- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Unconventional supersymmetry via the dressing field method

J. François*

L. Ravera†

  • *Contact author: jordan.francois@uni-graz.at
  • †Contact author: lucrezia.ravera@polito.it
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 111, 125022 – Published 25 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/76n5-4mg1

Abstract

We reconstrue unconventional supersymmetry, a notion introduced by Alvarez-Valenzuela-Zanelli, as an attempt to use the framework of supersymmetric field theory to describe fermionic matter fields and bosonic gauge fields in a unified way, as parts of a single superconnection. It hinges upon the so-called matter ansatz. Unfortunately, the formal and conceptual status of the ansatz has remained unclear, preventing unconventional supersymmetry to be used in a principled way as a general approach beyond the model in which it was first considered. In this paper, we lift this restriction by showing that the ansatz is a special case of the dressing field method, a new systematic tool to exhibit the gauge-invariant content of general-relativistic gauge field theories.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (74)

  1. M. F. Sohnius, Introducing supersymmetry, Phys. Rep. 128, 39 (1985).
  2. A. Armoni, QCD and supersymmetry, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 25, 470 (2010).
  3. N. Sourlas, Introduction to supersymmetry in condensed matter physics, Physica (Amsterdam) 15D, 115 (1985).
  4. K. Efetov, Supersymmetry in Disorder and Chaos (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2012).
  5. K. K. W. Ma, R. Wang, and K. Yang, Realization of supersymmetry and its spontaneous breaking in quantum Hall edges, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 206801 (2021).
  6. F. Berezin and M. Marinov, Particle spin dynamics as the grassmann variant of classical mechanics, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 104, 336 (1977).
  7. P. D. Alvarez, M. Valenzuela, and J. Zanelli, Supersymmetry of a different kind, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2012) 058.
  8. P. D. Alvarez, P. Pais, and J. Zanelli, Unconventional supersymmetry and its breaking, Phys. Lett. B 735, 314 (2014).
  9. A. Guevara, P. Pais, and J. Zanelli, Dynamical contents of unconventional supersymmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 085.
  10. J. Zanelli, Unconventional supersymmetry: Local SUSY without SUGRA, in 31st International Colloquium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics (Springer, Cham, 2017), pp. 61–62.
  11. P. D. Alvarez, L. Delage, M. Valenzuela, and J. Zanelli, Unconventional SUSY and conventional physics: A pedagogical review, Symmetry 13, 628 (2021).
  12. P. D. Alvarez, C. Corral, and J. Zanelli, Self duality in unconventional conformal supersymmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 065.
  13. L. Andrianopoli, B. L. Cerchiai, R. D’Auria, and M. Trigiante, Unconventional supersymmetry at the boundary of AdS4 supergravity, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2018) 007.
  14. L. Andrianopoli, B. L. Cerchiai, R. Matrecano, O. Miskovic, R. Noris, R. Olea, L. Ravera, and M. Trigiante, N=2 AdS4 supergravity, holography and Ward identities, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 141.
  15. P. D. Alvarez, C. Corral, and J. Zanelli, A black hole solution in conformal supergravity, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 009.
  16. M. DuboisViolette, R. Kerner, and J. Madore, Noncommutative differential geometry of matrix algebras, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 31, 316 (1990).
  17. M. DuboisViolette, R. Kerner, and J. Madore, Noncommutative differential geometry and new models of gauge theory, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 31, 323 (1990).
  18. A. Connes and J. Lott, Particle models and noncommutative geometry, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 18, 29 (1991).
  19. C. Fournel, S. Lazzarini, and T. Masson, Formulation of gauge theories on transitive Lie algebroids, J. Geom. Phys. 64, 174 (2013).
  20. S. Lazzarini and T. Masson, Connections on Lie algebroids and on derivation-based noncommutative geometry, J. Geom. Phys. 62, 387 (2012).
  21. C. Fournel, J. François, S. Lazzarini, and T. Masson, Gauge invariant composite fields out of connections, with examples, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 11, 1450016 (2014).
  22. J. François, Bundle geometry of the connection space, covariant Hamiltonian formalism, the problem of boundaries in gauge theories, and the dressing field method, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 225.
  23. J. T. François André, The dressing field method for diffeomorphisms: A relational framework, J. Phys. A 57, 305203 (2024).
  24. M. Zajac, The dressing field method in gauge theories—geometric approach, J. Geom. Mech. 15, 128 (2023).
  25. P. Berghofer, J. François, S. Friederich, H. Gomes, G. Hetzroni, A. Maas, and R. Sondenheimer, Gauge Symmetries, Symmetry Breaking, and Gauge-Invariant Approaches, Elements in the Foundations of Contemporary Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2023).
  26. P. Berghofer and J. François, Dressing vs. fixing: On how to extract and interpret gauge-invariant content, Found. Phys. 54, 72 (2024).
  27. J. François and L. Ravera, Dressing fields for supersymmetry: The cases of the Rarita-Schwinger and gravitino fields, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 041.
  28. J. François and L. Ravera, Geometric relational framework for general-relativistic gauge field theories, Fortschr. Phys. 73, 2400149 (2025).
  29. J. François and L. Ravera, On the meaning of local symmetries: Epistemic-ontological dialectics, Found. Phys. 55, 38 (2025).
  30. H. T. Nieh and M. L. Yan, Quantized Dirac field in curved Riemann-Cartan Background. 1. Symmetry properties, Green’s function, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 138, 237 (1982).
  31. O. Chandia and J. Zanelli, Topological invariants, instantons and chiral anomaly on spaces with torsion, Phys. Rev. D 55, 7580 (1997).
  32. D. Kreimer and E. W. Mielke, Comment on: Topological invariants, instantons, and the chiral anomaly on spaces with torsion, Phys. Rev. D 63, 048501 (2001).
  33. T. L. Hughes, R. G. Leigh, and O. Parrikar, Torsional anomalies, Hall viscosity, and bulk-boundary correspondence in topological states, Phys. Rev. D 88, 025040 (2013).
  34. O. Parrikar, T. L. Hughes, and R. G. Leigh, Torsion, parity-odd response and anomalies in topological states, Phys. Rev. D 90, 105004 (2014).
  35. A. Iorio and G. Lambiase, The Hawking-Unruh phenomenon on graphene, Phys. Lett. B 716, 334 (2012).
  36. A. Iorio and G. Lambiase, Quantum field theory in curved graphene spacetimes, Lobachevsky geometry, Weyl symmetry, Hawking effect, and all that, Phys. Rev. D 90, 025006 (2014).
  37. A. Iorio, Curved spacetimes and curved graphene: A status report of the Weyl-symmetry approach, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, 1530013 (2015).
  38. A. Iorio, Graphene and black holes: Novel materials to reach the unreachable, Front. Mater. 1, 36 (2015).
  39. A. Iorio and P. Pais, (Anti-)de Sitter, Poincaré, Super symmetries, and the two Dirac points of graphene, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 398, 265 (2018).
  40. M. F. Ciappina, A. Iorio, P. Pais, and A. Zampeli, Torsion in quantum field theory through time-loops on Dirac materials, Phys. Rev. D 101, 036021 (2020).
  41. L. Andrianopoli, B. L. Cerchiai, R. D’Auria, A. Gallerati, R. Noris, M. Trigiante, and J. Zanelli, N-extended D=4 supergravity, unconventional SUSY and graphene, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2020) 084.
  42. A. Iorio and P. Pais, Time-loops in Dirac materials, torsion and unconventional supersymmetry, Proc. Sci. ICHEP2020 (2021) 669 [arXiv:2012.09910]
  43. G. Acquaviva, A. Iorio, P. Pais, and L. Smaldone, Hunting quantum gravity with analogs: The case of graphene†, Universe 8, 455 (2022).
  44. A. Iorio, B. Ivetić, S. Mignemi, and P. Pais, Three “layers” of graphene monolayer and their analog generalized uncertainty principles, Phys. Rev. D 106, 116011 (2022).
  45. A. Iorio, Carbon pseudospheres and the BTZ black hole, Proc. Sci. CORFU2021 (2022) 240 [arXiv:2212.00106].
  46. M. Valenzuela and J. Zanelli, On the spin content of the classical massless Rarita-Schwinger system, SciPost Phys. Proc. 14, 047 (2023).
  47. M. Valenzuela and J. Zanelli, Massless Rarita-Schwinger equations: Half and three halves spin solution, SciPost Phys. 16, 065 (2024).
  48. L. Andrianopoli, B. L. Cerchiai, P. A. Grassi, and M. Trigiante, The quantum theory of Chern-Simons supergravity, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2019) 036.
  49. L. Andrianopoli, B. L. Cerchiai, R. Matrecano, R. Noris, L. Ravera, and M. Trigiante, Twisting D(2,1;α) superspace, Fortschr. Phys. 69, 2100111 (2021).
  50. J. François, Artificial versus substantial gauge symmetries: A criterion and an application to the electroweak model, Philos. Sci. 86, 472 (2019).
  51. A. Komar, Construction of a complete set of independent observables in the general theory of relativity, Phys. Rev. 111, 1182 (1958).
  52. J. D. Brown and K. V. Kuchař, Dust as a standard of space and time in canonical quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 51, 5600 (1995).
  53. R. Jackiw and S. Y. Pi, Fake conformal symmetry in conformal cosmological models, Phys. Rev. D 91, 067501 (2015).
  54. X.-S. Chen, X.-F. Lu, W.-M. Sun, F. Wang, and T. Goldman, Spin and orbital angular momentum in gauge theories: Nucleon spin structure and multipole radiation revisited, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 232002 (2008).
  55. X.-S. Chen, W.-M. Sun, X.-F. Lu, F. Wang, and T. Goldman, Do gluons carry half of the nucleon momentum?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 062001 (2009).
  56. E. Leader and C. Lorcé, The angular momentum controversy: What’s it all about and does it matter?, Phys. Rep. 541, 163 (2014).
  57. J. François, S. Lazzarini, and T. Masson, Nucleon spin decomposition and differential geometry, Phys. Rev. D 91, 045014 (2015).
  58. J. François, S. Lazzarini, and T. Masson, Becchi-Rouet-Stora-Tyutin structure for the mixed Weyl-diffeomorphism residual symmetry, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 57, 033504 (2016).
  59. J. Attard and J. François, Tractors and twistors from conformal Cartan geometry: A gauge theoretic approach I. Tractors, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 22, 1831 (2018).
  60. J. Attard and J. François, Tractors and twistors from conformal Cartan geometry: A gauge theoretic approach II. Twistors, Classical Quantum Gravity 34, 085004 (2017).
  61. J. François, Dilaton from tractor and matter field from twistor, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2019) 018.
  62. N. Boulanger, Algebraic classification of weyl anomalies in arbitrary dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 261302 (2007).
  63. J. François and L. Ravera, Cartan geometry, supergravity, and group manifold approach, Arch. Math. 60, 243 (2024).
  64. P. D. Alvarez, M. Valenzuela, and J. Zanelli, Chiral gauge theory and gravity from unconventional supersymmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 205.
  65. R. W. Sharpe, Differential Geometry: Cartan’s Generalization of Klein’s Erlangen Program, Graduate Text in Mathematics Vol. 166 (Springer, New York, 1996).
  66. A. Cap and J. Slovak, Parabolic Geometries I: Background and General Theory, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs Vol. 1 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2009).

  67. In the MAG literature, both problems are “solved” (following a construction from the appendix of [68]) by introducing ad hoc the so-called “radius vector” ξ, a Rn-valued 0-form, which is none other than a dressing field for the translation gauge subgroup of the full affine gauge group. So that the basic variable of MAG is the translation-invariant dressed (gl(n)⊕Rn)-valued connection, whose dressed Rn-potential part is called the “key relation” of MAG in [69]. Given that the translation gauge group is eliminated via a local ad hoc dressing field, it is an artificial (fake) symmetry, only the (residual) GL(n) (or SO) gauge symmetry is substantive. Thus dressed, MAG therefore simply reproduces standard Cartan geometric treatment of gravity, as will be thoroughly laid out in a forthcoming paper [70]. This further highlights the relevance of the DFM to a diverse range of topics in physics.

  68. A. Trautman, On the structure of the Einstein-Cartan equations, Symp. Math. 12, 139 (1973), https://cds.cern.ch/record/111319?ln=fr.
  69. F. W. Hehl, J. D. McCrea, E. W. Mielke, and Y. Ne’eman, Metric-affine gauge theory of gravity: Field equations, Noether identities, world spinors, and breaking of dilation invariance, Phys. Rep. 258, 1 (1995).
  70. J. François and L. Ravera, Reassessing the foundations of Metric-Affine Gravity, arXiv:2505.05349.
  71. V. G. Kac, Lie superalgebras, Adv. Math. 26, 8 (1977).
  72. M. Abe and N. Nakanishi, Supersymmetric extension of local Lorentz symmetry, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 04, 2837 (1989).
  73. M. Abe, Another supersymmetric extension of local Lorentz symmetry in the vierbein formalism of Einstein gravity, Z. Phys. C Part. Fields 41, 637 (1989).
  74. M. Abe, Supersymmetric extension of local Lorentz symmetry in the vierbein formalism of Einstein gravity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 05, 3277 (1990).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 111, 125022– Published 25 June, 2025
  • Received 4 December 2024
  • Accepted 3 June 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation