Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Ratio of γ/π0 production rates in neutrino-nucleus interactions in the Δ resonance mass region

Ara N. Ioannisian

Phys. Rev. D 112, 094034 – Published 19 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/93ym-jy8f

Abstract

We study the dependence of neutrino-induced γ/π0 production (νμ(−)+A→νμ(−)(μ)+γ/π0+X) on the target nucleus A, in the Δ resonance mass region. Our conclusion is based on experimental data for π0 production rates at photon-nucleus interactions from the A2 Collaboration at the Mainz MAMI accelerator. We assume that Δ resonance decays are independent of the production mechanism (via photon, Z, or W boson). In neutral current (NC) interactions, the 1π0+X production scales as A2/3. In contrast, photons from Δ decays typically escape the nucleus, resulting in a cross-section proportional to the atomic number A. Thus, in NC interactions, the ratio of γ production to π0 production is proportional to A1/3. In charged current (CC) νμ− (ν¯μ)-induced production of Δ+ (Δ0) will be proportional to the number of neutrons (protons) in the nucleus. After Δ decay, due to the charge universality in strong interactions, the suppression factor for π0 escaping the nucleus must also follow A−1/3, as in NC interactions. We predict the ratio of the γ/π0 production rates in NC and CC interactions and for νμ and ν¯μ beams: argon target, ∼3.1% (NC/CC νμ/ν¯μ); water target, ∼1.9% (NC), ∼2.3% (CC νμ), and ∼1.7% (CC ν¯μ); liquid scintillator target: ∼1.7% (NC), ∼2.1% (CC νμ), and ∼1.6% (CC ν¯μ). The accuracy of our predictions is limited due to uncertainties in the decay rate Δ+/0→p/n+γ and the presence of other (minor) channels of neutrino-induced γ/π0 production in the Δ mass region. We also discuss solving the MiniBooNE anomaly by looking at the CC single-photon and single-neutral-pion production rates at the short baseline neutrino program experiments at Fermilab.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (11)

  1. K. Abe et al. (Hyper-Kamiokande Collaboration), arXiv:1805.04163.
  2. M. Antonello et al. (MicroBooNE and LAr1-ND and ICARUS-WA104 Collaborations), arXiv:1503.01520.
  3. R. Acciarri et al. (DUNE Collaboration), arXiv:1512.06148.
  4. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  5. A. Ioannisian, arXiv:1909.08571.
  6. https://wwwa2.kph.uni-mainz.de/
  7. B. Krusche, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 55, 46 (2005).
  8. X. Zhang and B. D. Serot, Phys. Rev. C 86, 035504 (2012); 86, 035502 (2012).
  9. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 103, 052002 (2021).
  10. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 111801 (2022); arXiv:2502.06064; Phys. Rev. Lett.arXiv:2502.06091; Phys. Rev. Lett.arXiv:2502.05750.
  11. R. J. Hill, Phys. Rev. D 84, 017501 (2011); X. Zhang and B. D. Serot, Phys. Lett. B 719, 409 (2013); E. Wang, L. Alvarez-Ruso, and J. Nieves, 740, 16 (2015); C. Giunti, A. Ioannisian, and G. Ranucci, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 146; 02 (2021) 078(E).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation