- Open Access
Performance of the Eos detector with water
Phys. Rev. D 114, 052012 – Published 21 September, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7qkt-mnqz
Abstract
In this manuscript we present the first results from Eos, a four tonne optical detector located at the University of California, Berkeley. The primary goal of Eos is to demonstrate the performance capabilities of scintillation-based, “hybrid” detector technology for future neutrino detectors. The data presented were collected while both the inner target vessel and the outer buffer vessel were filled with water. The water target acts as a well-understood medium that produces only Cherenkov light, which can be used to calibrate and develop the detector model and reconstruction algorithms prior to the deployment of scintillating material. Using deployed optical and radioactive calibration sources, a series of detailed detector calibrations are performed. These enable a suite of tests for various reconstruction algorithms. Simulations that use calibrated models are compared with the data across a variety of different types of calibration sources, source positions, and rotations.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (51)
- Y. Fukuda et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562 (1998).
- Q. R. Ahmad et al. (SNO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 011301 (2002).
- R. Bonventre and G. D. Orebi Gann, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 435 (2018).
- S. Andringa et al. (SNO+ Collaboration), Adv. High Energy Phys. 2016, 6194250 (2016).
- M. Agostini et al. (BOREXINO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 091803 (2022).
- A. Allega et al. (SNO+ Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 109, 072002 (2024).
- M. Askins et al. (Theia Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 416 (2020).
- J. Sawatzki, M. Wurm, and D. Kresse, Phys. Rev. D 103, 023021 (2021).
- M. Askins et al. (WATCHMAN Collaboration), arXiv:1502.01132.
- A. Bat, E. Tiras, V. Fischer, and M. Kamislioglu, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 734 (2022).
- M. Yeh, S. Hans, W. Beriguete, R. Rosero, L. Hu, R. L. Hahn, M. V. Diwan, D. E. Jaffe, S. H. Kettell, and L. Littenberg, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 660, 51 (2011).
- S. D. Biller, E. J. Leming, and J. L. Paton, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 972, 164106 (2020).
- Z. Guo, M. Yeh, R. Zhang, D.-W. Cao, M. Qi, Z. Wang, and S. Chen, Astropart. Phys. 109, 33 (2019).
- H. T. J. Steiger et al., J. Instrum. 19, P09015 (2024).
- A. V. Lyashenko et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 958, 162834 (2020).
- T. Kaptanoglu, E. J. Callaghan, M. Yeh, and G. D. O. Gann, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 169 (2022).
- T. Kaptanoglu, M. Luo, and J. Klein, J. Instrum. 14, T05001 (2018).
- T. Kaptanoglu, M. Luo, B. Land, A. Bacon, and J. Klein, Phys. Rev. D 101, 072002 (2020).
- A. Elagin, H. Frisch, B. Naranjo, J. Ouellet, L. Winslow, and T. Wongjirad, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 849, 102 (2017).
- A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (CCM Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 171804 (2025).
- T. Anderson et al., J. Instrum. 18, P02009 (2022).
- Hamamatsu, Photomultiplier tube R14688/R14688-100, https://www.hamamatsu.com/content/dam/hamamatsu-photonics/sites/documents/99_SALES_LIBRARY/etd/R14688_R14688-100_TPMH1385E.pdf (2022).
- T. Kaptanoglu, A. Rincon, M. Duce, S. Kaplan, J. Koplowitz, S. Lynch, H. J. Ryoo, and G. Orebi Gann, J. Instrum. 19, P02032 (2023).
- J. Brack et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 712, 162 (2013).
- Hamamatsu, Large area photocathode photomultiplier tubes, https://www.hamamatsu.com/content/dam/hamamatsu-photonics/sites/documents/99_SALES_LIBRARY/etd/LARGE_AREA_PMT_TPMH1376E.pdf (2022).
- T. Anderson et al. (Eos Collaboration), arXiv:2607.20285.
- CAEN, CAEN V1730, https://www.caen.it/products/v1730/ (2025).
- S. Seibert et al., ratpac-two user’s guide, https://ratpac.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ (2025).
- S. Agostinelli et al. (GEANT4 Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003).
- GEANT4 Collaboration, Guide for physics lists, https://geant4-userdoc.web.cern.ch/UsersGuides/PhysicsListGuide/BackupVersions/V11.1b/html/index.html (2023).
- W. Warburton and W. Hennig, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 64, 2938 (2017).
- W. Jiang, G. Huang, Z. Liu, W. Luo, L. Wen, and J. Luo, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 69 (2025).
- M. Akashi-Ronquest et al., Astropart. Phys. 65, 40 (2015).
- J. Tang, T. Xiao, X. Tang, and Y. Huang, J. Instrum. 20, P03019 (2024).
- D. Xu et al., J. Instrum. 17, P06040 (2021).
- M. Daimon and A. Masumura, Appl. Opt. 46, 3811 (2007).
- I. Coulter, Modelling and reconstruction of events in related to future searches for lepton and baryon number violation, Ph.D. thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford, 2013.
- S. G. Johnson, The NLopt nonlinear-optimization package, https://github.com/stevengj/nlopt (2007).
- T. H. Rowan, Functional stability analysis of numerical algorithms, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 1990.
- F. James and M. Roos, Comput. Phys. Commun. 10, 343 (1975).
- K. M. Gorski, E. Hivon, A. J. Banday, B. D. Wandelt, F. K. Hansen, M. Reinecke, and M. Bartelmann, Astrophys. J. 622, 759 (2005).
- P. Eller, A. T. Fienberg, J. Weldert, G. Wendel, S. Böser, and D. F. Cowen, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 1048, 168011 (2023).
- J. Hermans, V. Begy, and G. Louppe, in International Conference on Machine Learning (PMLR, Cambridge, MA, 2020), pp. 4239–4248.
- D. Misra, arXiv:1908.08681.
- A. Bacon, B. Harris, and J. Klein, J. Instrum. 20, P09012 (2025).
- B. Aharmim et al. (SNO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 81, 055504 (2010).
- A. Allega et al. (SNO+ Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 110, 122003 (2024).
- K. Abe et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 94, 052010 (2016).
- M. R. Anderson et al. (SNO+ Collaboration), J. Instrum. 16, P05009 (2020).
- T. Suzuki, D. F. Measday, and J. P. Roalsvig, Phys. Rev. C 35, 2212 (1987).
- T. H. Burnett, L. J. LaMay, G. E. Masek, T. Maung, E. S. Miller, H. Ruderman, and W. Vernon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 937 (1973).