Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Unraveling freeze-in dark matter through the echoes of gravitational waves

Partha Konar1,* and Sudipta Show2,†

  • *Contact author: konar@prl.res.in
  • †Contact author: sudiptas@iitk.ac.in

Phys. Rev. D 113, L071701 – Published 22 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/8vjm-1g58

Abstract

In the quest to unravel the dark sector, feebly interacting freeze-in dark matter presents an intriguing possibility, plausibly explaining the consistent null results from various dark matter experiments. We propose a unique imprint in the form of gravitational waves generated during the freeze-in production of dark matter from heavy particle decay in the early Universe. This characteristic gravitational wave signature can serve as a powerful probe for freeze-in dark matter. Our study indicates that future high-frequency gravitational wave experiments can detect these waves, offering a novel avenue to critically test the underlying conditions and requirements of this dark matter paradigm, which typically lie beyond the reach of current and planned dark matter detection experiments.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (62)

  1. G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 203 (2018).
  2. L. Roszkowski, E. M. Sessolo, and S. Trojanowski, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 066201 (2018).
  3. L. J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell, and S. M. West, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2009) 080.
  4. N. Bernal, M. Heikinheimo, T. Tenkanen, K. Tuominen, and V. Vaskonen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32, 1730023 (2017).
  5. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023).
  6. Z. Bo et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011805 (2025).
  7. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 221003 (2025).
  8. M. Ackermann et al. (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 231301 (2015).
  9. A. Albert et al. (Fermi-LAT, DES Collaborations), Astrophys. J. 834, 110 (2017).
  10. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 97, 052012 (2018).
  11. D. Curtin et al., Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 116201 (2019).
  12. G. Bélanger et al., J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2018) 186.
  13. M. Garny, J. Heisig, M. Hufnagel, and B. Lülf, Phys. Rev. D 97, 075002 (2018).
  14. F. D’Eramo, N. Fernandez, and S. Profumo, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2017) 046.
  15. A. Ghosh, P. Konar, and S. Show, Phys. Rev. D 112, 055012 (2025).
  16. M. Becker, E. Copello, J. Harz, J. Lang, and Y. Xu, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2023) 053.
  17. S. Chakraborti, V. Martin, and P. Poulose, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2019) 057.
  18. J. M. No, P. Tunney, and B. Zaldivar, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 022.
  19. P. Ghosh, P. Konar, A. K. Saha, and S. Show, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2021) 017.
  20. P. K. Das, P. Konar, S. Kundu, and S. Show, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 198.
  21. L. Calibbi, A. Mariotti, and P. Tziveloglou, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2015) 116.
  22. L. Calibbi, L. Lopez-Honorez, S. Lowette, and A. Mariotti, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2018) 037.
  23. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/8vjm-1g58 for (i) the realization of different class of models based on the yXξχ interaction topology, (ii) the evolution of dark matter (Yχ) and heavy mediator number density (YXeq) as functions of x, (iii) proof that the freeze-in DM never thermalizes for our choice of masses and couplings, (iv) the uniqueness of peak frequency of studied GW spectrum, and (v) the detection prospects of this GW spectrum.
  24. V. Iršič et al., Phys. Rev. D 96, 023522 (2017).
  25. F. D’Eramo and A. Lenoci, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2020) 045.
  26. M. Viel, G. D. Becker, J. S. Bolton, and M. G. Haehnelt, Phys. Rev. D 88, 043502 (2013).
  27. M. R. Lovell, V. Eke, C. S. Frenk, L. Gao, A. Jenkins, T. Theuns, J. Wang, S. D. M. White, A. Boyarsky, and O. Ruchayskiy, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 420, 2318 (2012).
  28. P. Bode, J. P. Ostriker, and N. Turok, Astrophys. J. 556, 93 (2001).
  29. S. Y. Choi, J. S. Shim, and H. S. Song, Phys. Rev. D 51, 2751 (1995).
  30. B. R. Holstein, Am. J. Phys. 74, 1002 (2006).
  31. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  32. A. Strumia, arXiv:hep-ph/0608347.
  33. M.-C. Chen, arXiv:hep-ph/0703087.
  34. B. Barman, N. Bernal, Y. Xu, and O. Zapata, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2023) 019.
  35. S. Kanemura and K. Kaneta, Phys. Lett. B 855, 138807 (2024).
  36. K. Nakayama and Y. Tang, Phys. Lett. B 788, 341 (2019); 839, 137787(E) (2023).
  37. D. Huang and L. Yin, Phys. Rev. D 100, 043538 (2019).
  38. B. Barman, N. Bernal, Y. Xu, and O. Zapata, Phys. Rev. D 108, 083524 (2023).
  39. N. Bernal, S. Cléry, Y. Mambrini, and Y. Xu, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2023) 065.
  40. A. Tokareva, Phys. Lett. B 853, 138695 (2024).
  41. N. Bernal, Q.-f. Wu, X.-J. Xu, and Y. Xu, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 125.
  42. K.-Y. Choi, E. Lkhagvadorj, and S. Mahapatra, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2024) 064.
  43. A. Datta and A. Sil, arXiv:2410.01900.
  44. P. Amaro-Seoane, H. Audley, S. Babak, J. Baker, E. Barausse, P. Bender, E. Berti, P. Binetruy, M. Born, D. Bortoluzzi et al., arXiv:1702.00786.
  45. N. Seto, S. Kawamura, and T. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 221103 (2001).
  46. B. P. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, and Virgo Collaborations), Living Rev. Relativity 19, 1 (2016).
  47. S. Hild, S. Chelkowski, and A. Freise, arXiv:0810.0604.
  48. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 34, 044001 (2017).
  49. M. Maggiore, Phys. Rep. 331, 283 (2000).
  50. N. Herman, A. Füzfa, L. Lehoucq, and S. Clesse, Phys. Rev. D 104, 023524 (2021).
  51. N. Herman, L. Lehoucq, and A. Fúzfa, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124009 (2023).
  52. T.-H. Yeh, J. Shelton, K. A. Olive, and B. D. Fields, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2022) 046.
  53. C. Armitage-Caplan, M. Avillez, D. Barbosa, A. Banday, N. Bartolo, R. Battye, J. Bernard, P. de Bernardis, S. Basak, M. Bersanelli et al., arXiv:1102.2181.
  54. R. Laureijs, J. Amiaux, S. Arduini, J.-L. Augueres, J. Brinchmann, R. Cole, M. Cropper, C. Dabin, L. Duvet, A. Ealet et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:1110.3193 (2011).
  55. J. Ghiglieri and M. Laine, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2015) 022.
  56. J. Ghiglieri, G. Jackson, M. Laine, and Y. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 092.
  57. A. Ringwald, J. Schütte-Engel, and C. Tamarit, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2020) 054.
  58. M. Drewes, Y. Georis, J. Klaric, and P. Klose, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2023) 073.
  59. P. Konar and S. Show, arXiv:2512.13799.
  60. R. Tito D’Agnolo and S. A. R. Ellis, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2024) 164.
  61. Y. He, S. K. Giri, R. Sharma, S. Mtchedlidze, and I. Georgiev, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2023) 051.
  62. V. Domcke, C. Garcia-Cely, and N. L. Rodd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 041101 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation