Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Explaining Belle data on B→K(*)νν¯ decays via dark Z resonances

T. M. Aliev1, A. Elpe1, L. Selbuz2, and I. Turan1

Phys. Rev. D 112, 015025 – Published 25 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6j6r-9vsl

Abstract

The Belle II Collaboration reported the first measurement on Br(B+→K+νν¯), which lies 2.7σ away from the Standard Model expectation. This result may be manifestation of new physics beyond the Standard Model. In present work, motivated by the Belle II measurement, we investigate the effect of a dark photon/dark Z on the rare B meson decay B+→K+νν¯ and show that the Br(B+→K+νν¯) excess from Belle II over the Standard Model expectation explained by the appearance of the dark Z especially in resonances. We also derive constraints on various parameters of the two-Higgs-doublet model extended with a dark Abelian gauge group, in light of the measurement of the Br(B+→K+νν¯) by the Belle-II Collaboration as well as the upper bound on Br(B0→K*0νν¯) decay, set by the Belle data. Our results indicate that there exists a common region where both experimental results are satisfied for a dark Z mass around 4.5 GeV with suitable values of the other parameters.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (76)

  1. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012).
  2. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012).
  3. S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos, and L. Maiani, Weak interactions with lepton-hadron symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 2, 1285 (1970).
  4. D. London and J. Matias, B flavour anomalies: 2021 theoretical status report, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 72, 37 (2022).
  5. B. Capdevila, A. Crivellin, and J. Matias, Review of semileptonic B anomalies, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 1, 20 (2023).
  6. W. Altmannshofer, A. J. Buras, D. M. Straub, and M. Wick, New strategies for new physics search in B→K*νν¯, B→Kνν¯ and B→Xsνν¯ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2009) 022.
  7. A. J. Buras, J. Girrbach-Noe, C. Niehoff, and D. M. Straub, B→K(*)νν¯ decays in the standard model and beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 184.
  8. D. Bečirević, G. Piazza, and O. Sumensari, Revisiting B→K(*)νν¯ decays in the standard model and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 252 (2023).
  9. T. Felkl, S. L. Li, and M. A. Schmidt, A tale of invisibility: Constraints on new physics in b→sνν, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 118.
  10. R. Bause, H. Gisbert, M. Golz, and G. Hiller, Interplay of dineutrino modes with semileptonic rare B-decays, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 061.
  11. T. E. Browder, N. G. Deshpande, R. Mandal, and R. Sinha, Impact of B→Kνν¯ measurements on beyond the standard model theories, Phys. Rev. D 104, 053007 (2021).
  12. D. Bečirević, S. Fajfer, N. Košnik, and L. Pavičić, Right-handed interactions in puzzling B-decays, Phys. Lett. B 861, 139285 (2025).
  13. P. del Amo Sanchez et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Search for the rare decay B→Kνν¯, Phys. Rev. D 82, 112002 (2010).
  14. O. Lutz et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for B→h(*)νν¯ with the full Belle ϒ(4S) data sample, Phys. Rev. D 87, 111103 (2013).
  15. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Search for B→K(*)νν¯ and invisible quarkonium decays, Phys. Rev. D 87, 112005 (2013).
  16. J. Grygier et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for B→hνν¯ decays with semileptonic tagging at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 96, 091101 (2017); 97, 099902(A) (2018).
  17. W. Altmannshofer et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), The Belle II physics book, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 123C01 (2019); 2020, 029201(E) (2020).
  18. I. Adachi et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), Evidence for B+→K+νν¯ decays, Phys. Rev. D 109, 112006 (2024).
  19. E. Gabrielli, L. Marzola, K. Müürsepp, and M. Raidal, Explaining the B+→K+νν¯ excess via a massless dark photon, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 460 (2024).
  20. W. Altmannshofer, A. Crivellin, H. Haigh, G. Inguglia, and J. Martin Camalich, Light new physics in B→K(*)νν¯? Phys. Rev. D 109, 075008 (2024).
  21. L. Allwicher, D. Becirevic, G. Piazza, S. Rosauro-Alcaraz, and O. Sumensari, Understanding the first measurement of B(B→Kνν¯), Phys. Lett. B 848, 138411 (2024).
  22. R. Bause, H. Gisbert, and G. Hiller, Implications of an enhanced B→Kνν¯ branching ratio, Phys. Rev. D 109, 015006 (2024).
  23. D. McKeen, J. N. Ng, and D. Tuckler, Higgs portal interpretation of the Belle II B+→K+νν¯ measurement, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075006 (2024).
  24. K. Fridell, M. Ghosh, T. Okui, and K. Tobioka, Decoding the B→Kνν excess at Belle II: Kinematics, operators, and masses, Phys. Rev. D 109, 115006 (2024).
  25. T. Felkl, A. Giri, R. Mohanta, and M. A. Schmidt, When energy goes missing: New physics in b→sνν with sterile neutrinos, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1135 (2023).
  26. Z. S. Wang, H. K. Dreiner, and J. Y. Günther, The decay B→Kνν¯ at Belle II and a massless bino in R-parity-violating supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 66 (2025).
  27. X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, and G. Valencia, Revisiting models that enhance B+→K+νν¯ in light of the new Belle II measurement, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075019 (2024).
  28. A. Datta, D. Marfatia, and L. Mukherjee, B→Kνν¯, MiniBooNE and muon g−2 anomalies from a dark sector, Phys. Rev. D 109, L031701 (2024).
  29. S.-Y. Ho, J. Kim, and P. Ko, Recent B+→K+νν¯ excess and muon g−2 illuminating light dark sector with Higgs portal, Phys. Rev. D 111, 055029 (2025).
  30. F.-Z. Chen, Q. Wen, and F. Xu, Correlating B→K(*)νν¯ and flavor anomalies in SMEFT, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1012 (2024).
  31. B.-F. Hou, X.-Q. Li, M. Shen, Y.-D. Yang, and X.-B. Yuan, Deciphering the Belle II data on B→Kνν¯ decay in the (dark) SMEFT with minimal flavour violation, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 172.
  32. X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, M. A. Schmidt, G. Valencia, and R. R. Volkas, Scalar dark matter explanation of the excess in the Belle II B+→K++ invisible measurement, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 168.
  33. P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, Signatures of light new particles in B→K(*)Emiss, Phys. Rev. D 110, 055001 (2024).
  34. A. J. Buras, J. Harz, and M. A. Mojahed, Disentangling new physics inK→πνν¯ and B→K(K*)νν¯ observables, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 087.
  35. W. Altmannshofer and S. Roy, A joint explanation of the B→πK puzzle and the B→Kνν¯ excess, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075029 (2025).
  36. D. Marzocca, M. Nardecchia, A. Stanzione, and C. Toni, Implications of B→Kνν¯ under rank-one flavor violation hypothesis, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1217 (2024).
  37. Q.-Y. Hu, Are the new particles heavy or light in b→sEmiss? Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 556 (2025).
  38. L. Allwicher, M. Bordone, G. Isidori, G. Piazza, and A. Stanzione, Probing third-generation new physics with K→πνν¯ and B→K(*)νν¯, Phys. Lett. B 861, 139295 (2025).
  39. A. Berezhnoy and D. Melikhov, B→K*MX vs B→KMX as a probe of a scalar-mediator dark matter scenario, Europhys. Lett. 145, 14001 (2024).
  40. L. Calibbi, T. Li, L. Mukherjee, and M. A. Schmidt, Is dark matter the origin of the B→Kνν¯ excess at Belle II? arXiv:2502.04900.
  41. J.-P. Lee, New physics effects in R(K(*)), Bs→μ+μ−, and B+→K+νν¯, arXiv:2502.06370.
  42. P. Athron, R. Martinez, and C. Sierra, B meson anomalies and large B+→K+νν¯ in non-universal U(1)′ models, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2024) 121.
  43. S. Rosauro-Alcaraz and L. P. S. Leal, Disentangling left and right-handed neutrino effects in B→K(*)νν, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 795 (2024).
  44. D. Bečirević, I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, N. Košnik, D. A. Faroughy, and O. Sumensari, Scalar leptoquarks from grand unified theories to accommodate the B-physics anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 98, 055003 (2018).
  45. J. Martin Camalich, M. Pospelov, P. N. H. Vuong, R. Ziegler, and J. Zupan, Quark flavor phenomenology of the QCD axion, Phys. Rev. D 102, 015023 (2020).
  46. A. Filimonova, R. Schäfer, and S. Westhoff, Probing dark sectors with long-lived particles at BELLE II, Phys. Rev. D 101, 095006 (2020).
  47. B. Holdom, Two U(1)’s and Epsilon charge shifts, Phys. Lett. 166B, 196 (1986).
  48. M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, and G. Lanfranchi, The Physics of the Dark Photon—A Primer, Springer Briefs in Physics (Springer, Cham, 2021).
  49. P. Fayet, On the search for a new spin 1 boson, Nucl. Phys. B187, 184 (1981).
  50. P. Fayet, Extra U(1)’s and new forces, Nucl. Phys. B347, 743 (1990).
  51. B.-A. Gradwohl and J. A. Frieman, Dark matter, long range forces, and large scale structure, Astrophys. J. 398, 407 (1992).
  52. L. Ackerman, M. R. Buckley, S. M. Carroll, and M. Kamionkowski, Dark matter and dark radiation, Phys. Rev. D 79, 023519 (2009).
  53. J. Fan, A. Katz, L. Randall, and M. Reece, Dark-disk universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 211302 (2013).
  54. R. Foot and S. Vagnozzi, Dissipative hidden sector dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 91, 023512 (2015).
  55. J. T. Acuña, M. Fabbrichesi, and P. Ullio, Phenomenological consequences of an interacting multicomponent dark sector, Phys. Rev. D 102, 083009 (2020).
  56. E. Gabrielli and M. Raidal, Exponentially spread dynamical Yukawa couplings from nonperturbative chiral symmetry breaking in the dark sector, Phys. Rev. D 89, 015008 (2014).
  57. E. Gabrielli, L. Marzola, and M. Raidal, Radiative Yukawa Couplings in the simplest left-right symmetric model, Phys. Rev. D 95, 035005 (2017).
  58. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for dark photons in Higgs boson production via vector boson fusion in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 011.
  59. E. Gabrielli, B. Mele, M. Raidal, and E. Venturini, FCNC decays of standard model fermions into a dark photon, Phys. Rev. D 94, 115013 (2016).
  60. M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, and B. Mele, Hunting down massless dark photons in kaon physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 031801 (2017).
  61. B. A. Dobrescu, Massless gauge bosons other than the photon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 151802 (2005).
  62. A. Elpe, E. Akyumuk, T. M. Aliev, L. Selbuz, and I. Turan, Constraining nonminimal dark sector scenarios with the COHERENT neutrino scattering data, Phys. Rev. D 107, 075022 (2023).
  63. M. D. Campos, D. Cogollo, M. Lindner, T. Melo, F. S. Queiroz, and W. Rodejohann, Neutrino masses and absence of flavor changing interactions in the 2HDM from gauge principles, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 092.
  64. T. D. Lee, A Theory of spontaneous T violation, Phys. Rev. D 8, 1226 (1973).
  65. H.-S. Lee and M. Sher, Dark two Higgs doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 87, 115009 (2013).
  66. M. Lindner, F. S. Queiroz, W. Rodejohann, and X.-J. Xu, Neutrino-electron scattering: General constraints on Z′ and dark photon models, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 098.
  67. E. C. G. Stueckelberg, Interaction energy in electrodynamics and in the field theory of nuclear forces, Helv. Phys. Acta 11, 225 (1938).
  68. D. Feldman, Z. Liu, and P. Nath, The Stueckelberg Z′ extension with kinetic mixing and milli-charged dark matter From the hidden sector, Phys. Rev. D 75, 115001 (2007).
  69. B. Kors and P. Nath, A Stueckelberg extension of the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 586, 366 (2004).
  70. G. Panotopoulos and P. Tuzon, The physics of a new gauge boson in a Stueckelberg extension of the two-Higgs-doublet model, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2011) 039.
  71. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  72. A. Bharucha, D. M. Straub, and R. Zwicky, B→Vℓ+ℓ− in the standard model from light-cone sum rules, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 098.
  73. M. B. Voloshin, KL→μ+μ− Decay and (nλZ) Vertex in the Weinberg-Salam model, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 24, 422 (1976).
  74. T. Inami and C. S. Lim, Effects of superheavy quarks and leptons in low-energy weak processes KL→μμ¯,K+→π+νν¯ and K0↔K¯0, Prog. Theor. Phys. 65, 297 (1981); 65, 1772(E) (1981).
  75. X.-G. Wang and A. W. Thomas, Dark photon effect on the rare kaon decay, J. Phys. G 50, 085001 (2023).
  76. T. Hahn and M. Perez-Victoria, Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118, 153 (1999).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation