Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation

    Constraining gravitational wave memory with hierarchical inference

    Keefe Mitman1,*, Maximiliano Isi2,3,†, and Will M. Farr4,3,‡

    • 1Cornell Center for Astrophysics and Planetary Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
    • 2Columbia University, Department of Astronomy, 550 West 120th Street, New York, New York 10027, USA
    • 3Center for Computational Astrophysics, Flatiron Institute, 162 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10010, USA
    • 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA

    • *Contact author: kem343@cornell.edu
    • †Contact author: msi2114@columbia.edu
    • ‡Contact author: will.farr@stonybrook.edu

    Phys. Rev. D 114, 064016 – Published 8 September, 2026

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5mn4-r915

    Abstract

    With the multitude of gravitational wave observations that have been made in the past ten years, probing the dynamical and nonlinear nature of strong gravity is becoming more and more feasible. One promising way to test the nonlinear nature of Einstein’s theory of general relativity (GR) is through the gravitational wave null memory effect: a nonlinear prediction of GR which corresponds to initially comoving observers being permanently displaced due to a burst of gravitational radiation. Previous studies have shown that, while it is unlikely that the memory effect will be observed in a single event by the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) detectors, evidence for memory in the population of LVK events should be attainable after ∼2000 gravitational wave detections. Many of these works, however, largely relied on Bayes factors to perform their memory analyses: an approach that can depend sensitively on the analysis priors and, when multiplied across many events, can even favor incorrect conclusions. In this work, using the GWTC-5.0 catalog of binary black hole observations, we instead perform hierarchical Bayesian inference—which is not subject to the issues associated with Bayes factors—to measure the evidence for memory in current LVK observations. We find that we can constrain what we call the memory enhancement factor—the constant appearing in front of the contribution to the strain from the supermomentum flux—to 0.26−4.08+4.09 (with ± values denoting the 68% credible interval), consistent with its GR value of 1. We also forecast that ∼2000 detections will be needed to constrain the memory enhancement factor away from zero at the 1σ level.

    Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

    Authorization Required

    We need you to provide your credentials before accessing this content.

    References (Subscription Required)

    Outline

    Information

    Sign In to Your Journals Account

    Filter

    Filter

    Article Lookup

    Enter a citation