Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Interference resurrection of the τ dipole through quantum tomography

Prisco Lo Chiatto*,†

  • *Present address: Max-Planck-Institut für Physik (MPP), Föhringer Ring 6, 80805 Munich, Germany and Weizmann Institute of Science, P.O. Box 26, 76100 Rehovot.
  • †Contact author: prisco.lochiatto@mpp.mpg.de

Phys. Rev. D 112, 015017 – Published 18 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/8gtq-twfc

Abstract

Helicity selection rules can suppress the leading contributions from dimension-6 operators in the Standard Model effective field theory (SMEFT), reducing sensitivity to potential new physics. This paper explores how the interference contributions from the τ lepton’s anomalous dipole moment is restored in different observables, in particular comparing the sensitivity to SMEFT operators of quantum information observable and more traditional spin correlations. We compute the sensitivity of various observables—including entanglement measures, Bell inequality violations, and quantum uncertainties—to new physics effects using Monte Carlo simulations. Spin correlation observables are found to outperform both the integrated cross section and quantum information observables in sensitivity to both CP-conserving and -violating effects, improving the sensitivity to the scale of new physics by up to a factor of 3. Our results suggest that quantum information observables are suboptimal probes for resurrecting the interference, and more in general to disentangle the CP properties of new physics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (110)

  1. W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. B268, 621 (1986).
  2. I. Brivio and M. Trott, Phys. Rep. 793, 1 (2019).
  3. A. Falkowski, M. Gonzalez-Alonso, A. Greljo, D. Marzocca, and M. Son, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2017) 115.
  4. D. Liu, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi, and F. Riva, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2016) 141.
  5. A. Azatov, R. Contino, C. S. Machado, and F. Riva, Phys. Rev. D 95, 065014 (2017).
  6. A. Helset and M. Trott, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2018) 038.
  7. A. Azatov, D. Barducci, and E. Venturini, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2019) 075.
  8. H. El Faham, G. Pelliccioli, and E. Vryonidou, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 087.
  9. L. J. Dixon and Y. Shadmi, Nucl. Phys. B423, 3 (1994); B452, 724(E) (1995).
  10. Y. Afik and J. R. M. n. de Nova, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 907 (2021).
  11. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Nature (London) 633, 542 (2024).
  12. A. J. Barr, M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli, and L. Marzola, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 139, 104134 (2024).
  13. J. S. Bell, Physics Physique Fizika 1, 195 (1964).
  14. S. J. Freedman and J. F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938 (1972).
  15. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).
  16. S. A. Abel, M. Dittmar, and H. K. Dreiner, Phys. Lett. B 280, 304 (1992).
  17. S. Li, W. Shen, and J. M. Yang, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1195 (2024).
  18. F. Maltoni, C. Severi, S. Tentori, and E. Vryonidou, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 099.
  19. W. Bernreuther, A. Brandenburg, Z. G. Si, and P. Uwer, Nucl. Phys. B690, 81 (2004).
  20. W. Bernreuther, P. Galler, Z.-G. Si, and P. Uwer, Phys. Rev. D 95, 095012 (2017).
  21. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2010) 085.
  22. E. H. Simmons, Phys. Lett. B 226, 132 (1989).
  23. E. H. Simmons, Phys. Lett. B 246, 471 (1990).
  24. A. Azatov, J. Elias-Miro, Y. Reyimuaji, and E. Venturini, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 027.
  25. R. Aoude and W. Shepherd, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2019) 009.
  26. G. Panico, F. Riva, and A. Wulzer, Phys. Lett. B 776, 473 (2018).
  27. G. M. D’Ariano, M. G. A. Paris, and M. F. Sacchi, Adv. Imaging Electron Phys. 128, 205 (2003).
  28. Y. Afik and J. R. M. n. de Nova, Quantum 6, 820 (2022).
  29. U. Fano, Rev. Mod. Phys. 55, 855 (1983).
  30. R. D. Ball et al. (PDF4LHC Working Group), J. Phys. G 49, 080501 (2022).
  31. D. Clark, E. Godat, and F. Olness, Comput. Phys. Commun. 216, 126 (2016).
  32. E. Schrödinger, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 31, 555 (1935).
  33. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009).
  34. W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
  35. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and M. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 200, 340 (1995).
  36. N. Gisin, Phys. Lett. A 154, 201 (1991).
  37. W. Bernreuther, D. Heisler, and Z.-G. Si, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2015) 026.
  38. A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996).
  39. C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, C. A. Fuchs, T. Mor, E. Rains, P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1070 (1999).
  40. A. Bera, T. Das, D. Sadhukhan, S. S. Roy, A. S. De, and U. Sen, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 024001 (2018).
  41. Y. Afik and J. R. M. n. de Nova, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 221801 (2023).
  42. D. Girolami, T. Tufarelli, and G. Adesso, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 240402 (2013).
  43. M. Baumgart and B. Tweedie, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2013) 117.
  44. W. Bernreuther, L. Chen, and O. Nachtmann, Phys. Rev. D 103, 096011 (2021).
  45. M. M. Altakach, P. Lamba, F. Maltoni, K. Mawatari, and K. Sakurai, Phys. Rev. D 107, 093002 (2023).
  46. K. Ehatäht, M. Fabbrichesi, L. Marzola, and C. Veelken, Phys. Rev. D 109, 032005 (2024).
  47. K. Cheng, T. Han, and M. Low, Phys. Rev. D 109, 116005 (2024).
  48. D. Jeans, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 810, 51 (2016).
  49. R. Aoude, E. Madge, F. Maltoni, and L. Mantani, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 017.
  50. U. Haisch, L. Schnell, and J. Weiss, SciPost Phys. 16, 048 (2024).
  51. S. Eidelman and M. Passera, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 22, 159 (2007).
  52. F. Feruglio, P. Paradisi, and O. Sumensari, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2018) 191.
  53. W. Bernreuther, A. Brandenburg, and P. Overmann, Phys. Lett. B 391, 413 (1997); 412, 425(E) (1997).
  54. I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, A. Greljo, J. F. Kamenik, and N. Košnik, Phys. Rep. 641, 1 (2016).
  55. K.-m. Cheung, Phys. Rev. D 64, 033001 (2001).
  56. I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, and O. Sumensari, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2020) 089.
  57. A. Crivellin and M. Hoferichter, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 135; 10 (2022) 30.
  58. T. Aoyama et al., Phys. Rep. 887, 1 (2020).
  59. B. Abi et al. (Muon g-2 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 141801 (2021).
  60. A. S. Fomin, A. Y. Korchin, A. Stocchi, S. Barsuk, and P. Robbe, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 156.
  61. J. Fu, M. A. Giorgi, L. Henry, D. Marangotto, F. M. Vidal, A. Merli, N. Neri, and J. Ruiz Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 011801 (2019).
  62. J. Bernabeu, G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg, M. Tung, and J. Vidal, Nucl. Phys. B436, 474 (1995).
  63. J. Bernabeu, G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg, J. Papavassiliou, and J. Vidal, Nucl. Phys. B790, 160 (2008).
  64. J. Bernabeu, G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg, and J. Vidal, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2009) 062.
  65. S. Eidelman, D. Epifanov, M. Fael, L. Mercolli, and M. Passera, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2016) 140.
  66. A. Rajaraman, J. N. Howard, R. Riley, and T. M. P. Tait, Lett. High Energy Phys. 2, 5 (2019).
  67. K. Inami et al. (Belle Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2022) 110.
  68. G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg, A. Santamaria, and J. Vidal, Nucl. Phys. B582, 3 (2000).
  69. J. Abdallah et al. (DELPHI Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 35, 159 (2004).
  70. I. Galon, A. Rajaraman, and T. M. P. Tait, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 111.
  71. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151802 (2023).
  72. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151803 (2023).
  73. M. Verducci, C. Roda, V. Cavasinni, and N. Vignaroli, Phys. Rev. D 110, 052001 (2024).
  74. M. L. Laursen, M. A. Samuel, and A. Sen, Phys. Rev. D 29, 2652 (1984); 56, 3155(E) (1997).
  75. I. Rodriguez and O. A. Sampayo, arXiv:hep-ph/0312316.
  76. M. Fael, L. Mercolli, and M. Passera, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 253–255, 103 (2014).
  77. J. Aebischer, W. Dekens, E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, D. Sengupta, and P. Stoffer, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 107.
  78. T. Hahn and M. Perez-Victoria, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118, 153 (1999).
  79. T. Hahn, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140, 418 (2001).
  80. J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.
  81. K. Hagiwara, T. Li, K. Mawatari, and J. Nakamura, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2489 (2013).
  82. D. Atwood and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D 45, 2405 (1992).
  83. M. Davier, L. Duflot, F. Le Diberder, and A. Rouge, Phys. Lett. B 306, 411 (1993).
  84. M. Diehl and O. Nachtmann, Z. Phys. C 62, 397 (1994).
  85. H. Denizli, A. Senol, and M. Köksal, Chin. J. Phys. (Taipei) 95, 1250 (2025).
  86. M. Fabbrichesi, M. Low, and L. Marzola, arXiv:2501.03311.
  87. A. Elagin, P. Murat, A. Pranko, and A. Safonov, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 654, 481 (2011).
  88. P. Calfayan (CMS Collaboration and ATLAS Collaboration), Nuovo Cimento C 47, 6 (2023).
  89. X. Chen and Y. Wu, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 089.
  90. L. Bianchini, B. Calpas, J. Conway, A. Fowlie, L. Marzola, C. Veelken, and L. Perrini, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 862, 54 (2017).
  91. P. Bärtschi, C. Galloni, C. Lange, and B. Kilminster, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 929, 29 (2019).
  92. N. Tamir, I. Bessudo, B. Chen, H. Raiko, and L. Barak, J. Instrum. 19, P07004 (2024).
  93. L. Tani, N.-N. Seeba, H. Vanaveski, J. Pata, and T. Lange, Comput. Phys. Commun. 307, 109399 (2025).
  94. A. Y. Korchin, E. Richter-Was, Y. Volkotrub, and Z. Was, Phys. Rev. D 111, 013006 (2025).
  95. M. Sullivan, arXiv:2410.10980.
  96. S. Chai, J. Gu, and L. Li, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 292.
  97. A. Cervera-Lierta, J. I. Latorre, J. Rojo, and L. Rottoli, SciPost Phys. 3, 036 (2017).
  98. S. R. Beane, D. B. Kaplan, N. Klco, and M. J. Savage, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 102001 (2019).
  99. I. Low and T. Mehen, Phys. Rev. D 104, 074014 (2021).
  100. Q. Liu, I. Low, and T. Mehen, Phys. Rev. C 107, 025204 (2023).
  101. M. Carena, I. Low, C. E. M. Wagner, and M.-L. Xiao, Phys. Rev. D 109, L051901 (2024).
  102. F. Maltoni, C. Severi, S. Tentori, and E. Vryonidou, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 001.
  103. K. Kowalska and E. M. Sessolo, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 156.
  104. W. Bernreuther, O. Nachtmann, P. Overmann, and T. Schröder, Nucl. Phys. B388, 53 (1992); B406, 516(E) (1993).
  105. S. Banerjee, A. Y. Korchin, and Z. Was, Phys. Rev. D 106, 113010 (2022).
  106. C. Bierlich et al., SciPost Phys. Codebases 2022, 8 (2022).
  107. J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi (DELPHES 3 Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 057.
  108. The ATLAS Collaboration, Report No. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011, 2021.
  109. M. Fabbrichesi and L. Marzola, Phys. Rev. D 110, 076004 (2024).
  110. S. Frixione, O. Mattelaer, M. Zaro, and X. Zhao, arXiv:2108.10261.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation