- Open Access
Measurement of inclusive partial branching fractions and at Belle II
Phys. Rev. D 113, 032004 – Published 9 February, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/59ws-zxbt
Abstract
A sample of of data collected by the Belle II experiment is used to measure the partial branching fractions of charmless semileptonic meson decays and determine the magnitude of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix element . Events containing a signal electron or muon and a fully reconstructed hadronic decay that constrains the signal kinematics are selected, while the rest of the event defines the hadronic system associated with the signal. To discriminate the signal from the 50-times larger background originating from CKM-favored semileptonic decays, a template fit is performed in both signal and control regions after applying an optimized selection. The partial branching fraction measured for lepton energies greater than 1 GeV in the signal meson rest frame is . From this measurement, using the Gambino, Giordano, Ossola, Uraltsev theoretical framework, is determined, where the uncertainties are experimental and theoretical, respectively. This value is consistent with the world average obtained from previous inclusive measurements. Different theoretical predictions and partial branching fractions measured in other phase-space regions, defined by additional selections on the and leptonic system masses, are also used to determine . This allows for a comparison of the resulting values across theoretical frameworks and phase-space regions.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (58)
- N. Cabibbo, Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 531 (1963).
- M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, violation in the renormalizable theory of weak interaction, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).
- R. Aaij et al., Measurement of the branching fraction of the decay, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 314 (2021).
- L. Aggarwal et al., Snowmass white paper: Belle II physics reach and plans for the next decade and beyond, arXiv:2207.06307.
- S. Banerjee et al. (Heavy Flavor Averaging Group), Averages of -hadron, -hadron, and -lepton properties as of 2023, arXiv:2411.18639.
- T. Mannel, Operator product expansion for inclusive semileptonic decays in heavy quark effective field theory, Nucl. Phys. B413, 396 (1994).
- J. Chay, H. Georgi, and B. Grinstein, Lepton energy distributions in heavy meson decays from QCD, Phys. Lett. B 247, 399 (1990).
- B. Blok, M. Shifman, and D.-X. Zhang, Illustrative example of how quark-hadron duality might work, Phys. Rev. D 57, 2691 (1998).
- P. Gambino, P. Giordano, G. Ossola, and N. Uraltsev, Inclusive semileptonic decays and the determination of , J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2007) 058.
- B. O. Lange, M. Neubert, and G. Paz, Theory of charmless inclusive decays and the extraction of , Phys. Rev. D 72, 073006 (2005).
- J. R. Andersen and E. Gardi, Inclusive spectra in charmless semileptonic decays by dressed gluon exponentiation, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2006) 097.
- K. Akai, K. Furukawa, and H. Koiso, SuperKEKB collider, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 907, 188 (2018).
- S. Agostinelli et al., geant4—A simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003).
- T. Kuhr, C. Pulvermacher, M. Ritter, T. Hauth, and N. Braun (Belle-II Framework Software Group), The Belle II Core Software, Comput. Software Big Sci. 3, 1 (2018).
- S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
- D. J. Lange, The evtgen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 462, 152 (2001).
- T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands, A brief introduction to pythia 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 852 (2008).
- C. Ramirez, J. F. Donoghue, and G. Burdman, Semileptonic decay, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1496 (1990).
- F. De Fazio and M. Neubert, decay distributions to order , J. High Energy Phys. 06 (1999) 017.
- A. L. Kagan and M. Neubert, QCD anatomy of decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 7, 5 (1999).
- O. L. Buchmüller and H. U. Flächer, Fit to moments of inclusive and decay distributions using heavy quark expansions in the kinetic scheme, Phys. Rev. D 73, 073008 (2006).
- C. Bourrely, I. Caprini, and L. Lellouch, Model-independent description of decays and a determination of , Phys. Rev. D 79, 013008 (2009).
- Y. Aoki et al. (Flavour Lattice Averaging Group), FLAG review 2021, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 869 (2022).
- A. Bharucha, D. M. Straub, and R. Zwicky, in the standard model from light-cone sum rules, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 098.
- F. U. Bernlochner, M. T. Prim, and D. J. Robinson, and in and beyond the standard model: Improved predictions and , Phys. Rev. D 104, 034032 (2021).
- D. Scora and N. Isgur, Semileptonic meson decays in the quark model: An update, Phys. Rev. D 52, 2783 (1995).
- G. Duplancic and B. Melic, Form factors of and transitions from QCD light-cone sum rules, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2015) 138.
- F. U. Bernlochner, Z. Ligeti, M. Papucci, M. T. Prim, D. J. Robinson, and C. Xiong, Constrained second-order power corrections in HQET: , , and new physics, Phys. Rev. D 106, 096015 (2022).
- F. U. Bernlochner, Z. Ligeti, and S. Turczyk, A proposal to solve some puzzles in semileptonic decays, Phys. Rev. D 85, 094033 (2012).
- F. U. Bernlochner, Z. Ligeti, and D. J. Robinson, Model independent analysis of semileptonic decays to for arbitrary new physics, Phys. Rev. D 97, 075011 (2018).
- L. Cao et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurements of partial branching fractions of inclusive decays with hadronic tagging, Phys. Rev. D 104, 012008 (2021).
- S. Jadach, B. Ward, Z. Was, S. Yost, and A. Siodmok, Multi-photon Monte Carlo event generator kkmcee for lepton and quark pair production in lepton colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 283, 108556 (2023).
- T. Keck et al., The full event interpretation, Comput. Software Big Sci. 3, 6 (2019).
- M. Milesi, J. Tan, and P. Urquijo, Lepton identification in Belle II using observables from the electromagnetic calorimeter and precision trackers, EPJ Web Conf. 245, 06023 (2020).
- P. Cheema, Suppressing beam background and fake photons at Belle II using machine learning, EPJ Web Conf. 295, 09035 (2024).
- I. Adachi et al. (Belle II Collaboration), Charged-hadron identification at Belle II, Eur. Phys. J C 85, 1237 (2025).
- G. C. Fox and S. Wolfram, Observables for the analysis of event shapes in annihilation and other processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1581 (1978).
- S. Lee et al. (Belle Collaboration), Evidence for , Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 261801 (2003).
- D. Asner et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Search for exclusive charmless hadronic decays, Phys. Rev. D 53, 1039 (1996).
- P. Ramachandran, B. Zoph, and Q. V. Le, Searching for activation functions, arXiv:1710.05941.
- I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter, Decoupled weight decay regularization, arXiv:1711.05101.
- T. Akiba, S. Sano, T. Yanase, T. Ohta, and M. Koyama, optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework, arXiv:1907.10902.
- D. Martschei, M. Feindt, S. Honc, and J. Wagner-Kuhr, Advanced event reweighting using multivariate analysis, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 368, 012028 (2012).
- I. Adachi et al. (Belle II Collaboration), Evidence for decays, Phys. Rev. D 109, 112006 (2024).
- L. Heinrich, M. Feickert, G. Stark, and K. Cranmer, pyhf: Pure-python implementation of HistFactory statistical models, J. Open Source Softwaare 6, 2823 (2021).
- eFFORT, https://github.com/b2-hive/eFFORT (2022).
- S. Bosch, B. Lange, M. Neubert, and G. Paz, Factorization and shape-function effects in inclusive -meson decays, Nucl. Phys. B699, 335 (2004).
- M. Althoff et al. (TASSO Collaboration), A detailed study of strange particle production in annihilation at high-energy, Z. Phys. C 27, 27 (1985).
- W. Bartel et al. (JADE Collaboration), Charged particle and neutral kaon production in annihilation at PETRA, Z. Phys. C 20, 187 (1983).
- B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Measurement of the branching fractions of decays in events tagged by a fully reconstructed meson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 261802 (2008).
- F. Meier et al. (Belle Collaboration), First observation of and measurement of the and branching fractions with hadronic tagging at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 107, 092003 (2023).
- F. U. Bernlochner, S. Duell, Z. Ligeti, M. Papucci, and D. J. Robinson, Das ist der hammer: Consistent new physics interpretations of semileptonic decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 883 (2020).
- M. Feindt, F. Keller, M. Kreps, T. Kuhr, S. Neubauer, D. Zander, and A. Zupanc, A hierarchical neurobayes-based algorithm for full reconstruction of mesons at factories, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 654, 432 (2011).
- J. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Measurement of the inclusive electron spectrum from meson decays and determination of , Phys. Rev. D 95, 072001 (2017).
- J. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Study of decays in events tagged by a fully reconstructed -meson decay and determination of , Phys. Rev. D 86, 032004 (2012).
- M. Neubert, Two-loop relations for heavy-quark parameters in the shape-function scheme, Phys. Lett. B 612, 13 (2005).
- M. Neubert, Advanced predictions for moments of the photon spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 72, 074025 (2005).
- I. Bigi, M. Shifman, N. Uraltsev, and A. Vainshtein, High power of in -flavored widths and limit, Phys. Rev. D 56, 4017 (1997).