Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Is the 3S−2D mixing strong for the charmonia ψ(4040) and ψ(4160)?

Zi-Long Man, Si-Qiang Luo, and Xiang Liu*

  • School of Physical Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; Lanzhou Center for Theoretical Physics, Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics of Gansu Province, Key Laboratory of Quantum Theory and Applications of MoE, Gansu Provincial Research Center for Basic Disciplines of Quantum Physics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; MoE Frontiers Science Center for Rare Isotopes, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China, and Research Center for Hadron and CSR Physics, Lanzhou University and Institute of Modern Physics of CAS, Lanzhou 730000, China

  • *Contact author: xiangliu@lzu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 112, 074025 – Published 23 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/76fd-njsy

Abstract

In this work, we revisit the 3S−2D mixing scheme for the charmonia ψ(4040) and ψ(4160). We introduce a coupled-channel mechanism—distinct from the tensor-force contribution in potential models, which alone is insufficient to induce significant mixing—to describe the mixing between these states. Our analysis yields mixing angles of θ1=7° and θ2=10°, inconsistent with the larger angle inferred from experimental data, such as the dielectronic widths of the ψ(4040) and ψ(4160). We discuss possible origins of this discrepancy and emphasize the need for future experiments to resolve it. Precise measurements of the resonance parameters and dielectronic decay widths, via both inclusive and exclusive processes, will be crucial in clarifying this issue.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (36)

  1. R. Brandelik et al. (DASP Collaboration), Total cross-section for hadron production by e+e− annihilation at center-of-mass energies between 3.6 GeV and 5.2 GeV, Phys. Lett. 76B, 361 (1978).
  2. J. L. Rosner, Charmless final states and S−D wave mixing in the ψ′′, Phys. Rev. D 64, 094002 (2001).
  3. Z.-L. Man, S.-Q. Luo, Z.-Y. Bai, and X. Liu, Coupled-channel study of 4S−3D mixing dynamics in ψ(4220) and ψ(4380), Phys. Lett. B 868, 139644 (2025).
  4. K.-T. Chao, Interpretations for the X(4160) observed in the double charm production at B factories, Phys. Lett. B 661, 348 (2008).
  5. B.-Q. Li and K.-T. Chao, Higher charmonia and X, Y, Z states with screened potential, Phys. Rev. D 79, 094004 (2009).
  6. A. M. Badalian, B. L. G. Bakker, and I. V. Danilkin, The S−D mixing and di-electron widths of higher charmonium 1−− states, Phys. At. Nucl. 72, 638 (2009).
  7. M. N. Anwar, Y. Lu, and B.-S. Zou, Modeling charmonium-η decays of JPC=1−− higher charmonia, Phys. Rev. D 95, 114031 (2017).
  8. Y. Yang, Y. Guo, J. Sun, N. Wang, Q. Chang, and G. Lu, Bu→ψM decays and S−D wave mixing effects, Chin. Phys. C 42, 113102 (2018).
  9. J.-Z. Wang and X. Liu, Confirming the existence of a new higher charmonium ψ(4500) by the newly released data of e+e−→K+K−J/ψ, Phys. Rev. D 107, 054016 (2023).
  10. C. A. Bokade and Bhaghyesh, Conventional and XYZ charmonium states in a relativistic screened potential model, Phys. Rev. D 111, 014030 (2025).
  11. Z. Zhao, K. Xu, A. Limphirat, W. Sreethawong, N. Tagsinsit, A. Kaewsnod, X. Liu, K. Khosonthongkee, S. Cheedket, and Y. Yan, Mass spectrum of 1−− heavy quarkonium, Phys. Rev. D 109, 016012 (2024).
  12. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  13. K. K. Seth, Alternative analysis of the R measurements: Resonance parameters of the higher vector states of charmonium, Phys. Rev. D 72, 017501 (2005).
  14. M. Ablikim et al. (BES Collaboration), Determination of the ψ(3770), ψ(4040), ψ(4160) and ψ(4415) resonance parameters, eConf C 070805, 02 (2007).
  15. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rep. 639, 1 (2016).
  16. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, A review of the open charm and open bottom systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 076201 (2017).
  17. Y.-R. Liu, H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Pentaquark and tetraquark states, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107, 237 (2019).
  18. M. Mai, U.-G. Meißner, and C. Urbach, Towards a theory of hadron resonances, Phys. Rep. 1001, 1 (2023).
  19. M.-Z. Liu, Y.-W. Pan, Z.-W. Liu, T.-W. Wu, J.-X. Lu, and L.-S. Geng, Three ways to decipher the nature of exotic hadrons: Multiplets, three-body hadronic molecules, and correlation functions, Phys. Rep. 1108, 1 (2025).
  20. A. De Rujula, H. Georgi, and S. L. Glashow, Hadron masses in a gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 12, 147 (1975).
  21. S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Mesons in a relativized quark model with chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 32, 189 (1985).
  22. A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, and J. C. Raynal, Naive quark pair creation model of strong interaction vertices, Phys. Rev. D 8, 2223 (1973).
  23. A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, and J. C. Raynal, Naive quark pair creation model and baryon decays, Phys. Rev. D 9, 1415 (1974).
  24. M. R. Pennington and D. J. Wilson, Decay channels and charmonium mass-shifts, Phys. Rev. D 76, 077502 (2007).
  25. M.-X. Duan, S.-Q. Luo, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Possibility of charmoniumlike state X(3915) as χc0(2P) state, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054029 (2020).
  26. M.-X. Duan and X. Liu, Where are 3P and higher P-wave states in the charmonium family?, Phys. Rev. D 104, 074010 (2021).
  27. Q. Deng, R.-H. Ni, Q. Li, and X.-H. Zhong, Charmonia in an unquenched quark model, Phys. Rev. D 110, 056034 (2024).
  28. Z.-Y. Zhou and Z. Xiao, Comprehending heavy charmonia and their decays by hadron loop effects, Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 165 (2014).
  29. T.-C. Peng, Z.-Y. Bai, J.-Z. Wang, and X. Liu, Reevaluating the ψ(4160) resonance parameter using B+→K+μ+μ− data in the context of unquenched charmonium spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D 111, 054023 (2025).
  30. R.-H. Ni, Q. Deng, J.-J. Wu, and X.-H. Zhong, Bottomonia in an unquenched quark model, Phys. Rev. D 111, 114027 (2025).
  31. X. H. Mo, C. Z. Yuan, and P. Wang, On the leptonic partial widths of the excited ψ states, Phys. Rev. D 82, 077501 (2010).
  32. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of a resonance in B+→K+μ+μ− decays at low recoil, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 112003 (2013).
  33. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Precise measurement of the e+e−→Ds*+Ds*− cross sections at center-of-mass energies from threshold to 4.95 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151903 (2023).
  34. W. Kwong, P. B. Mackenzie, R. Rosenfeld, and J. L. Rosner, Quarkonium annihilation rates, Phys. Rev. D 37, 3210 (1988).
  35. J.-Z. Wang, D.-Y. Chen, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Constructing J/ψ family with updated data of charmoniumlike Y states, Phys. Rev. D 99, 114003 (2019).
  36. I. Balossino, F. Cossio, R. Farinelli, and L. Lavezzi, The CGEM-IT: An upgrade for the BESIII experiment, Symmetry 14, 905 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation