Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Neutrino self-interaction and weak mixing-angle measurements

Yue Zhang

Phys. Rev. D 112, 035027 – Published 20 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7y8g-56fz

Abstract

Neutrino self-interaction with a larger “Fermi constant” is often resorted to for understanding various puzzles of our Universe. We point out that a light, neutrinophilic scalar particle ϕ through radiative correction leads to an energy-scale dependence in the neutrino-Z-boson gauge coupling. The driver behind this phenomenon is a large separation between the mass scales of ϕ and additional heavy particles needed for gauge invariance. This is a generic effect insensitive to details of the UV completion. We show that the running can change the Zνν¯ coupling by several percent and affect the measurement of weak mixing angle through neutrino neutral-current processes. We discuss the interplay between the running of the Zνν¯ coupling and sin2θW in various experimental observables. It is possible to disentangle the two effects with more than one precise measurement.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (63)

  1. C. D. Kreisch, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, and O. Doré, Phys. Rev. D 101, 123505 (2020).
  2. A. Das and S. Ghosh, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2021) 038.
  3. A. He, R. An, M. M. Ivanov, and V. Gluscevic, Phys. Rev. D 109, 103527 (2024).
  4. D. Camarena, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, and J. Houghteling, Phys. Rev. D 108, 103535 (2023).
  5. A. Das and S. Ghosh, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2023) 042.
  6. D. Camarena and F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, Phys. Rev. D 111, 023504 (2025).
  7. S. Pal, R. Samanta, and S. Pal, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2025) 047.
  8. D. Racco, P. Zhang, and H. Zheng, Phys. Dark Universe 47, 101803 (2025).
  9. A. De Gouvêa, M. Sen, W. Tangarife, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 081802 (2020).
  10. K. J. Kelly, M. Sen, W. Tangarife, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 101, 115031 (2020).
  11. K. J. Kelly, M. Sen, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 041101 (2021).
  12. C. Chichiri, G. B. Gelmini, P. Lu, and V. Takhistov, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2022) 036.
  13. C. Benso, W. Rodejohann, M. Sen, and A. U. Ramachandran, Phys. Rev. D 105, 055016 (2022).
  14. R. An, V. Gluscevic, E. O. Nadler, and Y. Zhang, Astrophys. J. Lett. 954, L18 (2023).
  15. E. O. Nadler et al. (DES Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 091101 (2021).
  16. V. D. Barger, W.-Y. Keung, and S. Pakvasa, Phys. Rev. D 25, 907 (1982).
  17. J. M. Berryman, A. De Gouvêa, K. J. Kelly, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 97, 075030 (2018).
  18. N. Blinov, K. J. Kelly, G. Z. Krnjaic, and S. D. McDermott, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 191102 (2019).
  19. V. Brdar, M. Lindner, S. Vogl, and X.-J. Xu, Phys. Rev. D 101, 115001 (2020).
  20. K.-F. Lyu, E. Stamou, and L.-T. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 103, 015004 (2021).
  21. P. S. B. Dev, D. Kim, D. Sathyan, K. Sinha, and Y. Zhang, arXiv:2407.12738.
  22. K. J. Kelly and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 99, 055034 (2019).
  23. K. J. Kelly, F. Kling, D. Tuckler, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 105, 075026 (2022).
  24. N. M. Coyle, S. W. Li, and P. A. N. Machado, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2022) 166.
  25. A. de Gouvêa, P. S. B. Dev, B. Dutta, T. Ghosh, T. Han, and Y. Zhang, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 142.
  26. K. Ioka and K. Murase, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2014, 061E01 (2014).
  27. K. C. Y. Ng and J. F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. D 90, 065035 (2014); 90, 089904(E) (2014).
  28. M. Ibe and K. Kaneta, Phys. Rev. D 90, 053011 (2014).
  29. A. Kamada and H.-B. Yu, Phys. Rev. D 92, 113004 (2015).
  30. I. Esteban, S. Pandey, V. Brdar, and J. F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. D 104, 123014 (2021).
  31. S. Shalgar, I. Tamborra, and M. Bustamante, Phys. Rev. D 103, 123008 (2021).
  32. P.-W. Chang, I. Esteban, J. F. Beacom, T. A. Thompson, and C. M. Hirata, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 071002 (2023).
  33. D. F. G. Fiorillo, G. G. Raffelt, and E. Vitagliano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 021002 (2024).
  34. A. B. Balantekin et al., arXiv:2209.06872.
  35. J. R. Klein et al., arXiv:2211.09669.
  36. A. de Gouvêa et al., arXiv:2209.07983.
  37. C. Giunti, J. Gruszko, B. Jones, L. Kaufman, D. Parno, and A. Pocar, arXiv:2209.03340.
  38. D. Buskulic , I. De Bonis, D. Decamp, P. Ghez, C. Goy, J.-P. Lees, M.-N. Minard, B. Pietrzyk, and F. Ariztizabal (ALEPH Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 313, 520 (1993).
  39. R. Akers et al. (OPAL Collaboration), Z. Phys. C 65, 47 (1995).
  40. M. Acciarri et al. (L3 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 431, 199 (1998).
  41. T. Appelquist and J. Carazzone, Phys. Rev. D 11, 2856 (1975).
  42. J. M. Berryman et al., Phys. Dark Universe 42, 101267 (2023).
  43. J. Erler and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Phys. Rev. D 72, 073003 (2005).
  44. K. S. Kumar, S. Mantry, W. J. Marciano, and P. A. Souder, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63, 237 (2013).
  45. G. P. Zeller et al. (NuTeV Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 091802 (2002); 90, 239902(E) (2003).
  46. W. Loinaz, N. Okamura, T. Takeuchi, and L. C. R. Wijewardhana, Phys. Rev. D 67, 073012 (2003).
  47. W. Bentz, I. C. Cloet, J. T. Londergan, and A. W. Thomas, Phys. Lett. B 693, 462 (2010).
  48. S. J. Brodsky, I. Schmidt, and J.-J. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 70, 116003 (2004).
  49. E. A. Paschos and L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. D 7, 91 (1973).
  50. E. Cortina Gil et al. (NA62 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 816, 136259 (2021).
  51. The ALEPH Collaboration, The DELPHI Collaboration, The L3 Collaboration, The OPAL Collaboration, The SLD Collaboration, The LEP Electroweak Working Group, The SLD Electroweak, and Heavy Flavour Groups, Phys. Rep. 427, 257 (2006).
  52. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/7y8g-56fz for useful details for deriving the neutrino self-interaction contribution to the invisible Z decay width, which serves as the leading experimental constraint in the heavy mediator region.
  53. R. Mammen Abraham, S. Foroughi-Abari, F. Kling, and Y.-D. Tsai, Phys. Rev. D 111, 015029 (2025).
  54. D. Akimov et al. (COHERENT Collaboration), Science 357, 1123 (2017).
  55. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 191002 (2024).
  56. F. Gao, in Proceedings of the 15th International Workshop on the Identification of Dark Matter (L’Aquila, Italy, 2024).
  57. Z. Bo et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 191001 (2024).
  58. B. C. Cañas, E. A. Garcés, O. G. Miranda, and A. Parada, Phys. Lett. B 784, 159 (2018).
  59. K. Scholberg, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1468, 012126 (2020).
  60. M. W. Goodman and E. Witten, Phys. Rev. D 31, 3059 (1985).
  61. J. A. Formaggio and G. P. Zeller, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1307 (2012).
  62. A. de Gouvea, P. A. N. Machado, Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, and Z. Tabrizi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 051803 (2020).
  63. G. F. S. Alves, A. P. Ferreira, S. W. Li, P. A. N. Machado, and Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, arXiv:2409.07430.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation