Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Constructing dimension-8 SMEFT from conserved currents

Leonardo P. G. De Assis*

  • ULO-Math and Physics Program, Stanford University, 415 Broadway, Redwood City, Zip code 94063, CA, USA

  • *Contact author: lpgassis@stanford.edu

Phys. Rev. D 113, 056004 – Published 3 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/66tz-nlbq

Abstract

Effective field theories are the primary tool for interpreting precision collider data in the absence of new resonances. However, in the dimension-8 Standard Model effective field theory, the utility of traditional algebraically minimal bases is fundamentally limited by kinematic mixing: multiple operators contribute to a single high-energy amplitude, creating degeneracies that obscure ultraviolet interpretations and complicate the application of theoretical constraints. We introduce a generative framework that resolves this by constructing operators directly from the conserved Noether currents of the Standard Model. The resulting kinematically diagonalized current basis (KDCB) ensures that each operator maps to a unique asymptotic energy scaling (E4, E2, E0) in scattering amplitudes. This organization makes S-matrix positivity bounds manifest, enables a stable auxiliary-field formulation for Monte Carlo simulation, and provides direct diagnostics for universal versus nonuniversal ultraviolet completions through current decomposition. By rotating the operator space into physically interpretable sectors, the KDCB offers a transformative framework for global fits and a clear pathway from high-energy data to the structure of new physics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (20)

  1. W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. B268, 621 (1986).
  2. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzyński, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2010) 085.
  3. L. Lehman, Phys. Rev. D 90, 125023 (2014).
  4. Y. Liao and X.-D. Ma, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2016) 043.
  5. R. Contino, A. Falkowski, F. Goertz, C. Grojean, and F. Riva, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2016) 144.
  6. X.-X. Li, Z. Ren, and J.-H. Yu, Phys. Rev. D 109, 095041 (2024).
  7. C. W. Murphy, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 174.
  8. A. Helset, A. Martin, and M. Trott, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 163.
  9. B. Henning, X. Lu, T. Melia, and H. Murayama, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 016.
  10. M. Chala and X. Li, Phys. Rev. D 109, 065015 (2024).
  11. T. Corbett, J. Desai, O. J. Eboli, and M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Phys. Rev. D 110, 033003 (2024).
  12. C. Degrande, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 101.
  13. T. Corbett, J. Desai, O. Éboli, M. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Martines, and P. Reimitz, Phys. Rev. D 107, 115013 (2023).
  14. O. J. P. Éboli and M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Phys. Rev. D 93, 093013 (2016).
  15. R. Alonso, E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and M. Trott, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 159.
  16. R. Boughezal, Y. Huang, and F. Petriello, Phys. Rev. D 110, 116015 (2024).
  17. J. Elias-Miró, J. R. Espinosa, E. Masso, and A. Pomarol, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 066.
  18. Z. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 011803 (2017).
  19. T. Corbett, O. Éboli, and M. Gonzalez-Garcia, Phys. Rev. D 91, 035014 (2015).
  20. T. W. Grimm and M. van Vliet, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 215.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation