Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Thermal and quantum phase transitions of the ϕ4 model

István Gábor Márián1,2, Andrea Trombettoni3,4, and István Nándori5,1

  • 1HUN-REN Atomki, P.O.Box 51, H-4001 Debrecen, Hungary
  • 2University of Debrecen, Institute of Physics, P.O.Box 105, H-4010 Debrecen, Hungary
  • 3Department of Physics, University of Trieste, Strada Costiera 11, I-34151 Trieste, Italy
  • 4CNR-IOM DEMOCRITOS Simulation Center, Via Bonomea 265, I-34136 Trieste, Italy
  • 5University of Miskolc, Institute of Physics and Electrical Engineering, H-3515, Miskolc, Hungary

Phys. Rev. D 112, 085011 – Published 15 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5rfz-5lfy

Abstract

In this paper we discuss and revisit the finite temperature extension of the renormalization group (RG) treatment of T=0 field theories, focusing as a case study on the ϕ4 model. We first discuss the extension of RG equations of the very same model from T=0 to finite T in the usual way by resorting to sums on the Matsubara frequencies and fixing the physical temperature parameter T. We show that this approach, although useful for a variety of applications, may lead to the disappearance of the critical points as extracted from the RG flow. Since the identification of fixed points is key in the study of classical and quantum phase transitions, we propose a modification of the usual finite-temperature RG approach by relating the temperature parameter to the running RG scale, T≡kT=τk, where kT is the running cutoff for thermal and k is for the quantum fluctuations. Once this dimensionless temperature τ is introduced, we investigate the consequences on the thermal RG approach for the ϕ4 model and construct its phase diagram. Finally, we formulate requirements for the phase diagram of the ϕ4 theory based on known properties of the quantum and classical phase diagrams of the Ising model.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (45)

  1. S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2011).
  2. R. J. Elliott and C. Wood, J. Phys. C 4, 2359 (1971).
  3. P. Pfeuty and R. J. Elliott, J. Phys. C 4, 2370 (1971); P. Pfeuty, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 57, 79 (1970).
  4. R. Shankar, Quantum field theory and condensed matter: An introduction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2017).
  5. C. Wetterich, Phys. Lett. B 301, 90 (1993); T. R. Morris, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 09, 2411 (1994).
  6. N. Tetradis and C. Wetterich, Nucl. Phys. B398, 659 (1993).
  7. M. Pietroni, N. Rius, and N. Tetradis, Phys. Lett. B 397, 119 (1997).
  8. J. Braun, B. Klein, and H. Pirner, Phys. Rev. D 72, 034017 (2005).
  9. J.-P. Blaizot, A. Ipp, R. Méndez-Galain, and N. Wschebor, Nucl. Phys. A784, 376 (2007).
  10. J.-P. Blaizot, A. Ipp, and N. Wschebor, Nucl. Phys. A849, 165 (2011).
  11. L. Fister and J. M. Pawlowski, arXiv:1112.5440.
  12. L. Fister and J. M. Pawlowski, Proc. Sci. QCD-TNT-II2011 (2011) 021.
  13. J. Braun, S. Diehl, and M. M. Scherer, Phys. Rev. A 84, 063616 (2011).
  14. J. Braun, B. Klein, and B.-J. Schaefer, Phys. Lett. B 713, 216 (2012).
  15. L. Fister and J. M. Pawlowski, Phys. Rev. D 88, 045010 (2013).
  16. R.-A. Tripolt, J. Braun, B. Klein, and B.-J. Schaefer, Phys. Rev. D 90, 054012 (2014).
  17. L. Fister and J. M. Pawlowski, Phys. Rev. D 92, 076009 (2015).
  18. J. Braun and H. Gies, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2006) 024.
  19. P. Jakubczyk, P. Strack, A. A. Katanin, and W. Metzner, Phys. Rev. B 77, 195120 (2008).
  20. J. Braun, Eur. Phys. J. C 64, 459 (2009).
  21. P. Jakubczyk, Phys. Rev. B 79, 125115 (2009).
  22. P. Strack and P. Jakubczyk, Phys. Rev. B 80, 085108 (2009).
  23. P. Jakubczyk, W. Metzner, and H. Yamase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 220602 (2009).
  24. P. Jakubczyk, J. Bauer, and W. Metzner, Phys. Rev. B 82, 045103 (2010).
  25. J. Braun, B. Klein, and P. Piasecki, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1576 (2011).
  26. J. Braun, J. Phys. G 39, 033001 (2012).
  27. D. D. Scherer, J. Braun, and H. Gies, J. Phys. A 46, 285002 (2013).
  28. J. Braun, M. Leonhardt, and M. Pospiech, Phys. Rev. D 96, 076003 (2017).
  29. K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. B 4, 3174 (1971); 4, 3184 (1971).
  30. A. Rancon and N. Dupuis, Phys. Rev. B 84, 174513 (2011).
  31. A. Rancon and N. Dupuis, Phys. Rev. B 83, 172501 (2011).
  32. A. Rancon, O. Kodio, N. Dupuis, and P. Lecheminant, Phys. Rev. E 88, 012113 (2013).
  33. For example, in [26] at page 42, in Eq. (132) one finds ∂tτ=−τ where t=ln(k/Λ) and in [28] at the top of the page 12 one can read ∂tT/k=−T/k which result in the trivial RG scale dependence for τk. Another example is found in [24] at page 4 above equation (21), T˜(Λ⋆)=1 where the intermediate momentum scale Λ⋆ is fixed by the running dimensionless temperature T˜ which is identical to τ. Finally, we refer to [32] at page 7 right below equation (50), where one finds T˜k=T/(ckk).

  34. J. I. Kapusta, Finite-Temperature Field Theory: Principles and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2023).
  35. J. W. Negele and H. Orland, Quantum Many-Particle Systems (Perseus, Reading, 1998).
  36. I. G. Márián, A. Trombettoni, and I. Nándori, Phys. Lett. B 858, 139051 (2024).
  37. C. Branchina, V. Branchina, F. Contino, and N. Darvishi, Phys. Rev. D 106, 065007 (2022).
  38. C. Branchina, V. Branchina, and F. Contino, Phys. Rev. D 107, 096012 (2023).
  39. T. Steingasser, Proc. Sci. CORFU2023 (2024) 150 [arXiv:2405.02415].
  40. T. Steingasser and I. Kaiser, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095035 (2023).
  41. D. F. Litim, Phys. Lett. B 486, 92 (2000).
  42. F. J. Wegner and A. Houghton, Phys. Rev. A 8, 401 (1973).
  43. I. Steib, S. Nagy, and J. Polonyi, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36, 2150031 (2021).
  44. F. Gégény and S. Nagy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36, 2250061 (2022).
  45. B. Blass and H. Rieger, Sci. Rep. 6, 38185 (2016).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation