nicolini, A. Smailagic, and E. Spallucci, Noncommutative geometry inspired Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Lett. B 632, 547 (2006).
  49. B. Bukor and J. Tekel, On quarkonium masses in 3D non-commutative space, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 499 (2023).
  50. V. Gáliková and P. Prešnajder, Coulomb scattering in non-commutative quantum mechanics, Acta Polytech. 53, 427 (2013).
  51. S. Kováčik and P. Prešnajder, The velocity operator in quantum mechanics in noncommutative space, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 54, 102103 (2013).
  52. S. Kováčik, Hawking-radiation recoil of microscopic black holes, Phys. Dark Universe 34, 100906 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation