Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Discrete spacetime theories can explain the muon magnetic moment discrepancy

Paul C. W. Davies* and Philip Tee†,‡

  • *Contact author: paul.davies@asu.edu
  • †Contact author: p.tee@sussex.ac.uk, ptee2@asu.edu
  • ‡Also at Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Falmer, United Kingdom.

Phys. Rev. D 112, 025002 – Published 7 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/9jty-782x

Abstract

An unsolved problem of particle physics is a discrepancy between the measured value of the muon anomalous magnetic moment and the theoretical prediction based on standard quantum electrodynamics. In this paper we show that if spacetime possesses a fundamental length scale, the ensuing modifications to the photon propagator can account for the discrepancy if the scale is chosen to be 10−22  m; the corresponding energy being about 30 TeV. The possibility that spacetime possesses a graininess on a fine enough scale has a long history. One class of theories that develops this idea is doubly special relativity, and we choose this as a model for our calculation. We note that the derived length scale is many orders of magnitude larger than the Planck length but comparable to that of some higher dimensional gravitational theories. It is also within the scope of experimental confirmation in the next generation of colliders.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (28)

  1. L. Evans, The Large Hadron Collider, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 370, 831 (2012).
  2. S. Hossenfelder, Minimal length scale scenarios for quantum gravity, Living Rev. Relativity 16, 1 (2013).
  3. G. Amelino-Camelia, Testable scenario for relativity with minimum length, Phys. Lett. B 510, 255 (2001).
  4. G. Amelino-Camelia, L. Freidel, J. Kowalski-Glikman, and L. Smolin, Principle of relative locality, Phys. Rev. D 84, 084010 (2011).
  5. T. Adorno, D. Gitman, A. Shabad, and D. Vassilevich, Noncommutative magnetic moment of charged particles, Phys. Rev. D 84, 085031 (2011).
  6. X.-J. Wang and M.-L. Yan, Noncommutative QED and muon anomalous magnetic moment, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2002) 047.
  7. P. K. Panigrahi and T. Shreecharan, Induced magnetic moment in noncommutative Chern-Simons scalar QED, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2005) 045.
  8. M. Born, A suggestion for unifying quantum theory and relativity, Proc. R. Soc. A 165, 291 (1938).
  9. H. S. Snyder, Quantized space-time, Phys. Rev. 71, 38 (1947).
  10. S. Hossenfelder, The minimal length and large extra dimensions, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 19, 2727 (2004).
  11. M. J. Lake and B. Carr, Does Compton–Schwarzschild duality in higher dimensions exclude TeV quantum gravity?, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27, 1930001 (2018).
  12. L. A. Anchordoqui and I. Antoniadis, Large extra dimensions from higher-dimensional inflation, Phys. Rev. D 109, 103508 (2024).
  13. I. B. Logashenko and S. I. Eidelman, Anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, Phys. Usp. 61, 480 (2018).
  14. B. Abi, T. Albahri, S. Al-Kilani, D. Allspach, L. Alonzi, A. Anastasi, A. Anisenkov, F. Azfar, K. Badgley, S. Baeßler et al., Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.46 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 141801 (2021).
  15. ACME Collaboration, Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron, Nature (London) 562, 355 (2018).
  16. P. C. Davies and P. Tee, Quantum vacuum of spacetime with a fundamental length, Phys. Rev. D 110, 025009 (2024).
  17. N. D. Birrell and P. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1984).
  18. G. Amelino-Camelia, M. Arzano, J. Kowalski-Glikman, G. Rosati, and G. Trevisan, Relative-locality distant observers and the phenomenology of momentum-space geometry, Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 075007 (2012).
  19. J. Schwinger, On quantum-electrodynamics and the magnetic moment of the electron, Phys. Rev. 73, 416 (1948).
  20. J. Schwinger, Quantum electrodynamics. III. The electromagnetic properties of the electron–radiative corrections to scattering, Phys. Rev. 76, 790 (1949).
  21. D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell Hoogerheide, and G. Gabrielse, Cavity control of a single-electron quantum cyclotron: Measuring the electron magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. A 83, 052122 (2011).
  22. L. Ryder, Introduction to General Relativity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2009).
  23. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370 (1999).
  24. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, An alternative to compactification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4690 (1999).
  25. A. Rich and J. C. Wesley, The current status of the lepton g factors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 44, 250 (1972).
  26. P. A. M. Dirac, The quantum theory of the electron, Proc. R. Soc. A 117, 610 (1928).
  27. A. Agostini, G. Amelino-Camelia, and M. Arzano, Dirac spinors for doubly special relativity and κ-Minkowski noncommutative spacetime, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, 2179 (2004).
  28. E. Harikumar and V. Rajagopal, Quantization of κ-deformed dirac equation, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35, 2050147 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation