- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

New multimessenger probe of dark matter-nucleon interactions from ultrahigh energy cosmic ray acceleration

Stephan A. Meighen-Berger1,2,3,*, P. S. Bhupal Dev4,†, and Matheus Hostert3,‡

  • *Contact author: stephan-meighen-berger@uiowa.edu
  • †Contact author: bdev@wustl.edu
  • ‡Contact author: matheus-hostert@uiowa.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 113, 103050 – Published 29 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/747j-mhcq

Abstract

It has been suggested that the density of dark matter (DM) halo can be highly enhanced around supermassive black holes at the centers of massive galaxies. If real, these DM spikes would offer new opportunities to probe the properties of DM. In this work, we point out that DM spikes can significantly impact the composition and survivability of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays accelerated near supermassive black holes. A large DM-nucleon cross section would fragment heavy nuclei into lighter elements and prevent them from attaining the energies observed at Earth. While the origin of cosmic rays remains a mystery, we show that if the highest-energy cosmic rays on Earth come from sources like NGC 1068, then cross sections of size σχp≤10−33(mχGeV)  cm2 would be excluded by cosmic ray data. These bounds can be competitive with other existing probes and rule out new parameter space in the DM mass region mχ∈[3  MeV,30  MeV]. While the uncertainties on the acceleration mechanism of cosmic rays prevent us from setting robust limits, our study highlights an important connection between DM spikes and cosmic ray physics that is complementary to existing cosmological and direct detection constraints.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (175)

  1. K. Ptitsyna and A. Neronov, Particle acceleration in the vacuum gaps in black hole magnetospheres, Astron. Astrophys. 593, A8 (2016).
  2. Y. Inoue, D. Khangulyan, and A. Doi, On the origin of high-energy neutrinos from NGC 1068: The role of nonthermal coronal activity, Astrophys. J. Lett. 891, L33 (2020).
  3. K. Murase, S. S. Kimura, and P. Meszaros, Hidden cores of active galactic nuclei as the origin of medium-energy neutrinos: Critical tests with the MeV gamma-ray connection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 011101 (2020).
  4. G. Katsoulakos and F. M. Rieger, Gap-type particle acceleration in the magnetospheres of rotating supermassive black holes, Astrophys. J. 895, 99 (2020).
  5. A. Kheirandish, K. Murase, and S. S. Kimura, High-energy neutrinos from magnetized Coronae of active galactic nuclei and prospects for identification of Seyfert galaxies and quasars in neutrino telescopes, Astrophys. J. 922, 45 (2021).
  6. B. Eichmann, F. Oikonomou, S. Salvatore, R.-J. Dettmar, and J. Becker Tjus, Solving the multimessenger puzzle of the AGN-starburst composite galaxy NGC 1068, Astrophys. J. 939, 43 (2022).
  7. S. Inoue, M. Cerruti, K. Murase, and R.-Y. Liu, Multimessenger emission from winds and tori in active galactic nuclei, Proc. Sci., ICRC2023 (2023) 1161 [arXiv:2207.02097].
  8. D. F. G. Fiorillo, M. Petropoulou, L. Comisso, E. Peretti, and L. Sironi, TeV neutrinos and hard X-rays from relativistic reconnection in the corona of NGC 1068, Astrophys. J. 961, L14 (2024).
  9. D. F. G. Fiorillo, L. Comisso, E. Peretti, M. Petropoulou, and L. Sironi, A magnetized strongly turbulent corona as the source of neutrinos from NGC 1068, Astrophys. J. 974, 75 (2024).
  10. D. Karavola, M. Petropoulou, D. F. G. Fiorillo, L. Comisso, and L. Sironi, Neutrino and pair creation in reconnection-powered coronae of accreting black holes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2025) 075; 11 (2025) E01(E).
  11. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Evidence for neutrino emission from the nearby active galaxy NGC 1068, Science 378, 538 (2022).
  12. P. Padovani et al., High-energy neutrinos from the vicinity of the supermassive black hole in NGC 1068, Nat. Astron. 8, 1077 (2024).
  13. D. Berge et al., Fast variability of TeV gamma-rays from the radio galaxy M87, Science 314, 1424 (2006).
  14. F. Aharonian et al., An exceptional very high energy gamma-ray flare of PKS 2155-304, Astrophys. J. Lett. 664, L71 (2007).
  15. V. A. Acciari et al., Observation of gamma-ray emission from the galaxy M87 above 250 GeV with VERITAS, Astrophys. J. 679, 397 (2008).
  16. A. Abramowski et al. (H.E.S.S. Collaboration and VERITAS Collaboration), The 2010 very high energy gamma-ray flare & 10 years of multi-wavelength observations of M 87, Astrophys. J. 746, 151 (2012).
  17. J. Aleksic et al. (MAGIC Collaboration), MAGIC observations of the giant radio galaxy M87 in a low-emission state between 2005 and 2007, Astron. Astrophys. 544, A96 (2012).
  18. J. Aleksic et al., Black hole lightning due to particle acceleration at subhorizon scales, Science 346, 1080 (2014).
  19. V. S. Berezinsky, in Proceedings of the International Conference Neutrino ’77 (1977), p. 177.
  20. D. Eichler, High-energy neutrino astronomy: A probe of galactic nuclei?, Astrophys. J. 232, 106 (1979).
  21. R. Silberberg and M. M. Shapiro, Neutrinos as a probe for the nature of and processes in active galactic nuclei, in 16th International Cosmic Ray Conference (1979), pp. 357–362.
  22. R. C. Hickox and D. M. Alexander, Obscured active galactic nuclei, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 56, 625 (2018).
  23. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Search for neutrino emission from cores of active galactic nuclei, Phys. Rev. D 106, 022005 (2022).
  24. P. Giommi and P. Padovani, Astrophysical neutrinos and blazars, Universe 7, 492 (2021).
  25. K. Fang, J. S. Gallagher, and F. Halzen, The TeV diffuse cosmic neutrino spectrum and the nature of astrophysical neutrino sources, Astrophys. J. 933, 190 (2022).
  26. G. Setti and L. Woltjer, Active galactic nuclei and the spectrum of the x-ray background, Astron. Astrophys. 224, L21 (1989).
  27. A. Comastri, G. Setti, G. Zamorani, and G. Hasinger, The contribution of AGNs to the x-ray background, Astron. Astrophys. 296, 1 (1995).
  28. E. Treister and C. M. Urry, The evolution of obscuration in AGN, Astrophys. J. Lett. 652, L79 (2006).
  29. A. Akylas, A. Georgakakis, I. Georgantopoulos, M. Brightman, and K. Nandra, Constraining the fraction of Compton-thick AGN in the Universe by modelling the diffuse X-ray background spectrum, Astron. Astrophys. 546, A98 (2012).
  30. T. T. Ananna, E. Treister, C. M. Urry, C. Ricci, A. Kirkpatrick, S. LaMassa, J. Buchner, M. Tremmel, S. Marchesi, and F. Civano, The accretion history of AGNs. I. Supermassive black hole population synthesis model, Astrophys. J. 871, 240 (2019).
  31. R. Gilli, A. Comastri, and G. Hasinger, The synthesis of the cosmic X-ray background in the Chandra and XMM-Newton era, Astron. Astrophys. 463, 79 (2007).
  32. P. Padovani, R. Gilli, E. Resconi, C. Bellenghi, and F. Henningsen, The neutrino background from non-jetted active galactic nuclei, Astron. Astrophys. 684, L21 (2024).
  33. Q.-R. Yang, X.-B. Chen, R.-Y. Liu, X.-Y. Wang, and M. Lemoine, On the origin of ∼100  TeV neutrinos from the Seyfert galaxy NGC 7469, Astrophys. J. 995, 166 (2025).
  34. P. Gondolo and J. Silk, Dark matter annihilation at the galactic center, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1719 (1999).
  35. O. Y. Gnedin and J. R. Primack, Dark matter profile in the galactic center, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 061302 (2004).
  36. M. Portail, C. Wegg, O. Gerhard, and I. Martinez-Valpuesta, Made-to-measure models of the galactic box/peanut bulge: Stellar and total mass in the bulge region, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 448, 713 (2015).
  37. F. Iocco and M. Benito, An estimate of the DM profile in the Galactic bulge region, Phys. Dark Universe 15, 90 (2017).
  38. D. Hooper, The density of dark matter in the galactic bulge and implications for indirect detection, Phys. Dark Universe 15, 53 (2017).
  39. M. Baumgart, S. Bottaro, D. Redigolo, N. L. Rodd, and T. R. Slatyer, Testing Real WIMPs with CTAO, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2026) 213.
  40. G. D. Quinlan, L. Hernquist, and S. Sigurdsson, Models of galaxies with central black holes: Adiabatic growth in spherical galaxies, Astrophys. J. 440, 554 (1995).
  41. G. Bertone and D. Merritt, Time-dependent models for dark matter at the galactic center, Phys. Rev. D 72, 103502 (2005).
  42. T. Lacroix, Dynamical constraints on a dark matter spike at the galactic centre from stellar orbits, Astron. Astrophys. 619, A46 (2018).
  43. L. Sadeghian, F. Ferrer, and C. M. Will, Dark matter distributions around massive black holes: A general relativistic analysis, Phys. Rev. D 88, 063522 (2013).
  44. P. Sandick, J. Diemand, K. Freese, and D. Spolyar, Black holes in our galactic halo: Compatibility with FGST and PAMELA data and constraints on the first stars, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2011) 018.
  45. M. Regis and P. Ullio, Multi-wavelength signals of dark matter annihilations at the Galactic center, Phys. Rev. D 78, 043505 (2008).
  46. M. Gorchtein, S. Profumo, and L. Ubaldi, Probing Dark Matter with AGN Jets, Phys. Rev. D 82, 083514 (2010); 84, 069903(E) (2011).
  47. S. Balaji, D. Sachdeva, F. Sala, and J. Silk, Dark matter spikes around Sgr A* in γ-rays, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2023) 063.
  48. R. A. Gustafson, I. M. Shoemaker, and V. Takhistov, Probing dark matter interactions with stellar motion near Sagittarius A* (2025).
  49. J. F. Acevedo, A. J. Reilly, and L. Santos-Olmsted, Dark drag around Sagittarius A*, arXiv:2510.01320.
  50. I. John, R. K. Leane, and T. Linden, Dark matter scattering constraints from observations of stars surrounding Sgr A*, Phys. Rev. D 109, 123041 (2024).
  51. B. Betancourt Kamenetskaia, Observable signatures and consequences of high-density dark matter environments, Ph.D. thesis, Munich, Tech University, 2025.
  52. J.-W. Wang, A. Granelli, and P. Ullio, Direct detection constraints on Blazar-Boosted dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 221104 (2022).
  53. A. Granelli, P. Ullio, and J.-W. Wang, Blazar-boosted dark matter at Super-Kamiokande, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2022) 013.
  54. K. Akita, A. Ibarra, and R. Zimmermann, Dark matter explanations for the neutrino emission from the Seyfert galaxy NGC 1068, arXiv:2507.16539.
  55. J. M. Cline, S. Gao, F. Guo, Z. Lin, S. Liu, M. Puel, P. Todd, and T. Xiao, Blazar constraints on neutrino-dark matter scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 091402 (2023).
  56. F. Ferrer, G. Herrera, and A. Ibarra, New constraints on the dark matter-neutrino and dark matter-photon scattering cross sections from TXS 0506+056, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2023) 057.
  57. J. M. Cline and M. Puel, NGC 1068 constraints on neutrino-dark matter scattering, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2023) 004.
  58. A. G. De Marchi, A. Granelli, J. Nava, and F. Sala, Did IceCube discover dark matter around blazars?, Phys. Rev. D 112, 043042 (2025).
  59. G. D. Zapata, J. Jones-Pérez, and A. M. Gago, Bounds on neutrino-DM interactions from TXS 0506+056 neutrino outburst, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2025) 042.
  60. A. G. De Marchi, A. Granelli, J. Nava, and F. Sala, Diffuse astrophysical neutrinos from dark matter around blazars, Phys. Lett. B 871, 140015 (2025).
  61. P. S. B. Dev, D. Kim, D. Sathyan, K. Sinha, and Y. Zhang, New constraints on neutrino-dark matter interactions: A comprehensive analysis, arXiv:2507.01000.
  62. A. G. De Marchi, A. Granelli, J. Nava, and F. Sala, Boosted dark matter versus dark matter-induced neutrinos from single and stacked blazars, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 136.
  63. P. Ullio, H. Zhao, and M. Kamionkowski, A dark matter spike at the galactic center?, Phys. Rev. D 64, 043504 (2001).
  64. Z.-Q. Shen, G.-W. Yuan, C.-Z. Jiang, Y.-L. S. Tsai, Q. Yuan, and Y.-Z. Fan, Exploring dark matter spike distribution around the Galactic centre with stellar orbits, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 527, 3196 (2023).
  65. T. K. Gaisser, Spectrum of cosmic-ray nucleons, kaon production, and the atmospheric muon charge ratio, Astropart. Phys. 35, 801 (2012).
  66. S. Thoudam, J. P. Rachen, A. van Vliet, A. Achterberg, S. Buitink, H. Falcke, and J. R. Hörandel, Cosmic-ray energy spectrum and composition up to the ankle: The case for a second Galactic component, Astron. Astrophys. 595, A33 (2016).
  67. M. S. Muzio, M. Unger, and G. R. Farrar, Progress towards characterizing ultrahigh energy cosmic ray sources, Phys. Rev. D 100, 103008 (2019).
  68. D. Ivanov (Telescope Array Collaboration), Energy spectrum measured by the telescope array, Proc. Sci., ICRC2019 (2020) 298.
  69. E. W. Mayotte et al. (Pierre Auger Collaboration), Measurement of the mass composition of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays at the Pierre Auger Observatory, Proc. Sci., ICRC2023 (2023) 365.
  70. D. Ehlert, A. van Vliet, F. Oikonomou, and W. Winter, Constraints on the proton fraction of cosmic rays at the highest energies and the consequences for cosmogenic neutrinos and photons, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2024) 022.
  71. B. T. Zhang, K. Murase, N. Ekanger, M. Bhattacharya, and S. Horiuchi, Ultraheavy Ultrahigh-Energy Cosmic Rays (2024).
  72. R. U. Abbasi et al. (Telescope Array Collaboration), Isotropy of cosmic rays beyond 1020 eV favors their heavy mass composition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 041001 (2024).
  73. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration)§, IceCube Collaboration), Search for extremely-high-energy neutrinos and first constraints on the ultrahigh-energy cosmic-ray proton fraction with IceCube, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 031001 (2025).
  74. A. Abdul Halim et al. (Pierre Auger Collaboration), Energy spectrum of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays across declinations −90° to +44.8° as measured at the Pierre Auger Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 241002 (2025).
  75. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Measurement of the mean number of muons with energies above 500 GeV in air showers detected with the IceCube Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. D 112, 082004 (2025).
  76. K. Greisen, End to the cosmic ray spectrum?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 748 (1966).
  77. G. T. Zatsepin and V. A. Kuzmin, Upper limit of the spectrum of cosmic rays, JETP Lett. 4, 78 (1966).
  78. D. J. Bird et al. (HIRES Collaboration), Detection of a cosmic ray with measured energy well beyond the expected spectral cutoff due to cosmic microwave radiation, Astrophys. J. 441, 144 (1995).
  79. A. Abdul Halim et al. (Pierre Auger Collaboration), A catalog of the highest-energy cosmic rays recorded during Phase I of operation of the Pierre Auger Observatory, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 264, 50 (2023).
  80. R. U. Abbasi et al. (Telescope Array Collaboration), An extremely energetic cosmic ray observed by a surface detector array, Science 382, abo5095 (2023).
  81. A. Aab et al. (Pierre Auger Collaboration), Measurement of the cosmic-ray energy spectrum above 2.5×1018  eV using the Pierre Auger Observatory, Phys. Rev. D 102, 062005 (2020).
  82. K. Lu, Y.-L. S. Tsai, Q. Yuan, and L. Zhang, Inelastic scattering of dark matter with heavy cosmic rays, Res. Astron. Astrophys. 24, 065007 (2024).
  83. M. Aguilar et al. (AMS Collaboration), Properties of iron primary cosmic rays: Results from the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 041104 (2021).
  84. M. Froissart, Asymptotic behavior and subtractions in the Mandelstam representation, Phys. Rev. 123, 1053 (1961).
  85. A. Martin, Unitarity and high-energy behavior of scattering amplitudes, Phys. Rev. 129, 1432 (1963).
  86. R. J. Glauber and G. Matthiae, High-energy scattering of protons by nuclei, Nucl. Phys. B21, 135 (1970).
  87. M. M. Block and F. Halzen, New evidence for the saturation of the Froissart bound, Phys. Rev. D 72, 036006 (2005); 72, 039902(E) (2005).
  88. R. Ulrich, R. Engel, and M. Unger, Hadronic multiparticle production at ultra-high energies and extensive air showers, Phys. Rev. D 83, 054026 (2011).
  89. T. K. Gaisser, T. Stanev, and S. Tilav, Cosmic ray energy spectrum from measurements of air showers, Front. Phys. 8, 748 (2013).
  90. C. V. Cappiello, K. C. Y. Ng, and J. F. Beacom, Reverse direct detection: Cosmic ray scattering with light dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 99, 063004 (2019).
  91. G. Herrera and K. Murase, Probing light dark matter through cosmic-ray cooling in active galactic nuclei, Phys. Rev. D 110, L011701 (2024).
  92. A. Burkert, The Structure of dark matter halos in dwarf galaxies, Astrophys. J. Lett. 447, L25 (1995).
  93. J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, The structure of cold dark matter halos, Astrophys. J. 462, 563 (1996).
  94. G. Elor, R. McGehee, and A. Pierce, Maximizing direct detection with highly interactive particle relic dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 031803 (2023).
  95. P. N. Bhattiprolu, G. Elor, R. McGehee, and A. Pierce, Freezing-in hadrophilic dark matter at low reheating temperatures, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 128.
  96. G. Bertone and D. Merritt, Dark matter dynamics and indirect detection, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 20, 1021 (2005).
  97. B. Betancourt Kamenetskaia, M. Fujiwara, A. Ibarra, and T. Toma, Dark matter spikes with strongly self-interacting particles, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2025) 074.
  98. F. Ferrer, A. M. da Rosa, and C. M. Will, Dark matter spikes in the vicinity of Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. D 96, 083014 (2017).
  99. R. Abuter et al. (GRAVITY Collaboration), Polarimetry and astrometry of NIR flares as event horizon scale, dynamical probes for the mass of Sgr A*, Astron. Astrophys. 677, L10 (2023).
  100. G. Lodato and G. Bertin, Non-Keplerian rotation in the nucleus of NGC 1068: Evidence for a massive accretion disk?, Astron. Astrophys. 398, 517 (2003).
  101. J.-H. Woo and C. M. Urry, AGN black hole masses and bolometric luminosities, Astrophys. J. 579, 530 (2002).
  102. E. Dalla Bontà et al., Estimating masses of supermassive black holes in active galactic nuclei from the hα emission line, Astron. Astrophys. 696, A48 (2025).
  103. Y. Ema, F. Sala, and R. Sato, Light dark matter at neutrino experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 181802 (2019).
  104. T. Bringmann and M. Pospelov, Novel direct detection constraints on light dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 171801 (2019).
  105. J. B. Dent, B. Dutta, J. L. Newstead, and I. M. Shoemaker, Bounds on cosmic ray-boosted dark matter in simplified models and its corresponding neutrino-floor, Phys. Rev. D 101, 116007 (2020).
  106. M. Císcar-Monsalvatje, G. Herrera, and I. M. Shoemaker, Upper limits on the cosmic neutrino background from cosmic rays, Phys. Rev. D 110, 063036 (2024).
  107. D. Bardhan, S. Bhowmick, D. Ghosh, A. Guha, and D. Sachdeva, Bounds on boosted dark matter from direct detection: The role of energy-dependent cross sections, Phys. Rev. D 107, 015010 (2023).
  108. J. Zhang, A. Sandrock, J. Liao, and B. Yue, Impact of coherent scattering on relic neutrinos boosted by cosmic rays, Phys. Rev. D 113, 043028 (2026).
  109. D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, Inelastic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 64, 043502 (2001).
  110. F. M. Rieger, UHE Cosmic Rays and AGN Jets, Proc. Sci., HEPROVII2020 (2020) 019 [arXiv:1911.04171].
  111. F. M. Rieger, Active galactic nuclei as potential sources of ultra-high energy cosmic rays, Universe 8, 607 (2022).
  112. V. K. Jha, R. Joshi, H. Chand, X.-B. Wu, L. C. Ho, S. Rastogi, and Q. Ma, Accretion disc sizes from continuum reverberation mapping of AGN selected from the ZTF survey, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 511, 3005 (2022).
  113. W.-J. Guo, Y.-R. Li, Z.-X. Zhang, L. C. Ho, and J.-M. Wang, Accretion disk size measurements of active galactic nuclei monitored by the Zwicky transient facility, Astrophys. J. 929, 19 (2022).
  114. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), New constraints on cosmic ray-boosted dark matter from the LUX-ZEPLIN experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 241801 (2025).
  115. E. O. Nadler, V. Gluscevic, K. K. Boddy, and R. H. Wechsler, Constraints on dark matter microphysics from the Milky Way satellite population, Astrophys. J. Lett. 878, 32 (2019); 897, L46(E) (2020).
  116. A. M. Hillas, The origin of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 22, 425 (1984).
  117. K. V. Ptitsyna and S. V. Troitsky, Physical conditions in potential sources of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays. I. Updated Hillas plot and radiation-loss constraints, Phys. Usp. 53, 691 (2010).
  118. K. Kotera and A. V. Olinto, The astrophysics of ultrahigh energy cosmic rays, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 49, 119 (2011).
  119. A. R. Bell, Cosmic ray acceleration, Astropart. Phys. 43, 56 (2013).
  120. N. A. Silant’ev, M. Y. Piotrovich, Y. N. Gnedin, and T. M. Natsvlishvili, Magnetic fields of AGNs and standard accretion disk model: testing by optical polarimetry, Astron. Astrophys. 507, 171 (2009).
  121. A. K. Baczko et al., A highly magnetized twin-jet base pinpoints a supermassive black hole, Astron. Astrophys. 593, A47 (2016).
  122. M. Y. Piotrovich, A. G. Mikhailov, S. D. Buliga, and T. M. Natsvlishvili, Determination of magnetic field strength on the event horizon of supermassive black holes in active galactic nuclei, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 495, 614 (2020).
  123. F. A. Aharonian, A. A. Belyanin, E. V. Derishev, V. V. Kocharovsky, and V. V. Kocharovsky, Constraints on the extremely high-energy cosmic ray accelerators from classical electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 66, 023005 (2002).
  124. M. Lemoine and E. Waxman, Anisotropy vs chemical composition at ultra-high energies, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2009) 009.
  125. A. A. Arkhipov, The GZK puzzle and fundamental dynamics, arXiv:hep-ph/0607265.
  126. R. Genzel, F. Eisenhauer, and S. Gillessen, The Galactic Center massive black hole and nuclear star cluster, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3121 (2010).
  127. R. Schödel, A. Eckart, T. Alexander, D. Merritt, R. Genzel et al., The structure of the nuclear stellar cluster of the Milky Way, Astron. Astrophys. 469, 125 (2007).
  128. R. Schödel, D. Merritt, and A. Eckart, The nuclear star cluster of the Milky Way: Proper motions and mass, Astron. Astrophys. 502, 91 (2009).
  129. F. K. Baganoff, Y. Maeda, M. Morris, M. W. Bautz, W. N. Brandt et al., Chandra X-ray spectroscopic imaging of Sagittarius A* and the central parsec of the Galaxy, Astrophys. J. 591, 891 (2003).
  130. P. G. Mezger, W. J. Duschl, and R. Zylka, The Galactic Center: A laboratory for AGN?, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 7, 289 (1996).
  131. F. Peißker, A. Eckart, M. Zajacek, M. Subroweit, P. Dykstra et al., S4716: A new star with a highly eccentric orbit around Sagittarius A*, Astrophys. J. Lett. 899, L5 (2020).
  132. D. N. Spergel and P. J. Steinhardt, Observational evidence for selfinteracting cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3760 (2000).
  133. M. Kaplinghat, S. Tulin, and H.-B. Yu, Dark matter halos as particle colliders: Unified solution to small-scale structure puzzles from dwarfs to clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 041302 (2016).
  134. J. Billard et al., Direct detection of dark matter—APPEC committee report*, Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 056201 (2022).
  135. G. Angloher et al. (CRESST Collaboration), Results on MeV-scale dark matter from a gram-scale cryogenic calorimeter operated above ground, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 637 (2017).
  136. G. Angloher et al. (CRESST Collaboration), Testing spin-dependent dark matter interactions with lithium aluminate targets in CRESST-III, Phys. Rev. D 106, 092008 (2022).
  137. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (DAMIC Collaboration), Results on low-mass weakly interacting massive particles from a 11  kg−day target exposure of DAMIC at SNOLAB, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 241803 (2020).
  138. P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide Collaboration), Low-mass dark matter search with the DarkSide-50 experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 081307 (2018).
  139. P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide Collaboration), DarkSide-50 532-day dark matter search with low-radioactivity argon, Phys. Rev. D 98, 102006 (2018).
  140. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Dark matter search results from a one ton-year exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111302 (2018).
  141. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Light dark matter search with ionization signals in XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 251801 (2019).
  142. N. Sabti, J. Alvey, M. Escudero, M. Fairbairn, and D. Blas, Refined bounds on MeV-scale thermal dark sectors from BBN and the CMB, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2020) 004.
  143. G. Krnjaic and S. D. McDermott, Implications of BBN bounds for cosmic ray upscattered dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 101, 123022 (2020).
  144. N. Sabti, J. Alvey, M. Escudero, M. Fairbairn, and D. Blas, Addendum: Refined bounds on MeV-scale thermal dark sectors from BBN and the CMB, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2021) A01.
  145. Q.-R. Yang, R.-Y. Liu, and X.-Y. Wang, Could the neutrino emission of TXS 0506+056 come from the accretion flow of the supermassive black hole?, Astrophys. J. 980, 255 (2025).
  146. M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert, Science 361, 147 (2018).
  147. Y. T. Tanaka, S. Buson, and D. Kocevski, Fermi-LAT detection of increased gamma-ray activity of TXS 0506+056, located inside the IceCube-170922A error region, Astronomer’s Telegram 10791, 1 (2017).
  148. S. Ansoldi et al. (MAGIC Collaboration), The blazar TXS 0506+056 associated with a high-energy neutrino: Insights into extragalactic jets and cosmic ray acceleration, Astrophys. J. Lett. 863, L10 (2018).
  149. E. M. de Gouveia Dal Pino, J. C. Rodríguez-Ramírez, and M. V. del Valle, Multi-messenger emission from magnetic reconnection in blazar jets: The case of TXS 0506+056, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 537, 3895 (2025).
  150. E. Kun, P. L. Biermann, and L. Á. Gergely, VLBI radio structure and radio brightening of the high-energy neutrino emitting blazar TXS 0506+056, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 483, L42 (2019).
  151. A. Caproni, Z. Abraham, H. Monteiro et al., Relativistic parsec-scale jets of the blazars TXS 0506+056 and PKS 0502+049 and their possible association with gamma-ray flares and neutrino production, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 509, 1646 (2022).
  152. D. F. G. Fiorillo, F. Testagrossa, M. Petropoulou, and W. Winter, Can the neutrinos from TXS 0506+056 have a coronal origin?, Astrophys. J. 986, 104 (2025).
  153. R. Xue, R.-Y. Liu, M. Petropoulou, F. Oikonomou, Z.-R. Wang, K. Wang, and X.-Y. Wang, A two-zone model for blazar emission: Implications for TXS 0506+056 and the neutrino event IceCube-170922A, arXiv:1908.10190.
  154. R. Xue, R.-Y. Liu, Z.-R. Wang, N. Ding, and X.-Y. Wang, A two-zone blazar radiation model for “Orphan” neutrino flares, Astrophys. J. 906, 51 (2021).
  155. P. Padovani, F. Oikonomou, M. Petropoulou, P. Giommi, and E. Resconi, TXS 0506+056, the first cosmic neutrino source, is not a BL Lac, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 484, L104 (2019).
  156. E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic, and B. Shuve, Discovering inelastic thermal-relic dark matter at colliders, Phys. Rev. D 93, 063523 (2016).
  157. A. Berlin and F. Kling, Inelastic dark matter at the LHC lifetime frontier: ATLAS, CMS, LHCb, CODEX-b, FASER, and MATHUSLA, Phys. Rev. D 99, 015021 (2019).
  158. A. L. Erickcek, P. J. Steinhardt, D. McCammon, and P. C. McGuire, Constraints on the interactions between dark matter and baryons from the X-ray quantum calorimetry experiment, Phys. Rev. D 76, 042007 (2007).
  159. V. Gluscevic and K. K. Boddy, Constraints on scattering of keV–TeV dark matter with protons in the Early Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 081301 (2018).
  160. M. Andriamirado et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration), Limits on sub-GeV dark matter from the PROSPECT reactor antineutrino experiment, Phys. Rev. D 104, 012009 (2021).
  161. E. Armengaud et al. (EDELWEISS Collaboration), Searching for low-mass dark matter particles with a massive Ge bolometer operated above-ground, Phys. Rev. D 99, 082003 (2019).
  162. T. Emken and C. Kouvaris, How blind are underground and surface detectors to strongly interacting dark matter?, Phys. Rev. D 97, 115047 (2018).
  163. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), First dark matter search results from the XENON1T experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 181301 (2017).
  164. A. H. Abdelhameed et al. (CRESST Collaboration), First results from the CRESST-III low-mass dark matter program, Phys. Rev. D 100, 102002 (2019).
  165. A. H. Abdelhameed et al. (CRESST Collaboration), Description of CRESST-III data, arXiv:1905.07335.
  166. K. K. Rogers, C. Dvorkin, and H. V. Peiris, Limits on the light dark matter–proton cross section from cosmic large-scale structure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 171301 (2022).
  167. T. Emken, R. Essig, C. Kouvaris, and M. Sholapurkar, Direct detection of strongly interacting sub-GeV dark matter via electron recoils, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2019) 070.
  168. D. Merritt, M. Milosavljevic, L. Verde, and R. Jimenez, Dark matter spikes and annihilation radiation from the galactic center, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 191301 (2002).
  169. D. Merritt, Dark matter spikes and indirect detection, in 4th International Workshop on the Identification of Dark Matter (2003), pp. 96–101.
  170. G. Bertone, G. Sigl, and J. Silk, Annihilation radiation from a dark matter spike at the galactic center, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 337, 98 (2002).
  171. D. Merritt, Evolution of the dark matter distribution at the galactic center, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 201304 (2004).
  172. M. H. Chan and C. M. Lee, The first robust evidence showing a dark matter density spike around the supermassive black hole in oj 287, Astrophys. J. Lett. 962, L40 (2024).
  173. P. De la Torre Luque, S. Balaji, M. Fairbairn, F. Sala, and J. Silk, 511 keV Galactic photons from a dark matter spike, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2025) 034.
  174. X. Ou, A.-C. Eilers, L. Necib, and A. Frebel, The dark matter profile of the Milky Way inferred from its circular velocity curve, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 528, 693 (2024).
  175. S. H. Lim, E. Putney, M. R. Buckley, and D. Shih, Mapping dark matter in the Milky Way using normalizing flows and Gaia DR3, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2025) 021.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 113, 103050– Published 29 May, 2026
  • Received 6 February 2026
  • Accepted 1 May 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation