- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Constraints and sensitivities for dipole-portal heavy neutral leptons from ND280 and its upgrade

M-S. Liu1,*, N. W. Kamp2,†, and C. A. Argüelles2,‡

  • *Contact author: msl63@cam.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: nkamp@fas.harvard.edu
  • ‡Contact author: carguelles@fas.harvard.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 112, 035012 – Published 11 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5738-hj4s

Abstract

We report new constraints and sensitivities to heavy neutral leptons (HNLs) with transition magnetic moments, also known as dipole-portal HNLs. This is accomplished using data from the T2K ND280 near detector in addition to the projected three-year dataset of the upgraded ND280 detector. Dipole-portal HNLs have been extensively studied in the literature and offer a potential explanation for the 4.8σ MiniBooNE anomaly. To perform our analysis, we simulate HNL decays to e+e− pairs in the gaseous time projection chambers of the ND280 detector and its upgrade. Recasting an ND280 search for mass-mixed HNLs, we find that ND280 data places world-leading constraints on dipole-portal HNLs in the 390–743 MeV mass range, disfavoring the region of parameter space favored by the MiniBooNE anomaly. The addition of three years of ND280 upgrade data will be able to disfavor the MiniBooNE solution at the 5σ confidence level and extend the world-leading constraints to dipole-portal HNLs in the 148–860 MeV mass range. Our analysis suggests that ND280 data excludes dipole-portal HNLs as a solution to the MiniBooNE excess, motivating a dedicated search within the T2K collaboration and potentially highlighting the need for alternative explanations for the MiniBooNE anomaly.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (68)

  1. J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2227 (1980).
  2. T. Yanagida, Conf. Proc. C 7902131, 95 (1979).
  3. R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980).
  4. M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, Conf. Proc. C 790927, 315 (1979).
  5. P. Minkowski, Phys. Lett. B 67, 421 (1977).
  6. T. Asaka and M. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. 620B, 17 (2005).
  7. T. Asaka, S. Blanchet, and M. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. B 631, 151 (2005).
  8. N. Bozorgnia, J. Bramante, J. M. Cline, D. Curtin, D. McKeen, D. E. Morrissey, A. Ritz, S. Viel, A. C. Vincent, and Y. Zhang, (2024), 10.1139/cjp-2024-0128.
  9. M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 174, 45 (1986).
  10. S. Davidson, E. Nardi, and Y. Nir, Phys. Rep. 466, 105 (2008).
  11. A. M. Abdullahi et al., J. Phys. G 50, 020501 (2023).
  12. M. A. Acero et al., J. Phys. G 51, 120501 (2024).
  13. J. Kopp, P. A. N. Machado, M. Maltoni, and T. Schwetz, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 050.
  14. A. Diaz, C. A. Argüelles, G. H. Collin, J. M. Conrad, and M. H. Shaevitz, Phys. Rep. 884, 1 (2020).
  15. S. Böser, C. Buck, C. Giunti, J. Lesgourgues, L. Ludhova, S. Mertens, A. Schukraft, and M. Wurm, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 111, 103736 (2020).
  16. M. Drewes et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2017) 025.
  17. C. A. Argüelles, V. Brdar, and J. Kopp, Phys. Rev. D 99, 043012 (2019).
  18. R. E. Shrock, Phys. Rev. D 24, 1232 (1981).
  19. R. E. Shrock, Phys. Lett. 96B, 159 (1980).
  20. E. Cortina Gil et al. (NA62 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 807, 135599 (2020).
  21. P. Carenza, G. Lucente, L. Mastrototaro, A. Mirizzi, and P. D. Serpico, Phys. Rev. D 109, 063010 (2024).
  22. R. Barouki, G. Marocco, and S. Sarkar, SciPost Phys. 13, 118 (2022).
  23. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 110, 112004 (2024).
  24. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rep. 1115, 570 (2025).
  25. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 103, 052002 (2021).
  26. S. N. Gninenko, Phys. Rev. D 83, 015015 (2011).
  27. S. N. Gninenko, Phys. Rev. D 83, 093010 (2011).
  28. S. N. Gninenko, Phys. Rev. D 85, 051702 (2012).
  29. S. N. Gninenko, Phys. Lett. B 710, 86 (2012).
  30. G. Magill, R. Plestid, M. Pospelov, and Y.-D. Tsai, Phys. Rev. D 98, 115015 (2018).
  31. A. Radionov, Phys. Rev. D 88, 015016 (2013).
  32. L. Alvarez-Ruso and E. Saul-Sala, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 230, 4373 (2021).
  33. N. W. Kamp, M. Hostert, A. Schneider, S. Vergani, C. A. Argüelles, J. M. Conrad, M. H. Shaevitz, and M. A. Uchida, Phys. Rev. D 107, 055009 (2023).
  34. S. Vergani, N. W. Kamp, A. Diaz, C. A. Argüelles, J. M. Conrad, M. H. Shaevitz, and M. A. Uchida, Phys. Rev. D 104, 095005 (2021).
  35. T. Lux (T2K Collaboration), J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 65, 012018 (2007).
  36. T. Lindner (T2K Collaboration), in 34th International Conference on High Energy Physics (2008), arXiv:0810.2220.
  37. A. Ferrero (T2K Collaboration), AIP Conf. Proc. 1189, 77 (2009).
  38. T. Lindner (T2K Collaboration), J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 136, 042035 (2008).
  39. K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), arXiv:1901.03750.
  40. S. Roth (T2K Collaboration), Proc. Sci., TAUP2023 (2024) 220.
  41. K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 100, 052006 (2019).
  42. K. Abe et al., arXiv:1609.04111.
  43. C. A. Argüelles, N. Foppiani, and M. Hostert, Phys. Rev. D 105, 095006 (2022).
  44. A. Schneider, N. W. Kamp, and A. Y. Wen, arXiv:2406.01745.
  45. V. Brdar, A. Greljo, J. Kopp, and T. Opferkuch, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2021) 039.
  46. D. Allan et al. (T2K UK Collaboration), J. Instrum. 8, P10019 (2013).
  47. P. A. Amaudruz et al. (T2K ND280 FGD Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 696, 1 (2012).
  48. D. Attié et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 1025, 166109 (2022).
  49. M. Feltre, Phys. Sci. Forum 8, 47 (2023).
  50. D. Attié (T2K/ND280 Upgrade Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 1047, 167582 (2023).
  51. A. Korzenev et al., J. Instrum. 17, P01016 (2022).
  52. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/5738-hj4s for details validating the detector implementation and comparison with previous studies, which includes Refs. [53] and [54].
  53. K. J. Kelly and P. A. N. Machado, Phys. Rev. D 104, 055015 (2021).
  54. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151803 (2021).
  55. R. Abbasi et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Comput. Phys. Commun. 266, 108018 (2021).
  56. A. M. Abdullahi, J. Hoefken Zink, M. Hostert, D. Massaro, and S. Pascoli, Comput. Phys. Commun. 297, 109075 (2024).
  57. K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 87, 012001 (2013); 87, 019902(A) (2013).
  58. N. Abgrall et al. (NA61/SHINE Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 100 (2019).
  59. M. Lamoureux, Recherche de neutrinos lourds avec l’expérience T2K, Ph.D. thesis, Saclay, 2018.
  60. R. Plestid, Phys. Rev. D 104, 075027 (2021).
  61. R. A. Gustafson, R. Plestid, and I. M. Shoemaker, Phys. Rev. D 106, 095037 (2022).
  62. P. Coloma, P. A. N. Machado, I. Martinez-Soler, and I. M. Shoemaker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 201804 (2017).
  63. S. N. Gninenko and N. V. Krasnikov, Phys. Lett. B 450, 165 (1999).
  64. V. Brdar, A. de Gouvêa, Y.-Y. Li, and P. A. N. Machado, Phys. Rev. D 107, 073005 (2023).
  65. G. Chauhan, S. Horiuchi, P. Huber, and I. M. Shoemaker, Phys. Rev. D 110, 015007 (2024).

  66. We also note that even in the flavor-universal case, the astrophysical bounds do not rule out the MiniBooNE region of interest [30].

  67. K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), J. Phys. G 46, 08LT01 (2019).
  68. M.-S. Liu, N. W. Kamp, and C. A. Argüelles, Data for HNL interaction with the ND280 detector and its upgrade, 10.7910/DVN/EHISPC (2024), Harvard Dataverse, V2.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 112, 035012– Published 11 August, 2025
  • Received 4 January 2025
  • Accepted 27 June 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation