- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Charting WIMP territories at the neutrino floor

Giorgio Arcadi1,2,*, Manfred Lindner3,†, and Stefano Profumo4,5,‡

  • *Contact author: giorgio.arcadi@unime.it
  • †Contact author: lindner@mpi-hd.mpg.de
  • ‡Contact author: profumo@ucsc.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 113, 015005 – Published 6 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7g3h-kwdl

Abstract

We establish comprehensive theoretical benchmarks for weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) accessible to ultimate direct detection experiments, focusing on the challenging parameter space between current experimental limits and the irreducible neutrino background. We systematically examine both thermal freeze-out and freeze-in production mechanisms across a range of simplified dark matter models, including s-channel scalar and vector portals, t-channel mediator scenarios, and electroweakly interacting multiplets. For thermal relics, we identify parameter regions where suppressed direct detection cross sections naturally arise through momentum-dependent interactions and blind-spot configurations, while maintaining the correct relic abundance. We extensively investigate freeze-in scenarios, demonstrating how feebly interacting massive particles in portal models can populate experimentally accessible parameter space despite their ultraweak couplings. Additionally, we explore how nonstandard cosmological histories—including early matter domination and fast-expanding Universe scenarios—can dramatically alter the relationship between relic density and detection prospects, opening new avenues for discovery. Our analysis provides a roadmap for next-generation experiments approaching the neutrino floor, highlighting complementary detection strategies and identifying the most promising theoretical targets for ultimate sensitivity dark matter searches. These benchmarks establish the theoretical foundation for the final push toward comprehensive coverage of well-motivated WIMP parameter space.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (67)

  1. J. Billard, E. Figueroa-Feliciano, and L. Strigari, Implication of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next generation dark matter direct detection experiments, Phys. Rev. D 89, 023524 (2014).
  2. D. Akerib et al. (LUX-ZEPLIN Collaboration), Snowmass2021 cosmic frontier dark matter direct detection to the neutrino fog, arXiv:2203.08084.
  3. J. Dent, B. Dutta, J. Newstead, and L. Strigari, Effective field theory treatment of the neutrino background in direct dark matter detection experiments, Phys. Rev. D 95, 043511 (2017).
  4. C. O’Hare, Can we overcome the neutrino floor at high masses?, Phys. Rev. D 102, 063024 (2020).
  5. D. A. Sierra, N. Rojas, and M. Tytgat, Electronic bandstructure and optical gain of lattice matched III-V dilute nitride bismide quantum wells for 1.55  μm optical communication systems, J. Appl. Phys. 120, 093111 (2016).
  6. G. Arcadi, F. Costa, A. Goudelis, and O. Lebedev, Higgs portal dark matter freeze-in at stronger coupling: Observational benchmarks, arXiv:2406.19110.
  7. T. Hambye, M. Tytgat, J. Vandecasteele, and L. Vanderheyden, Dark matter direct detection is testing freeze-in, Phys. Rev. D 98, 075017 (2018).
  8. C. Cosme, F. Costa, and O. Lebedev, Freeze-in at stronger coupling, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 135.
  9. P. Arias, N. Bernal, A. Herrera, and C. Maldonado, Reconstructing non-standard cosmologies with dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2019) 047.
  10. J. Silva-Malpartida, N. Bernal, J. Jones-Pérez, and R. Lineros, From WIMPs to FIMPs: Impact of early matter domination, arXiv:2406.17284.
  11. F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, T. Schwetz, and S. Vogl, Implications of unitarity and gauge invariance for simplified dark matter models, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2016) 016.
  12. G. Bélanger, S. Chakraborti, and A. Pukhov, EV-catcher: High-speed object catching using low-latency event-based neural networks, in IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2022), arXiv:2304.07200.
  13. S. Heeba, T. Lin, and K. Schutz, Inelastic freeze-in, J. Phys. A 56, 255003 (2023).
  14. F. D’Eramo, N. Fernandez, and S. Profumo, When the Universe expands too fast: Relentless dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2017) 012,
  15. F. D’Eramo, N. Fernandez, and S. Profumo, Dark matter freeze-in production in fast-expanding Universes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2018) 046.
  16. M. Cirelli, N. Fornengo, and A. Strumia, Minimal dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B753, 178 (2006).
  17. M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and M. Tamburini, Cosmology and astrophysics of minimal dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B787, 152 (2007).
  18. A. Alenezi, C. Cesarotti, S. Gori, and J. Shelton, Discovery prospects for a minimal dark matter model at cosmic and intensity frontier experiments, arXiv:2504.00077.
  19. J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata, N. Nagata, and T. Takesako, Direct detection of electroweak-interacting dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2011) 005.
  20. F. Cirelli, F. Sala, and M. Taoso, Wino-like minimal dark matter and future colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2014) 033.
  21. G. Arcadi, C. Gross, O. Lebedev, S. Pokorski, and T. Toma, Evading direct dark matter detection in Higgs portal models, Phys. Lett. B 769, 129 (2017).
  22. G. Gelmini, V. Takhistov, and S. Witte, Casting a wide signal net with future direct dark matter detection experiments, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2018) 009.
  23. C. Bœhm, S. Cebrían, P. Machado, A. O. Campo, E. Perdomo, and E. Reid, How high is the neutrino floor?, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2019) 043.
  24. W. Chao, J. Jiang, and X. Zhang, Direct detections of dark matter in the presence of non-standard neutrino interactions, Soft Matter 15, 6160 (2019).
  25. J. H. Davis, Dark matter vs neutrinos: The effect of astrophysical uncertainties and timing information on the neutrino floor, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2015) 012.
  26. F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, T. Schwetz, and S. Vogl, Implications of unitarity and gauge invariance for simplified dark matter models, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2016) 016.
  27. C. Arina, B. Fuks, L. Mantani, H. Mies, L. Panizzi, and J. Salko, Closing in on t-channel simplified dark matter models, Phys. Lett. B 813, 136038 (2021).
  28. G. Arcadi, L. Calibbi, M. Fedele, and F. Mescia, Systematic approach to B-physics anomalies and t-channel dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 104, 115012 (2021).
  29. G. Arcadi, L. Calibbi, M. Fedele, and F. Mescia, Muon g−2 and B-anomalies from dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 061802 (2021).
  30. C. Arina, B. Fuks, J. Heisig, M. Krämer, L. Mantani, and L. Panizzi, Comprehensive exploration of t-channel simplified models of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 108, 115007 (2023).
  31. G. Arcadi, D. Cabo-Almeida, F. Mescia, and J. Virto, Dark matter direct detection in t-channel mediator models, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2024) 005.
  32. C. Arina et al., t-channel dark matter at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 975 (2025).
  33. M. Cirelli, F. Sala, and M. Taoso, Wino-like minimal dark matter and future colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2014) 033; 01 (2015) 041(E).
  34. M. Garny, J. Heisig, B. Lülf, and S. Vogl, Coannihilation without chemical equilibrium, Phys. Rev. D 96, 103521 (2017).
  35. R. T. D’Agnolo, D. Pappadopulo, and J. T. Ruderman, Fourth exception in the calculation of relic abundances, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 061102 (2017).
  36. L. Covi, J. E. Kim, and L. Roszkowski, Axinos as cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4180 (1999).
  37. J. L. Feng, A. Rajaraman, and F. Takayama, SuperWIMP dark matter signals from the early Universe, Phys. Rev. D 68, 063504 (2003).
  38. K. Griest and D. Seckel, Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances, Phys. Rev. D 43, 3191 (1991).
  39. P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis, Nucl. Phys. B360, 145 (1991).
  40. G. Arcadi, C. Gross, O. Lebedev, S. Pokorski, and T. Toma, Evading direct dark matter detection in Higgs portal models, Phys. Lett. B 769, 129 (2017).
  41. G. Arcadi and S. Profumo, WIMPs below the radar: Blind spots and benchmarks beyond the neutrino floor, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 123.
  42. G. B. Gelmini and P. Gondolo, Neutralino with the right cold dark matter abundance in (almost) any supersymmetric model, Phys. Rev. D 74, 023510 (2006).
  43. P. Arias, N. Bernal, A. Herrera, and C. Maldonado, Reconstructing non-standard cosmologies with dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2019) 047.
  44. G. Arcadi, Thermal and non-thermal DM production in non-standard cosmologies: A mini review, arXiv:2406.11042.
  45. N. Bernal and Y. Xu, WIMPs during reheating, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2022) 017.
  46. J. Silva-Malpartida, N. Bernal, J. Jones-Pérez, and R. A. Lineros, From WIMPs to FIMPs with low reheating temperatures, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2023) 015.
  47. N. Bernal, K. Deka, and M. Losada, Thermal dark matter with low-temperature reheating, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2024) 024.
  48. S. E. Henrich, M. Gross, Y. Mambrini, and K. A. Olive, Ultra-relativistic freeze-out during reheating, Phys. Rev. D 112, 103538 (2025).
  49. G. F. Giudice, E. W. Kolb, and A. Riotto, Largest temperature of the radiation era and its cosmological implications, Phys. Rev. D 64, 023508 (2001).
  50. G. Arcadi and P. Ullio, Accurate estimate of the relic density and the kinetic decoupling in non-thermal dark matter models, Phys. Rev. D 84, 043520 (2011).
  51. V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, feyncalc 10: Do multiloop integrals dream of computer codes?, Comput. Phys. Commun. 306, 109357 (2025).
  52. V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, feyncalc 9.3: New features and improvements, Comput. Phys. Commun. 256, 107478 (2020).
  53. V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, New developments in feyncalc 9.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 207, 432 (2016).
  54. R. Mertig, M. Bohm, and A. Denner, FEYN CALC: Computer algebraic calculation of Feynman amplitudes, Comput. Phys. Commun. 64, 345 (1991).
  55. G. Gelmini, P. Gondolo, A. Soldatenko, and C. E. Yaguna, The effect of a late decaying scalar on the neutralino relic density, Phys. Rev. D 74, 083514 (2006).
  56. D. J. H. Chung, E. W. Kolb, and A. Riotto, Production of massive particles during reheating, Phys. Rev. D 60, 063504 (1999).
  57. L. Aparicio, M. Cicoli, B. Dutta, F. Muia, and F. Quevedo, Light Higgsino dark matter from non-thermal cosmology, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2016) 038.
  58. F. D’Eramo, N. Fernandez, and S. Profumo, When the Universe expands too fast: Relentless dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2017) 012,
  59. P. Salati, Quintessence and the relic density of neutralinos, Phys. Lett. B 571, 121 (2003).
  60. S. Profumo and P. Ullio, SUSY dark matter and quintessence, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2003) 006.
  61. K. Choi, String or M theory axion as a quintessence, Phys. Rev. D 62, 043509 (2000).
  62. F. D’Eramo, N. Fernandez, and S. Profumo, Dark matter freeze-in production in fast-expanding Universes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2018) 046.
  63. G. Arcadi, D. Cabo-Almeida, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, J. P. Neto, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, and F. Queiroz, The waning of the WIMP: Endgame?, arXiv:2410.16520.
  64. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  65. S. Galli, F. Iocco, G. Bertone, and A. Melchiorri, CMB constraints on dark matter models with large annihilation cross-section, Phys. Rev. D 80, 023505 (2009).
  66. S. Galli, F. Iocco, G. Bertone, and A. Melchiorri, Updated CMB constraints on dark matter annihilation cross-sections, Phys. Rev. D 84, 027302 (2011).
  67. T. Cohen, M. Lisanti, A. Pierce, and T. R. Slatyer, Wino dark matter under siege, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2013) 061.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 113, 015005– Published 6 January, 2026
  • Received 3 August 2025
  • Accepted 17 December 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation