Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Multiprocess imaging of nuclear modifications on parton distributions in proton-nucleus collisions

Meng-Quan Yang1, Peng Ru2,3,4,*, and Ben-Wei Zhang1,†

  • 1Key Laboratory of Quark and Lepton Physics (MOE) and Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
  • 2School of Materials and New Energy, South China Normal University, Shanwei 516699, China
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Institute of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • 4Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Structure and Fundamental Interactions of Matter, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Guangzhou 510006, China

  • *Contact author: p.ru@m.scnu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: bwzhang@mail.ccnu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 112, 074008 – Published 8 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/9wpm-z7lk

Abstract

Nuclear modifications to collinear parton distribution functions are conventionally quantified by the ratios riA(x,Q2)=fiA,proton(x,Q2)/fiproton(x,Q2). For a given nucleus A, these ratios generally depend on the parton momentum fraction x, the probing scale Q2, and the parton species i. Determining these dependencies relies on a global analysis of diverse experimental data. However, in realistic observables, these dependencies are intricately intertwined, making their extraction challenging. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to effectively image the nuclear modification factors riA(x,Q2) at the observable level in proton-nucleus collisions at the Large Hadron Collider. Specifically, through a combined study of Z-boson production, Z+jet production, and Z+c-jet production, we separately enhance signals arising from light-quark, gluon, and heavy-flavor (charm) distributions in nuclei. This enables us to effectively image the riA(x,Q2) for specific parton species. The feasibility of this method is validated through perturbative calculations at next-to-leading order in the strong coupling constant, employing three sets of nuclear PDF parametrizations: EPPS21, nCTEQ15, and TUJU19. Future measurements of these observables are expected to provide better-motivated parametrization forms of nuclear PDFs and yield new insights into the detailed partonic structures of nuclei.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (83)

  1. K. Kovařík, P. M. Nadolsky, and D. E. Soper, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 045003 (2020).
  2. J. J. Ethier and E. R. Nocera, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70, 43 (2020).
  3. F. Gross, E. Klempt, S. J. Brodsky, A. J. Buras, V. D. Burkert, G. Heinrich, K. Jakobs, C. A. Meyer, K. Orginos, M. Strickland et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1125 (2023).
  4. M. Klasen and H. Paukkunen, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 74, 49 (2024).
  5. R. Abdul Khalek, A. Accardi, J. Adam, D. Adamiak, W. Akers, M. Albaladejo, A. Al-bataineh, M. G. Alexeev, F. Ameli, P. Antonioli et al., Nucl. Phys. A1026, 122447 (2022).
  6. D. P. Anderle, V. Bertone, X. Cao, L. Chang, N. Chang, G. Chen, X. Chen, Z. Chen, Z. Cui, L. Dai et al., Front. Phys. (Beijing) 16, 64701 (2021).
  7. N. Armesto, T. Cridge, F. Giuli, L. Harland-Lang, P. Newman, B. Schmookler, R. Thorne, and K. Wichmann, Phys. Rev. D 109, 054019 (2024).
  8. M. Gyulassy, I. Vitev, X. N. Wang, and B. W. Zhang, QuarkGluon Plasma 3 (World Scientific, Singapore, 2004).
  9. G. Y. Qin and X. N. Wang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24, 1530014 (2015).
  10. S. Cao and X. N. Wang, Rep. Prog. Phys. 84, 024301 (2021).
  11. L. Cunqueiro and A. M. Sickles, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 124, 103940 (2022).
  12. M. Xie, Q. F. Han, E. K. Wang, B. W. Zhang, and H. Z. Zhang, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 125 (2024); Y. Li, S. Shen, S. Wang, and B. W. Zhang, 35, 125 (2024).
  13. S. Cao, A. Majumder, R. Modarresi-Yazdi, I. Soudi, and Y. Tachibana, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33, 2430002 (2024).
  14. Y. Mehtar-Tani, D. Pablos, and K. Tywoniuk, Phys. Rev. D 110, 014009 (2024).
  15. Z. Yang, Y. He, I. Moult, and X. N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 011901 (2024).
  16. C. Andres, J. Holguin, R. Kunnawalkam Elayavalli, and J. Viinikainen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 082303 (2025).
  17. M. Klasen, Proc. Sci. DIS2024 (2025) 002 [arXiv:2407.10719].
  18. S. Dulat, T. J. Hou, J. Gao, M. Guzzi, J. Huston, P. Nadolsky, J. Pumplin, C. Schmidt, D. Stump, and C. P. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 93, 033006 (2016).
  19. E. P. Segarra, T. Ježo, A. Accardi, P. Duwentäster, O. Hen, T. J. Hobbs, C. Keppel, M. Klasen, K. Kovařík, A. Kusina et al., Phys. Rev. D 103, 114015 (2021).
  20. M. Hirai, S. Kumano, and T. H. Nagai, Phys. Rev. C 76, 065207 (2007).
  21. K. J. Eskola, H. Paukkunen, and C. A. Salgado, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2009) 065.
  22. D. de Florian, R. Sassot, P. Zurita, and M. Stratmann, Phys. Rev. D 85, 074028 (2012).
  23. K. Kovarik, A. Kusina, T. Jezo, D. B. Clark, C. Keppel, F. Lyonnet, J. G. Morfin, F. I. Olness, J. F. Owens, I. Schienbein et al., Phys. Rev. D 93, 085037 (2016).
  24. R. Wang, X. Chen, and Q. Fu, Nucl. Phys. B920, 1 (2017).
  25. M. Walt, I. Helenius, and W. Vogelsang, Phys. Rev. D 100, 096015 (2019).
  26. H. Khanpour, M. Soleymaninia, S. Atashbar Tehrani, H. Spiesberger, and V. Guzey, Phys. Rev. D 104, 034010 (2021).
  27. K. J. Eskola, P. Paakkinen, H. Paukkunen, and C. A. Salgado, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 413 (2022).
  28. R. Abdul Khalek, R. Gauld, T. Giani, E. R. Nocera, T. R. Rabemananjara, and J. Rojo, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 507 (2022).
  29. R. K. Ellis, W. J. Stirling, and B. R. Webber, QCD and Collider Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2003).
  30. S. I. Alekhin, S. A. Kulagin, and R. Petti, Phys. Rev. D 105, 114037 (2022).
  31. S. I. Alekhin, S. A. Kulagin, and R. Petti, Phys. Rev. D 107, L051506 (2023).
  32. I. C. Cloet, W. Bentz, and A. W. Thomas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 182301 (2012).
  33. B. Schmookler et al. (CLAS Collaboration), Nature (London) 566, 354 (2019).
  34. C. Cocuzza, C.  E. Keppel, H. Liu, W. Melnitchouk, A. Metz, N. Sato, and A.  W. Thomas (Jefferson Lab Angular Momentum (JAM) Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 242001 (2021).
  35. R. Dalal and I. J. D. MacGregor, Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 034301 (2024).
  36. A. W. Denniston et al. (nCTEQ Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 152502 (2024).
  37. J. J. Aubert et al. (European Muon Collaboration), Phys. Lett. 105B, 322 (1981).
  38. A. Bodek, N. Giokaris, W. B. Atwood, D. H. Coward, D. Sherden, D. L. Dubin, J. E. Elias, J. I. Friedman, H. W. Kendall, J. S. Poucher et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1431 (1983).
  39. M. Arneodo, Phys. Rep. 240, 301 (1994).
  40. J. Seely, A. Daniel, D. Gaskell, J. Arrington, N. Fomin, P. Solvignon, R. Asaturyan, F. Benmokhtar, W. Boeglin, B. Boillat et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 202301 (2009).
  41. N. Armesto, J. Phys. G 32, R367 (2006).
  42. A. Kusina, J. P. Lansberg, I. Schienbein, and H. S. Shao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 052004 (2018).
  43. K. J. Eskola, P. Paakkinen, and H. Paukkunen, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 511 (2019).
  44. K. J. Eskola, I. Helenius, P. Paakkinen, and H. Paukkunen, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 037.
  45. A. Kusina, J. P. Lansberg, I. Schienbein, and H. S. Shao, Phys. Rev. D 104, 014010 (2021).
  46. P. K. M. Paakkinen, Proc. Sci. LHCP2022 (2023) 137 [arXiv:2211.08906].
  47. B. B. Abelev et al. (ALICE Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 073.
  48. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 774, 159 (2017).
  49. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 062002 (2018).
  50. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 041.
  51. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 111, 052006 (2025).
  52. S. Shen, P. Ru, and B. W. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 105, 096025 (2022).
  53. S. D. Ellis and D. E. Soper, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 5182 (1995).
  54. J. L. Albacete, N. Armesto, R. Baier, G. G. Barnafoldi, J. Barrette, S. De, W. T. Deng, A. Dumitru, K. Dusling, K. J. Eskola et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 22, 1330007 (2013).
  55. J. L. Albacete, F. Arleo, G. G. Barnaföldi, G. Bíró, D. d’Enterria, B. Ducloué, K. J. Eskola, E. G. Ferreiro, M. Gyulassy, S. M. Harangozó et al., Nucl. Phys. A972, 18 (2018).
  56. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 749, 187 (2015).
  57. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 847 (2019).
  58. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 287 (2018).
  59. J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis, Phys. Rev. D 60, 113006 (1999).
  60. J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2011) 018.
  61. J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and W. T. Giele, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 246 (2015).
  62. J. M. Campbell, S. Höche, and C. T. Preuss, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 1117 (2021).
  63. P. Ru, B. W. Zhang, L. Cheng, E. Wang, and W. N. Zhang, J. Phys. G 42, 085104 (2015).
  64. I. Helenius, M. Walt, and W. Vogelsang, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094031 (2022).
  65. T. J. Hou, J. Gao, T. J. Hobbs, K. Xie, S. Dulat, M. Guzzi, J. Huston, P. Nadolsky, J. Pumplin, C. Schmidt et al., Phys. Rev. D 103, 014013 (2021).
  66. K. F. Muzakka, P. Duwentäster, T. J. Hobbs, T. Ježo, M. Klasen, K. Kovařík, A. Kusina, J. G. Morfín, F. I. Olness, R. Ruiz et al., Phys. Rev. D 106, 074004 (2022).
  67. F. Halzen, Y. S. Jeong, and C. S. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 88, 073013 (2013).
  68. J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. F. Sterman, Adv. Ser. Dir. High Energy Phys. 5, 1 (1989).
  69. P. Ru, S. A. Kulagin, R. Petti, and B. W. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 94, 113013 (2016).
  70. P. Ru, B. W. Zhang, E. Wang, and W. N. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 426 (2015).
  71. D. d’Enterria, K. Krajczár, and H. Paukkunen, Phys. Lett. B 746, 64 (2015).
  72. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 101.
  73. L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin, R. Nathvani, and R. S. Thorne, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 811 (2019).
  74. J. Cruz-Martinez, S. Forte, N. Laurenti, T. R. Rabemananjara, and J. Rojo, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 088.
  75. P. E. Reimer, Eur. Phys. J. A 31, 593 (2007).
  76. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 182.
  77. R. B. Neufeld, I. Vitev, and B. W. Zhang, Phys. Rev. C 83, 034902 (2011).
  78. G. Y. Ma, W. Dai, and B. W. Zhang, Chin. Phys. C 43, 044104 (2019).
  79. V. Guzey and M. Klasen, Phys. Rev. C 102, 065201 (2020).
  80. Y. Y. Zhang and X. N. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034015 (2022).
  81. Z. B. Kang, I. Vitev, and H. Xing, Phys. Rev. D 88, 054010 (2013).
  82. P. Ru, Z. B. Kang, E. Wang, H. Xing, and B. W. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 103, L031901 (2021).
  83. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 142004 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation