Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Search for quadruplet scalars using boosted decision trees at the LHC

Amit Chakraborty1,*, Shreecheta Chowdhury1,†, Nilanjana Kumar2,‡, and Vandana Sahdev3,§

  • *Contact author: amit.c@srmap.edu.in
  • †Contact author: shreecheta_c@srmap.edu.in
  • ‡Contact author: nilanjana.kumar@gmail.com
  • §Contact author: vandanasahdev20@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 113, 095017 – Published 8 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6mts-6b68

Abstract

Beyond the Standard Model scenarios introduce additional scalar and fermion multiplets, which influence neutrino mass generation mechanisms and yield distinctive collider signatures. This work focuses on a particular scenario involving a fermion quintuplet and a scalar quadruplet. The study examines the production and decay of the scalar quadruplet components at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), emphasizing how their decay patterns, fermiophobic versus fermiophilic, depend on mass differences and Yukawa couplings with the fermion multiplets. This study provides an overview of possible signals at the LHC, along with a detailed collider analysis focused on final states containing at least four leptons and two jets, in which the masses of the scalars and fermions are reconstructed successfully. Standard Model backgrounds are also incorporated in the study, with multivariate techniques leveraged via boosted decision trees. Results indicate discovery potential for scalar masses around 600–700 GeV and exclusion sensitivity extending beyond 1 TeV, highlighting the promising experimental signatures of the model and its role in probing new physics at colliders.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (73)

  1. Howard E. Haber and Gordon L. Kane, The search for supersymmetry: Probing physics beyond the standard model, Phys. Rep. 117, 75 (1985).
  2. Juan Martin Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
  3. S. S. Gubser, Igor R. Klebanov, and Alexander M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B 428, 105 (1998).
  4. Edward Witten, Anti de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998).
  5. Lisa Randall and Raman Sundrum, A large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370 (1999).
  6. H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Unity of all elementary particle forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 438 (1974).
  7. Jogesh C. Pati and Abdus Salam, Lepton number as the fourth color, Phys. Rev. D 10, 275 (1974); 11, 703(E) (1975).
  8. Nima Arkani-Hamed, Savas Dimopoulos, and G. R. Dvali, The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter, Phys. Lett. B 429, 263 (1998).
  9. David B. Kaplan and Howard Georgi, SU(2)×U(1) breaking by vacuum misalignment, Phys. Lett. 136B, 183 (1984).
  10. Kaustubh Agashe, Roberto Contino, and Alex Pomarol, The minimal composite Higgs model, Nucl. Phys. B719, 165 (2005).
  11. R. N. Mohapatra and Jogesh C. Pati, A natural left-right symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 11, 2558 (1975).
  12. G. Senjanovic and Rabindra N. Mohapatra, Exact left-right symmetry and spontaneous violation of parity, Phys. Rev. D 12, 1502 (1975).
  13. Z. Chacko, Hock-Seng Goh, and Roni Harnik, The twin Higgs: Natural electroweak breaking from mirror symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 231802 (2006).
  14. G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, Marc Sher, and Joao P. Silva, Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rep. 516, 1 (2012).
  15. J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, Neutrino masses in SU(2)×U(1) theories, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2227 (1980).
  16. Sofiane M. Boucenna, Stefano Morisi, and José W. F. Valle, The low-scale approach to neutrino masses, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2014, 831598 (2014).
  17. Ran Ding, Zhi-Long Han, Yi Liao, Hong-Jun Liu, and Ji-Yuan Liu, Phenomenology in the minimal cascade seesaw mechanism for neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. D 89, 115024 (2014).
  18. Florian Bonnet, Martin Hirsch, Toshihiko Ota, and Walter Winter, Systematic study of the d=5 Weinberg operator at one-loop order, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2012) 153.
  19. Ernest Ma, Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 73, 077301 (2006).
  20. K. S. Babu, S. Nandi, and Zurab Tavartkiladze, New mechanism for neutrino mass generation and triply charged Higgs bosons at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 80, 071702 (2009).
  21. Kresimir Kumericki, Ivica Picek, and Branimir Radovcic, TeV-scale seesaw with quintuplet fermions, Phys. Rev. D 86, 013006 (2012).
  22. Takaaki Nomura and Hiroshi Okada, Neutrino mass with large SU(2)L multiplet fields, Phys. Rev. D 96, 095017 (2017).
  23. Tathagata Ghosh, Sudip Jana, and S. Nandi, Neutrino mass from Higgs quadruplet and multicharged Higgs searches at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 97, 115037 (2018).
  24. Alessio Giarnetti, Juan Herrero-Garcia, Simone Marciano, Davide Meloni, and Drona Vatsyayan, Neutrino masses from new Weinberg-like operators: Phenomenology of TeV scalar multiplets, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 055.
  25. Alessio Giarnetti, Juan Herrero-García, Simone Marciano, Davide Meloni, and Drona Vatsyayan, Neutrino masses from new seesaw models: Low-scale variants and phenomenological implications, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 803 (2024).
  26. Sanjib Kumar Agarwalla, Kirtiman Ghosh, and Ayon Patra, Sub-TeV quintuplet minimal dark matter with left-right symmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 123.
  27. Ian Low, Witold Skiba, and David Tucker-Smith, Little Higgses from an antisymmetric condensate, Phys. Rev. D 66, 072001 (2002).
  28. Natascia Vignaroli, Discovering the composite Higgs through the decay of a heavy fermion, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2012) 158.
  29. Yi Cai and Michael A. Schmidt, Revisiting the RνMDM models, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2016) 028.
  30. Shruti Dubey, Nilanjana Kumar, Tanumoy Mandal, Subhadip Mitra, and Rachit Sharma, Vectorlike τ production through leptoquarks, arXiv:2508.18047.
  31. Saiyad Ashanujjaman, Debajyoti Choudhury, and Kirtiman Ghosh, Search for exotic leptons in final states with two or three leptons and fat-jets at 13 TeV LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2022) 150.
  32. Nilanjana Kumar and Vandana Sahdev, Exotic decays and collider signatures of pNGB scalars in the SU(5)/SO(5) composite higgs model, Phys. Rev. D 113, 015022 (2026).
  33. Avik Banerjee et al., Phenomenological aspects of composite Higgs scenarios: Exotic scalars and vector-like quarks, arXiv:2203.07270.
  34. Teng Ma, Bin Zhang, and Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Doubly charged lepton from an exotic doublet at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 89, 093022 (2014).
  35. Nilanjana Kumar, Takaaki Nomura, and Hiroshi Okada, Scotogenic neutrino mass with large SU(2)L multiplet fields, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 801 (2020).
  36. You Yu, Chong-Xing Yue, and Shuo Yang, Signatures of the quintuplet leptons at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 91, 093003 (2015).
  37. J. A. Casas and A. Ibarra, Oscillating neutrinos and μ→e,γ, Nucl. Phys. B618, 171 (2001).
  38. Vandana Sahdev, Massive neutrinos, Anomalous magnetic moments and Dark matter, arXiv:2411.11328.
  39. Takaaki Nomura and Hiroshi Okada, Neutrino mass generation with large SU(2)L multiplets under local U(1)Lμ−Lτ symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 783, 381 (2018).
  40. Nilanjana Kumar and Vandana Sahdev, Alternative signatures of the quintuplet fermions at the LHC and future linear colliders, Phys. Rev. D 105, 115016 (2022).
  41. W. Grimus and L. Lavoura, The seesaw mechanism at arbitrary order: Disentangling the small scale from the large scale, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2000) 042.
  42. R. L. Workman et al., Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  43. Q. R. Ahmad et al., Direct evidence for neutrino flavor transformation from neutral current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 011301 (2002).
  44. S. Fukuda et al., Solar B-8 and hep neutrino measurements from 1258 days of Super-Kamiokande data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5651 (2001).
  45. Y. Fukuda et al., Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562 (1998).
  46. Ivan Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Alvaro Hernandez-Cabezudo, Michele Maltoni, and Thomas Schwetz, Global analysis of three-flavour neutrino oscillations: Synergies and tensions in the determination of θ23, δCP, and the mass ordering, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 106.
  47. G. Abbiendi et al., Search for charged Higgs bosons: Combined results using LEP data, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2463 (2013).
  48. Junquan Tao, Searches for additional Higgs bosons at the LHC, Proc. Sci. LHCP2021 (2021) 077.
  49. Georges Aad et al., ATLAS searches for additional scalars and exotic Higgs boson decays with the LHC Run 2 dataset, Phys. Rep. 1116, 184 (2025).
  50. Yasuyuki Horii, Searches for singly- and doubly-charged Higgs bosons in ATLAS, Proc. Sci. ICHEP2024 (2025) 070.
  51. Avik Banerjee, Dipankar Das, Samadrita Mukherjee, and Shreya Pandey, Drell-Yan constraints on charged scalars: A weak isospin perspective, Phys. Rev. D 111, 115014 (2025).
  52. Georges Aad et al., Search for resonant WZ production in the fully leptonic final state in proton–proton collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 633 (2023).
  53. Georges Aad et al., Measurement and interpretation of same-sign W boson pair production in association with two jets in pp collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2024) 026.
  54. Albert M. Sirunyan et al., Search for charged Higgs bosons produced in vector boson fusion processes and decaying into vector boson pairs in proton–proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 723 (2021).
  55. Morad Aaboud et al., Search for doubly charged scalar bosons decaying into same-sign W boson pairs with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 58 (2019).
  56. Albert M. Sirunyan et al., Search for charged Higgs bosons in the H±→τ±ντ decay channel in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2019) 142.
  57. Georges Aad et al., Search for charged Higgs bosons decaying via H+→τν in top quark pair events using pp collision data at s=7  TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2012) 039.
  58. Morad Aaboud et al., Search for charged Higgs bosons decaying via H±→τ±ντ in the τ+jets and τ+lepton final states with 36  fb−1 of pp collision data recorded at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS experiment, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2018) 139.
  59. Morad Aaboud et al., Search for charged Higgs bosons decaying into top and bottom quarks at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2018) 085.
  60. Georges Aad et al., Search for charged Higgs bosons in the H±→tb decay channel in pp collisions at s=8  TeV using the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2016) 127.
  61. Georges Aad et al., Search for doubly charged Higgs boson production in multilepton final states using 139  fb−1 of proton–proton collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 605 (2023).
  62. Georges Aad et al., Search for a light charged Higgs boson in the decay channel H+→cs¯ in tt¯ events using pp collisions at s=7  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2465 (2013).
  63. Georges Aad et al., Search for doubly and singly charged Higgs bosons decaying into vector bosons in multilepton final states with the ATLAS detector using proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 146.
  64. Georges Aad et al., Differential cross-section measurements of the production of four charged leptons in association with two jets using the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 004.
  65. Albert M Sirunyan et al., Evidence for electroweak production of four charged leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Phys. Lett. B 812, 135992 (2021).
  66. Johan Alwall, Michel Herquet, Fabio Maltoni, Olivier Mattelaer, and Tim Stelzer, MadGraph 5: Going beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2011) 128.
  67. Christian Bierlich et al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, SciPost Phys. Codebases 2022, 8 (2022).
  68. J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi, DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 057.
  69. Matteo Cacciari and Gavin P. Salam, Dispelling the N3 myth for the kt jet-finder, Phys. Lett. B 641, 57 (2006).
  70. Matteo Cacciari, Gavin P. Salam, and Gregory Soyez, FastJet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1896 (2012).
  71. Andreas Hocker et al., TMVA—toolkit for multivariate data analysis, arXiv:physics/0703039.
  72. Yoav Freund and Robert E Schapire, A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting, J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 55, 119 (1997).
  73. Glen Cowan, Kyle Cranmer, Eilam Gross, and Ofer Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1554 (2011); 73, 2501(E) (2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation