Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Effects of radiative corrections on Starobinsky inflation

John Ellis1,2,*, Tony Gherghetta3,†, Kunio Kaneta4,‡, Wenqi Ke3,5,§, and Keith A. Olive3,5,∥

  • *Contact author: John.Ellis@cern.ch
  • †Contact author: tgher@umn.edu
  • ‡Contact author: kaneta@ed.niigata-u.ac.jp
  • §Contact author: wke@umn.edu
  • ∥Contact author: olive@umn.edu

Phys. Rev. D 112, 123530 – Published 17 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/8cx9-c642

Abstract

We analyze radiative corrections to the predictions of Starobinsky-like models of inflation arising from self-interactions of the inflaton, and from its Yukawa couplings, y, to matter fermions, and dimensionful trilinear couplings, κ, to scalar fields, which could be responsible for reheating the Universe after inflation. The inflaton self-interactions are found to be of higher order in the Hubble expansion rate during inflation, and hence unimportant for CMB observations. In contrast, Einstein-frame matter couplings to an inflaton generating Starobinsky-like inflation can have significant effects on the spectral index of scalar CMB perturbations, ns, and on the tensor-to-scalar ratio, r. Using a renormalization-group improved analysis of the effective inflationary potential, we find that the Planck measurement of ns constrains the inflaton coupling to light fermions in the Einstein frame; y<4.5×10−4, corresponding to an upper limit on the reheating temperature TRH<2×1011  GeV, whereas the ACT DR6 measurement of ns corresponds to 3.8×10−4<y<5.6×10−4 and 1.7×1011  GeV<TRH<2.8×1011  GeV, while the upper limits on r provide weaker constraints. Planck data also imply a constraint on a trilinear inflaton coupling to light scalars in the Einstein frame: κ≤4×1012  GeV, corresponding to TRH≤4.2×1013  GeV. We further present constraints on inflaton couplings to massive fermions and scalars, and analyze constraints on couplings in the Jordan frame.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (68)

  1. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021); Y. Akrami et al. (Planck Collaboration), 641, A10 (2020).
  2. A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. 91B, 99 (1980).
  3. K. S. Stelle, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 9, 353 (1978); B. Whitt, Phys. Lett. 145B, 176 (1984).
  4. S. Kalara, N. Kaloper, and K. A. Olive, Nucl. Phys. B341, 252 (1990); K. i. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D 39, 3159 (1989).
  5. P. A. R. Ade et al. (BICEP and Keck Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151301 (2021).
  6. E. J. Copeland, C. Rahmede, and I. D. Saltas, Phys. Rev. D 91, 103530 (2015).
  7. J. Ellis, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K. A. Olive, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 111301 (2013).
  8. J. Ellis, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K. A. Olive, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2013) 009.
  9. J. Ellis, D. V. Nanopoulos, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 099.
  10. J. Ellis, M. A. G. Garcia, N. Nagata, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K. A. Olive, arXiv:2508.13279.
  11. A. D. Dolgov and A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. 116B, 329 (1982).
  12. L. F. Abbott, E. Farhi, and M. B. Wise, Phys. Lett. 117B, 29 (1982).
  13. D. V. Nanopoulos, K. A. Olive, and M. Srednicki, Phys. Lett. 127B, 30 (1983).
  14. R. Kallosh and A. Linde, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2016) 047.
  15. D. I. Kazakov, R. M. Iakhibbaev, and D. M. Tolkachev, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2023) 049.
  16. I. D. Gialamas, A. Karam, A. Racioppi, and M. Raidal, Phys. Rev. D 112, 103544 (2025).
  17. W. J. Wolf, arXiv:2506.12436.
  18. W. Ahmed and M. U. Rehman, Phys. Rev. D 112, 063519 (2025).
  19. J. Han, H. M. Lee, and J. H. Song, arXiv:2506.21189.
  20. T. Louis et al. (ACT Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2025) 062; E. Calabrese et al. (ACT Collaboration), arXiv:2503.14454.
  21. R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 161001 (2025).
  22. C. Dioguardi, A. J. Iovino, and A. Racioppi, Phys. Lett. B 868, 139664 (2025).
  23. I. Antoniadis, J. Ellis, W. Ke, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K. A. Olive, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2025) 090.
  24. A. Salvio, Phys. Rev. D 112, L061301 (2025).
  25. J. Kim, X. Wang, Y. l. Zhang, and Z. Ren, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2025) 011.
  26. G. German, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 34, 2550065 (2025).
  27. M. He, M. Hong, and K. Mukaida, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2025) 080.
  28. M. Drees and Y. Xu, Phys. Lett. B 867, 139612 (2025).
  29. D. S. Zharov, O. O. Sobol, and S. I. Vilchinskii, Phys. Rev. D 112, 023544 (2025).
  30. M. R. Haque, S. Pal, and D. Paul, arXiv:2505.01517.
  31. L. Liu, Z. Yi, and Y. Gong, arXiv:2505.02407.
  32. I. D. Gialamas, T. Katsoulas, and K. Tamvakis, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2025) 060.
  33. C. T. Byrnes, M. Cortês, and A. R. Liddle, arXiv:2505.09682.
  34. A. Addazi, Y. Aldabergenov, and S. V. Ketov, Phys. Lett. B 869, 139883 (2025).
  35. R. Mondal, S. Mondal, and A. Chakraborty, arXiv:2505.13387.
  36. S. Saini and A. Nautiyal, arXiv:2505.16853.
  37. M. R. Haque and D. Maity, arXiv:2505.18267.
  38. M. Hai, A. R. Kamal, N. F. Shamma, and M. S. J. Shuvo, arXiv:2506.08083.
  39. H. Heidarian, M. Solbi, S. Heydari, and K. Karami, Phys. Lett. B 869, 139833 (2025).
  40. S. Choudhury, B. Gulnur, S. K. Singh, and K. Yerzanov, arXiv:2506.15407.
  41. C. Pallis, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2025) 061.
  42. G. German and J. C. Hidalgo, arXiv:2508.01017.
  43. S. Aoki, H. Otsuka, and R. Yanagita, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2025) 088.
  44. T. Modak, Phys. Rev. D 112, 115006 (2025).
  45. C. Pallis, arXiv:2510.02083.
  46. S. Aoki, H. Otsuka, and R. Yanagita, Phys. Rev. D 112, 043505 (2025).
  47. J. D. Barrow and S. Cotsakis, Phys. Lett. B 214, 515 (1988).
  48. J. Ellis, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K. A. Olive, Phys. Rev. D 97, 043530 (2018).
  49. J. Ellis, M. A. G. Garcia, N. Nagata, D. V. Nanopoulos, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29, 2030011 (2020).
  50. A. R. Liddle and S. M. Leach, Phys. Rev. D 68, 103503 (2003).
  51. J. Martin and C. Ringeval, Phys. Rev. D 82, 023511 (2010).
  52. J. Ellis, M. A. G. García, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K. A. Olive, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2015) 050.
  53. J. Ellis, M. A. G. Garcia, D. V. Nanopoulos, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner, Phys. Rev. D 105, 043504 (2022).
  54. D. J. Fixsen, Astrophys. J. 707, 916 (2009).
  55. M. Abdul Karim et al. (DESI Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 112, 083514 (2025); arXiv:2503.14738.
  56. E. Camphuis et al. (SPT-3G Collaboration), arXiv:2506.20707.
  57. T. Markkanen, S. Nurmi, A. Rajantie, and S. Stopyra, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2018) 040.
  58. D. P. George, S. Mooij, and M. Postma, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2014) 024.
  59. Y. Ema, M. A. G. Garcia, W. Ke, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner, Universe 10, 239 (2024).
  60. M. x. Luo, H. w. Wang, and Y. Xiao, Phys. Rev. D 67, 065019 (2003).
  61. L. E. Parker and D. Toms, Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2009), ISBN [Amazon][WorldCat], [Amazon][WorldCat], [Amazon][WorldCat].
  62. M. A. G. Garcia, W. Ke, Y. Mambrini, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2025) 039.
  63. J. R. Ellis, D. V. Nanopoulos, K. A. Olive, and K. Tamvakis, Phys. Lett. 118B, 335 (1982).
  64. J. R. Ellis, K. Enqvist, D. V. Nanopoulos, K. A. Olive, and M. Srednicki, Phys. Lett. 152B, 175 (1985); 156, 452(E) (1985).
  65. J. Ellis, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K. A. Olive, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 111301 (2013); 111, 129902(E) (2013).
  66. K. Nakayama and F. Takahashi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2011) 033.
  67. J. Ellis, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K. A. Olive, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2013) 009.
  68. J. Ellis, D. V. Nanopoulos, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 099.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation