- Open Access
Ratio of production rates in neutrino-nucleus interactions in the resonance mass region
Phys. Rev. D 112, 094034 – Published 19 November, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/93ym-jy8f
Abstract
We study the dependence of neutrino-induced production () on the target nucleus , in the resonance mass region. Our conclusion is based on experimental data for production rates at photon-nucleus interactions from the A2 Collaboration at the Mainz MAMI accelerator. We assume that resonance decays are independent of the production mechanism (via photon, Z, or W boson). In neutral current (NC) interactions, the production scales as . In contrast, photons from decays typically escape the nucleus, resulting in a cross-section proportional to the atomic number . Thus, in NC interactions, the ratio of production to production is proportional to . In charged current (CC) ()-induced production of () will be proportional to the number of neutrons (protons) in the nucleus. After decay, due to the charge universality in strong interactions, the suppression factor for escaping the nucleus must also follow , as in NC interactions. We predict the ratio of the production rates in NC and CC interactions and for and beams: argon target, (NC/CC ); water target, (NC), (CC ), and (CC ); liquid scintillator target: (NC), (CC ), and (CC ). The accuracy of our predictions is limited due to uncertainties in the decay rate and the presence of other (minor) channels of neutrino-induced production in the mass region. We also discuss solving the MiniBooNE anomaly by looking at the CC single-photon and single-neutral-pion production rates at the short baseline neutrino program experiments at Fermilab.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (11)
- K. Abe et al. (Hyper-Kamiokande Collaboration), arXiv:1805.04163.
- M. Antonello et al. (MicroBooNE and LAr1-ND and ICARUS-WA104 Collaborations), arXiv:1503.01520.
- R. Acciarri et al. (DUNE Collaboration), arXiv:1512.06148.
- R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
- A. Ioannisian, arXiv:1909.08571.
- https://wwwa2.kph.uni-mainz.de/
- B. Krusche, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 55, 46 (2005).
- X. Zhang and B. D. Serot, Phys. Rev. C 86, 035504 (2012); 86, 035502 (2012).
- A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 103, 052002 (2021).
- P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 111801 (2022); arXiv:2502.06064; Phys. Rev. Lett.arXiv:2502.06091; Phys. Rev. Lett.arXiv:2502.05750.
- R. J. Hill, Phys. Rev. D 84, 017501 (2011); X. Zhang and B. D. Serot, Phys. Lett. B 719, 409 (2013); E. Wang, L. Alvarez-Ruso, and J. Nieves, 740, 16 (2015); C. Giunti, A. Ioannisian, and G. Ranucci, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 146; 02 (2021) 078(E).