Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Heavy-quark corner of the Columbia plot from the center-symmetric Curci-Ferrari model

Phys. Rev. D 112, 014002 – Published 1 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7dx2-vmj6

Abstract

We investigate the heavy-quark corner of the Columbia plot using the gluon potential derived from the Curci-Ferrari extension of the Faddeev-Popov gauge fixing in the center-symmetric Landau gauge, as a proxy for the Polyakov loop potential. In line with the observation that Landau gauge couplings are not that large in the case of heavy-quark QCD, we consider a one-loop approximation and test its consistency by using various renormalization schemes while investigating the dependence of our results on the renormalization scale. We find that the main qualitative features of the phase structure in the heavy-quark regime are reproduced. Notably, we have direct access to real chemical potentials, and have tested that extrapolations from imaginary chemical potentials approximate the direct calculation well until large chemical potentials. Our results agree quantitatively with those of simulations to 10% accuracy, which is the expected precision of the one-loop calculations in applications of the Curci-Ferrari model to Yang-Mills or heavy-quark QCD theories.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (69)

  1. E. Kolb, The Early Universe, edited by E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2018), Vol. 69.
  2. S. Weissenborn, I. Sagert, G. Pagliara, M. Hempel, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Astrophys. J. Lett. 740, L14 (2011).
  3. A. Kurkela, E. S. Fraga, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and A. Vuorinen, Astrophys. J. 789, 127 (2014).
  4. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. Guenther, K.-H. Kampert, S. D. Katz, T. Kawanai, T. G. Kovacs, S. W. Mages, A. Pasztor, F. Pittler, J. Redondo, A. Ringwald, and K. K. Szabo, Nature (London) 539, 69 (2016).
  5. B. Mohanty, J. Phys. G 38, 124023 (2011).
  6. ALICE Collaboration, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 813 (2024).
  7. S. Mogliacci, J. O. Andersen, M. Strickland, N. Su, and A. Vuorinen, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2013) 055.
  8. S. Borsányi, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, and K. K. Szabó, Phys. Lett. B 730, 99 (2014).
  9. A. Bazavov et al., Phys. Rev. D 90, 094503 (2014).
  10. S. Muroya, A. Nakamura, C. Nonaka, and T. Takaishi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 110, 615 (2003).
  11. P. de Forcrand, Proc. Sci. LAT2009 (2010) 010.
  12. O. Philipsen, Proc. Sci. ConfinementVIII2012 (2012) 011.
  13. S. Borsányi, G. Endrődi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabó, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2012) 053.
  14. K. Nagata, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 127, 103991 (2022).
  15. B.-J. Schaefer and H.-J. Pirner, Nucl. Phys. A660, 439 (1999).
  16. P. Adhikari, J. O. Andersen, and P. Kneschke, Phys. Rev. D 98, 074016 (2018).
  17. P. Kovács, Z. Szép, and G. Wolf, Phys. Rev. D 93, 114014 (2016).
  18. K. Fukushima, Phys. Lett. B 591, 277 (2004).
  19. C. Ratti, M. A. Thaler, and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. D 73, 014019 (2006).
  20. S. Roessner, C. Ratti, and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. D 75, 034007 (2007).
  21. T. Fujihara, D. Kimura, T. Inagaki, and A. Kvinikhidze, Phys. Rev. D 79, 096008 (2009).
  22. C. S. Fischer, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 105, 1 (2019).
  23. W.-j. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, and F. Rennecke, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054032 (2020).
  24. V. N. Gribov, Nucl. Phys. B139, 1 (1978).
  25. I. M. Singer, Commun. Math. Phys. 60, 7 (1978).
  26. G. Eichmann, H. Sanchis-Alepuz, R. Williams, R. Alkofer, and C. S. Fischer, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 91, 1 (2016).
  27. M. Q. Huber, Phys. Rep. 879, 1 (2020).
  28. G. Curci and R. Ferrari, Il Nuovo Cimento A 32, 151 (1976).
  29. F. D. R. Bonnet, P. O. Bowman, D. B. Leinweber, and A. G. Williams, Phys. Rev. D 62, 051501 (2000).
  30. F. D. R. Bonnet, P. O. Bowman, D. B. Leinweber, A. G. Williams, and J. M. Zanotti, Phys. Rev. D 64, 034501 (2001).
  31. A. Cucchieri and T. Mendes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 241601 (2008).
  32. I. L. Bogolubsky, E.-M. Ilgenfritz, M. Müller-Preussker, and A. Sternbeck, Phys. Lett. B 676, 69 (2009).
  33. O. Oliveira and P. J. Silva, Phys. Rev. D 86, 114513 (2012).
  34. A. Maas, Phys. Rep. 524, 203 (2013).
  35. P. Silva, O. Oliveira, P. Bicudo, and N. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D 89, 074503 (2014).
  36. M. N. Ferreira and J. Papavassiliou, arXiv:2501.01080.
  37. J. I. Skullerud, P. O. Bowman, A. Kizilersu, D. B. Leinweber, and A. G. Williams, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2003) 047.
  38. M. Tissier and N. Wschebor, Phys. Rev. D 82, 101701 (2010).
  39. M. Tissier and N. Wschebor, Phys. Rev. D 84, 045018 (2011).
  40. M. Peláez, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, Phys. Rev. D 88, 125003 (2013).
  41. M. Peláez, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, Phys. Rev. D 90, 065031 (2014).
  42. M. Peláez, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, Phys. Rev. D 92, 045012 (2015).
  43. U. Reinosa, J. Serreau, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, Phys. Rev. D 89, 105016 (2014).
  44. M. Peláez, U. Reinosa, J. Serreau, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, Phys. Rev. D 96, 114011 (2017).
  45. M. Peláez, U. Reinosa, J. Serreau, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, Phys. Rev. D 103, 094035 (2021).
  46. M. Peláez, U. Reinosa, J. Serreau, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, Rep. Prog. Phys. 84, 124202 (2021).
  47. J. Maelger, U. Reinosa, and J. Serreau, Phys. Rev. D 101, 014028 (2020).
  48. B. S. DeWitt, Phys. Rev. 162, 1195 (1967).
  49. A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. 72B, 477 (1978).
  50. J. Braun, H. Gies, and J. M. Pawlowski, Phys. Lett. B 684, 262 (2010).
  51. U. Reinosa, J. Serreau, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, Phys. Lett. B 742, 61 (2015).
  52. U. Reinosa, J. Serreau, and M. Tissier, Phys. Rev. D 92, 025021 (2015).
  53. U. Reinosa, J. Serreau, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, Phys. Rev. D 93, 105002 (2016).
  54. J. Maelger, U. Reinosa, and J. Serreau, Phys. Rev. D 97, 074027 (2018).
  55. D. M. van Egmond, U. Reinosa, J. Serreau, and M. Tissier, SciPost Phys. 12, 087 (2022).
  56. D. M. van Egmond, O. Oliveira, U. Reinosa, J. Serreau, P. J. Silva, and M. Tissier, arXiv:2412.07930.
  57. D. M. van Egmond and U. Reinosa, Phys. Rev. D 108, 054029 (2023).
  58. D. M. van Egmond and U. Reinosa, Phys. Rev. D 109, 036002 (2024).
  59. T. Mari Surkau and U. Reinosa, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094033 (2024).
  60. M. Fromm, J. Langelage, S. Lottini, and O. Philipsen, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2012) 042.
  61. F. R. Brown, F. P. Butler, H. Chen, N. H. Christ, Z. Dong, W. Schaffer, L. I. Unger, and A. Vaccarino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2491 (1990).
  62. D. Zwanziger, Nucl. Phys. B323, 513 (1989).
  63. D. Dudal, J. A. Gracey, S. P. Sorella, N. Vandersickel, and H. Verschelde, Phys. Rev. D 78, 065047 (2008).
  64. A. Maas, Phys. Rev. D 79, 014505 (2009).
  65. A. Maas, Proc. Sci. QCD-TNT-II2011 (2011) 028.
  66. A. Maas, Proc. Sci. Lattice2010 (2011) 279.
  67. J. Maelger, U. Reinosa, and J. Serreau, Phys. Rev. D 98, 094020 (2018).
  68. U. Reinosa, J. Serreau, and M. Tissier, Phys. Rev. D 92, 025021 (2015).
  69. M. Surkau, T. Victor, and U. Reinosa, Heavy-Quark Corner of the Columbia Plot from the Center-Symmetric Curci-Ferrari Model–DATA (Zenodo, 2025), 10.5281/zenodo.15632729.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation