Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Rescuing leptogenesis in inverse seesaw models with the help of non-Abelian flavor symmetries

Yan Shao and Zhen-hua Zhao*

  • *Contact author: zhaozhenhua@lnnu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 113, 015001 – Published 2 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/8pl4-nrkf

Abstract

The inverse seesaw (ISS) model provides an attractive framework that can naturally explain the smallness of neutrino masses while accommodating some sterile neutrinos potentially accessible at present or future experiments. However, in generic ISS models with hierarchical pseudo-Dirac (PD) sterile neutrino pairs, the generation of the observed baryon asymmetry of the Universe via the leptogenesis mechanism is extremely challenging. In this paper, we investigate rescuing leptogenesis in the ISS model with the help of non-Abelian flavor symmetries, which have the potential to explain the observed peculiar neutrino mixing pattern: we first implement non-Abelian flavor symmetries to naturally enforce mass degeneracies among different pseudo-Dirac sterile neutrino pairs and then break them in a proper way so that resonant leptogenesis among different PD sterile neutrino pairs can arise, thus enhancing the generated baryon asymmetry. To be specific, we have considered the following two well-motivated approaches for generating the tiny mass splittings among different PD sterile neutrino pairs: one approach makes use of the renormalization-group corrections to the sterile neutrino masses, while the other approach invokes nontrivial flavor structure of the μs matrix. For these two scenarios, we aim to explore the viability of leptogenesis and to identify the conditions under which the observed baryon asymmetry can be successfully reproduced.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (63)

  1. Z. Z. Xing, Phys. Rep. 854, 1 (2020).
  2. P. A. R. Ade et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 16, 571 (2014).
  3. P. Minkowski, Phys. Lett. 67B, 421 (1977).
  4. M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, in Supergravity, edited by P. van Nieuwenhuizen and D. Freedman (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979), p. 315.
  5. T. Yanagida, in Proceedings of the Workshop on the Unified Theory and the Baryon Number in the Universe, edited by O. Sawada and A. Sugamoto, KEK Report No. 79-18 (Tsukuba, 1979), p. 95.
  6. R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980).
  7. J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2227 (1980).
  8. M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 174, 45 (1986).
  9. W. Buchmuller, R. D. Peccei, and T. Yanagida, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 55, 311 (2005).
  10. W. Buchmuller, P. Di Bari, and M. Plumacher, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 315, 305 (2005).
  11. S. Davidson, E. Nardi, and Y. Nir, Phys. Rep. 466, 105 (2008).
  12. D. Bodeker and W. Buchmuller, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 035004 (2021).
  13. S. Davidson and A. Ibarra, Phys. Lett. B 535, 25 (2002).
  14. D. Wyler and L. Wolfenstein, Nucl. Phys. B218, 205 (1983).
  15. R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 561 (1986).
  16. G. ′t Hooft, NATO Sci. Ser. B 59, 135 (1980).
  17. A. M. Abdullahi et al., J. Phys. G 50, 020501 (2023).
  18. A. Das and N. Okada, Phys. Rev. D 88, 113001 (2013).
  19. L. Wolfenstein, Nucl. Phys. B186, 147 (1981).
  20. S. T. Petcov, Phys. Lett. 110B, 245 (1982).
  21. J. W. F. Valle and M. Singer, Phys. Rev. D 28, 540 (1983).
  22. M. Kobayashi and C. S. Lim, Phys. Rev. D 64, 013003 (2001).
  23. A. Pilaftsis, Phys. Rev. D 56, 5431 (1997).
  24. A. Pilaftsis and T. E. J. Underwood, Nucl. Phys. B692, 303 (2004).
  25. M. J. Dolan, T. P. Dutka, and R. R. Volkas, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2018) 012.
  26. A. Abada, G. Arcadi, V. Domcke, and M. Lucente, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2015) 041.
  27. A. Abada, G. Arcadi, V. Domcke, and M. Lucente, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2017) 024.
  28. E. K. Akhmedov, V. A. Rubakov, and A. Y. Smirnov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1359 (1998).
  29. T. Asaka and M. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. B 620, 17 (2005).
  30. A. Mukherjee and A. K. Saha, Phys. Lett. B 849, 138474 (2024).
  31. K. Agashe, P. Du, M. Ekhterachian, C. S. Fong, S. Hong, and L. Vecchi, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2019) 029.
  32. I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 216.
  33. F. Capozzi, W. Giarè, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, A. Melchiorri, and A. Palazzo, Phys. Rev. D 111, 093006 (2025).
  34. P. F. Harrison, D. H. Perkins, and W. G. Scott, Phys. Lett. B 530, 167 (2002).
  35. Z. Z. Xing, Phys. Lett. B 533, 85 (2002).
  36. G. Altarelli and F. Feruglio, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2701 (2010).
  37. S. F. King and C. Luhn, Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 056201 (2013).
  38. F. Feruglio and A. Romanino, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015007 (2021).
  39. G. J. Ding and S. F. King, Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 084201 (2024).
  40. G. J. Ding and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rep. 1109, 1 (2025).
  41. J. D. Bjorken, P. F. Harrison, and W. G. Scott, Phys. Rev. D 74, 073012 (2006).
  42. Z. Z. Xing and S. Zhou, Phys. Lett. B 653, 278 (2007).
  43. X. G. He and A. Zee, Phys. Lett. B 645, 427 (2007).
  44. C. H. Albright and W. Rodejohann, Eur. Phys. J. C 62, 599 (2009).
  45. C. H. Albright, A. Dueck, and W. Rodejohann, Eur. Phys. J. C 70, 1099 (2010).
  46. C. C. Li and G. J. Ding, Nucl. Phys. B881, 206 (2014).
  47. F. Feruglio, C. Hagedorn, and R. Ziegler, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2753 (2014).
  48. G. J. Ding, S. F. King, C. Luhn, and A. J. Stuart, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 084.
  49. T. Nomura, H. Okada, and S. Patra, Nucl. Phys. B967, 115395 (2021).
  50. T. P. Nguyen, T. T. Thuc, D. T. Si, T. T. Hong, and L. T. Hue, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 023B01 (2022).
  51. C. Hagedorn, J. Kriewald, J. Orloff, and A. M. Teixeira, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 194 (2022).
  52. B. Karmakar and A. Sil, Phys. Rev. D 96, 015007 (2017).
  53. S. Blanchet, T. Hambye, and F. X. Josse-Michaux, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2010) 023.
  54. A. Abada, S. Davidson, F. X. Josse-Michaux, M. Losada, and A. Riotto, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2006) 004.
  55. E. Nardi, Y. Nir, E. Roulet, and J. Racker, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2006) 164.
  56. A. Pilaftsis and T. E. J. Underwood, Nucl. Phys. B692, 303 (2004).
  57. A. Pilaftsis and T. E. J. Underwood, Phys. Rev. D 72, 113001 (2005).
  58. P. C. da Silva, D. Karamitros, T. McKelvey, and A. Pilaftsis, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 065.
  59. S. Blanchet, P. S. Bhupal Dev, and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D 82, 115025 (2010).
  60. W. Buchmuller, P. Di Bari, and M. Plumacher, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 315, 305 (2005).
  61. J. Bergstrom, M. Malinsky, T. Ohlsson, and H. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 81, 116006 (2010).
  62. A. M. Baldini et al. (MEG Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 434 (2016).
  63. D. V. Forero, S. Morisi, M. Tortola, and J. W. F. Valle, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2011) 142.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation