Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Characterizing dark bosons at Chiral Belle

Carlos Henrique de Lima1,*, David McKeen1,†, Afif Omar1,2,‡, and Douglas Tuckler1,3,§

  • 1TRIUMF, 4004 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2A3, Canada
  • 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8P 5C2, Canada
  • 3Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada

  • *Contact author: cdelima@triumf.ca
  • †Contact author: mckeen@triumf.ca
  • ‡Contact author: aomar@triumf.ca
  • §Contact author: dtuckler@triumf.ca

Phys. Rev. D 112, 095025 – Published 18 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6zpx-5tt1

Abstract

We explore the advantages of a polarized electron beam at Belle II, as proposed for “Chiral Belle,” in the search for invisibly decaying (dark) bosons that weakly couple to the Standard Model. By measuring the polarization dependence of the production cross section of dark bosons in association with a photon, the dark boson’s spin and Lorentz structure of its couplings can potentially be determined. We analyze the mono-photon channel e+e−→γ+invisible in detail, focusing on the production of an on-shell spin-1 boson. We explore this in the context of three separate scenarios for a new dark vector: a dark photon, a mass-mixed “dark Z,” and a vector that couples to right-handed electrons, and we estimate how well the couplings of such bosons to electrons can be constrained in the event of a positive signal.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (62)

  1. P. Salucci, The distribution of dark matter in galaxies, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 27, 2 (2019); A. J. S. Hamilton and M. Tegmark, The real space power spectrum of the PSCz survey from 0.01 to 300 h Mpc−1, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 330, 506 (2002); N. A. Bahcall and P. Bode, The amplitude of mass fluctuations, Astrophys. J. 588, L1 (2003); S. W. Allen, A. E. Evrard, and A. B. Mantz, Cosmological parameters from observations of galaxy clusters, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 49, 409 (2011); J. D. Simon, The faintest dwarf galaxies, 57, 375 (2019).
  2. N. Bozorgnia, J. Bramante, J. M. Cline, D. Curtin, D. McKeen, D. E. Morrissey, A. Ritz, S. Viel, A. C. Vincent, and Y. Zhang, Dark matter candidates and searches, Can. J. Phys. 103, 671 (2025); T. Lin, Dark matter models and direct detection, Proc. Sci. 333 (2019) 009 [arXiv:1904.07915]; M. Lisanti, Lectures on dark matter physics, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings (2017), pp. 399–446, arXiv:1603.03797; G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rep. 405, 279 (2005); G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, 267, 195 (1996).
  3. R. Essig et al., Working group report: New light weakly coupled particles, in Snowmass 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi (2013), arXiv:1311.0029; J. Alexander et al., Dark sectors 2016 workshop: Community report, arXiv:1608.08632; M. Battaglieri et al., US cosmic visions: New ideas in dark matter 2017: Community report, arXiv:1707.04591; P. Agrawal et al., Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2020 workshop report, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 1015 (2021); S. Gori et al., Dark sector physics at high-intensity experiments, arXiv:2209.04671; C. H. de Lima, B. Keeshan, H. E. Logan, and Y. Zhang, Probing dark sector CP violation with electric dipole moments and colliders, Phys. Rev. D 103, 115034 (2021).
  4. M. Schumann, Direct detection of WIMP dark matter: Concepts and status, J. Phys. G 46, 103003 (2019).
  5. B. W. Lee and S. Weinberg, Cosmological lower bound on heavy neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 165 (1977).
  6. T. Abe et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), Belle II technical design report, arXiv:1011.0352.
  7. Z. Liptak, M. Kuriki, and J. M. Roney, Possibilities for upgrading to polarized SuperKEKB, JACoW IPAC2021, 3799 (2021).
  8. J. M. Roney, A polarized electron beam upgrade to SuperKEKB enabling precision electroweak measurements, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. Conf. Proc. 37, 020503 (2022).
  9. D. M. Asner et al. (US Belle II Group, Belle II/SuperKEKB e- Polarization Upgrade Working Group), Snowmass 2021 white paper on upgrading SuperKEKB with a polarized electron beam: Discovery potential and proposed implementation, in Snowmass 2021 (2022), arXiv:2205.12847.
  10. G. P. Zeller et al. (NuTeV Collaboration), A precise determination of electroweak parameters in neutrino nucleon scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 091802 (2002); 90, 239902(E) (2003).
  11. M. Roney (Belle II Collaboration), Status of chiral Belle: The beam polarization upgrade of SuperKEKB, Proc. Sci. ICHEP2024 (2025) 452.
  12. J. Bernabeu, G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg, J. Papavassiliou, and J. Vidal, Tau anomalous magnetic moment form-factor at super B/flavor factories, Nucl. Phys. B790, 160 (2008).
  13. A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, and J. M. Roney, Toward testing the magnetic moment of the tau at one part per million, Phys. Rev. D 106, 093007 (2022).
  14. J. Gogniat, M. Hoferichter, and Y. Ulrich, Towards testing (g−2)τ in e+e−→τ+τ−: Radiative corrections and projections for Belle II, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 172.
  15. M. Roney, Status of polarized beam operation at SuperKEKB, eeFACT https://indico.jacow.org/event/75/contributions/7040/attachments/791/3279/ChiralBelle-eeFACT2025-v2b.pdf (2025).
  16. A. Accardi et al., Opportunities for precision QCD physics in hadronization at Belle II—a snowmass whitepaper, in Snowmass 2021 (2022), arXiv:2204.02280.
  17. R. Essig, J. Mardon, M. Papucci, T. Volansky, and Y.-M. Zhong, Constraining light dark matter with low-energy e+e− colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 167.
  18. W. Altmannshofer et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), The Belle II physics book, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 123C01 (2019); 2020, 029201(E) (2020).
  19. M. Wakai, Search for invisible decays of dark photon at Belle II, Master’s thesis, University of British Columbia, 2021.
  20. M. Graham, C. Hearty, and M. Williams, Searches for dark photons at accelerators, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 37 (2021).
  21. C. Hearty, Searches for dark photons at accelerators, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2391, 012011 (2022).
  22. B. Batell, N. Blinov, C. Hearty, and R. McGehee, Exploring dark sector portals with high intensity experiments, in Snowmass 2021 (2022), arXiv:2207.06905.
  23. F. Acanfora, R. Franceschini, A. Mastroddi, and D. Redigolo, Fusing photons into nothing, a new search for invisible ALPs and dark matter at Belle II, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 156.
  24. M. Bauer and S. N. Erner, How to measure the spin of invisible states in e+e−→γ+X, Phys. Rev. D 108, 115013 (2023).
  25. L. Corona (Belle-II Collaboration), Searches for invisible new particles at Belle II, Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 79, 418 (2024).
  26. F.-F. Lee, G.-L. Lin, and V. Q. Nhat, Polarization effects in the search for dark vector boson at e+e− colliders, Phys. Rev. D 103, 015016 (2021).
  27. C. H. de Lima, D. McKeen, A. Omar, and D. Tuckler (to be published).
  28. L. B. Okun, Limits of electrodynamics: Paraphotons?, Sov. Phys. JETP 56, 502 (1982); P. Galison and A. Manohar, Two Z’s or not two Z’s?, Phys. Lett. 136B, 279 (1984); B. Holdom, Two U(1)’s and epsilon charge shifts, Phys. Lett. B 166B, 196 (1986).
  29. D. Curtin, R. Essig, S. Gori, and J. Shelton, Illuminating dark photons with high-energy colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 157.
  30. H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee, and W. J. Marciano, “Dark” Z implications for parity violation, rare meson decays, and Higgs physics, Phys. Rev. D 85, 115019 (2012).
  31. W. J. Marciano and J. L. Rosner, Atomic parity violation as a probe of new physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2963 (1990); 68, 898(E) (1992); S. G. Porsev, K. Beloy, and A. Derevianko, Precision determination of weak charge of Cs133 from atomic parity violation, Phys. Rev. D 82, 036008 (2010).
  32. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  33. B. Batell, D. McKeen, and M. Pospelov, New parity-violating muonic forces and the proton charge radius, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 011803 (2011).
  34. S. G. Karshenboim, D. McKeen, and M. Pospelov, Constraints on muon-specific dark forces, Phys. Rev. D 90, 073004 (2014); 90, 079905(A) (2014).
  35. J. Preskill, Gauge anomalies in an effective field theory, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 210, 323 (1991); P. Batra, B. A. Dobrescu, and D. Spivak, Anomaly-free sets of fermions, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 47, 082301 (2006); B. A. Dobrescu and C. Frugiuele, Hidden GeV-scale interactions of quarks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 061801 (2014).
  36. J. A. Dror, R. Lasenby, and M. Pospelov, New constraints on light vectors coupled to anomalous currents, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 141803 (2017).
  37. J. A. Dror, R. Lasenby, and M. Pospelov, Dark forces coupled to nonconserved currents, Phys. Rev. D 96, 075036 (2017).
  38. L. Gan, B. Kubis, E. Passemar, and S. Tulin, Precision tests of fundamental physics with η and η’ mesons, Phys. Rep. 945, 1 (2022).
  39. Y. Kahn, G. Krnjaic, S. Mishra-Sharma, and T. M. P. Tait, Light weakly coupled axial forces: Models, constraints, and projections, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2017) 002.
  40. I. Adachi et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), Evidence for B+→K+νν¯ decays, Phys. Rev. D 109, 112006 (2024).
  41. W. Altmannshofer, A. Crivellin, H. Haigh, G. Inguglia, and J. Martin Camalich, Light new physics in B→K(*)νν¯?, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075008 (2024); D. McKeen, J. N. Ng, and D. Tuckler, Higgs portal interpretation of the Belle II B+→K+νν measurement, 109, 075006 (2024); K. Fridell, M. Ghosh, T. Okui, and K. Tobioka, Decoding the B→Kνν excess at Belle II: Kinematics, operators, and masses, 109, 115006 (2024); X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, M. A. Schmidt, G. Valencia, and R. R. Volkas, Scalar dark matter explanation of the excess in the Belle II B+→K++ invisible measurement, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 168; A. J. Buras, J. Harz, and M. A. Mojahed, Disentangling new physics in K→πνν¯ and B→K(K*)νν¯ observables, 10 (2024) 087; W. Altmannshofer and S. Roy, Joint explanation of the B→πK puzzle and the B→Kνν¯ excess, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075029 (2025); B. Bhattacharya, A. Datta, G. Faisel, S. Khalil, and S. Roy, Flavor violations in B-mesons within non-minimal SU(5), arXiv:2412.16115; L. Calibbi, T. Li, L. Mukherjee, and M. A. Schmidt, Is Dark Matter the origin of the B→Kνν¯ excess at Belle II?, arXiv:2502.04900.
  42. N. Borodatchenkova, D. Choudhury, and M. Drees, Probing MeV dark matter at low-energy e+e− colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 141802 (2006).
  43. B. Batell, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, Probing a secluded U(1) at B-factories, Phys. Rev. D 79, 115008 (2009).
  44. R. Essig, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, Probing dark forces and light hidden sectors at low-energy e+e− colliders, Phys. Rev. D 80, 015003 (2009).
  45. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Search for invisible decays of a dark photon produced in e+e− collisions at BABAR, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 131804 (2017);
  46. A. Aleksejevs, S. Barkanova, C. Miller, J. M. Roney, and V. Zykunov, NLO radiative corrections for forward-backward and left-right asymmetries at a B-factory, Phys. Rev. D 101, 053003 (2020).
  47. C. Miller and J. M. Roney, Left-right asymmetry calculation comparisons and projected sensitivity to the weak mixing angle in polarized Bhabha scattering at 10.58 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 112, 013006 (2025).
  48. C. Hearty (private communication).
  49. I. Adachi, T. E. Browder, P. Križan, S. Tanaka, and Y. Ushiroda (Belle-II Collaboration), Detectors for extreme luminosity: Belle II, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 907, 46 (2018).
  50. J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.
  51. T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands, An introduction to pythia 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015).
  52. G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1554 (2011); 73, 2501(E) (2013).
  53. S. Adler et al. (E787 Collaboration), Further evidence for the decay K+→π+ neutrino anti-neutrino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 041803 (2002); A. V. Artamonov et al. (BNL-E949 Collaboration), Study of the decay K+→π+νν¯ in the momentum region 140<Pπ<199  MeV/c, Phys. Rev. D 79, 092004 (2009); H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee, and W. J. Marciano, Muon g−2, rare kaon decays, and parity violation from dark bosons, 89, 095006 (2014).
  54. E. Cortina Gil et al. (NA62 Collaboration), Search for production of an invisible dark photon in π0 decays, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2019) 182.
  55. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Search for invisible decays of a dark photon using e+e− annihilation data at BESIII, Phys. Lett. B 839, 137785 (2023).
  56. Y. M. Andreev et al. (NA64 Collaboration), Search for light dark matter with NA64 at CERN, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 161801 (2023).
  57. X. Fan, T. G. Myers, B. A. D. Sukra, and G. Gabrielse, Measurement of the electron magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 071801 (2023).
  58. L. Morel, Z. Yao, P. Cladé, and S. Guellati-Khélifa, Determination of the fine-structure constant with an accuracy of 81 parts per trillion, Nature (London) 588, 61 (2020).
  59. R. H. Parker, C. Yu, W. Zhong, B. Estey, and H. Müller, Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the standard model, Science 360, 191 (2018).
  60. A. Berlin, N. Blinov, G. Krnjaic, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, Dark matter, millicharges, axion and scalar particles, gauge bosons, and other new physics with LDMX, Phys. Rev. D 99, 075001 (2019).
  61. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for light neutral particles decaying promptly into collimated pairs of electrons or muons in pp collisions at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 335 (2025); A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Model-independent search for pair production of new bosons decaying into muons in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 172.
  62. A. Hook, E. Izaguirre, and J. G. Wacker, Model independent bounds on kinetic mixing, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2011, 859762 (2011); G. D. Kribs, D. McKeen, and N. Raj, Breaking up the proton: An affair with dark forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 011801 (2021); A. W. Thomas, X. G. Wang, and A. G. Williams, Constraints on the dark photon from deep inelastic scattering, Phys. Rev. D 105, L031901 (2022); A. W. Thomas, X. Wang, and A. G. Williams, Sensitivity of parity-violating electron scattering to a dark photon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 011807 (2022); B. Yan, Probing the dark photon via polarized DIS scattering at the HERA and EIC, Phys. Lett. B 833, 137384 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation