Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Predicting the dark matter-baryon abundance ratio

Abhishek Banerjee1,*, Dawid Brzeminski1,2,†, and Anson Hook1,‡

  • *Contact author: abanerj4@umd.edu
  • †Contact author: dawid@umich.edu
  • ‡Contact author: hook@umd.edu

Phys. Rev. D 113, 115017 – Published 8 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/98dc-kpx9

Abstract

We discuss relaxation solutions to the dark matter-baryon coincidence problem in the context of QCD axion dark matter. In relaxation solutions, a moduli dynamically adjusts the mass of dark matter and baryons until their energy densities are O(1) the same. Because the QCD axion is heavily connected to QCD, scanning the QCD axion mass inherently also scans the proton mass. In the context of relaxation solutions, this implies that the ratio of dark matter to baryon abundances (ΩDM/ΩB) is a ratio of beta functions showing that these models can only accommodate discrete values of ΩDM/ΩB thereby “predicting” the ratio of the dark matter to baryon abundances. The original composite axion model has only a single integer degree of freedom N, the size of the gauge group, and we show that when N=8 the observed value of ΩDM/ΩB=5.36 is reproduced to within its percent level error bars. Novel tests of this model include more precise measurements of ΩDM/ΩB, a better lattice determination of the dependence of the proton mass on the high energy QCD gauge coupling, as well as more traditional tests such as fifth force experiments.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (52)

  1. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  2. H. M. Hodges, Phys. Rev. D 47, 456 (1993).
  3. Z. G. Berezhiani, A. D. Dolgov, and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Lett. B 375, 26 (1996).
  4. S. Nussinov, Phys. Lett. 165B, 55 (1985).
  5. G. B. Gelmini, L. J. Hall, and M. J. Lin, Nucl. Phys. B281, 726 (1987).
  6. S. M. Barr, R. S. Chivukula, and E. Farhi, Phys. Lett. B 241, 387 (1990).
  7. S. M. Barr, Phys. Rev. D 44, 3062 (1991).
  8. D. B. Kaplan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 741 (1992).
  9. D. E. Kaplan, M. A. Luty, and K. M. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D 79, 115016 (2009).
  10. R. Foot and R. R. Volkas, Phys. Rev. D 68, 021304 (2003).
  11. H. An, S.-L. Chen, R. N. Mohapatra, and Y. Zhang, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2010) 124.
  12. M. Farina, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2015) 017.
  13. I. Garcia Garcia, R. Lasenby, and J. March-Russell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 121801 (2015).
  14. S. J. Lonsdale and R. R. Volkas, Phys. Rev. D 97, 103510 (2018).
  15. M. Ibe, A. Kamada, S. Kobayashi, T. Kuwahara, and W. Nakano, Phys. Rev. D 100, 075022 (2019).
  16. C. Murgui and K. M. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D 105, 095002 (2022).
  17. Y. Bai and P. Schwaller, Phys. Rev. D 89, 063522 (2014).
  18. J. L. Newstead and R. H. TerBeek, Phys. Rev. D 90, 074008 (2014).
  19. A. C. Ritter and R. R. Volkas, Phys. Rev. D 107, 015029 (2023).
  20. J. a. G. Rosa and D. M. C. Silva, Phys. Lett. B 846, 138178 (2023).
  21. D. Brzeminski and A. Hook, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 201001 (2024).
  22. A. Hook, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 261802 (2018).
  23. D. Brzeminski, Z. Chacko, A. Dev, and A. Hook, Phys. Rev. D 104, 075019 (2021).
  24. J. E. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 31, 1733 (1985).
  25. M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to quantum field theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995).
  26. I. Affleck and M. Dine, Nucl. Phys. B249, 361 (1985).
  27. A. Lloyd-Stubbs and J. McDonald, Phys. Rev. D 103, 123514 (2021).
  28. R. N. Mohapatra and N. Okada, Phys. Rev. D 104, 055030 (2021).
  29. P. A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
  30. A. Pich, Rep. Prog. Phys. 58, 563 (1995).
  31. E. Witten, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 128, 363 (1980).
  32. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  33. S. Borsanyi et al., Nature (London) 539, 69 (2016).
  34. G. Grilli di Cortona, E. Hardy, J. Pardo Vega, and G. Villadoro, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2016) 034.
  35. M. Quiros, in ICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology (1999), pp. 187–259.
  36. N. Fonseca, E. Morgante, R. Sato, and G. Servant, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 010.
  37. E. Masso, F. Rota, and G. Zsembinszki, Phys. Rev. D 66, 023004 (2002).
  38. G. D. Moore and M. Tassler, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2011) 105.
  39. D. Antypas et al., arXiv:2203.14915.
  40. G. G. Raffelt, Lect. Notes Phys. 741, 51 (2008).
  41. N. Bar, K. Blum, and G. D’amico, Phys. Rev. D 101, 123025 (2020).
  42. N. Iwamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1198 (1984).
  43. M. Buschmann, C. Dessert, J. W. Foster, A. J. Long, and B. R. Safdi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 091102 (2022).
  44. https://github.com/papai1994/Dark-Matter-Baryon-Abundance.
  45. K. Choi and J. E. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 32, 1828 (1985).
  46. D. B. Kaplan, Nucl. Phys. B260, 215 (1985).
  47. L. Randall, Phys. Lett. B 284, 77 (1992).
  48. B. A. Dobrescu, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5826 (1997).
  49. A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan, and A. E. Nelson, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 43, 27 (1993).
  50. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 789 (2018); 82, 379(E) (2022).
  51. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  52. F. Ferrari (UTfit Collaboration), Proc. Sci. CKM2021 (2023) 078.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation