- Open Access
How isotropic is dark energy?
Phys. Rev. D 113, 123533 – Published 17 June, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7195-wl39
Abstract
Tensions in late-time expansion data have renewed interest in models beyond . We ask: how isotropic must dark energy be? Working in Bianchi I, we allow time-dependent anisotropic stress and introduce a parametrization that enforces a vanishing line-of-sight integral of the shear, thereby satisfying the CMB integrated Sachs–Wolfe quadrupole bound by construction. Using SNe together with Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) distances, single-bin (constant) and five-bin anisotropic models improve the fit over by and 26.6, respectively, but both violate the quadrupole constraint. In contrast, a five-bin constrained model achieves while remaining compatible with the quadrupole limit. The fit improvement arises from two sources: capturing directional structure in the data, and partially alleviating the tension between the SH0ES value and DESI BAO distances.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (34)
- A. G. Riess et al. (Supernova Search Team), Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998).
- S. Perlmutter et al. (Supernova Cosmology Project Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999).
- E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15, 1753 (2006).
- M. Abdul Karim et al. (DESI Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 112, 083515 (2025).
- K. Lodha et al. (DESI Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 112, 083511 (2025).
- P. A. R. Ade et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016).
- N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
- D. Scolnic et al., Astrophys. J. 938, 113 (2022).
- T. M. C. Abbott et al. (DES Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Lett. 973, L14 (2024).
- D. Rubin et al., Astrophys. J. 986, 231 (2025).
- D. Saadeh, S. M. Feeney, A. Pontzen, H. V. Peiris, and J. D. McEwen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 131302 (2016).
- S. A. Appleby, A. Shafieloo, and A. Johnson, Astrophys. J. 801, 76 (2015).
- J. Colin, R. Mohayaee, M. Rameez, and S. Sarkar, Astron. Astrophys. 631, L13 (2019).
- F. Sorrenti, R. Durrer, and M. Kunz, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2023) 054.
- A. Sah, M. Rameez, S. Sarkar, and C. G. Tsagas, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 596 (2025).
- J. A. Cowell, S. Dhawan, and H. J. Macpherson, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 526, 1482 (2023).
- A. Verma, P. K. Aluri, and D. F. Mota, Phys. Rev. D 111, 083508 (2025).
- S. Appleby, R. Battye, and A. Moss, Phys. Rev. D 81, 081301 (2010).
- R. A. Battye and A. Moss, Phys. Rev. D 74, 041301 (2006).
- R. Battye and A. Moss, Phys. Rev. D 80, 023531 (2009).
- J. Motoa-Manzano, J. Bayron Orjuela-Quintana, T. S. Pereira, and C. A. Valenzuela-Toledo, Phys. Dark Universe 32, 100806 (2021).
- T. Koivisto and D. F. Mota, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2008) 021.
- J. B. Orjuela-Quintana, J. L. Palacios-Córdoba, and C. A. Valenzuela-Toledo, Phys. Dark Universe 46, 101575 (2024).
- B. Alhulaimi, A. Coley, and P. Sandin, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 54, 042503 (2013).
- G. F. R. Ellis and M. A. H. MacCallum, Commun. Math. Phys. 12, 108 (1969).
- T. S. Pereira, C. Pitrou, and J.-P. Uzan, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2007) 006.
- N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A5 (2020).
- J. P. Beltrán Almeida, J. Motoa-Manzano, J. Noreña, T. S. Pereira, and C. A. Valenzuela-Toledo, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2022) 018.
- P. T. Saunders, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 142, 213 (1969).
- P. Fleury, C. Pitrou, and J.-P. Uzan, Phys. Rev. D 91, 043511 (2015).
- K. M. Górski, E. Hivon, A. J. Banday, B. D. Wandelt, F. K. Hansen, M. Reinecke, and M. Bartelman, Astrophys. J. 622, 759 (2005).
- D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, and J. Goodman, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 125, 306 (2013).
- A. Pontzen and A. Challinor, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 380, 1387 (2007).
- T. S. Pereira, C. Pitrou, and J.-P. Uzan, Astron. Astrophys. 585, L3 (2016).