Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Understanding the nontrivial isoscalar pseudoscalar structures in the KSKSπ0 spectra in the J/ψ radiative decay

Yin Cheng1,2,3,*, Lin Qiu1,2,†, and Qiang Zhao1,2,4,‡

  • *Contact author: chengyin@itp.ac.cn
  • †Contact author: qiulin@ihep.ac.cn
  • ‡Contact author: zhaoq@ihep.ac.cn

Phys. Rev. D 111, 114015 – Published 17 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/8hbx-79qp

Abstract

Initiated by the recent observation of a flattened line shape of IJPC=00−+ around 1.4–1.5 GeV in the KSKSπ0 invariant mass spectrum by BESIII, we make a systematic partial wave analysis of J/ψ→γηX→γKK¯π based on an isobaric approach. We demonstrate that in the scenario of the first radial excitations of the isoscalar pseudoscalar from the KK¯π threshold to about 1.6 GeV the non-trivial KSKSπ0 invariant mass spectrum can be explained by the coupled-channel effects with the presence of the triangle singularity mechanism. It shows that a combined fit of the Dalitz plots, three-body and two-body spectra can be achieved, which suggests that the one-state solution around 1.4–1.5 GeV proposed before still holds well. In particular, we show that the coupled-channel effects between the three important quasi-two-body decay channels, K*K¯+c.c., κK¯+c.c. and a0(980)π, can be well described by taking into account the one-loop corrections in the isobaric approach. This is because the isoscalar pseudoscalar states are coupled to the K*K¯+c.c. and a0(980)π (κK¯+c.c.) channels via the P and S waves, respectively. As a consequence, the coupled-channel effects can be largely absorbed into the redefinition of the tree-level effective couplings with the transition amplitudes computed to the order of one-loop corrections. Then, the coupled-channel effects can be estimated by the contributions from the one-loop rescattering amplitudes in comparison with the tree-level ones, where we find that the rescattering contributions from the P wave into the S wave, or vice versa, are apparently suppressed in the kinematic region near threshold.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (59)

  1. P. H. Baillon et al., Further study of the e-meson in antiproton proton annihilation at rest, Nuovo Cimento A 50, 393 (1967).
  2. Z. Bai et al. (MARK-III Collaboration), Partial wave analysis of J/ψ→γKs0K±π±, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2507 (1990).
  3. J. E. Augustin et al. (DM2 Collaboration), Partial wave analysis of DM2 data in the η (1430) energy range, Phys. Rev. D 46, 1951 (1992).
  4. G. Adams et al., Observation of pseudoscalar and axial vector resonances in π−p→k+k−π0n at 18 gev, Phys. Lett. B 516, 264 (2001).
  5. F. Nichitiu et al. (OBELIX Collaboration), Study of the K+ K− π+π−π0  final state in anti-proton annihilation at rest in gaseous hydrogen at NTP with the OBELIX spectrometer, Phys. Lett. B 545, 261 (2002).
  6. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  7. L. Faddeev, A. J. Niemi, and U. Wiedner, Glueballs, closed flux tubes and η(1440). Phys. Rev. D 70, 114033 (2004).
  8. J. F. Donoghue, K. Johnson, and B. A. Li, Low mass glueballs in the meson spectrum, Phys. Lett. 99B, 416 (1981).
  9. F. E. Close and S. Monaghan, A new approach to interactions in the MIT bag, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2098 (1981).
  10. F. E. Close, Gluonic hadrons, Rep. Prog. Phys. 51, 833 (1988).
  11. C. Amsler and N. A. Tornqvist, Mesons beyond the naive quark model, Phys. Rep. 389, 61 (2004).
  12. T. Barnes, F. E. Close, and S. Monaghan, The MIT bag can accomodate the θ(1640) and Iota (1440) as glueballs, Phys. Lett. 110B, 159 (1982).
  13. F. E. Close, G. R. Farrar, and Z.-p. Li, Determining the gluonic content of isoscalar mesons, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5749 (1997).
  14. A. Masoni, C. Cicalo, and G. L. Usai, The case of the pseudoscalar glueball, J. Phys. G 32, R293 (2006).
  15. Y. Chen et al., Glueball spectrum and matrix elements on anisotropic lattices, Phys. Rev. D 73, 014516 (2006).
  16. G. S. Bali, K. Schilling, A. Hulsebos, A. C. Irving, C. Michael, and P. W. Stephenson (UKQCD Collaboration), A comprehensive lattice study of SU(3) glueballs, Phys. Lett. B 309, 378 (1993).
  17. C. J. Morningstar and M. J. Peardon, The glueball spectrum from an anisotropic lattice study, Phys. Rev. D 60, 034509 (1999).
  18. A. Chowdhury, A. Harindranath, and J. Maiti, Correlation and localization properties of topological charge density and the pseudoscalar glueball mass in SU(3) lattice Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D 91, 074507 (2015).
  19. C. M. Richards, A. C. Irving, E. B. Gregory, and C. McNeile (UKQCD Collaboration), Glueball mass measurements from improved staggered fermion simulations, Phys. Rev. D 82, 034501 (2010).
  20. W. Sun, L.-C. Gui, Y. Chen, M. Gong, C. Liu, Y.-B. Liu, Z. Liu, J.-P. Ma, and J.-B. Zhang, Glueball spectrum from Nf=2 lattice QCD study on anisotropic lattices, Chin. Phys. C 42, 093103 (2018).
  21. W. Qin, Q. Zhao, and X.-H. Zhong, Revisiting the pseudoscalar meson and glueball mixing and key issues in the search for a pseudoscalar glueball state, Phys. Rev. D 97, 096002 (2018).
  22. V. Mathieu and V. Vento, Pseudoscalar glueball and eta—eta-prime mixing, Phys. Rev. D 81, 034004 (2010).
  23. G. Gabadadze, Pseudoscalar glueball mass: QCD versus lattice gauge theory prediction, Phys. Rev. D 58, 055003 (1998).
  24. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), First observation of η(1405) decays into f0(980)π0, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 182001 (2012).
  25. J.-J. Wu, X.-H. Liu, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, The puzzle of anomalously large isospin violations in η(1405/1475)→3π, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 081803 (2012).
  26. X.-G. Wu, J.-J. Wu, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Understanding the property of η(1405/1475) in the J/ψ radiative decay, Phys. Rev. D 87, 014023 (2013).
  27. M.-C. Du and Q. Zhao, Internal particle width effects on the triangle singularity mechanism in the study of the η(1405) and η(1475) puzzle, Phys. Rev. D 100, 036005 (2019).
  28. Y. Cheng and Q. Zhao, Hadronic loop effects on the radiative decays of the first radial excitations of η and η′, Phys. Rev. D 105, 076023 (2022).
  29. F. Aceti, W. H. Liang, E. Oset, J. J. Wu, and B. S. Zou, Isospin breaking and f0(980)−a0(980) mixing in the η(1405)→π0f0(980) reaction, Phys. Rev. D 86, 114007 (2012).
  30. N. N. Achasov, A. A. Kozhevnikov, and G. N. Shestakov, Isospin breaking decay η(1405)→f0(980)π0→3π, Phys. Rev. D 92, 036003 (2015).
  31. J. E. Augustin et al. (DM2 Collaboration), Radiative decay of J/ψ into η(1430) and nearby states, Phys. Rev. D 42, 10 (1990).
  32. T. Bolton et al., Partial wave analysis of J/ψ→γηπ+π−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1328 (1992).
  33. J. Z. Bai et al. (BES Collaboration), Partial wave analysis of J/ψ→γ(ηπ+π−). Phys. Lett. B 446, 356 (1999).
  34. A. V. Anisovich, D. V. Bugg, N. Djaoshvili, C. Hodd, J. Kisiel, L. Montanet, A. V. Sarantsev, and B. S. Zou, Resonances in anti-p p–> eta pi+ pi− pi+ pi− at rest, Nucl. Phys. A690, 567 (2001).
  35. M. Acciarri et al. (L3 Collaboration), Light resonances in KS0K±π∓ and ηπ+π− final states in γγ collisions at LEP, Phys. Lett. B 501, 1 (2001).
  36. C. Amsler et al., Production and decay of η′(958) and η(1440) in p¯p annihilation at rest, Eur. Phys. J. C 33, 23 (2004).
  37. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), ηπ+π− resonant structure around 1.8  GeV/c2 and η(1405) in J/ψ→ωηπ+π−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 182001 (2011).
  38. D. Coffman et al. (MARK-III Collaboration), Study of the doubly radiative decay J/ψ→γγρ0, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1410 (1990).
  39. J. Z. Bai et al. (BES Collaboration), A Study of J/ψ→γγV(ρ,φ) decays with the BESII detector, Phys. Lett. B 594, 47 (2004).
  40. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Study of η(1475) and X(1835) in radiative J/ψ decays to γϕ, Phys. Rev. D 97, 051101 (2018).
  41. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Partial wave analysis of J/ψ→γγϕ, Phys. Rev. D 111, 052011 (2025).
  42. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Study of η(1405)/η(1475) in J/ψ→γKS0KS0π0 decay, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 121.
  43. S. X. Nakamura, Q. Huang, J. J. Wu, H. P. Peng, Y. Zhang, and Y. C. Zhu, Three-body unitary coupled-channel analysis on η(1405/1475). Phys. Rev. D 107, L091505 (2023).
  44. S. X. Nakamura, Q. Huang, J. J. Wu, H. P. Peng, Y. Zhang, and Y. C. Zhu, Three-body unitary coupled-channel approach to radiative J/ψ decays and η(1405/1475). Phys. Rev. D 109, 014021 (2024).
  45. We shall also report the comparison between this phenomenological analysis and the full coupled-channel calculations with three-body unitarity in a forthcoming work. Our preliminary results show that these two analyses are in good agreement with each other.

  46. M.-C. Du, Y. Cheng, and Q. Zhao, Vertex corrections due to the triangle singularity mechanism in the light axial vector meson couplings to K*K¯+c.c., Phys. Rev. D 106, 054019 (2022).
  47. V. Baru, J. Haidenbauer, C. Hanhart, Yu. Kalashnikova, and A. Kudryavtsev, Evidence that the a0(980) and f0(980) are not elementary particles, Phys. Lett. B 586, 53 (2004).
  48. G. Janssen, B. C. Pearce, K. Holinde, and J. Speth, Structure of the scalar mesons f0(980) and a0(980), Phys. Rev. D 52, 2690 (1995).
  49. D. Lohse, J. W. Durso, K. Holinde, and J. Speth, Meson exchange model for pseudoscalar meson-meson scattering, Nucl. Phys. A516, 513 (1990).
  50. J. A. Oller and E. Oset, Chiral symmetry amplitudes in the S-wave isoscalar and isovector channels and the σ, f0(980), a0(980) scalar mesons, Nucl. Phys. A620, 438 (1997).
  51. J. Weinstein and N. Isgur, K K molecules, Phys. Rev. D 41, 2236 (1990).
  52. D. Black, A. H. Fariborz, F. Sannino, and J. Schechter, Evidence for a scalar κ(900) resonance in π K scattering, Phys. Rev. D 58, 054012 (1998).
  53. S. Descotes-Genon and B. Moussallam, The K0* (800) scalar resonance from Roy-Steiner representations of π K scattering, Eur. Phys. J. C 48, 553 (2006).
  54. M. Doring and U. G. Meissner, Finite volume effects in pion-kaon scattering and reconstruction of the κ(800) resonance, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2012) 009.
  55. S. Teige et al. (E852 Collaboration), Properties of the a0 (980) meson, Phys. Rev. D 59, 012001 (1999).
  56. Special acknowledgement goes to H.-P. Peng for the clarification of the detection efficiency effects.

  57. C. Schmid, Final-state interactions and the simulation of resonances, Phys. Rev. 154, 1363 (1967).
  58. In Ref. [42] the two-body invariant mass spectra KK¯ and Kπ are extracted by an isobaric parametrization which is an assumption made in the data analysis. Because of this treatment some model-dependent features with the two-body spectra may be inevitable. Although it may raise concerns about the output of fitting the two-body spectra, it is actually a proof that the one-state isobaric picture around 1.4 GeV can be accommodated by the data. It also implies that the three-body unitarity approach would not drastically change such a phenomenon. We will report the full analysis with three-body unitarity in a forthcoming work.

  59. J. Z. Bai et al. (BES Collaboration), Partial wave analysis of J/ψ→γ(K±Ks0π±). Phys. Lett. B 476, 25 (2000).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation