Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Dark matter emission at Belle II and NA62 in the minimal flavor violation framework

Federico Mescia1, Shohei Okawa2,3,4, Joel Swallow5, and Claudio Toni6

Phys. Rev. D 113, 095014 – Published 7 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7dlz-bwlz

Abstract

Minimal flavor violation (MFV) provides a compelling framework for exploring physics beyond the Standard Model, in which new QCD-singlet fields transforming under the global SU(3)3 quark flavor symmetry can naturally be stable and act as dark matter (DM) candidates. We show that the DM–MFV framework naturally accommodates the excess in either K+→π+νν¯ or B+→K+νν¯, while a unified explanation of both channels simultaneously cannot be achieved within a minimal setup containing only a single dark matter multiplet with nearly degenerate masses. Overall, our findings underscore the intricate interplay between MFV-based model building, flavored dark matter scenarios, and precision flavor experiments, highlighting flavored dark matter as a framework that is both theoretically robust and experimentally testable.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (94)

  1. E. Cortina Gil et al. (NA62 Collaboration), Observation of the K+→π+νν¯ decay and measurement of its branching ratio, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 191.
  2. J. K. Ahn et al. (KOTO Collaboration), Search for the KL→π0νν¯ decay at the J-PARC KOTO experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 081802 (2025).
  3. I. Adachi et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), Evidence for B+→K+νν¯ decays, Phys. Rev. D 109, 112006 (2024).
  4. P. Athron, R. Martinez, and C. Sierra, B meson anomalies and large B+→K+νν¯ in non-universal U(1)′ models, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2024) 121.
  5. R. Bause, H. Gisbert, and G. Hiller, Implications of an enhanced B→Kνν¯ branching ratio, Phys. Rev. D 109, 015006 (2024).
  6. L. Allwicher, D. Becirevic, G. Piazza, S. Rosauro-Alcaraz, and O. Sumensari, Understanding the first measurement of B(B→Kνν¯), Phys. Lett. B 848, 138411 (2024).
  7. T. Felkl, A. Giri, R. Mohanta, and M. A. Schmidt, When energy goes missing: New physics in b→sνν with sterile neutrinos, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1135 (2023).
  8. X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, and G. Valencia, Revisiting models that enhance B+→K+νν¯ in light of the new Belle II measurement, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075019 (2024).
  9. F.-Z. Chen, Q. Wen, and F. Xu, Correlating B→K(*)νν¯ and flavor anomalies in SMEFT, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1012 (2024).
  10. B.-F. Hou, X.-Q. Li, M. Shen, Y.-D. Yang, and X.-B. Yuan, Deciphering the Belle II data on B→Kνν¯ decay in the (dark) SMEFT with minimal flavour violation, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 172.
  11. D. Marzocca, M. Nardecchia, A. Stanzione, and C. Toni, Implications of B→Kνν¯ under rank-one flavor violation hypothesis, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1217 (2024).
  12. S. Rosauro-Alcaraz and L. P. S. Leal, Disentangling left and right-handed neutrino effects in B→K(*)νν, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 795 (2024).
  13. A. J. Buras, J. Harz, and M. A. Mojahed, Disentangling new physics in K→πνν¯ and B→K(K*)νν¯ observables, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 087.
  14. C. S. Kim, D. Sahoo, and K. N. Vishnudath, Searching for signatures of new physics in B→Kνν¯ to distinguish between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 882 (2024).
  15. L. Allwicher, M. Bordone, G. Isidori, G. Piazza, and A. Stanzione, Probing third-generation New Physics with K→πνν¯ and B→K(*)νν¯, Phys. Lett. B 861, 139295 (2025).
  16. D. Bečirević, S. Fajfer, N. Košnik, and L. Pavičić, Right-handed interactions in puzzling B-decays, Phys. Lett. B 861, 139285 (2025).
  17. J.-P. Lee, New physics effects in R(K(*)), Bs→μ+μ−, and B+→K+νν¯, arXiv:2502.06370.
  18. Z. S. Wang, H. K. Dreiner, and J. Y. Günther, The decay B→K+ν+ν¯ at Belle II and a massless bino in R-parity-violating supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 66 (2025).
  19. C.-H. Chen and C.-W. Chiang, Flavor anomalies in leptoquark model with gauged U(1)Lμ−Lτ, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075004 (2024).
  20. C. Hati, J. Leite, N. Nath, and J. W. F. Valle, QCD axion, color-mediated neutrino masses, and B+→K++Emiss anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 111, 015038 (2025).
  21. C.-Q. Zhang, J. Sun, Z.-P. Xing, and R.-L. Zhu, Probing B+→K+ semileptonic FCNC decay with new physics effects in the PQCD approach, Phys. Rev. D 111, 113003 (2025).
  22. C.-H. Chen, C.-W. Chiang, and L. M. G. de la Vega, Leptoquark-mediated Dirac neutrino mass and its impact on B→Kνν¯ and K→πνν¯ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2025) 055.
  23. A. Crivellin, S. Iguro, and T. Kitahara, Discriminating tauphilic leptoquark explanations of the B anomalies via K→πνν¯ and B→Kνν¯, Phys. Rev. D 112, 095016 (2025).
  24. A. J. Buras and P. Stangl, On the interplay of constraints from Bs,D, and K meson mixing in Z′ models with implications for b→sνν¯ transitions, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 519 (2025).
  25. C.-H. Chen and C.-W. Chiang, Rare B and K decays in a scotogenic model, Phys. Rev. D 110, 075036 (2024).
  26. B. Bhattacharya, A. Datta, G. Faisel, S. Khalil, and S. Roy, Flavor violations in B-mesons within non-minimal SU(5), arXiv:2412.16115.
  27. A. Shaw, Belle II constraints on the non-minimal universal extra dimensional model, arXiv:2509.20027.
  28. M. Abdughani and Y. Reyimuaji, Constraining light dark matter and mediator with B+→K+νν¯ data, Phys. Rev. D 110, 055013 (2024).
  29. A. Berezhnoy and D. Melikhov, B→K*MX vs B→KMX as a probe of a scalar-mediator dark matter scenario, Europhys. Lett. 145, 14001 (2024).
  30. A. Datta, D. Marfatia, and L. Mukherjee, B→Kνν¯, MiniBooNE and muon g-2 anomalies from a dark sector, Phys. Rev. D 109, L031701 (2024).
  31. D. McKeen, J. N. Ng, and D. Tuckler, Higgs portal interpretation of the Belle II B+→K+νν measurement, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075006 (2024).
  32. K. Fridell, M. Ghosh, T. Okui, and K. Tobioka, Decoding the B→Kνν excess at Belle II: Kinematics, operators, and masses, Phys. Rev. D 109, 115006 (2024).
  33. S.-Y. Ho, J. Kim, and P. Ko, Recent B+→K+νν¯ excess and muon g-2 illuminating light dark sector with Higgs portal, Phys. Rev. D 111, 055029 (2025).
  34. X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, M. A. Schmidt, G. Valencia, and R. R. Volkas, Scalar dark matter explanation of the excess in the Belle II B+→K++ invisible measurement, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 168.
  35. P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, Signatures of light new particles in B→K(*)Emiss, Phys. Rev. D 110, 055001 (2024); 111, 039903(E) (2025).
  36. X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, J. Tandean, and G. Valencia, B→K+ invisible, dark matter, and CP violation in hyperon decays, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 078.
  37. A. Berezhnoy, W. Lucha, and D. Melikhov, Analysis of qrec2-distribution for B→KMX and B→K*MX decays in a scalar-mediator dark-matter scenario, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075035 (2025).
  38. P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, Impact of new invisible particles on B→K(*)Emiss observables, Phys. Rev. D 112, 035010 (2025).
  39. P. Ko, Y. Kwon, C.-T. Lu, and X. Wei, Searching for elusive dark Higgs boson in spin-1/2 inelastic dark matter models at Belle II, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 150.
  40. A. Berezhnoy, W. Lucha, and D. Melikhov, Probing vector- vs scalar-mediator dark-matter scenarios in B→(K,K*)MX decays, arXiv:2507.10801.
  41. J. Kim and P. Ko, B+→K+νν¯ excess and DM semi-annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 113, 075023 (2026).
  42. W. Altmannshofer, A. Crivellin, H. Haigh, G. Inguglia, and J. Martin Camalich, Light new physics in B→K(*)νν¯?, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075008 (2024).
  43. W. Altmannshofer and S. Roy, Joint explanation of the B→πK puzzle and the B→Kνν¯ excess, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075029 (2025).
  44. Q.-Y. Hu, Are the new particles heavy or light in b→sEmiss?, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 556 (2025).
  45. L. Calibbi, T. Li, L. Mukherjee, and M. A. Schmidt, Is dark matter the origin of the B→Kνν¯ excess at Belle II?, Phys. Rev. D 112, 075020 (2025).
  46. K. Ding, Y. Li, X. Liu, Y. Liu, C.-T. Lu, and B. Zhu, Resonant ALP-portal dark matter annihilation as a solution to the B±→K±νν¯ excess, Phys. Rev. D 112, 115034 (2025).
  47. T. Li, M. A. Schmidt, and M. Yuan, Reexamining the search for light ALPs at flavor and forward accelerator experiments, Phys. Rev. D 112, 115038 (2025).
  48. X. Gao and U. Nierste, B→K+ axionlike particles: Effective versus UV-complete models and enhanced two-loop contributions, Phys. Rev. D 112, 055008 (2025).
  49. J. Alda, M. Fuentes Zamoro, L. Merlo, X. Ponce Díaz, and S. Rigolin, Comprehensive ALP searches in meson decays, arXiv:2507.19578.
  50. M. Abumusabh, G. Dujany, D. Guadagnoli, A. Iohner, and C. Toni, The B+→K+νν¯ decay as a search for the QCD axion, arXiv:2510.18953.
  51. E. Gabrielli, L. Marzola, K. Müürsepp, and M. Raidal, Explaining the B+→K+νν¯ excess via a massless dark photon, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 460 (2024).
  52. T. M. Aliev, A. Elpe, L. Selbuz, and I. Turan, Explaining Belle data on B→K(*)νν¯ decays via dark Z resonances, Phys. Rev. D 112, 015025 (2025).
  53. L. Di Luzio, M. Nardecchia, and C. Toni, Gauged τ-lepton chiral currents and B→K(*)Emiss, Phys. Rev. D 112, 055031 (2025).
  54. P. D. Bolton, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, Dark light shining on B→K(*)Emiss, arXiv:2512.16999.
  55. B. Batell, J. Pradler, and M. Spannowsky, Dark matter from minimal flavor violation, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2011) 038.
  56. L. Lopez-Honorez and L. Merlo, Dark matter within the minimal flavour violation ansatz, Phys. Lett. B 722, 135 (2013).
  57. B. Batell, T. Lin, and L.-T. Wang, Flavored dark matter and R-parity violation, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2014) 075.
  58. F. Bishara, A. Greljo, J. F. Kamenik, E. Stamou, and J. Zupan, Dark matter and gauged flavor symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2015) 130.
  59. F. Mescia, S. Okawa, and K. Wu, Multi-component dark matter from minimal flavor violation, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 114.
  60. R. S. Chivukula and H. Georgi, Composite technicolor standard model, Phys. Lett. B 188, 99 (1987).
  61. L. J. Hall and L. Randall, Weak scale effective supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2939 (1990).
  62. A. J. Buras, P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, S. Jager, and L. Silvestrini, Universal unitarity triangle and physics beyond the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 500, 161 (2001).
  63. G. D’Ambrosio, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori, and A. Strumia, Minimal flavor violation: An effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B645, 155 (2002).
  64. J. M. Gerard, Fermion mass spectrum in SU(2)-L x U(1), Z. Phys. C 18, 145 (1983).
  65. W. G. Parrott, C. Bouchard, and C. T. H. Davies (HPQCD Collaboration), Standard model predictions for B→Kℓ+ℓ−, B→Kℓ1−ℓ2+ and B→Kνν¯ using form factors from Nf=2+1+1 lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014511 (2023); 107, 119903(E) (2023).
  66. D. Bečirević, G. Piazza, and O. Sumensari, Revisiting B→K(*)νν¯ decays in the standard model and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 252 (2023).
  67. F. Loparco, A new look at b →  s observables in 331 models, Particles 7, 161 (2024).
  68. A. D’Alise, G. Fabiano, D. Frattulillo, D. Iacobacci, F. Sannino, P. Santorelli, and N. Vignaroli, New physics pathways from B processes, Nucl. Phys. B1006, 116631 (2024).
  69. D. Bečirević, S. Fajfer, N. Košnik, and L. Pavičić, RD(*) and survival of the fittest scalar leptoquark, Phys. Rev. D 110, 055023 (2024).
  70. G. Guedes and P. Olgoso, From the EFT to the UV: The complete SMEFT one-loop dictionary, arXiv:2412.14253.
  71. S.-P. Lin (Belle-II Collaboration), Recent highlights from the Belle II experiment, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 40, 2544001 (2025).
  72. A. J. Buras and E. Venturini, The exclusive vision of rare K and B decays and of the quark mixing in the standard model, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 615 (2022).
  73. G. Anzivino et al., Workshop summary: Kaons@CERN 2023, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 377 (2024).
  74. G. D’Ambrosio, A. M. Iyer, F. Mahmoudi, and S. Neshatpour, Anatomy of kaon decays and prospects for lepton flavour universality violation, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 148.
  75. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration, Search for B→K(*)νν¯ and invisible quarkonium decays, Phys. Rev. D 87, 112005 (2013).
  76. O. Lutz et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for B→h(*)νν¯ with the full Belle ϒ(4S) data sample, Phys. Rev. D 87, 111103 (2013).
  77. E. Cortina Gil et al. (NA62 Collaboration), First search for K+→π+νν¯ using the decay-in-flight technique, Phys. Lett. B 791, 156 (2019).
  78. E. Cortina Gil et al. (NA62 Collaboration), An investigation of the very rare K+→π+νν¯ decay, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 042.
  79. E. Cortina Gil et al. (NA62 Collaboration), Measurement of the very rare K+→π+νν¯ decay, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 093.
  80. E. Cortina Gil et al. (NA62 Collaboration), Searches for hidden sectors using K+→π+X decays, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2025) 143.
  81. A. J. Buras, J. Girrbach-Noe, C. Niehoff, and D. M. Straub, B→K(*)νν¯ decays in the Standard Model and beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 184.
  82. J. Brod, M. Gorbahn, and E. Stamou, Two-loop electroweak corrections for the K→πνν¯ decays, Phys. Rev. D 83, 034030 (2011).
  83. M. T. Prim et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for B+→μ+νμ and B+→μ+N with inclusive tagging, Phys. Rev. D 101, 032007 (2020).
  84. F. Abudinén et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), Search for B+→K+νν¯ decays using an inclusive tagging method at Belle II, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 181802 (2021).
  85. V. Bertacchi et al. (Belle II Tracking Group), Track finding at Belle II, Comput. Phys. Commun. 259, 107610 (2021).
  86. J. Grygier et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for B→hνν¯ decays with semileptonic tagging at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 96, 091101 (2017); 97, 099902(A) (2018).
  87. R. Bause, H. Gisbert, M. Golz, and G. Hiller, Interplay of dineutrino modes with semileptonic rare B-decays, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 061.
  88. E. Cortina Gil et al. (NA62 Collaboration), Search for a feebly interacting particle X in the decay K+→π+X, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 058.
  89. D. Guadagnoli, A. Iohner, C. Lazzeroni, D. Martinez Santos, J. C. Swallow, and C. Toni, New bound on the vectorial axion-down-strange coupling from K+→π+νν¯ data, arXiv:2503.05865.
  90. R. D. Cousins, J. T. Linnemann, and J. Tucker, Evaluation of three methods for calculating statistical significance when incorporating a systematic uncertainty into a test of the background-only hypothesis for a poisson process, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 595, 480 (2008).
  91. N. Gubernari, M. Reboud, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto, Dispersive analysis of B→K(*) and Bs→ϕ form factors, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 153; 01 (2025) 125(E).
  92. A. Bharucha, D. M. Straub, and R. Zwicky, B→Vℓ+ℓ− in the standard model from light-cone sum rules, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 098.
  93. A. Biswas, S. Nandi, and I. Ray, Extractions of |Vub|/|Vcb| from a combined study of the exclusive b→u(c)ℓ−ν¯ℓ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 024.
  94. N. Carrasco, P. Lami, V. Lubicz, L. Riggio, S. Simula, and C. Tarantino, K→π semileptonic form factors with Nf=2+1+1 twisted mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D 93, 114512 (2016).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation