Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Canonical analysis of the gravitational description of the TT¯ deformation

Florencia Benítez*, Guzmán Hernández-Chifflet, and Esteban Mato

  • *Contact author: florenciab@fing.edu.uy
  • Contact author: guzmanhc@fing.edu.uy
  • Contact author: emato@fing.edu.uy

Phys. Rev. D 113, 046015 – Published 19 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/9g3f-nc1f

Abstract

The description of the TT¯ deformation in terms of two-dimensional gravity is analyzed from the Hamiltonian point of view, in a manner analogous to the Arnowitt-Deser-Misner description of general relativity. We find that the Hamiltonian constraints of the theory imply relations between target-space momentum at finite volume that are equivalent to the TT¯ finite-volume flow equations. This fully quantum TT¯ result emerges already at the classical level within the gravitational theory. We exemplify the analysis for the case when the undeformed sector is a collection of D2 free massless scalars, where it is shown that—somewhat nontrivially—the target-space two-dimensional Poincaré symmetry is extended to D dimensions. The connection between canonical quantization of this constrained Hamiltonian system and previous path integral quantizations is also discussed. We extend our analysis to the “gravitational” description of JT¯-type deformations, where it is found that the flow equations obtained involve deformations that twist the spatial boundary conditions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (42)

  1. F. A. Smirnov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Nucl. Phys. B915, 363 (2017).
  2. A. Cavaglià, S. Negro, I. M. Szécsényi, and R. Tateo, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2016) 112.
  3. S. Dubovsky, V. Gorbenko, and M. Mirbabayi, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2017) 136 .
  4. S. Dubovsky, V. Gorbenko, and G. Hernández-Chifflet, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2018) 158.
  5. E. A. Mazenc, V. Shyam, and R. M. Soni, arXiv:1912.09179.
  6. R. L. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 40, 1997 (2008).
  7. M. Bojowald, Canonical Gravity and ApplicationsCosmology, Black Holes, and Quantum Gravity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2010), ISBN [Amazon][WorldCat], [Amazon][WorldCat].
  8. A. J. Tolley, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2020) 050.
  9. C. De Rham, G. Gabadadze, and A. J. Tolley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 231101 (2011).
  10. S. F. Hassan, R. A. Rosen, and A. Schmidt-May, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2012) 026.
  11. L. Alberte and A. Khmelnitsky, Phys. Rev. D 88, 064053 (2013).
  12. K. Hinterbichler and R. A. Rosen, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2012) 047.
  13. N. A. Ondo and A. J. Tolley, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2013) 059.
  14. C. Itzykson and J. B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory, International Series in Pure and Applied Physics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980), ISBN [Amazon][WorldCat].
  15. S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995).
  16. C. T. Marc Henneaux, Quantization of Gauge Systems (Princeton University Press, Cambridge, England, 1991).
  17. L. Brink and M. Henneaux, Principles of String Theory (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013).
  18. R. Jackiw, arXiv:gr-qc/9511048.
  19. C. Rovelli, Quantum Gravity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2004).
  20. T. Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2008).
  21. R. Conti, L. Iannella, S. Negro, and R. Tateo, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2018) 007.
  22. R. Monten, R. M. Myers, and K. Roumpedakis, SciPost Phys. 19, 082 (2025).
  23. S. Dubovsky, R. Flauger, and V. Gorbenko, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2012) 133.
  24. N. Callebaut, J. Kruthoff, and H. Verlinde, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 084.
  25. S. Frolov, Proc Steklov Inst Math / Trudy Matematicheskogo instituta imeni VA Steklova 309, 107 (2020).
  26. M. Guica, SciPost Phys. 5, 048 (2018).
  27. A. Bzowski and M. Guica, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 198.
  28. S. Chakraborty, A. Giveon, and D. Kutasov, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 057.
  29. O. Aharony, S. Datta, A. Giveon, Y. Jiang, and D. Kutasov, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 085.
  30. L. Apolo and W. Song, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 165.
  31. A. Bhattacharyya, S. Ghosh, and S. Pal, arXiv:2309.16658.
  32. J. Aguilera-Damia, V. I. Giraldo-Rivera, E. A. Mazenc, I. Salazar Landea, and R. M. Soni, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 085.
  33. G. Hernández-Chifflet, S. Negro, and A. Sfondrini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 200601 (2020).
  34. J. Polchinski, Commun. Math. Phys. 104, 37 (1986).
  35. E. D’Hoker and D. H. Phong, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 917 (1988).
  36. E. Witten, arXiv:2212.08270.
  37. J. B. Hartle and K. V. Kuchar, Phys. Rev. D 34, 2323 (1986).
  38. A. G. Cohen, G. W. Moore, P. C. Nelson, and J. Polchinski, Nucl. Phys. B267, 143 (1986).
  39. S. Dubovsky, S. Negro, and M. Porrati, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 240.
  40. G. Torroba, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 163.
  41. C. Ferko, A. Sfondrini, L. Smith, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 201604 (2022).
  42. R. Borsato, C. Ferko, and A. Sfondrini, Phys. Rev. D 107, 086011 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation