Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

UV stability of one-loop radiative corrections in higher-derivative scalar field theory

Yugo Abe1, Takeo Inami2,3, and Keisuke Izumi4,5

Phys. Rev. D 113, 016020 – Published 20 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6gb9-35zv

Abstract

We consider the theory of a higher-derivative (HD) real scalar field ϕ coupled to a complex scalar σ, the coupling of the ϕ and σ being given by two types, λσϕσ†σϕ2 and ξσϕσ†σ(∂μϕ)2. We evaluate ϕ one-loop corrections δV(σ) to the effective potential of σ, both the contribution from the positive norm part of ϕ and that from the negative norm part (ghost). We show that δV(σcl) at σcl→∞, where σcl is a classical value of σ, is positive, implying the stability of δV(σcl) by the HD one-loop radiative corrections at high energy.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (29)

  1. Y. Hamada, H. Kawai, and K.-y. Oda, Phys. Rev. D 87, 053009 (2013); 89, 059901(E) (2014).
  2. F. Bezrukov, M. Y. Kalmykov, B. A. Kniehl, and M. Shaposhnikov, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2012) 140.
  3. G. Degrassi, S. Di Vita, J. Elias-Miro, J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori, and A. Strumia, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2012) 098.
  4. L. Smolin, Phys. Lett. 93B, 95 (1980).
  5. S. Bhattacharjee and P. Majumdar, Nucl. Phys. B885, 481 (2014).
  6. N. Haba, K. Kaneta, R. Takahashi, and Y. Yamaguchi, Phys. Rev. D 91, 016004 (2015).
  7. F. Loebbert and J. Plefka, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 30, 1550189 (2015).
  8. Y. Abe, M. Horikoshi, and T. Inami, Commun. Phys. 26, 229 (2017).
  9. C. Álvarez-Luna, S. de la Calle-Leal, J. A. R. Cembranos, and J. J. Sanz-Cillero, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 232.
  10. K. S. Stelle, Phys. Rev. D 16, 953 (1977).
  11. A. Salvio, Front. Phys. 6, 77 (2018).
  12. M. Ostrogradsky, Mem. Acad. St. Petersbourg 6, 385 (1850).
  13. A. Pais and G. E. Uhlenbeck, Phys. Rev. 79, 145 (1950).
  14. R. P. Woodard, Scholarpedia 10, 32243 (2015).
  15. T. D. Lee and G. C. Wick, Nucl. Phys. B9, 209 (1969).
  16. T. D. Lee and G. C. Wick, Phys. Rev. D 2, 1033 (1970).
  17. J. Kubo and T. Kugo, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2023, 123B02 (2023).
  18. J. Kubo and T. Kugo, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2024, 053B01 (2024).
  19. S. W. Hawking and T. Hertog, Phys. Rev. D 65, 103515 (2002).
  20. Y. Abe, T. Inami, K. Izumi, T. Kitamura, and T. Noumi, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 083B06 (2019).
  21. B. Holdom, Phys. Lett. B 843, 138023 (2023).
  22. J. F. Donoghue and G. Menezes, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2025) 062.
  23. S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 7, 1888 (1973).
  24. T. Fujimori, T. Inami, K. Izumi, and T. Kitamura, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 013B08 (2016).
  25. M. Laine and A. Vuorinen, Lect. Notes Phys. 925, 1 (2016).
  26. Y. Makeenko, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 085.
  27. Y. Makeenko, Nucl. Phys. B967, 115398 (2021).
  28. Y. Nakayama, Lett. Math. Phys. 109, 2255 (2019).
  29. W. Bialek and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1512 (1988).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation