- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Degenerate kinks and kink-instantons in two-dimensional scalar field models with N=1 and N=2 supersymmetry

Evgenii Ievlev and Mikhail Shifman

PDF

Phys. Rev. D 112, 125001 – Published 1 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/8htl-6ncq

Abstract

Models with classically degenerate vacua often support quasiclassical configurations of nontrivial topology. In (0+1)-dimensional quantum mechanics with a double-well potential, for example, instantons induce mixing between the two perturbative ground states in the purely bosonic case, while in the supersymmetric version, the tunneling amplitude is suppressed. In this work, we investigate (1+1)-dimensional models featuring classically Bogomol’nyi-Prasad-Sommerfield saturated kinks with degenerate masses and identical topology. Recent studies suggest that such kinks may undergo mixing mediated by scalar-field instantons. We analyze this phenomenon in a supersymmetric framework and demonstrate that, whereas mixing indeed occurs in the bosonic theory, the presence of fermionic zero modes in the supersymmetric case leads to the vanishing of the transition amplitude. To illustrate these results, we examine two examples featuring Wess-Zumino models with two and four supercharges. The latter example is motivated by the Affleck-Dine-Seiberg superpotential. We also present a number of developments of instanton calculus in the case of instantons in kink backgrounds.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (56)

  1. G. ’t Hooft, Magnetic monopoles in unified gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B79, 276 (1974).
  2. A. A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, A. S. Schwartz, and Y. S. Tyupkin, Pseudoparticle solutions of the Yang-Mills equations, Phys. Lett. 59B, 85 (1975).
  3. R. F. Dashen, B. Hasslacher, and A. Neveu, Nonperturbative methods and extended hadron models in field theory 1. Semiclassical functional methods, Phys. Rev. D 10, 4114 (1974).
  4. F. R. Klinkhamer and N. S. Manton, A saddle point solution in the Weinberg-Salam theory, Phys. Rev. D 30, 2212 (1984).
  5. V. A. Rubakov, Adler-Bell-Jackiw anomaly and fermion number breaking in the presence of a magnetic monopole, Nucl. Phys. B203, 311 (1982).
  6. C. G. Callan, Jr., Monopole catalysis of baryon decay, Nucl. Phys. B212, 391 (1983).
  7. S. Weinberg, A new light boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978).
  8. F. Wilczek, Problem of strong P and T invariance in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978).
  9. M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, Can confinement ensure natural CP invariance of strong interactions?, Nucl. Phys. B166, 493 (1980).
  10. J. E. Kim, Weak interaction singlet and strong CP invariance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 103 (1979).
  11. P. Sikivie, Experimental tests of the invisible axion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1415 (1983).
  12. N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Electric—magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B426, 19 (1994).
  13. G. R. Dvali and M. A. Shifman, Domain walls in strongly coupled theories, Phys. Lett. B 396, 64 (1997); Phys. Lett. B 407, 452(E) (1997).
  14. R. Auzzi, S. Bolognesi, J. Evslin, K. Konishi, and A. Yung, NonAbelian superconductors: Vortices and confinement in N=2 SQCD, Nucl. Phys. B673, 187 (2003).
  15. M. Shifman and A. Yung, NonAbelian string junctions as confined monopoles, Phys. Rev. D 70, 045004 (2004).
  16. A. Hanany and D. Tong, Vortex strings and four-dimensional gauge dynamics, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2004) 066.
  17. J. Evslin, A. García Martín-Caro, and A. Wereszczyński, Instanton corrections to the MSTB Kink mass, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 173.
  18. C. Montonen, On solitons with an Abelian charge in scalar field theories. 1. Classical theory and Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization, Nucl. Phys. B112, 349 (1976).
  19. S. Sarkar, S. E. Trullinger, and A. R. Bishop, Solitary wave solution for a complex one-dimensional field, Phys. Lett. 59A, 255 (1976).
  20. S. Takagi and G. Tatara, Macroscopic quantum coherence of chirality of a domain wall in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 54, 9920 (1996).
  21. M. Dubé and P. C. E. Stamp, Effects of phonons and nuclear spins on the tunneling of a domain wall, J. Low Temp. Phys. 110, 779 (1998).
  22. J. Shibata and S. Takagi, Macroscopic quantum dynamics of a free domain wall in a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 62, 5719 (2000).
  23. E. G. Galkina, B. A. Ivanov, and S. Savel’ev, Chirality tunneling and quantum dynamics for domain walls in mesoscopic ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 77, 134425 (2008).
  24. A. A. Izquierdo, M. A. Gonzalez Leon, and J. Mateos Guilarte, BPS and non-BPS kinks in a massive non-linear S**2-sigma model, Phys. Rev. D 79, 125003 (2009).
  25. M. Hongo, T. Fujimori, T. Misumi, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, Instantons in chiral magnets, Phys. Rev. B 101, 104417 (2020).
  26. M. A. Shifman and M. B. Voloshin, Degenerate domain wall solutions in supersymmetric theories, Phys. Rev. D 57, 2590 (1998).
  27. J. P. Gauntlett, D. Tong, and P. K. Townsend, Multidomain walls in massive supersymmetric sigma models, Phys. Rev. D 64, 025010 (2001).
  28. D. Tong, The Moduli space of BPS domain walls, Phys. Rev. D 66, 025013 (2002).
  29. E. Ievlev, “kink-inst: Mathematica code.” https://github.com/ievlev9292/kink-inst, 2025.
  30. M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and M. B. Voloshin, Anomaly and quantum corrections to solitons in two-dimensional theories with minimal supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 59, 045016 (1999).
  31. A. Losev, M. A. Shifman, and A. I. Vainshtein, Counting supershort supermultiplets, Phys. Lett. B 522, 327 (2001).
  32. A. Losev, M. A. Shifman, and A. I. Vainshtein, Single state supermultiplet in (1+1)-dimensions, New J. Phys. 4, 21 (2002).
  33. E. Witten and D. I. Olive, Supersymmetry algebras that include topological charges, Phys. Lett. 78B, 97 (1978).
  34. A. Rebhan and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, No saturation of the quantum Bogomolnyi bound by two-dimensional supersymmetric solitons, Nucl. Phys. B508, 449 (1997).
  35. H. Nastase, M. A. Stephanov, P. van Nieuwenhuizen, and A. Rebhan, Topological boundary conditions, the BPS bound, and elimination of ambiguities in the quantum mass of solitons, Nucl. Phys. B542, 471 (1999).
  36. N. Graham and R. L. Jaffe, Energy, central charge, and the BPS bound for (1+1)-dimensional supersymmetric solitons, Nucl. Phys. B544, 432 (1999).
  37. A. Rebhan, P. van Nieuwenhuizen, and R. Wimmer, The Anomaly in the central charge of the supersymmetric kink from dimensional regularization and reduction, Nucl. Phys. B648, 174 (2003).
  38. A. Alonso-Izquierdo, Kink dynamics in the MSTB model, Phys. Scr. 94, 085302 (2019).
  39. D. Tong, Lectures on Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics (2025).
  40. A. Alonso-Izquierdo, S. Navarro-Obregón, K. Oles, J. Queiruga, T. Romanczukiewicz, and A. Wereszczynski, Semi-Bogomol’nyi-Prasad-Sommerfield sphaleron and its dynamics, Phys. Rev. E 108, 064208 (2023).
  41. A. Alonso Izquierdo, W. Garcia Fuertes, M. A. Gonzalez Leon, and J. Mateos Guilarte, Semiclassical mass of quantum k component topological kinks, Nucl. Phys. B638, 378 (2002).
  42. M. Shifman, Advanced Topics in Quantum Field Theory: A Lecture Course, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2022).
  43. A. Kovner, Confinement, magnetic Z(N) symmetry and low-energy effective theory of gluodynamics, in At The Frontier of Particle Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001), pp. 1777–1825.
  44. M. B. Hindmarsh and T. W. B. Kibble, Cosmic strings, Rep. Prog. Phys. 58, 477 (1995).
  45. V. R. Khalilov and C.-L. Ho, Dirac electron in a Coulomb field in (2+1)-dimensions, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 13, 615 (1998).
  46. R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten, Topological gauge theories and group cohomology, Commun. Math. Phys. 129, 393 (1990).
  47. R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, Solitons with fermion number 1/2, Phys. Rev. D 13, 3398 (1976).
  48. A. Kovner, M. A. Shifman, and A. V. Smilga, Domain walls in supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories, Phys. Rev. D 56, 7978 (1997).
  49. A. Ritz, M. Shifman, and A. Vainshtein, Enhanced worldvolume supersymmetry and intersecting domain walls in N=1 SQCD, Phys. Rev. D 70, 095003 (2004).
  50. N. S. Manton, Integration theory for kinks and sphalerons in one dimension, J. Phys. A 57, 025202 (2024).
  51. A. Gorsky and M. A. Shifman, More on the tensorial central charges in N=1 supersymmetric gauge theories (BPS wall junctions and strings), Phys. Rev. D 61, 085001 (2000).
  52. M. Shifman and A. Yung, Supersymmetric Solitons (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2009).
  53. C. Callias, Index theorems on open spaces, Commun. Math. Phys. 62, 213 (1978).
  54. E. J. Weinberg, Index calculations for the fermion-vortex system, Phys. Rev. D 24, 2669 (1981).
  55. R. Jackiw and P. Rossi, Zero modes of the vortex—fermion system, Nucl. Phys. B190, 681 (1981).
  56. X. Cui and M. Shifman, N=(0,2) deformation of CP(1) model: Two-dimensional analog of N=1 Yang-Mills theory in four dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 85, 045004 (2012).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 112, 125001– Published 1 December, 2025
  • Received 9 October 2025
  • Accepted 9 November 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation