Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

B+→K+νν¯ excess and DM semi-annihilation

Jongkuk Kim1,2,3,* and Pyungwon Ko2,4,†

  • *Contact author: jongkukkim@cau.ac.kr
  • †Contact author: pko@kias.re.kr

Phys. Rev. D 113, 075023 – Published 17 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5ygk-bswh

Abstract

In 2023, the Belle II Collaboration announced the observation of the B+→K+νν¯ decay channel for the first time. This decay channel provides a clean signal with high precision in theoretical calculations. However, we encounter a 2.8σ deviation from the Standard Model prediction. To resolve this excess, we study a scalar dark matter model with local discrete Z3 symmetry. Assuming dark U(1)X≡U(1)Lμ−Lτ symmetry, this U(1)Lμ−Lτ symmetry is spontaneously broken into local discrete Z3 by nonzero vacuum expectation value of dark Higgs boson. Considering a dark Higgs mass is 2 GeV, we can explain the recent Br(B+→K+νν¯) excess reported from the Belle II Collaboration and relic abundance at the same time.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (88)

  1. Belle-II Collaboration, Evidence for B+→K+νν¯ decays, Phys. Rev. D 109, 112006 (2024).
  2. P. Athron, R. Martinez, and C. Sierra, B meson anomalies and large B+→K+νν¯ in non-universal U(1)′ models, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2024) 121.
  3. R. Bause, H. Gisbert, and G. Hiller, Implications of an enhanced B→Kνν¯ branching ratio, Phys. Rev. D 109, 015006 (2024).
  4. L. Allwicher, D. Becirevic, G. Piazza, S. Rosauro-Alcaraz, and O. Sumensari, Understanding the first measurement of B(B→Kνν), Phys. Lett. B 848, 138411 (2024).
  5. X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, and G. Valencia, Revisiting models that enhance B+→K+νν¯ in light of the new Belle II measurement, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075019 (2024).
  6. B.-F. Hou, X.-Q. Li, M. Shen, Y.-D. Yang, and X.-B. Yuan, Deciphering the Belle II data on B→Kνν¯ decay in the (dark) SMEFT with minimal flavour violation, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 172.
  7. A. Berezhnoy and D. Melikhov, B→K*MX vs B→KMX as a probe of a scalar-mediator dark matter scenario, Europhys. Lett. 145, 14001 (2024).
  8. A. Datta, D. Marfatia, and L. Mukherjee, B→Kνν¯, MiniBooNE and muon g-2 anomalies from a dark sector, Phys. Rev. D 109, L031701 (2024).
  9. W. Altmannshofer, A. Crivellin, H. Haigh, G. Inguglia, and J. Martin Camalich, Light new physics in B→K(*)νν¯?, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075008 (2024).
  10. D. McKeen, J. N. Ng, and D. Tuckler, Higgs portal interpretation of the Belle II B+→K+νν¯ measurement, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075006 (2024).
  11. K. Fridell, M. Ghosh, T. Okui, and K. Tobioka, Decoding the B→Kνν¯ excess at Belle II: Kinematics, operators, and masses, Phys. Rev. D 109, 115006 (2024).
  12. K. Cheung, Y. Kim, Y. Kwon, C. J. Ouseph, A. Soffer, and Z. S. Wang, Probing dark photons from a light scalar at Belle II, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 094.
  13. S.-Y. Ho, J. Kim, and P. Ko, Recent B+→K+νν¯ excess and muon g−2 illuminating light dark sector with Higgs portal, Phys. Rev. D 111, 055029 (2025).
  14. E. Gabrielli, L. Marzola, K. Müürsepp, and M. Raidal, Explaining the B+→K+νν¯ excess via a massless dark photon, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 460 (2024).
  15. A. Berezhnoy, W. Lucha, and D. Melikhov, Probing vector- vs scalar-mediator dark-matter scenarios in B→(K,K*)MX decays, arXiv:2507.10801.
  16. Q.-Y. Hu and Z.-B. Duan, Influence of invisible light particles on Λb→Λ+Emiss, Phys. Rev. D 112, 095007 (2025).
  17. T. Felkl, A. Giri, R. Mohanta, and M. A. Schmidt, When energy goes missing: New physics in b→sνν with sterile neutrinos, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1135 (2023).
  18. Z. S. Wang, H. K. Dreiner, and J. Y. Günther, The decay B→K+ν+ν¯ at Belle II and a massless bino in R-parity-violating supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 66 (2025).
  19. X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, M. A. Schmidt, G. Valencia, and R. R. Volkas, Scalar dark matter explanation of the excess in the Belle II B+→K++ invisible measurement, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 168.
  20. P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, Signatures of light new particles in B→K(*)Emiss, Phys. Rev. D 110, 055001 (2024).
  21. S. Rosauro-Alcaraz and L. P. S. Leal, Disentangling left and right-handed neutrino effects in B→K(*)νν, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 795 (2024).
  22. C. S. Kim, D. Sahoo, and K. N. Vishnudath, Searching for signatures of new physics in B→Kνν¯ to distinguish between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 882 (2024).
  23. C. Hati, J. Leite, N. Nath, and J. W. F. Valle, QCD axion, color-mediated neutrino masses, and B+→K++Emiss anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 111, 015038 (2025).
  24. A. J. Buras, J. Harz, and M. A. Mojahed, Disentangling new physics in K→πνν¯ and B→K(K*)νν¯ observables, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 087.
  25. W. Altmannshofer and S. Roy, Joint explanation of the B→πK puzzle and the B→Kνν¯ excess, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075029 (2025).
  26. Q.-Y. Hu, Are the new particles heavy or light in b→sEmiss?, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 556 (2025).
  27. W. Altmannshofer, S. A. Gadam, and K. Toner, New strategies for new physics search with Λb→Λνν¯ decays, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075005 (2025).
  28. L. Calibbi, T. Li, L. Mukherjee, and M. A. Schmidt, Is dark matter the origin of the B→Kνν¯ excess at Belle II?, Phys. Rev. D 112, 075020 (2025).
  29. J.-P. Lee, New physics effects in R(K(*)), Bs→μ+μ−, and B+→K+νν¯, arXiv:2502.06370.
  30. X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, J. Tandean, and G. Valencia, B→K+ invisible, dark matter, and CP violation in hyperon decays, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 078.
  31. A. Berezhnoy, W. Lucha, and D. Melikhov, Analysis of qrec2-distribution for B→KMX and B→K*MX decays in a scalar-mediator dark-matter scenario, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075035 (2025).
  32. P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, Impact of new invisible particles on B→K(*)Emiss observables, Phys. Rev. D 112, 035010 (2025).
  33. T. M. Aliev, A. Elpe, L. Selbuz, and I. Turan, Explaining Belle data on B→Kνν¯ decays via dark Z resonances, Phys. Rev. D 112, 015025 (2025).
  34. C.-H. Chen, C.-W. Chiang, and L. M. G. de la Vega, Leptoquark-mediated Dirac neutrino mass and its impact on B→Kνν¯ and K→πνν¯ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2025) 055.
  35. K. Ding, Y. Li, X. Liu, Y. Liu, C.-T. Lu, and B. Zhu, Resonant ALP-portal dark matter annihilation as a solution to the B±→K±νν¯ Excess, arXiv:2504.00383.
  36. X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, J. Tandean, and G. Valencia, Light dark-matter window constrained by K+→π++E, Phys. Rev. D 112, 055025 (2025).
  37. L. Di Luzio, M. Nardecchia, and C. Toni, Gauged τ-lepton chiral currents and B→K(*)Emiss, Phys. Rev. D 112, 055031 (2025).
  38. A. Shaw, Belle II constraints on the non-minimal universal extra dimensional model, arXiv:2509.20027.
  39. A. Berezhnoy, W. Lucha, and D. Melikhov, Scrutinizing dark-matter scenarios with B→(K,K*)ν¯ν decays, arXiv:2509.23210.
  40. J.-P. Lee, Λb→Λ(*)νν¯ and b→sB decays, arXiv:2509.26370.
  41. Planck Collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
  42. G. Steigman, B. Dasgupta, and J. F. Beacom, Precise relic WIMP abundance and its impact on searches for dark matter annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 86, 023506 (2012).
  43. X. G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew, and R. R. Volkas, New Z-prime phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 43, 22 (1991).
  44. X.-G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew, and R. R. Volkas, Simplest Z-prime model, Phys. Rev. D 44, 2118 (1991).
  45. R. Aliberti et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the standard model: An update, Phys. Rep. 1143, 1 (2025).
  46. Muon g-2 Collaboration, Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 127 ppb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 101802 (2025).
  47. S. Baek, N. G. Deshpande, X. G. He, and P. Ko, Muon anomalous g−2 and gauged Lμ−Lτ models, Phys. Rev. D 64, 055006 (2001).
  48. K. R. Lynch, Extended electroweak interactions and the muon g−2, Phys. Rev. D 65, 053006 (2002).
  49. E. Ma, D. P. Roy, and S. Roy, Gauged Lμ−Lτ with large muon anomalous magnetic moment and the bimaximal mixing of neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 525, 101 (2002).
  50. S. Baek and P. Ko, Phenomenology of U(1)Lμ−Lτ charged dark matter at PAMELA and colliders, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2009) 011.
  51. W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, M. Pospelov, and I. Yavin, Neutrino trident production: A powerful probe of new physics with neutrino beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 091801 (2014).
  52. A. Kamada and H.-B. Yu, Coherent propagation of PeV neutrinos and the dip in the neutrino spectrum at IceCube, Phys. Rev. D 92, 113004 (2015).
  53. M. Escudero, D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic, and M. Pierre, Cosmology with a very light Lμ−Lτ gauge boson, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 071.
  54. CHARM-II Collaboration, First observation of neutrino trident production, Phys. Lett. B 245, 271 (1990).
  55. CCFR Collaboration, Neutrino tridents and W Z interference, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3117 (1991).
  56. NuTeV Collaboration, Evidence for diffractive charm production in muon-neutrino Fe and anti-muon-neutrino Fe scattering at the Tevatron, Phys. Rev. D 61, 092001 (2000).
  57. P. Ballett, M. Hostert, S. Pascoli, Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, Z. Tabrizi, and R. Zukanovich Funchal, Neutrino trident scattering at near detectors, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 119.
  58. W. Altmannshofer, T. Mäkelä, S. Sarkar, S. Trojanowski, K. Xie, and B. Zhou, Discovering neutrino tridents at the large hadron collider, Phys. Rev. D 110, 072018 (2024).
  59. Y. M. Andreev et al., Exploration of the muon g−2 and light dark matter explanations in NA64 with the CERN SPS high energy muon beam, arXiv:2401.01708.
  60. P. Ko and Y. Tang, Galactic center γ-ray excess in hidden sector DM models with dark gauge symmetries: local Z3 symmetry as an example, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2015) 023.
  61. P. Ko and Y. Tang, Self-interacting scalar dark matter with local Z3 symmetry, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2014) 047.
  62. P. Ko and Y. Tang, Semi-annihilating Z3 dark matter for XENON1T excess, Phys. Lett. B 815, 136181 (2021).
  63. S. Baek, J. Kim, and P. Ko, Muon (g−2) and thermal WIMP DM in U(1)Lμ−Lτ models, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2025) 014.
  64. ATLAS Collaboration, Combination of searches for invisible decays of the Higgs boson using 139  fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at s=13  TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Lett. B 842, 137963 (2023).
  65. CMS Collaboration, A search for decays of the Higgs boson to invisible particles in events with a top-antitop quark pair or a vector boson in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 933 (2023).
  66. M. Cepeda et al., Report from working group 2: Higgs physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7, 221 (2019).
  67. CLICdp and CLIC Collaborations, The compact linear collider (CLIC)—2018 summary report, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 2, 1 (2018).
  68. A. Blondel and P. Janot, FCC-ee overview: New opportunities create new challenges, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137, 92 (2022).
  69. C. Potter, A. Steinhebel, J. Brau, A. Pryor, and A. White, Expected sensitivity to invisible Higgs boson decays at the ILC with the SiD detector, arXiv:2203.08330.
  70. J. Edsjo and P. Gondolo, Neutralino relic density including coannihilations, Phys. Rev. D 56, 1879 (1997).
  71. P. Foldenauer, Light dark matter in a gauged U(1)Lμ−Lτ model, Phys. Rev. D 99, 035007 (2019).
  72. I. Holst, D. Hooper, and G. Krnjaic, The simplest and most predictive model of muon g−2 and thermal dark matter, arXiv:2107.09067.
  73. M. Drees and W. Zhao, U(1)Lμ−Lτ for light dark matter, gμ−2, the 511 keV excess and the Hubble tension, Phys. Lett. B 827, 136948 (2022).
  74. S. Baek, J. Kim, and P. Ko, XENON1T excess in local Z2 DM models with light dark sector, Phys. Lett. B 810, 135848 (2020).
  75. A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, feynrules 2.0—A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2250 (2014).
  76. G. Alguero, G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, S. Chakraborti, A. Goudelis, S. Kraml, A. Mjallal, and A. Pukhov, micromegas 6.0: N-component dark matter, Comput. Phys. Commun. 299, 109133 (2024).
  77. J.-C. Park, J. Kim, and S. C. Park, Galactic Center GeV gamma-ray excess from dark matter with gauged lepton numbers, Phys. Lett. B 752, 59 (2016).
  78. LZ Collaboration, Dark matter search results from 4.2 tonne-years of exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011802 (2025).
  79. DAMIC-M Collaboration, Probing benchmark models of hidden-sector dark matter with DAMIC-M, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 071002 (2025).
  80. NA64 Collaboration, First results in the search for dark sectors at NA64 with the CERN SPS high energy muon beam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 211803 (2024).
  81. T. R. Slatyer, Indirect dark matter signatures in the cosmic dark ages. I. Generalizing the bound on Z′-wave dark matter annihilation from Planck results, Phys. Rev. D 93, 023527 (2016).
  82. M. Escudero, Neutrino decoupling beyond the standard model: CMB constraints on the dark matter mass with a fast and precise Neff evaluation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2019) 007.
  83. X. Chu and J. Pradler, Minimal mass of thermal dark matter and the viability of millicharged particles affecting 21-cm cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 109, 103510 (2024).
  84. HPQCD Collaboration, B→K and D→K form factors from fully relativistic lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014510 (2023).
  85. NA62 Collaboration, Measurement of the very rare K+→π+νν¯ decay, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 093.
  86. KOTO Collaboration, Study of the KL→π0νν¯ decay at the J-PARC KOTO experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 121801 (2021).
  87. Belle Collaboration, Search for B→hνν¯ decays with semileptonic tagging at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 96, 091101 (2017).
  88. IceCube Collaboration, Search for neutrino lines from dark matter annihilation and decay with IceCube, Phys. Rev. D 108, 102004 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation