Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Ultrarelativistic freeze-out during reheating

Stephen E. Henrich1,*, Mathieu Gross2,†, Yann Mambrini2,‡, and Keith A. Olive1,§

  • *Contact author: henri455@umn.edu
  • †Contact author: gross@ijclab.in2p3.fr
  • ‡Contact author: mambrini@ijclab.in2p3.fr
  • §Contact author: olive@umn.edu

Phys. Rev. D 112, 103538 – Published 24 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6yrm-g8t2

Abstract

We perform a thorough investigation of (ultra)relativistic freeze-out (UFO) during reheating. While the standard WIMP (nonrelativistic freeze-out) and FIMP (freeze-in) paradigms have been explored in detail during the reheating epoch, UFO has not been systematically studied, despite the fact that it is operative in a broad region of parameter space. Although dark matter (DM) is “hot” at the time of relativistic freeze-out, we show that it can easily undergo enough cooling by the time of structure formation to be compatible with ΛCDM. Unlike standard WIMP-like freeze-out, there can be significant out-of-equilibrium DM production after UFO, similar to the freeze-in mechanism. However, unlike freeze-in, UFO can accommodate much stronger couplings. The UFO parameter space consistent with Ωχh2=0.12 is quite large, with DM masses spanning about 13 orders of magnitude (10−7  GeV≲mχ≲106  GeV), reheating temperatures spanning 17 orders of magnitude (10−2  GeV≲TRH≲1015  GeV), and beyond the Standard Model effective interaction scales spanning 11 orders of magnitude (103  GeV≲Λ≲1014  GeV), where a thermally averaged cross section has been parametrized as ⟨σv⟩=TnΛn+2. Interestingly, the most suitable range of couplings for UFO lies precisely between the typical couplings for WIMPs and FIMPs, rendering UFO quite attractive from the standpoint of detection. Particle physics models that are easily amenable to UFO include heavy vector or scalar portal interactions, along with nonrenormalizable effective interactions. Finally, we show there is a distinction between UV UFO and IR UFO, where the relic abundance for the former is sensitive to the freeze-out temperature, while the abundance for the latter is sensitive to the DM mass and the reheating temperature but insensitive to the freeze-out temperature.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Ultrarelativistic Freeze-Out: A Bridge from WIMPs to FIMPs

Stephen E. Henrich, Yann Mambrini, and Keith A. Olive
Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 221002 (2025)

Article Text

References (49)

  1. X. Chu, T. Hambye, and M. H. G. Tytgat, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2012) 034.
  2. R. J. Scherrer and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 31, 681 (1985).
  3. G. F. Giudice, E. W. Kolb, and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. D 64, 023508 (2001); D. J. H. Chung, E. W. Kolb, and A. Riotto, 60, 063504 (1999).
  4. M. A. G. Garcia, K. Kaneta, Y. Mambrini, and K. A. Olive, Phys. Rev. D 101, 123507 (2020).
  5. M. A. G. Garcia, K. Kaneta, Y. Mambrini, and K. A. Olive, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2021) 012.
  6. S. E. Henrich, Y. Mambrini, and K. A. Olive, Phys. Rev. D 111, 083501 (2025).
  7. N. Bernal, K. Deka, and M. Losada, Phys. Rev. D 111, 055034 (2025).
  8. J. Silva-Malpartida, N. Bernal, J. Jones-Pérez, and R. A. Lineros, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2023) 015; J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2025) 003.
  9. M. R. Haque, D. Maity, and R. Mondal, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 012; R. Mondal, S. Mondal, and T. Yamada, arXiv:2503.20738.
  10. K. Kaneta, Y. Mambrini, and K. A. Olive, Phys. Rev. D 99, 063508 (2019).
  11. Y. Mambrini, K. A. Olive, and J. Zheng, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2022) 055.
  12. S. Biondini and J. Ghiglieri, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2021) 075.
  13. O. Lebedev and T. Toma, Phys. Lett. B 798, 134961 (2019).
  14. V. De Romeri, D. Karamitros, O. Lebedev, and T. Toma, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 137.
  15. G. Arcadi, O. Lebedev, S. Pokorski, and T. Toma, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2019) 050.
  16. O. Lebedev and T. Toma, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 108.
  17. R. Kallosh and A. Linde, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2013) 002.
  18. K. D. Lozanov and M. A. Amin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 061301 (2017); Phys. Rev. D 97, 023533 (2018).
  19. M. A. G. Garcia, M. Gross, Y. Mambrini, K. A. Olive, M. Pierre, and J. H. Yoon, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2023) 028.
  20. M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, and N. Sugiyama, Phys. Rev. D 62, 023506 (2000); P. F. de Salas, M. Lattanzi, G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor, and O. Pisanti, 92, 123534 (2015); S. Hannestad, 70, 043506 (2004); T. Hasegawa, N. Hiroshima, K. Kohri, R. S. L. Hansen, T. Tram, and S. Hannestad, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2019) 012.
  21. G. Bhattacharyya, M. Dutra, Y. Mambrini, and M. Pierre, Phys. Rev. D 98, 035038 (2018).
  22. Y. Mambrini, N. Nagata, K. A. Olive, and J. Zheng, Phys. Rev. D 93, 111703 (2016); Y. Mambrini, N. Nagata, K. A. Olive, J. Quevillon, and J. Zheng, 91, 095010 (2015); Y. Mambrini, K. A. Olive, J. Quevillon, and B. Zaldivar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 241306 (2013);
  23. K. Kaneta, W. Ke, Y. Mambrini, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner, Phys. Rev. D 108, 115027 (2023).
  24. T. H. Yeh, J. Shelton, K. A. Olive, and B. D. Fields, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2022) 046.
  25. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  26. S. S. Gershtein and Y. B. Zeldovich, JETP Lett. 4, 120 (1966).
  27. R. Cowsik and J. McClelland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 669 (1972).
  28. A. S. Szalay and G. Marx, Acta Physica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 35, 113 (1974).
  29. M. Garny, T. Konstandin, L. Sagunski, and M. Viel, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2021) 049. E. Di Valentino, S. Gariazzo, and O. Mena, Phys. Rev. D 104, 083504 (2021). S. Brieden, H. Gil-Marín, and L. Verde, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2022) 024. D. Wang, O. Mena, E. Di Valentino, and S. Gariazzo, Phys. Rev. D 110, 103536 (2024).
  30. M. S. Turner and L. M. Widrow, Phys. Rev. D 37, 3428 (1988).
  31. P. J. E. Peebles and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 60, 103506 (1999).
  32. K. Enqvist, S. Nurmi, T. Tenkanen, and K. Tuominen, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2014) 035.
  33. T. Markkanen, A. Rajantie, and T. Tenkanen, Phys. Rev. D 98, 123532 (2018).
  34. C. Cosme and T. Tenkanen, Phys. Rev. D 102, 123534 (2020).
  35. O. Lebedev, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2023) 032.
  36. G. Choi, M. A. G. Garcia, W. Ke, Y. Mambrini, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner, Phys. Rev. D 110, 083512 (2024).
  37. M. A. G. Garcia, W. Ke, Y. Mambrini, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2025) 039.
  38. Y. Mambrini, Particles in the Dark Universe, A Student’s Guide to Particle Physics and Cosmology (Springer, 2021).
  39. N. Bernal, P. Konar, and S. Show, Phys. Rev. D 109, 035018 (2024).
  40. V. Iršič, M. Viel, M. G. Haehnelt, J. S. Bolton, S. Cristiani, G. Cupani, T. S. Kim, V. D’Odorico, S. López, S. Ellison et al., Phys. Rev. D 96, 023522 (2017).
  41. B. Barman, S. Cléry, R. T. Co, Y. Mambrini, and K. A. Olive, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2022) 072.
  42. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023).
  43. Z. Bo et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011805 (2025).
  44. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), arXiv:2502.18005.
  45. J. Ellis, K. A. Olive, V. C. Spanos, and I. D. Stamou, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 246 (2023).
  46. D. V. Nanopoulos, K. A. Olive, and M. Srednicki, Phys. Lett. B 127B, 30 (1983). J. R. Ellis, J. S. Hagelin, D. V. Nanopoulos, K. A. Olive, and M. Srednicki, Nucl. Phys. B238, 453 (1984). M. Y. Khlopov and A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. 138B, 265 (1984).
  47. G. Belanger, N. Bernal, and A. Pukhov, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 079.
  48. N. Bernal, K. Deka, and M. Losada, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2024) 024.
  49. S. E. Henrich, Y. Mambrini, and K. Olive, companion Letter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 221002 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation